Stara basn. Kiedy slonce bylo bogiem
- 2003
- 1h 43m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,6/10
1,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn the 9th century, a tyrant oppresses pre-Christian Slavic tribes living on the Polish lands. They must unite for the common future.In the 9th century, a tyrant oppresses pre-Christian Slavic tribes living on the Polish lands. They must unite for the common future.In the 9th century, a tyrant oppresses pre-Christian Slavic tribes living on the Polish lands. They must unite for the common future.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Avis en vedette
Forget Brad Pitt as Achilles; Michal Zebrowski as Ziemowit the archer ROCKS! Seriously, the handsome, brooding Zebrowski is about as good as it gets when it comes to a costumed movie hero, and this vehicle is escapist fun from beginning to end. The setting is pre-Christian Poland, where the rustic natives worship the sun god and fend off the depredations of Odin-worshipping Vikings. When the late king's brother, ruling as regent, decides he doesn't want to the hand the throne over to his young nephew, the stage is set for a classic tale of murder, peasant uprising, and heroism (the hero being the loner Viking Ziemowit, who takes up the cause of the local peasants against their scheming ruler).
Pagan rituals, including a funeral, a bacchanalian festival, and the casting of a love-spell, are enchantingly portrayed. The forest scenery is gorgeous, and cinematography is excellent throughout. CGI backgrounds and settings are absolutely beautiful (though special action effects are not quite up to Hollywood standards). Pacing is almost too fast. There's a buoyant sense of energy reminiscent of American films I grew up watching in the 1960s about Vikings, King Arthur, Robin Hood, etc.
At the film's end, we learn that Ziemowit will found the Piast dynasty that will rule Poland as it emerges into the Christian era.
Alongside Zebrowski, the towering Polish actor Daniel Olbrychski does a great turn as the stoic conscience of the peasantry. Olbrychski used to be the male hottie in Polish movies (the slot now occupied by Zebrowski), and he's the one, not Zebrowski, who gets the shirtless scene in this movie. Like Sean Connery, Olbrychski has still got it, and always will! As of this writing (mid-2005), this movie can be found (though not easily!) on DVD with English subtitles, under the title WHEN THE SUN WAS GOD: AN ANCIENT TALE.
Pagan rituals, including a funeral, a bacchanalian festival, and the casting of a love-spell, are enchantingly portrayed. The forest scenery is gorgeous, and cinematography is excellent throughout. CGI backgrounds and settings are absolutely beautiful (though special action effects are not quite up to Hollywood standards). Pacing is almost too fast. There's a buoyant sense of energy reminiscent of American films I grew up watching in the 1960s about Vikings, King Arthur, Robin Hood, etc.
At the film's end, we learn that Ziemowit will found the Piast dynasty that will rule Poland as it emerges into the Christian era.
Alongside Zebrowski, the towering Polish actor Daniel Olbrychski does a great turn as the stoic conscience of the peasantry. Olbrychski used to be the male hottie in Polish movies (the slot now occupied by Zebrowski), and he's the one, not Zebrowski, who gets the shirtless scene in this movie. Like Sean Connery, Olbrychski has still got it, and always will! As of this writing (mid-2005), this movie can be found (though not easily!) on DVD with English subtitles, under the title WHEN THE SUN WAS GOD: AN ANCIENT TALE.
Whle watching this film I've grown to respect Hollywood much more. The thing is American films are usually professionally made (well, at least those which reach me here in Ukraine). Even if the idea is the simplest one possible, the films are still watchable and entertaining (well most of them). They know their stuff and at least don't make the simplest mistakes. This film done by the guru of polish cinema looked amateurish. The acting was rather poor. The lead roles often overplayed their emotions. I was constantly under the impression that most scenes took just one take and the director just didn't bother and was like "meh, it will do". The secondary role actors were even worse. Most of them looked like they are relatives of the production crew or were just random people from the street. The story never got me involved, it's just tedious. But there wasn't much to it anyway. Maybe the actors were so bad because of it, they just didn't understand what they are supposed to act. The characters have no depth and relations between them never get going. And the CGIs... 2003, two years after Shrek we get this kind of stuff?.. So the conclusion: there is no life in this film, it feels cheesy and uninspiring.
It will always puzzle me how can you make such a bad movie when you employ such great number of top Polish actors. I don't really know where to start...Actors (especially females) were bad and stiff. Women wore full make up and some of the Popiel's men seemed to have something that looked like a sabre to me, as a weapon. Shame. there was a great potential there. and with movies and TV series placed in medieval world today this could be another interesting addition to the genre. for Zebrowski this is another poor attempt at warrior based story. but as with The Witcher, this attempt is just abysmal. The same goes for Olbrychski. However, he doesn't really have to impress anyone at this stage of his career.
In my language this movie is called "The old tales of Vikings". For a fan of movies featuring Vikings one must say, that there aren't that many movies to watch. You keep returning to the same 3-4 good ones and if you crave something different, you start to scrape the bottom of the barrel pretty fast.
This movie appeared in the offering of my VOD. Given that it was apparently about Vikings and featured Zebrowski, whom I liked in the Witcher Series I gave it a go.
The movie has things I liked very much and things I didn't. Lets start with the bad.
The Acting is somewhat wooden, so is the direction and camerawork. The movie isn't very good to look at, with often bland colours, excessive exposition, lack of contrast and general shakiness. The opening shot of a wooden statue was already overly shaky, so the rest of the movie wasn't much of a surprise. The camerawork is basic and amateurish, reminiscent of television rather than a film. Imagine a worse Xena warrior princess style thing and you'd get the idea. What was making the experience worse in my case was the bad quallity of the dubbing, which had a reverb as if recorded in a bathroom. That's a problem though only if you watch the movie in Czech. I'd probably still choose the bathroom dubbing over trying to acquire the original with subtitles.
At times the direction is unintentionally funny. Usually death scenes feel more entertaining than dramatic.
The good things about the movie (other than the unintentional comedy) are the costumes, locations, fightscenes. The depicted Vikings are among the best and most accurate ones I have seen in a movie. Propper helmets and birnies are worn along with shields and 9th century swords. The fight scene against a band of Vikings is especially nicely done with practical effects and stunts. They must have been especially proud of the functional portcullis, because there are at leas 5 shots of it closing throughout the movie.
Overall, you can see that a lot of effort and passion went into making this movie. I feel like, they did the best they could with what was available and thus I can't be too critical about the shortcomings.
This movie appeared in the offering of my VOD. Given that it was apparently about Vikings and featured Zebrowski, whom I liked in the Witcher Series I gave it a go.
The movie has things I liked very much and things I didn't. Lets start with the bad.
The Acting is somewhat wooden, so is the direction and camerawork. The movie isn't very good to look at, with often bland colours, excessive exposition, lack of contrast and general shakiness. The opening shot of a wooden statue was already overly shaky, so the rest of the movie wasn't much of a surprise. The camerawork is basic and amateurish, reminiscent of television rather than a film. Imagine a worse Xena warrior princess style thing and you'd get the idea. What was making the experience worse in my case was the bad quallity of the dubbing, which had a reverb as if recorded in a bathroom. That's a problem though only if you watch the movie in Czech. I'd probably still choose the bathroom dubbing over trying to acquire the original with subtitles.
At times the direction is unintentionally funny. Usually death scenes feel more entertaining than dramatic.
The good things about the movie (other than the unintentional comedy) are the costumes, locations, fightscenes. The depicted Vikings are among the best and most accurate ones I have seen in a movie. Propper helmets and birnies are worn along with shields and 9th century swords. The fight scene against a band of Vikings is especially nicely done with practical effects and stunts. They must have been especially proud of the functional portcullis, because there are at leas 5 shots of it closing throughout the movie.
Overall, you can see that a lot of effort and passion went into making this movie. I feel like, they did the best they could with what was available and thus I can't be too critical about the shortcomings.
This is a Polish film which is all about a ruthless despot's attempts to crush a rebel army by enlisting the help of the Vikings. I'm not quite sure how historically accurate this is, but frankly who cares? It may not be a Hollywood spectacular but the hacking and slashing were enough to divert my attention and the complex plot is not unlike that great TV show, Game Of Thrones. It does come with subtitles intact though, so those dimwits who can't read and watch simultaneously can look elsewhere. Everyone else will probably enjoy a decent throwback to when our leaders were corrupt, life was cheap and barbarism ruled the day. Hmm... Maybe not that much of a throwback after all... 6/10
Le saviez-vous
- Autres versionsThe UK release was cut, cuts required to remove dangerous horse falls, specifically horses being tripped and caused to fall in a manner which could result in serious physical harm, in order to obtain a 15 classification. Cuts made in line with BBFC policy on animal cruelty. An uncut classification was not available.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Ancient Tale: When the Sun Was God?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ancient Tale: When the Sun Was God
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 11 000 000 PLN (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 2 626 649 $ US
- Durée1 heure 43 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Stara basn. Kiedy slonce bylo bogiem (2003) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre