NOTE IMDb
3,6/10
1,2 k
MA NOTE
Quatre cousins découvrent un passage menant à un monde mystérieux. Pris au piège dans ce pays, le Royaume de Keoherus, ils doivent affronter le Gardien du temps, affronter des forces et des ... Tout lireQuatre cousins découvrent un passage menant à un monde mystérieux. Pris au piège dans ce pays, le Royaume de Keoherus, ils doivent affronter le Gardien du temps, affronter des forces et des bêtes sombres pour espérer rentrer chez eux.Quatre cousins découvrent un passage menant à un monde mystérieux. Pris au piège dans ce pays, le Royaume de Keoherus, ils doivent affronter le Gardien du temps, affronter des forces et des bêtes sombres pour espérer rentrer chez eux.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Nicolas J Greco
- Agot
- (as Nicholas Greco)
Jonathan Dale Moore
- The Hooded Figure
- (générique uniquement)
Avis à la une
So, the story seems absurdly simplified. If it were a book, it's age group would be 7-9 year olds. The "bad guy" never even attacks... he just stands there and asks politely for the magic rock that ends the universe, a couple times. Everything about the movie was *ultra* low effort. CG was *terrible*, and you could tell they were on a greenscreen the whole time. Like the greenscreens that pod-casters use... The acting was poor, but not terrible. Story was childish... like written by a 9 year old for 9 year olds. Dialog and plot was just pathetic.
It's watchable, if you're bored, but don't expect anything of even "barely acceptable" quality.
It's watchable, if you're bored, but don't expect anything of even "barely acceptable" quality.
All of the four main characters just go along with everything almost as if it was some everyday stuff happening to them.
There was no deep conversation anywhere, main characters just go along with the story as it happens to them - they are not making any decisions.
Even nearly-adult just messes up inside of the house like a well-raised 10 year old wouldn't. I mean shooting arrows inside house? -- come on.
The story just lacks any content. No tension, no surprises, all is reasonable predictable.
It is my belief that this topic could easily make a nice series, so the writers must be very bad to make such 'basic' plot.
There was no deep conversation anywhere, main characters just go along with the story as it happens to them - they are not making any decisions.
Even nearly-adult just messes up inside of the house like a well-raised 10 year old wouldn't. I mean shooting arrows inside house? -- come on.
The story just lacks any content. No tension, no surprises, all is reasonable predictable.
It is my belief that this topic could easily make a nice series, so the writers must be very bad to make such 'basic' plot.
I feel like if I didn't comment on this movie, I'd have time to watch this movie. It was very worthless. This film is for children and unfortunately I read the deception of his poster. Actors in this one are worse than the other. And I would pierce my eyes with a knife and we wouldn't see that. I don't know what happened to people now, it doesn't respect the audience at all. Or the producer with a gun threatened to produce this damn film. Or don't know if he lost to a gamble. And the point of considerable consideration of these kinds of CJ films is that it's very fallen in this problem. Please, N.
Not a bad movie for kids, but at times the volume of the music far outweighs the voices, making it almost impossible to understand what's being said. The use of subtitles was almost a full-on requirement. Hard to believe that in this day and age this got through passed post-production and onto the final cut. The soundtrack's OK, but shouldn't have overplayed the voices. If it wasn't for this it would have received a higher score. Were they aiming for a Grammy with the soundtrack? Visual effects are okay, the plot was quite predictable with only one real 'surprise' revelation. Kids will probably enjoy it, and on the plus side with the soundtrack booming at you, you won't hear your kids.
I generally try find something good about a movie, but this doesn't have much going for it at all. Poorly borrowed storylines, bad quality imagery and CGI, bad acting...
There are several storylines borrowed from other stories, very badly stitched together.
The quality of scenery and CGI would have been better if they acted in front of a TV screen.
The sound quality in many places seemed like they were recording in a bathroom.
With very few exceptions, the acting was extremely weak. They made the weak characters seem even worse as a result.
Overall, an extremely weak storyline dragged out, making a short story very long.
The quality of scenery and CGI would have been better if they acted in front of a TV screen.
The sound quality in many places seemed like they were recording in a bathroom.
With very few exceptions, the acting was extremely weak. They made the weak characters seem even worse as a result.
Overall, an extremely weak storyline dragged out, making a short story very long.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSamantha Ryan's debut.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Guardians of Time?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 87 177 $US
- Durée1 heure 39 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Mexican Spanish language plot outline for Guardians of Time (2022)?
Répondre