La quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est r... Tout lireLa quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est révélé.La quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est révélé.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 6 nominations au total
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'The Beekeeper' is an action-packed film with Jason Statham's intense performance. Themes of revenge, corporate greed, and online scams are prominent. Critics praise Statham and the action sequences but criticize the lack of originality, predictable plot, and bee metaphors. Some appreciate the social commentary, while others find the script and supporting cast lacking. The film is entertaining but not groundbreaking, with mixed opinions on its quality.
Avis en vedette
A solid popcorn action flick. Jason is his standard typecast role, which you can't blame him for, he's a one trick pony but that one trick is entertaining.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
The actor playing Agent Parker should give up acting. She is laughable and the macho woman act is nauseating. The salvage point of this movie is the very existence of Statham. He is the ONLY reason I give it any stars at all. Without him, I would not give it a single star based on her performance alone. Not sure why actors, writers, producers always feel the necessity to butch up women and have them come off tough and crude. Pathetic if you ask me.
I did love seeing the call center ni rods getting their just desserts!
The world needs Jason Statham to be a real hero. He always makes a movie better.
I did love seeing the call center ni rods getting their just desserts!
The world needs Jason Statham to be a real hero. He always makes a movie better.
Verona Parker is easily one of the worst characters ever written for the screen, takes away everything this movie aspires to be. The actress also did a piss poor job and always had me cringing at the unrealistic and unreasonable choices she makes. If you'd delete that character entirely, this movie would've been a whole lot better in the long run.
Subject wise it's a very nice concept of a revenge thriller against scam call centers- but again, the whole govt mumbo jumbo makes it feel a whole run of the mill action BS from Hollywood mid tier movies. If the story had been awhole lot grounded, it would've done a whole lot better imo.
Subject wise it's a very nice concept of a revenge thriller against scam call centers- but again, the whole govt mumbo jumbo makes it feel a whole run of the mill action BS from Hollywood mid tier movies. If the story had been awhole lot grounded, it would've done a whole lot better imo.
- Plot/Script= 5/10
- Cinematography = 7/10
- Acting = 6/10
- Enjoyability = 8/10
- Notes: Imagine the Equalizer but it's Jason Statham as a beekeeper....that's what this movie was. I can't lie it kept me entertained the entire time, the plot was just a bit weird to me. It almost seemed like a mix of comedy and action with some of these scenes being comically hilarious. The movie is exactly what you expect it to be, nothing more nothing less. It seemed liked the writers & director knew how absurd the plot was and embraced it well. If you looking for a straight action movie with some badass scenes then you will like this movie. Not to mention Josh Hutchinson did a great job playing a character which seemed to be almost identically based of the current President's son.
So I rated this higher than it has a right to be rated but I don't want to take away from what could've been and what could be if there is a sequel.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDue to the tight production budget ($34 million) the majority of the film was shot in the UK to qualify for UK tax relief.
- GaffesAt around 46 minutes, an FBI tactical unit is stopped from proceeding by the leader of the private security company waving a sheet claiming his team are there on the direct orders of the Governor, and tells the FBI tactical team to leave. This is absolutely not true in real life. The FBI is a federal agency and is not under any direct state control by any governor of a state.
- Citations
Agent Verona Parker: I believe you. But there are laws for that.
Adam Clay: There are laws for that. Until they fail. Then they've got me.
- Générique farfeluThe opening titles appear over a montage of footage of bees and historical records of bees.
- Autres versionsGerman TV version is cut by 5 minutes overall to secure a "not under 16" rating. The "not under 18" rated version elsewhere is completely uncensored.
- ConnexionsFeatured in OWV Updates: OWV Cinema Poster Update (16/01/2024) (2024)
- Bandes originalesBreath
Performed by RiLLA*
Written by James Damon Woodford
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Beekeeper?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Beekeeper
- Lieux de tournage
- Kingsferry Bridge, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(elevator bridge scene)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 40 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 66 220 535 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 16 576 007 $ US
- 14 janv. 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 162 619 535 $ US
- Durée1 heure 45 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant