Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Décadence: L'héritage

Titre original : Jigsaw
  • 2017
  • 18A
  • 1h 32m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,7/10
99 k
MA NOTE
POPULARITÉ
4 894
256
Tobin Bell in Décadence: L'héritage (2017)
Bodies are turning up around the city, each having met a uniquely gruesome demise. As the investigation proceeds, evidence points to one suspect: John Kramer, the man known as Jigsaw, who has been dead for ten years.
Lireclip1 min 01 s
Regarder Bucket Heads
16 vidéos
99+ photos
Splatter HorrorWhodunnitHorrorMysteryThriller

Des corps/cadavres apparaissent aux quatre coins de la ville, chacun d'entre eux ayant subit un sort macabre. Au fur et à mesure que progresse l'enquête, toutes les preuves pointent vers un ... Tout lireDes corps/cadavres apparaissent aux quatre coins de la ville, chacun d'entre eux ayant subit un sort macabre. Au fur et à mesure que progresse l'enquête, toutes les preuves pointent vers un suspect: John Kramer, un homme connu sous le nom de Jigsaw, mort depuis plus de dix ans.Des corps/cadavres apparaissent aux quatre coins de la ville, chacun d'entre eux ayant subit un sort macabre. Au fur et à mesure que progresse l'enquête, toutes les preuves pointent vers un suspect: John Kramer, un homme connu sous le nom de Jigsaw, mort depuis plus de dix ans.

  • Directors
    • Michael Spierig
    • Peter Spierig
  • Writers
    • Josh Stolberg
    • Pete Goldfinger
  • Stars
    • Matt Passmore
    • Tobin Bell
    • Callum Keith Rennie
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    5,7/10
    99 k
    MA NOTE
    POPULARITÉ
    4 894
    256
    • Directors
      • Michael Spierig
      • Peter Spierig
    • Writers
      • Josh Stolberg
      • Pete Goldfinger
    • Stars
      • Matt Passmore
      • Tobin Bell
      • Callum Keith Rennie
    • 432Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 182Commentaires de critiques
    • 39Métascore
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Vidéos16

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:20
    Official Trailer
    Bucket Heads
    Clip 1:01
    Bucket Heads
    Bucket Heads
    Clip 1:01
    Bucket Heads
    Jigsaw: Bucketheads
    Clip 1:01
    Jigsaw: Bucketheads
    Jigsaw: Peter Spierig And Michael Spierig On What They Like About The Saw Franchise
    Featurette 0:42
    Jigsaw: Peter Spierig And Michael Spierig On What They Like About The Saw Franchise
    Jigsaw: Matt Passmore On 'Logan's' Role Helping The Investigation
    Featurette 0:32
    Jigsaw: Matt Passmore On 'Logan's' Role Helping The Investigation
    Jigsaw: Hannah Emily Anderson On 'Eleanor's' Connection To 'John Kramer'
    Featurette 0:35
    Jigsaw: Hannah Emily Anderson On 'Eleanor's' Connection To 'John Kramer'

    Photos526

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 520
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux33

    Modifier
    Matt Passmore
    Matt Passmore
    • Logan Nelson
    Tobin Bell
    Tobin Bell
    • Jigsaw…
    Callum Keith Rennie
    Callum Keith Rennie
    • Detective Halloran
    Hannah Emily Anderson
    Hannah Emily Anderson
    • Eleanor Bonneville
    Clé Bennett
    Clé Bennett
    • Detective Keith Hunt
    Laura Vandervoort
    Laura Vandervoort
    • Anna
    Paul Braunstein
    Paul Braunstein
    • Ryan
    Mandela Van Peebles
    Mandela Van Peebles
    • Mitch
    Brittany Allen
    Brittany Allen
    • Carly
    Josiah Black
    Josiah Black
    • Edgar Munsen
    Edward Ruttle
    Edward Ruttle
    • Matt
    Michael Boisvert
    Michael Boisvert
    • Lee James
    Sam Koules
    • Melissa
    Troy Feldman
    • Officer Palermo
    Shaquan Lewis
    Shaquan Lewis
    • Officer Solomon
    Esther Thibault
    • Asthmatic Woman
    Lauren Beatty
    Lauren Beatty
    • Carly Look-a-Like
    Nadine Whiteman
    Nadine Whiteman
    • News Reporter #1
    • (as Nadine Roden)
    • Directors
      • Michael Spierig
      • Peter Spierig
    • Writers
      • Josh Stolberg
      • Pete Goldfinger
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs432

    5,799K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    4ABCloverLane

    Slick and stylish, but ultimately disappointing

    Since the Saw franchise is one of my biggest guilty pleasures when it comes to horror, I've been hoping for a new installment ever since The Final Chapter was supposed to end the franchise back in 2010. Even though the movies got progressively worse, there is something about this franchise that always draws me back and makes me want to re-watch it.

    I had high expectations for Jigsaw because of two reasons: one, the producers stated in an interview that they were offered more than a hundred scripts for a new movie from different writers, but had never been pleased with any of them until they discovered a script so good, which ultimately got picked to be adapted; second, the Spierig brothers, Jigsaw's directors, had previously directed Predestination, such a smart and enticing sci-fi time- travel movie that I liked quite a lot.

    After seeing Jigsaw, I left the theater disappointed. I'll start with what I enjoyed:

    The score by Charlie Clouser is just as fabulous as it has always been and manages to go in line perfectly with each scene.

    The performances didn't bother me at all, although none of the actors really gets to shine. Laura Vandervoort and Paul Braunstein stood out here, with the latter generating some funny moments worthy of admiration.

    The direction was very polished and the movie was competently filmed, but the Spierig brothers weren't given much to show their creativity on. This leads me to the negatives.

    The CGI is very good. There is, however, one scene in which I was feeling as if I was watching one of the most recent Resident Evil movies and that didn't really work for me.

    What I didn't like:

    The ideas in this movie and its overall plot are somewhat underdeveloped. I know that this is supposed to be a new "beginning" for these movies, but as a franchise starter, I wanted more to be explored. The plot falls flat because the movie cuts from scene to scene so swiftly and tries to cram multiple narratives into 85 minutes, that ultimately none of them makes an impact.

    Saw is known for its visceral traps and torture devices, so I was looking forward to seeing more of that. However, the game presented in this movie has next to no memorable traps. That is because they are a lot tamer than what we've seen before and they simply can't hold a candle to all the ingenious traps from the past movies.

    The character development is another issue in this movie. The characters are so uni-dimensional, with some of them being there only to fill the screen. And I'm referring to some of the main casting here. Also, character arcs are left unfinished and the movie felt like it ended when the most important part of the story was about to happen.

    The editing undermines what could've been some very suspenseful scenes because of its sloppiness, by cutting from one narrative (the game) to the other (the investigation) at random moments.

    Now, it all comes down to the twist. Was it good and unexpected? Well, no, not really. It's not necessarily because you can predict it from miles away (for which the movie offers hints throughout the run-time) due to its small set of characters, but because it had no resonance for me. It didn't blow me away and you could've predicted it from the marketing of the movie alone. Just like with the traps, it just doesn't have the same visceral feel as the past movies and it doesn't really make you crave for the release of the next chapter.

    Overall, Jigsaw sets itself apart from the previous movies in the series with the help of the two directors who manage to make the movie look stylish and slick, but ultimately, it doesn't succeed in creating the sense of urgency that some of the old movies had and, sadly, disappoints on almost every other level. And yes, there are fan-service moments, but as a fan of this franchise, I felt very little excitement when they happened.

    Hopefully, if the movie does well in terms of box office, the sequel will improve upon this franchise "reinvention".
    4mikesnppr

    Dissapointing

    Very disappointing. Not only they rehashed many ideas from the previous movies, but the final reveal was also done SEVERAL times in the previous saws.

    I won't go into details because of spoilers, but every time some plot twist happened in the movie I was like "Wait, they already did that in Saw X". In fact, I since I saw all the Saws (pun intended) I was able to correctly guess what the final reveal will be because like I said, they already done it before.

    And most of the traps were just plain dumb, some of them giving a lot of room for cheating, which broke the immersion for me, because the "gamers" were acting like idiots who for some reason switched their brains off and walked into them like sheep. Other traps required pretty much clairvoyance from the Jigsaw, because to set up them the way they went, he would have to see the fricking future.

    Early Saws used to be great, but this movie, and several previous ones, are just plain bad and the franchise needs to be put to rest at this point. And if the decide to make another one, just don't rehash the same stuff over and over and over again.
    6jimbo-53-186511

    Like the numerous sequels this Saw entry is enjoyable without being particularly fantastic

    When a string of dead bodies begin to manifest themselves, the police and a small team of doctors begin to investigate. However, when both doctors and police begin to look in to things further all the evidence points to John Kramer being the suspect despite him seemingly being dead for 10 years...

