NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
1,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn Amsterdam, two prostitutes make a choice between love and work.In Amsterdam, two prostitutes make a choice between love and work.In Amsterdam, two prostitutes make a choice between love and work.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Diny de Neef
- Older prostitute
- (as Dini de Neef)
Avis à la une
The title says it all. 'Wat zien ik?' or 'What am I seeing?' was exactly the question I asked myself when I watched this film the other night. The film itself seems to be nothing more than an accumulation of 'strange' customers that a hooker in Amsterdam entertains and has a very sketch-like feel to it. Except that it isn't funny. For me it felt a bit like Monty Python's Meaning of life. Every customer was another short sketch that failed and everything in between was thinner than a piece of toilet paper. The reason I felt like that was because the characters, although the actors were OK, had no real depth and one just could not identify with any of them or with their actions. A bad effort from Verhoeven, which I guess nobody will enjoy much. Luckily he made better films later on.
4 out of 10
4 out of 10
Paul Verhoeven's first feature film after directing the legendary tv-series Floris. Although Verhoeven himself thinks not very highly of his first feature length film, some themes are in fact typical of his work: fear of death and sexuality with a glimpse the social context (e.g. Amsterdam early seventies). Wat Zien Ik also shows us the typical editing technique Paul Verhoeven sometimes uses to hide the lack of story: editing based on speed. In later films this kind of editing proved te be efficient but in this case it's like a bad make up job. Not his best movie...
I would like to say that I stay baffled to verify that this conspicuous and daring picture had so low grade at IMDB, this early Paul Verhoeven is too dazzling, he dives in underground world of the famous whoredom area at Amsterdam called Red Light district, where two prostitutes living in the same building offering valuable services to the hungry society of excludes men, all kind of requests are prompt and fully satisfied, the main character Blonde Greet (the sexy Ronnie Bierman) is a bit coarse, but has a golden heart, her friend Nell Muller (Sylvia de Leur) has tons of all sort of matters with her pimp, also Greet has been developing a romance with her customer, a married business man who have full interplay, Verhoeven shows us without be appealing their grief and rarely moments of happiness, mostly their disappointments, the skillful young director already exposes in a small portion your undeniable gift, a must to see!!!
Resume:
First watch: 2020 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.5
Resume:
First watch: 2020 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.5
This is possibly the most accurate film made about the sex industry ever and I ought to know. If you've ever worked in the industry you'll laugh till you cry.
I'm not really sure what to think about this movie. I'm still trying to figure out what exactly 'the point' of this movie was. It seems like Paul Verhoeven himself also agrees with this; This movie should be forgotten.
For a comedy it simply is not funny enough and for a drama it ain't heavy enough. It's a incoherent mess of sometimes intended funny scene's and intended dramatic one's. Neither style really works out an 100% and the end result is an unpleasant movie to watch that's neither really funny or dramatic.
Also a bit of a problem is the story itself, it's not realistic and highly unlikely all. The actors are quite good, I mean there are some big Dutch names in here but none of the characters are really any good or likable enough.
I always used to think that it was a awesome thing that a distant relative of mine, Henk Molenberg played in a Verhoeven movie. He is even on the cover of the movie. But than I saw the role he played...ha-ha I'm almost embarrassed now, he plays the customer of Greet who loves to clean while wearing pumps and nothing much else and when he doesn't clean good enough he loves to get slapped with a carpet-beater. Yeah weird I know, there are several other weird 'sex-fantasy' scene's like this, with different costumers that are just too odd to find amusing.
The way Amsterdam is filmed is quite good actually and one of the few things that I enjoyed about this movie. The cinematography is from Jan de Bont and one of his assistants is Theo van de Sande, two well known Hollywood names now.
A movie not worth seeing, even not if you're a Verhoeven fan.
4/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
For a comedy it simply is not funny enough and for a drama it ain't heavy enough. It's a incoherent mess of sometimes intended funny scene's and intended dramatic one's. Neither style really works out an 100% and the end result is an unpleasant movie to watch that's neither really funny or dramatic.
Also a bit of a problem is the story itself, it's not realistic and highly unlikely all. The actors are quite good, I mean there are some big Dutch names in here but none of the characters are really any good or likable enough.
I always used to think that it was a awesome thing that a distant relative of mine, Henk Molenberg played in a Verhoeven movie. He is even on the cover of the movie. But than I saw the role he played...ha-ha I'm almost embarrassed now, he plays the customer of Greet who loves to clean while wearing pumps and nothing much else and when he doesn't clean good enough he loves to get slapped with a carpet-beater. Yeah weird I know, there are several other weird 'sex-fantasy' scene's like this, with different costumers that are just too odd to find amusing.
The way Amsterdam is filmed is quite good actually and one of the few things that I enjoyed about this movie. The cinematography is from Jan de Bont and one of his assistants is Theo van de Sande, two well known Hollywood names now.
A movie not worth seeing, even not if you're a Verhoeven fan.
4/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis wasn't director Paul Verhoeven's and screenwriter Gerard Soeteman's preferred project to work on. Verhoeven had hoped to do an adaptation of a major Dutch literary work, rather than an anecdotal novel about prostitution. However, Soeteman convinced him that they could make something acceptable out of it, and that they simply needed the work. Soeteman's instincts turned out correct, as the movie became a success, and it opened the way for their next project, the critically acclaimed and commercially successful literary adaptation Turkish délices (1973).
- ConnexionsFeatured in Allemaal film: De magie van het witte doek (2007)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Business Is Business?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 800 000 NLG (estimé)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Qu'est ce que je vois? (1971) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre