The Second Coming of Christ

Unusually, I will not review the film, rather I will review the reviews. The GROSSLY negative reviews are, I strongly suspect, from non faith people, perhaps even atheists or followers of science who are following their own agenda in refusing to give ANY recognition to films, or the idea of faith. On the other hand, the 10/10s are clearly from the other side of the fence and appear to be OVER defensive of faith, and perhaps of faith films. I have seen it, and whilst not the best film ever, you should watch it, perhaps your opinion of BOTH sets of reviewers will be the same as mine afterwards. Now " Paul, The apostle of Christ ".... THAT is a fabulous and VERY dark and surprising film. Don't miss that one.

I never review movies, but have to comment on this one. It's AWFUL!! Bad acting, poor cinematography, weak plot.

For the record, I am a Christian and I appreciate the "bottom line" message the filmmakers are trying to get across, but movies like this are what make so many folks laugh and scoff at Christian films. My biggest gripe... there doesn't have to be a division between science and faith. Just take a look at the website Biologos dot org and see.

The script, the acting and the camera work are absolutely appalling !!! Without a doubt one of the worst films to be produced !!! How it has any rating at all is worrying !!! Don't waste time even giving it a chance !!! Terrible !!!

Obviously, this was not a major blockbuster heavily funded by the huge studios in Hollywood, so it's easy to nitpick the low budget aspects of this independent film.

I for one, appreciated the message and the effort behind this film. Jason London is an exceptional actor, and he brings a refreshing amount of honesty and authenticity in his role as John in this picture. Tom Sizemore made a small appearance in this film, and I would have liked for him to have a larger role, since he is also a great actor.

Some of the other acting was not great - but that's to be expected in a lower budget film. The set design could have been better in places, even with the limited resources, and some of the CGI landscapes and backgrounds looked artificial. Those resources would have been better spent elsewhere.

Overall, I did enjoy the film, even with its shortcomings. Without the brilliance of London's acting talent, this film would have suffered far more. However, my biggest issue with it is its departure from biblical accuracy in its telling of the second coming of Christ. This aspect of the film left much to be desired. That aside, I did enjoy it for the most part.

This is a movie you can't make fun of. It's just awful in every sense. I want to bang my face to the desk after watching it. The sets are glaring fake. The actings are awful. The plot makes no sense.