ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,2/10
6,4 k
MA NOTE
Au XVème siècle à Paris, un homme du clergé complote avec le roi des gitans pour susciter une révolte paysanne. Pendant ce temps, un bossu monstre tombe amoureux de la reine des gitans.Au XVème siècle à Paris, un homme du clergé complote avec le roi des gitans pour susciter une révolte paysanne. Pendant ce temps, un bossu monstre tombe amoureux de la reine des gitans.Au XVème siècle à Paris, un homme du clergé complote avec le roi des gitans pour susciter une révolte paysanne. Pendant ce temps, un bossu monstre tombe amoureux de la reine des gitans.
- Prix
- 3 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Nigel De Brulier
- Don Claudio
- (as Nigel de Brulier)
Ernest Torrence
- Clopin
- (as Ernest Torrance)
Harry von Meter
- Mons. Neufchatel
- (as Harry Van Meter)
Nick De Ruiz
- Mons. Le Torteru
- (as Nick de Ruiz)
Ray Myers
- Charmolu's Assistant
- (as W. Ray Meyers)
William Parke
- Josephus
- (as William Parke Sr.)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWallace Worsley Jr., son of the film's director, said that many of the extras for the massive crowd scenes were recruited in downtown Los Angeles for $1.00 a night and meals. Among them, he said, were a good number of prostitutes, who did a "considerable sideline business" on the sets. Universal also hired 50 Pinkerton detectives and put them among the crowd, and their job was to catch pickpockets and various other thieves among the extras.
- GaffesAfter Esmeralda gives Quasimodo water (he's still chained down), the nose putty on Quasimodo's left cheek is coming loose - there's a noticeable gap between Lon Lon Chaney's face and the nose putty used to make the fake cheek.
- Générique farfeluTully Marshall is billed erroneously as "El Rey Luis XI" which is Spanish for "King Louis XI". He should have been billed as "Le Roi Louis XI" which is French for "King Louis XI".
- Autres versionsSeveral video versions of this film exist, with running times from about 80 minutes up to the full time of the theatrical version.
- ConnexionsEdited into Dream Slashers (2007)
Commentaire en vedette
It's hard to rate this film. Much of this is because the film has been floating around for years and is available in many forms--some longer and some significantly shorter. I have a videotape version that only runs about 90 minutes and it lacks any musical score. The version I just saw on TCM lasted almost two hours and had a very good musical score by Robert Israel. However, despite the excellent score he recently wrote for the film, the print itself was in pretty poor shape--looking like it needed further restoration. The review I am giving is for this longer version with music.
The film was exceptional from a technical standpoint. There were huge numbers of extras, very impressive sets that make you think it was really filmed in Paris and the acting was very good. Not surprisingly, Lon Chaney was exceptional and his makeup very convincing. However, despite the technical merit, I still found myself preferring his PHANTOM OF THE OPERA--it was a more interesting story and has been completely restored, so it is a visual treat--unlike HUNCHBACK. Also, the story itself never seemed super-compelling. A good chance I feel this way is that I have seen at least five different versions of the story and it just feels a bit old. So I really can't blame THIS film--it's more a case of "burnout". Still, it's an amazing film and not to be missed by silent movie fans.
The film was exceptional from a technical standpoint. There were huge numbers of extras, very impressive sets that make you think it was really filmed in Paris and the acting was very good. Not surprisingly, Lon Chaney was exceptional and his makeup very convincing. However, despite the technical merit, I still found myself preferring his PHANTOM OF THE OPERA--it was a more interesting story and has been completely restored, so it is a visual treat--unlike HUNCHBACK. Also, the story itself never seemed super-compelling. A good chance I feel this way is that I have seen at least five different versions of the story and it just feels a bit old. So I really can't blame THIS film--it's more a case of "burnout". Still, it's an amazing film and not to be missed by silent movie fans.
- planktonrules
- 18 mars 2007
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Hunchback of Notre Dame?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Notre Dame'ın Kamburu
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 250 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée2 heures 13 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923) officially released in India in English?
Répondre