Hannibal

Titre original : Annibale

NOTE IMDb

5,2/10

1,2 k

MA NOTE

During the Second Punic War in 218 BC, Carthaginian general Hannibal attacks the Roman Republic by crossing the Pyrenees and the Alps with his vast army.

Lire trailer2:15

1 Video

22 photos

Docudrama Sword & Sandal Action Adventure Biography Drama History War

Lors de la seconde guerre punique en 218 av. J.-C., le général carthaginois Hannibal attaque la République romaine en traversant les Pyrénées et les Alpes avec sa vaste armée.Lors de la seconde guerre punique en 218 av. J.-C., le général carthaginois Hannibal attaque la République romaine en traversant les Pyrénées et les Alpes avec sa vaste armée.Lors de la seconde guerre punique en 218 av. J.-C., le général carthaginois Hannibal attaque la République romaine en traversant les Pyrénées et les Alpes avec sa vaste armée.

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

5,2/10

1,2 k

MA NOTE

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Anecdotes
The first film to co-star Terence Hill and Bud Spencer, and the only one where they are not the stars of the film. In fact they share no scenes and didn't actually meet until 8 years later.

Gaffes
Towards the start of the film there is a panoramic shot of Rome. This shot includes many familiar buildings such as the Colosseum, which was not built until some 300 years after the events of the film.

Versions alternatives
There were two different cuts of this movie in existence at the time of release. The version released originally in Italy and subsequently in Germany and maybe other non English speaking European countries had a running time of 95 minutes. The US release version is given with 103 minutes. The BBFC lists a submitted running time of 104m 40s.

Connexions
Edited into Ibiza: The Silent Movie (2019)

Avis des utilisateurs30

Commenter

Commentaire à la une

Just plain awful.

I don't know who the hell shot this, but I suppose I could glance at the credits and lay blame on the culprits, but since I'm lazy and irritated right now I'll just skip the formality and say that Victor Mature probably fired his agent several times over after being booked for this gig.

He is quite literally the only competent person thesping his role, all the while other actors are stiff, comical, and otherwise just plain unconvincing. But like I implied in my first paragraph, it's not even the acting (however bad by the supporting cast) that's the issue: It's the cinematography: It's the direction and shot set ups: It's poor scheduling of the extras so the most can be gotten out of them shot wise. It's everything from the awful costumes to the lack of historical accuracy, to the extreme lack of consistent production values.

The battle scenes are so poorly staged that you wonder who the hell was in charge of this thing. The acting, as mentioned, by all other than the lead (Mature) is some of the worst I've seen for a feature film. It's that bad.

Avoid this thing.