Une réédition d'un film de 1973, sur une fille de 12 ans qui est possédée par une mystérieuse entité démoniaque, forçant sa mère à demander l'aide de deux prêtres pour la sauver.Une réédition d'un film de 1973, sur une fille de 12 ans qui est possédée par une mystérieuse entité démoniaque, forçant sa mère à demander l'aide de deux prêtres pour la sauver.Une réédition d'un film de 1973, sur une fille de 12 ans qui est possédée par une mystérieuse entité démoniaque, forçant sa mère à demander l'aide de deux prêtres pour la sauver.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 22 nominations au total
Marie Michelle Bazile
- Craftsperson
- (as Marie Michele Bazile)
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'The Exorcist Believer' is a divisive sequel with mixed reactions. Praise is given for atmospheric execution, strong performances, and special effects. Criticisms include failure to match the original's impact, weak scares, predictable plot, and pacing issues. Ellen Burstyn's inclusion is seen as underutilized. Some appreciate religious themes and character development, while others find it formulaic and lacking genuine horror. Overall, it is an average addition to the franchise, struggling to live up to the original's legacy.
Avis en vedette
I think we were all fooled by Halloween 2018 and thought David Gordon Green was going to be somewhat of a saviour for horror... we were wrong. Instead of making these below average horror sequels/requels, whatever they're called these days, go make a sequel to Pineapple Express!!
This movie was so boring for 3/4 of it and then the other 1/4 of it was just disappointing. Cheap jump scares were below average. And the atmosphere and tension that made the original so amazing was nowhere to be seen!
Saw X and The Nun II are also in cinemas at the moment, go and see them instead because at least they're somewhat enjoyable!
This movie was so boring for 3/4 of it and then the other 1/4 of it was just disappointing. Cheap jump scares were below average. And the atmosphere and tension that made the original so amazing was nowhere to be seen!
Saw X and The Nun II are also in cinemas at the moment, go and see them instead because at least they're somewhat enjoyable!
Ouch....
This was a terrible film, when will they realise that trashy followups such as this are just pointless and unnecessary. The original is a classic, a movie that lived on in the minds of people for decades, this one, you'll forget about within just a few days.
It was only about an hour and a half long, but it felt painfully long, nothing happens until the final ten minutes or so, but even that bit of excitement was underwhelming.
I was genuinely excited by the trailer, and seeing Ellen Burstyn added extra excitement, but the trailer flattered the film, credit to whomever put that together, sadly the film was drab, slow and totally uninteresting.
I know I'd mentally zoned out about two thirds through, but there seemed to be no explanation, who the demon was, what its purpose was, the story was just so disjointed, dare I say badly realised.
It should have been a Halloween chiller, it remained tepid from start to finish.
4/10.
This was a terrible film, when will they realise that trashy followups such as this are just pointless and unnecessary. The original is a classic, a movie that lived on in the minds of people for decades, this one, you'll forget about within just a few days.
It was only about an hour and a half long, but it felt painfully long, nothing happens until the final ten minutes or so, but even that bit of excitement was underwhelming.
I was genuinely excited by the trailer, and seeing Ellen Burstyn added extra excitement, but the trailer flattered the film, credit to whomever put that together, sadly the film was drab, slow and totally uninteresting.
I know I'd mentally zoned out about two thirds through, but there seemed to be no explanation, who the demon was, what its purpose was, the story was just so disjointed, dare I say badly realised.
It should have been a Halloween chiller, it remained tepid from start to finish.
4/10.
95 minutes of plot building for a 10 minutes exorcist that was literally the lamest and most boring I've ever seen. And there wasn't even any plot. Nothing was explained about the demon, it's intentions or where it came from. There were no meaningful conversations with the possessed, no head spinning, no vomiting... The trailer was false advertising. No jump scares, no tension building, 1 death... just utter droll. The popes exorcist was better than this and it was lame too compared to Emily Rose and the original. I'm not sure what they were writing here but it wasn't a horror movie. Had me reaching for my phone a dozen times I was so bored.
I tried to like it, but after some 10 minutes into the movie I began to fear that this was a complete and utter dud. And it turned out I was right.
The bad: it is suppose to be horror, but it isnt horrifying for one minute. A bit freaky and strange, but definitely not scary. And I wanna get scared watching such a movie. That is the whole point of making horror movies.
More bad: besides a wonderful performance by the ever great Ellen Burstyn, none of the other actors impressed me. The 2 kids, who were possessed were okay, but not terrific either. But the other actors were plain average or even below average.
Defnitely an insult to the classic original from 1973, which was an absolute shocker of a classic!
The bad: it is suppose to be horror, but it isnt horrifying for one minute. A bit freaky and strange, but definitely not scary. And I wanna get scared watching such a movie. That is the whole point of making horror movies.
More bad: besides a wonderful performance by the ever great Ellen Burstyn, none of the other actors impressed me. The 2 kids, who were possessed were okay, but not terrific either. But the other actors were plain average or even below average.
Defnitely an insult to the classic original from 1973, which was an absolute shocker of a classic!
"The Exorcist: Believer" is a film whose trailer was better and which promised an old school style story but adding new elements, the result was not terrible but it was bad. The script starts without much interest, the scenes of the first symptoms of demonic possession were quite simple and did not create tension, the exorcism scenes fail to stand out and feel illogical, during this part of the film it manages to have a couple of good scenes. Using characters from the original film makes no sense, their participation is almost irrelevant but it is nice to see them again. Within the aforementioned script, an attempt was made to give it a new perspective with the theme of religions and a union with a common good, but it completely fails to innovate and they treat it in a simple way. The performances are average, the two possessed girls do not achieve the masterful performance that Linda Blair achieved in 1973. David Gordon Green fails miserably in his work as a director, the cinematography is decent, on the soundtrack it is appreciated to hear the legendary "Tubular Bells" although with certain changes that are not poorly achieved and the makeup effects look gloomy. The positive points are few and the negative ones are more, a soulless sequel.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOn William Friedkin's passing, writer and film critic Ed Whitfield posted this on Twitter(X) and Facebook : "William Friedkin once said to me, 'Ed, the guy who made those new Halloween sequels is about to make one to my movie, L'exorciste (1973). That's right, my signature film is about to be extended by the man who made Ananas express (2008). I don't want to be around when that happens. But if there's a spirit world, and I can come back, I plan to possess David Gordon Green and make his life a living hell.'" Friedkin actually died two months before the movie was released.
- Gaffes(at around 1h 3 mins) The demon in this movie, according to the credits, is Lamashtu, therefore, when it sees Chris McNeil, the "We've met before" quote is factually wrong since Chris met Pazuzu instead. However, Lamashtu was considered to be the wife of Pazuzu in ancient Mesopotamian mythology. This makes it not so much a "goof" as a clever reference to Pazuzu who, while depicted as Lamashtu's husband, was also the entity who opposed her extreme malevolence. In myth and legend, where you find one, you find the other.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Big Brother: Episode #25.26 (2023)
- Bandes originalesKamimizye
Written by Yves Boyer and Wilfrid Lavoud (as Wilfred Lavaud)
Performed by Foula
Courtesy of Seven Seas Music
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Exorcist: Believer?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Exorcist: Believer
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 30 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 65 537 395 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 26 497 600 $ US
- 8 oct. 2023
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 136 294 607 $ US
- Durée1 heure 51 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What was the official certification given to L'Exorciste : Le Croyant (2023) in India?
Répondre