    Like everything that preceded it, Jigsaw is a fun entry you meet the usual antagonists...or are they protagonists??? They all have to face off in Jigsaw's fun house (oddly enough Pat Sharpe is nowhere to be seen on this occasion). Although it's the usual shlock that you'll have seen in the earlier films if you bear with this one then it does have a point and has a story to tell...

    One negative, which plagues a lot of these Saw films is the general unlikeability of its leading actors; did you once care for any of these people?? If the answer is No then neither did I... I understand that a lot of Saw films are set up this way, but with this one I really struggled connecting to the characters.

    It's also fair to say that the Saw films strain plot credibility, but this one really pushes the boundaries and may make you think "What the hey" Well if it did it for you then it did it for me.

    Anyway all joking aside it was nice to see everything tied together here and I have to admit that I was never bored whilst watching this film.

    It's a decent ride, but the franchise is skating on thin ice by now. I'm curious about the new film Saw X to see where things are going here, but I'm starting to think that the franchise is getting a bit long in the tooth by now so won't be setting my hopes too high with the latest film.

    This is worth a look for the fans, but as with everything that proceeded it if you're watching it then keep your expectations on the low side.
    7AllieRubyStein

    Well, I Liked It

    Although its potential shines brighter than what it became, and it certainly has its clunkier moments, Jigsaw manages to shine among the Saw sequels with its ambitious approach and purely entertaining storyline. I know this film certainly has a lot of haters, and I can understand their dislike for the film to a certain level. Its ambitious, and at times feels like if just a little more effort was made, it could have been great, which is certainly disappointing. However, I appreciate Jigsaw immensely for its cleverness and well crafted storyline. It's a very entertaining film, unlike 4-6 you won't feel moments of boredom throughout. Some traps can be a bit basic, but others are incredibly well done, perhaps some of the best in the franchise in general. It's full of so many twists and turns and works on so many levels it's hard to believe that they pulled it off at least somewhat at all. The cinematography is excellent, very different from the grotesque look and atmosphere of the other films, providing a much needed and refreshing point of view. Tobin Bell's performance is excellent, with Matt Passmore and Hannah Emily Anderson providing some excellent leading performances as well. In the end, Jigsaw is a flawed puzzle, but it still makes a beautiful picture.

    My Rating: 7.4/10.
    6Farshnoshket

    Just a couple pieces missing

    I was a huge fan of the original series, although as more films were released the thrill lessened. The first is a Classic and may have one of the best twists of all time, and that's what makes it such a great film. It wasn't about the horror.

    This one, although entertaining, same awkward acting by many characters, same grizzly traps, and most of all a twist, which I believe everyone expects, however I feel there's some major plot holes that leaves me feeling dissatisfied. Of course I won't ruin for anyone, but this film reaches far, way too far, in my humble opinion.

    Very reminiscent of the original, but fails in the end. Maybe they'll do better next time because a new Saw film is always welcome to take a swing.

    Note: the red headed coroner was super hot, even before she let her hair down and took her glasses off. Way too hot to be a coroner. (not being sexist, just keeping it real)

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Upon the film's success, Twisted Pictures greenlit both a ninth and tenth installment for the series.
    • Gaffes
      (at around 1h 2 mins) The sticker on John Kramer's X-Ray doesn't have his birthdate on it. All labels (on any item) for a hospital patient would have their name and birthdate to ensure accurate cross-verifying of identification.
    • Citations

      John Kramer: The truth will set you free.

    • Connexions
      Featured in Tamara Just Saw: Jigsaw - Tamara Just Saw (2017)
    • Bandes originales
      Never Fade Away
      Performed by Great American Canyon Band

      Courtesy of Six Degrees Records

      By Arrangement with Primary Wave Entertainment

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ18

    • How long is Jigsaw?Propulsé par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 27 octobre 2017 (Canada)
    • Pays d’origine
      • United States
      • Canada
    • Sites officiels
      • Official Facebook
      • Official Site (Japan)
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Jigsaw
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada(filmed entirely in)
    • sociétés de production
      • Twisted Pictures
      • Burg Koules Hoffman Productions
      • Serendipity Productions
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 10 000 000 $ US (estimation)
    • Brut – États-Unis et Canada
      • 38 052 832 $ US
    • Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
      • 16 640 452 $ US
      • 29 oct. 2017
    • Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
      • 102 952 888 $ US
    Voir les informations détaillées sur le box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 32 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Atmos
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • Réponses IMDb : Aidez à combler les lacunes dans nos données
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.