Le roman de Scott Fitzgerald prend vie à travers l'histoire d'un producteur de films qui se tue lentement à la tâche.Le roman de Scott Fitzgerald prend vie à travers l'histoire d'un producteur de films qui se tue lentement à la tâche.Le roman de Scott Fitzgerald prend vie à travers l'histoire d'un producteur de films qui se tue lentement à la tâche.
- Nommé pour 1 Oscar
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
- Seal Trainer
- (as Seymour Cassell)
- Edna
- (as Angelica Huston)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesF. Scott Fitzgerald died of a heart attack before finishing the novel. It was based on the life of the late head of production at MGM, Irving Thalberg. Fitzgerald's old friend and Princeton classmate Edmund Wilson edited the uncompleted manuscript for publication. It was published, in its incomplete form, in 1941, in a volume that also included "The Great Gatsby" and a selection of short stories.
- GaffesAt Cecilia Brady's place she has photos on her walls of herself with obvious 70s style hairdos and she is posed quite unlike the 1930s. They seem typical of 1970s fashion shoots.
- Citations
Pat Brady: [after a film screening] What's Eddie, asleep? Jesus. Goddamn movie even puts the editor to sleep.
Assistant Editor: He's not asleep, Mr. Brady.
Pat Brady: What do you mean, he's not asleep?
Assistant Editor: He's dead, Mr. Brady.
Pat Brady: Dead? What do you mean, he's dead!
Assistant Editor: He must have died during the...
Pat Brady: How can he be dead? We were just watching the rough cut! Jesus, I didn't hear anything. Did you hear anything?
Fleishacker: Not a thing.
Assistant Editor: Eddie... he probably didn't want to disturb the screening, Mr. Brady.
- ConnexionsFeatured in American Cinema: The Studio System (1995)
The film adopts an approach that makes it come across as more of a love story than anything else, but there is a sub-narrative involved that revolves around De Niro's character of Monroe Stahr gradually getting more and more confused with his life and things around him. The primary problem here is the film is not involving enough to warrant it an interesting or touching love story and the dedication to the focus of a man slowly getting more and more overwhelmed is undercooked both are there and done reasonably well but both feel anti-climatic. Along with this and like I said in the opening paragraph, the film does not poke fun at and nor does it reference enough the industry in which it's set so it doesn't feel particularly clever, something Singin' in the Rain and The Player were because they did it very well and to good comic effect.
There is a definite study going on here with some substance in the sense it is about Stahr and his struggles with his current life and his love for newly acquired girlfriend Kathleen Moore (Boulting) but nothing much else. Is it a romance? Probably, but is it a good romance? Not really. Ingrid Boulting is shot in an extremely objective manner with lots of brightly lit shots and compositions that reveal enough of her body at particularly nicely timed incidences in the film. This is twinned with several close ups of De Niro's facial expressions in which the lust and desire is very much apparent. It would be easy to argue that these objective and obvious set ups revolving around a gaze of some sort are deliberate given the film is about film-making and that very early on there is a scene involving a man and woman shooting a romantic scene of some sort. But the concentration on a genuine romance between two characters in the story we're watching is clearly trying to come across as serious and thus; being self-aware of its own compositions is an idea the film fails to get across.
But before this romantic distraction gets involved, the film begins in a light-hearted but intriguing style. An individual answers a question on how difficult it must be to shoot an earthquake scene and they laugh, replying that shaking the camera usually works and insulting the idea as a cheap effect. Sure enough about ten minutes later, there is an earthquake within the universe of The Last Tycoon and we realise the film is poking fun at itself. Then there is the other concentrated dig early on that, unfortunately, isn't played on an awful lot and that involves Tony Curtis' character Rodriguez and Tony Curtis as a whole. The character name of Rodriguez is short and sharp it is exotic in the sense it sounds 'Latino' and we all know that 'Latinos' in Hollywood cinema are usually scorching hot in their appearance (at least the women are). Rodriguez is an actor who appears in lots of films about love and making love; he appears topless in the scenes within the scenes that Tony Curtis is filming. The point here being that Curtis himself is (or was) a bit of a pin-up and his public figure is being spoofed through him playing the part of a romantic lead in a film within a film.
When all is said and done, The Last Tycoon is a study of one man and his issues. It is not as engrossing as De Niro's own Taxi Driver from the same year and nor is it as interesting or disturbing as more contemporary examples like American Psycho and One Hour Photo. The film substitutes daily rigmarole and movie set interaction for the introduction of Boulting as the dull love interest and shoots her body accordingly. Twinned with this is a visit from Brimmer, played by Jack Nicholson, which is ill timed and feels out of place given the route the film had gone down at that point. While the film isn't particularly bad, it feels underdone and somewhat one dimensional. Its study of love and stress is alright but it does not demonise the film industry in ways it could've and nor does it feel particularly urgent. This could revolve around anyone, in any industry, at any time and that said, The Last Tycoon is pretty ordinary.
- johnnyboyz
- 15 août 2008
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Last Tycoon?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Last Tycoon
- Lieux de tournage
- Paradise Cove - 28128 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu, Californie, États-Unis(Unfinished Beach House)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 819 912 $US
- Montant brut mondial
- 1 819 912 $US
- Durée2 heures 3 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1