Lorsque leur immeuble se retrouve soudainement entouré d'un mystérieux mur de briques, Tim et Olivia doivent collaborer avec leurs voisins pour trouver une issue.Lorsque leur immeuble se retrouve soudainement entouré d'un mystérieux mur de briques, Tim et Olivia doivent collaborer avec leurs voisins pour trouver une issue.Lorsque leur immeuble se retrouve soudainement entouré d'un mystérieux mur de briques, Tim et Olivia doivent collaborer avec leurs voisins pour trouver une issue.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Leave it to German master filmmaker Philip Koch to deliver an unspectacular premise and execute with tons of tedious nonsense.
Despite the reviews that claim the math is wrong when emasculated protagonist calculates permutations of four digits, it actually holds, since we can see that four different digits have been used on the touchscreen. And because the number of permutations with four different elements is 4!=24, he is indeed right. Which still is complete nonsense, of course, because he couldn't have known the code has four digits to begin with.
So, whatever. The whole thing is written like someone just discovered writing. The dialogue is abysmal, the acting mostly bad, the inclusion forced like everything at Netflix, the direction incompetent, the score forgettable (except for the many times it misses the mood, then it's annoying). How something like this is still being greenlit? Why is non-filmmaker Koch still allowed anywhere near a camera? Who knows?
But because this is German filmmaking, it probably has to do with the pseudo-socialist funding system that proved to be a full trough the fat pigs won't leave - ever.
Don't waste your time on this.
Despite the reviews that claim the math is wrong when emasculated protagonist calculates permutations of four digits, it actually holds, since we can see that four different digits have been used on the touchscreen. And because the number of permutations with four different elements is 4!=24, he is indeed right. Which still is complete nonsense, of course, because he couldn't have known the code has four digits to begin with.
So, whatever. The whole thing is written like someone just discovered writing. The dialogue is abysmal, the acting mostly bad, the inclusion forced like everything at Netflix, the direction incompetent, the score forgettable (except for the many times it misses the mood, then it's annoying). How something like this is still being greenlit? Why is non-filmmaker Koch still allowed anywhere near a camera? Who knows?
But because this is German filmmaking, it probably has to do with the pseudo-socialist funding system that proved to be a full trough the fat pigs won't leave - ever.
Don't waste your time on this.
Schweighöfer, playing his usual Schweighöfer-role, wakes up and discovers - together with his wife - that all windows and doors are sealed shut by a mysterious black wall. Maybe the neighbors, who they reach by breaking through the wall, know something.
I've rarely seen something so utterly devoid of talent. Every single actor performs like they just found out what a film set is - this morning.
The dialogue is so far removed from anything resembling human speech, you'd think aliens tried to simulate human behavior... and failed miserably.
Every scene, every line, every plot point: completely absurd, utterly implausible.
So, if you're in the mood to cringe hard and feel your IQ gently slipping away - just hit play on Brick.
I've rarely seen something so utterly devoid of talent. Every single actor performs like they just found out what a film set is - this morning.
The dialogue is so far removed from anything resembling human speech, you'd think aliens tried to simulate human behavior... and failed miserably.
Every scene, every line, every plot point: completely absurd, utterly implausible.
So, if you're in the mood to cringe hard and feel your IQ gently slipping away - just hit play on Brick.
Brick is a classic example of a film with a fascinating concept but frustrating execution. Visually and thematically, it promises a lot; a surreal urban prison, mysterious walls, and hints of deeper societal metaphors. The creativity is undeniable, and the premise alone earns some respect. Unfortunately, that's where the praise ends. The flow is muddled, the plot is meandering, and any emotional resonance falls completely flat. It is as if the movie wanted to be some sort of sci-fi thriller, but shifted into almost a drama. It is confusing, and not focused on the plot itself.
It leaves you more detached than intrigued. Once the credits roll, there's little desire to revisit; simply because it is unsatisfying. A wasted opportunity wrapped in a high-concept shell.
It leaves you more detached than intrigued. Once the credits roll, there's little desire to revisit; simply because it is unsatisfying. A wasted opportunity wrapped in a high-concept shell.
I'm a bit surprised at the number of one-star reviews for this film. "Bad acting," "Dumb script," etc. I actually thought this was the time of storyline that Rod Serling would have written for a Twilight Zone episode and certainly intriguing enough to hold my attention throughout. The story centers on the husband and wife whose relationship is now in ruins. The other characters suffer from lack of development. I'm wondering if some viewers watched this film in the dubbed version -- where the English speaking dubbers are indeed bad and the translations awkward. I watched the subtitled version and I so no problems at all with the acting. Certainly the basic plot arc is not original -- it is similar to films like Saw, Escape Room, Cube and even Poseidon Adventure: characters must work together in order to escape and survive. But I found the film atmospheric and engaging. Granted the whole creation of the impenetrable wall and what has caused it is far fetched, but so what. There is also in interesting visual correlative throw in -- the fly. I wish there had been more visual moments like this, but just sit back and enjoy a "Twilight Zone" style story.
I like science fiction movies, so when I saw Netflix was releasing Brick, a film where people get mysteriously trapped in their apartments, I was immediately intrigued. Add Matthias Schweighöfer to the mix and I was in. (Fun fact: I didn't know he was German, but the last name should've tipped me off.)
The premise is cool: Tim (Schweighöfer) and his girlfriend Olivia (played by Ruby O. Fee) suddenly find themselves sealed inside their home by strange walls. They can't get out, but they can break through floors and walls into neighboring apartments. That's how they meet others in the same situation and form a group determined to escape.
The concept is strong, and I'll admit: I wanted to know what would happen next. There's suspense, tension, and a mysterious "end-of-the-world" atmosphere that kept me engaged. But... it's far from perfect.
Each character is given a brief backstory, but then when they die, it often feels pointless. Their background doesn't really feed into the story, and I was left wondering why the film spent time introducing it in the first place.
And while some moments are truly tense, others are unintentionally funny or just poorly written. A woman stuck halfway inside a wall? It's supposed to be horrific, but comes off as bizarre slapstick. A supposed villain taped to a chair escapes like it's a magic trick, which breaks the tension instead of building it.
There are also logic issues. One guy, who lost his hands, somehow figured out how to open part of the wall using advanced tech he shouldn't have access to. It's never explained. Plot holes like these hurt the believability, and that's especially annoying in a film that wants to be taken seriously.
Working in building maintenance myself, I also couldn't help but notice: the way the apartments are structured (with everyone able to break through floors so conveniently) is completely unrealistic. It took me out of the experience more than once.
That said, the ending was strong. Dark, grim, and oddly satisfying. It fit the tone of the story and didn't try to sugarcoat anything. I respect that.
So why a 6/10? Because despite the flaws, Brick does keep you watching. It's an original idea with a solid atmosphere and decent performances. But with lazy writing in key moments and too many logical gaps, it falls short of being the smart, grounded sci-fi it wants to be.
The premise is cool: Tim (Schweighöfer) and his girlfriend Olivia (played by Ruby O. Fee) suddenly find themselves sealed inside their home by strange walls. They can't get out, but they can break through floors and walls into neighboring apartments. That's how they meet others in the same situation and form a group determined to escape.
The concept is strong, and I'll admit: I wanted to know what would happen next. There's suspense, tension, and a mysterious "end-of-the-world" atmosphere that kept me engaged. But... it's far from perfect.
Each character is given a brief backstory, but then when they die, it often feels pointless. Their background doesn't really feed into the story, and I was left wondering why the film spent time introducing it in the first place.
And while some moments are truly tense, others are unintentionally funny or just poorly written. A woman stuck halfway inside a wall? It's supposed to be horrific, but comes off as bizarre slapstick. A supposed villain taped to a chair escapes like it's a magic trick, which breaks the tension instead of building it.
There are also logic issues. One guy, who lost his hands, somehow figured out how to open part of the wall using advanced tech he shouldn't have access to. It's never explained. Plot holes like these hurt the believability, and that's especially annoying in a film that wants to be taken seriously.
Working in building maintenance myself, I also couldn't help but notice: the way the apartments are structured (with everyone able to break through floors so conveniently) is completely unrealistic. It took me out of the experience more than once.
That said, the ending was strong. Dark, grim, and oddly satisfying. It fit the tone of the story and didn't try to sugarcoat anything. I respect that.
So why a 6/10? Because despite the flaws, Brick does keep you watching. It's an original idea with a solid atmosphere and decent performances. But with lazy writing in key moments and too many logical gaps, it falls short of being the smart, grounded sci-fi it wants to be.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFor the English dubbing, only Tim (Matthias Schweighöfer) was performed by the original actor.
- GaffesYuri is shot, and the bullet wound appears on the right part of his chest. A bit later, the wound has moved to the center of his chest.
- ConnexionsReferences Matrix (1999)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
July 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
July 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
"Foundation" and "Dexter: Resurrection" are two of this month's most anticipated TV releases. Check out our July calendar for more!
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Цегла
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 39 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant