Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
IMDbPro

Indiscrétions

Titre original : Listen
  • 1996
  • R
  • 1h 41m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,7/10
366
MA NOTE
Indiscrétions (1996)
MysteryThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young woman thinks one of her neighbors in her apartment building is a serial killer and begins to suspect both her current boyfriend and former girlfriend of being the killer.A young woman thinks one of her neighbors in her apartment building is a serial killer and begins to suspect both her current boyfriend and former girlfriend of being the killer.A young woman thinks one of her neighbors in her apartment building is a serial killer and begins to suspect both her current boyfriend and former girlfriend of being the killer.

  • Director
    • Gavin Wilding
  • Writers
    • Jonas Quastel
    • Micheal Bafaro
  • Stars
    • Brooke Langton
    • Sarah Buxton
    • Gordon Currie
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    4,7/10
    366
    MA NOTE
    • Director
      • Gavin Wilding
    • Writers
      • Jonas Quastel
      • Micheal Bafaro
    • Stars
      • Brooke Langton
      • Sarah Buxton
      • Gordon Currie
    • 10Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 1Commentaire de critique
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • Photos3

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche

    Rôles principaux26

    Modifier
    Brooke Langton
    Brooke Langton
    • Sarah Ross
    Sarah Buxton
    Sarah Buxton
    • Krista Barron
    • (as Sarah G. Buxton)
    Gordon Currie
    Gordon Currie
    • Jake Taft
    Andy Romano
    Andy Romano
    • Det. Sam Steinmann
    J.H. Wyman
    J.H. Wyman
    • Randy Wilkes
    • (as Joel Wyner)
    Evan Tylor
    • Det. Louis Penny
    Jeff Burnett
    • Erwin Farley
    Philip Granger
    Philip Granger
    • Max
    Frank Cassini
    Frank Cassini
    • Repairman
    Iris Quinn
    Iris Quinn
    • Farley's Sister
    Sherry Thoreson
    • Lisa
    Sandra P. Grant
    • Margaret
    • (as Sandra Grant)
    Erika Kline
    • Bartender
    Kim Calderoni
    • Peace Woman
    Junior Williams
    Junior Williams
    • Cabby
    David Fredericks
    David Fredericks
    • Charlie
    Nancy J. Lilley
    • Catherine
    James Strand
    James Strand
    • Chris Black
    • Director
      • Gavin Wilding
    • Writers
      • Jonas Quastel
      • Micheal Bafaro
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs10

    4,7366
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    2David B-2

    Amateurish crap.

    Quite the most boring nonsense I have seen in a long time. The plot was full of irrelevance, and the acting was the worst I have seen in a long time.

    To make it worse, camera angles that made me feel sick were used , the incidental music was terrible and drowned out the dialogue (maybe not a bad thing then), and the shots of San Francisco looked as if they had been stolen straight out of the city tourist board's promotional video.

    Oh, and the obligatory sex scene was not even half well done. Better lighting next time, please.
    lazarillo

    Pretty good actually for a 90's "erotic thriller"

    As a lonely, single guy in 1990's, I watched WAY too many "erotic thrillers" on late-night cable. The "erotic" part was always pretty debatable, but very few of these movies were at all "thrilling", especially as time went on and they became increasingly lousy with slumming porn actors, interminably long softcore sex scenes, and horrid music (that all seemed to be composed by a guy name "Herman Beeftink"). This movie, even though it was a half-assed vehicle for then-star of TV's "Melrose Place" Brooke Langton, is actually a lot more entertaining than most.

    Langton places a sexy young thing who has just moved into her boyfriend's apartment, but she has a jealous lesbian girlfriend (Sara Buxton) who won't let go. Through a crossed wire or something, she starts listening in on the phone sex conversations of someone in the building, and she realizes that this person's phone sex partners keep turning up dead. But is it the handsome but creepy upstairs neighbor, the landlady's disturbed brother, or is it perhaps someone closer to home?

    OK, in real-life there are probably half a dozen ridiculously sexy women anywhere in the world who were actually into phone sex in the 90's(if they weren't getting paid for it that is) and five of the sex get murdered in THIS movie. So, obviously the plot is less than believable. Still, this does keep you guessing to the end. It has some elements of superior thrillers of the era like "Single White Female", but while it's not as good as that one, it actually does have a much better ending. The erotic content is kind of brief as these films go, but that also makes this more entertaining than most as an actual MOVIE. Being the seething cauldrons of acting talent that they were, Langton and Buxton could not be called on to actually express their lesbian passion by stripping off for some hot girl-on-girl action, but that is not nearly as big of liability as it would be in a lesser movie. I would actually, tentatively recommend this. It's not much of a compliment perhaps, but there are only two direct-to-cable 90's "erotic thrillers" I actually think are better than this, "Sensation" with former MTV "VJ" Kari Wuhrer and Eric Roberts and "The Fourth Floor" with Juliette Lewis and William Hurt.
    Lisa-25

    Exciting, and Sarah Buxton makes a perfect Krista...

    "Listen" is pretty good, especially since I like actress Sarah Buxton.

    The movie is exciting, and rather complicated; it's all cleared up in the end, though.
    3smatysia

    Quite a mess

    This movie has a lot of problems. Set in San Francisco, but obviously filmed elsewhere (Vancouver, I think) it overuses way too many of the erotic thriller clichés. It wasn't very erotic, with only one scene being an exception. It casts suspicion on too many characters. There is some really poor acting by the police characters, and the supposed big-city police department was shockingly inept. But I suppose if they had done a better job, there would a lot less to make a movie about. Brooke Langton and Sarah Buxton, the two leads, are really the only ones in the film who could act at all. They carried the corpse of this movie through all of the gaping plot holes, and in the end, one of the characters had to explain the whole thing in a voice-over. Ugh. Don't bother, although it's unlikely anyone will see it these days. I had taped it from cable many years ago, and just watched it. Probably not available commercially any more.
    10SarahBuxtonFANatic

    Sarah Buxton is the best actress!

    I think Sarah Buxton is the best actress ever! (In my opinion, of course!) This is a great change in character from her other movies and tv shows. I really liked this movie because it has a great storyline and the plot goes deeper than you may think. To really understand this movie, you should really see it more than once.

    Brooke Langton and Gordon Currie are also great in this movie. Each character is exceptionally important, and it really is a good movie! 10/10!!!

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    Beach House
    6,1
    Beach House
    Mixed Signals
    5,2
    Mixed Signals
    The Net
    6,1
    The Net
    Reach the Rock
    6,6
    Reach the Rock
    Embrassez la mariée!
    5,2
    Embrassez la mariée!
    Poursuite illicite
    6,2
    Poursuite illicite
    Playing Mona Lisa
    5,8
    Playing Mona Lisa
    Primeval
    4,8
    Primeval

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Sherry Thoreson's debut.
    • Citations

      [first lines]

      Waitress: How you doin', Kris?

    • Connexions
      Referenced in Rewind This! (2013)
    • Bandes originales
      Wrapped Around Your Finger
      Performed by Dan Hill

      Courtesy of Spontaneous Records

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 27 septembre 1996 (United States)
    • Pays d’origine
      • United States
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Listen
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique, Canada
    • sociétés de production
      • Devin Entertainment
      • Rampage Entertainment
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 41 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Ultra Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Indiscrétions (1996)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was Indiscrétions (1996) officially released in Canada in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.