Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Passengers

  • 2016
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 56min
NOTE IMDb
7,0/10
478 k
MA NOTE
POPULARITÉ
1 103
28
Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence in Passengers (2016)
A spacecraft traveling to a distant colony planet and transporting thousands of people has a malfunction in its sleep chambers. As a result, two passengers are awakened 90 years early.
Lire trailer2:33
90 Videos
99+ photos
Space Sci-FiDramaRomanceSci-FiThriller

Un vaisseau spatial voyage vers une planète lointaine en transportant des milliers de personnes. En raison d'un dysfonctionnement dans les chambres de sommeil, deux passagers sont réveillés ... Tout lireUn vaisseau spatial voyage vers une planète lointaine en transportant des milliers de personnes. En raison d'un dysfonctionnement dans les chambres de sommeil, deux passagers sont réveillés 90 ans plus tôt que prévu.Un vaisseau spatial voyage vers une planète lointaine en transportant des milliers de personnes. En raison d'un dysfonctionnement dans les chambres de sommeil, deux passagers sont réveillés 90 ans plus tôt que prévu.

  • Réalisation
    • Morten Tyldum
  • Scénario
    • Jon Spaihts
  • Casting principal
    • Jennifer Lawrence
    • Chris Pratt
    • Michael Sheen
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    7,0/10
    478 k
    MA NOTE
    POPULARITÉ
    1 103
    28
    • Réalisation
      • Morten Tyldum
    • Scénario
      • Jon Spaihts
    • Casting principal
      • Jennifer Lawrence
      • Chris Pratt
      • Michael Sheen
    • 1.5Kavis d'utilisateurs
    • 441avis des critiques
    • 41Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Nommé pour 2 Oscars
      • 2 victoires et 12 nominations au total

    Vidéos90

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:33
    Official Trailer
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Clip 0:58
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Clip 0:58
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Clip 0:57
    Woke Up Too Soon
    Power Plant
    Clip 0:52
    Power Plant
    Power Plant
    Clip 0:52
    Power Plant
    Gravity Loss
    Clip 0:54
    Gravity Loss

    Photos317

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 312
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux45

    Modifier
    Jennifer Lawrence
    Jennifer Lawrence
    • Aurora Lane
    Chris Pratt
    Chris Pratt
    • Jim Preston
    Michael Sheen
    Michael Sheen
    • Arthur
    Laurence Fishburne
    Laurence Fishburne
    • Gus Mancuso
    Andy Garcia
    Andy Garcia
    • Captain Norris
    Vince Foster
    Vince Foster
    • Executive Officer
    Kara Flowers
    • Communications Officer
    Conor Brophy
    • Crew Member
    Julee Cerda
    Julee Cerda
    • Instructor (Hologram)
    Aurora Perrineau
    Aurora Perrineau
    • Best Friend
    Lauren Farmer
    Lauren Farmer
    • Party Friend
    Emerald Mayne
    • Party Friend
    Kristin Brock
    • Party Friend
    Tom Ferrari
    • Party Friend
    Quansae Rutledge
    • Party Friend
    Desmond Reid
    • Party Friend
    Emma Clarke
    • Voice of the Avalon
    • (voix)
    Chris Edgerly
    Chris Edgerly
    • InfoMat
    • (voix)
    • …
    • Réalisation
      • Morten Tyldum
    • Scénario
      • Jon Spaihts
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs1.5K

    7,0478.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    6Damien_King86

    A decent sci-fi rental that plays it too safe.

    I'm just going to list my takeaways from the movie in list format. Maybe it will be helpful to someone, maybe not.

    Pros - The production is immaculate. The cinematography, set design, CGI, all of it is top notch, as expected from a movie starring two of the most popular current actors. - Although I'm not crazy about Jennifer Lawrence, and I only really like Chris Pratt as Starlord, I will go ahead and list them as a pro, since they did a good job with these characters. Michael Sheen is also welcome in any movie.

    Cons - The science of the movie is a bit slinky at times, obviously to serve narrative motives. Other reviewers have detailed these inaccuracies, so I won't get into it, here. - The movie mostly leans toward a romantic drama vibe, and I personally think there should have been more of a sense of dread and danger throughout the movie, not just near the end. - Given the high profile status of the leads, the sex scenes are predictably tame and brief. Along with the lack of danger, the lack of eroticism is another way in which the movie plays it too safe. - The catharsis at the end that stems from the main moral dilemma (which I won't spoil) does not occur satisfactorily in my opinion. It didn't move me at all, and made it feel like it was never that important to begin with.

    In summary, this is an entertaining, but light sci-fi romance. It feels like a 70's sci-thriller that has been thoroughly processed for a general audience. It makes a good rental, but I couldn't help but lament that it wasn't the riskier, edgier film that it wanted to be.
    7TheLittleSongbird

    Romance and sci-fi in outer space

    Although 'Passengers' had one of the most unique concepts of any film in recent years, had talented actors on board and the production values looked wonderful from the advertising, the critical reception (not just from critics but also from those who dislike Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence and immediately saying the film would be terrible, not being ignorant this actually happened) was a turn off.

    Seeing it with my flatmate last night, who had seen the film before, really liked it and had recommended it to me, 'Passengers' turned out to be a much better film than expected. It's not perfect and can see where some of the criticisms are coming from, but it was to me a beautiful and thought-provoking film that raised some interesting questions and thoughts. Unlike a lot of people on the internet and particularly on IMDb, critics get a lot of respect from me and often we are on the same page. There have been a fair share of times where our opinions have been different, when a praised film didn't do much for me and a panned one surprised me in a good way. 'Passengers' is one of the latter examples and a lot of the problem with its less than enthusiastic critical response is to do with advertising which didn't indicate that it would be as unconventional as it was.

    For one thing 'Passengers' looks wonderful, the advertising didn't lie in this regard. It's beautifully shot and crisply edited while the lighting and sets have a lot of atmosphere and are imaginative in their scope, showing the beauty, wonder and mysteriousness of outer space. It is easy to see why the production design garnered an Oscar nomination The special effects at their best make the jaw drop.

    Don't think that Thomas Newman's score has been talked about enough despite being nominated for an Oscar (losing out to 'La La Land'), it's understated and hauntingly beautiful in a distinctive Newman. 'La La Land' deserved the win but of the other Best Original Score nominees (which included 'Jackie', which should never have been nominated) 'Passengers' for me was one of the better ones.

    There are many moments where 'Passengers' provokes a lot of thought and is intriguing, raising some very interesting questions and ideas. The story on the most part didn't lose me, while it is not your conventional thrilling sci-fi film with lots of special effects and action it has its fair share of poignancy and intrigue. The initial fiery animosity turning into a beautiful love story was convincing thanks to the chemistry between Pratt and Lawrence. The direction isn't mind-blowing but is competent before not knowing what to do with itself in the final quarter or so.

    Pratt is more understated than usual, in a cast against type dramatic role for an actor better known for comedy. He handles it very well and commands the screen. Lawrence gets a lot of hate here, but to me she is one of the better actresses today under 30 (her acting actually has a beyond her years feel to it). Here she is luminous and touching. Believed these two as lovers and found myself caring for their love story due to their success in keeping it alive. It's not just them though, Michael Sheen is amusing as Arthur and while his screen time is short (too short) Laurence Fishburne gives his characters pathos and dignity.

    On the other hand, 'Passengers' doesn't live up to full potential. Its biggest flaw is the last 30 minutes, it would have worked better as something more suspense or action-oriented but instead felt like a tacked on logic-free anti-climax where too many things felt unresolved and it was too over-the-top and ridiculous.

    While the writing did intrigue and provoked a lot of thought, it didn't always work. Some of it did get confusingly over-complicated, with things needing to be made clearer and less vague, and other parts were forced. Pacing also could have tightened in places, the beginning while interesting in what was explored takes a little long to get going but the film really gets going properly once Lawrence's character wakes up.

    In conclusion, was not sure what to expect but got a well above-average, to me it was good despite a few problems. 7/10 Bethany Cox
    8kosmasp

    Long way to go

    I heard the critics too. And I get that this is not for everyone. But I do believe that a rating that is currently around 7 (out of 10) is pretty accurate for this movie. It is good, it's not amazing or breath taking (excuse the pun), but it really is suspenseful and it does keep it real (if you buy into the whole notion that this space mission/travel thing is or will be possible in the first place of course).

    We do have some great actors involved in this, but you can imagine that there are moments in the movie where some may feel the movie could offer more. But that would not be keeping it real. Of course there are some decisions that are questionable at best, but that's life and that's how people work sometime ... Really good character piece surrounded by Science Fiction, but only watch it if you like human drama mixed with it!
    8fig-75275

    A moral problem beautifully presented and executed.

    I enjoyed Passengers a lot. It's not perfect though. The spaceship is beautiful from both the outside and the inside, and you get the impression that future technology is really fantastic. The computer systems are pretty dumb though (including Michael Sheen's android). This is all forgivable though, because if the computers weren't dumb the story wouldn't work.

    The only part of the film that doesn't really work is the bit in the middle with Laurence Fishburne. I could see three reasons why his character was needed, but it all felt very contrived. He has one important line though, so I can forgive it (just about). I just wish the writers had thought about that part a bit more, as the rest of the film was really great. Chris Pratt, Jennifer Lawrence and Michael Sheen were brilliant too.

    Passengers is clever, thoughtful, science fiction, and I would highly recommend it.
    8patrickjames85

    Passengers was fantastic!

    Passengers is yet another example as to why you should go see the movies professional critics hate & save your money on the ones they absolutely love. Going to see a movie at the theater is like $30 now for just 2 people & that's without visiting concessions. I don't know about everybody else but if I'm going to spend a few days worth of grocery money for a 2 hour movie experience I'm really hoping not to be bored to tears or looking at the time wondering how much longer it'll be until a movie is over. Passengers just ends up on my very long list, lately, of movies critics tried to bring down that were waves better than the ones they are directing people to see. This movie is visually stunning & the story telling is not only thought provoking but innovative while doing so! It was great to see a story like this one told in a way that didn't spend most of its time trying to dialogue it's way into Oscar nominations. If you are going to venture out to see a movie for the Holidays go see this one!

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The voice of The Starship Avalon belongs to voiceover artist Emma Clarke, who is also one of the iconic 'Mind the Gap' voices on London Underground.
    • Gaffes
      When Aurora is trapped in the water bubble, she appears to be unable to swim out of it. Even in zero gravity Newtons third law of action equaling reaction still applies. Pushing water backwards (through swimming movements) would easily push her forward to the surface and out of the bubble.
    • Citations

      [last lines]

      Aurora Lane: [voice over] A friend once said, "You can't get so hung up on where you'd rather be that you forget to make the most of where you are." We got lost along the way. But we found each other. And we made a life. A beautiful life. Together.

    • Crédits fous
      The first half of the end credits feature images of celestial objects in space, such as nebulas and galaxies.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Film '72: Épisode #45.8 (2016)
    • Bandes originales
      Like a Rolling Stone
      Written and Performed by Bob Dylan

      Courtesy of Columbia Records

      By arrangement with Sony Music Licensing

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ20

    • How long is Passengers?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 28 décembre 2016 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Hong Kong
      • Australie
      • États-Unis
    • Sites officiels
      • Official Facebook
      • Official Instagram
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Espagnol
      • Japonais
      • Français
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Pasajeros
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Trilith Studios, 461 Sandy Creek Road, Fayetteville, Géorgie, États-Unis(Studio)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Columbia Pictures
      • LStar Capital
      • Village Roadshow Pictures
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 110 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 100 014 699 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 14 869 736 $US
      • 25 déc. 2016
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 303 144 152 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 56 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Atmos
      • Auro 11.1
      • Sonics-DDP
      • Dolby Surround 7.1
      • SDDS
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • Réponses IMDb : Aidez à combler les lacunes dans nos données
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.