Les Chevaliers du Zodiaque

This movie fails to send me back to the anime, and I know it was supposed to be based on the newest properties that are coming out targeting the new generations, but I think it swings and misses at all target groups.

I guess Seiya works well and he kind of has a good chemistry with Saori. His training with Marin is done well and the first fights that don't have the armor are nicely choreographed but everything else is terrible.

I couldn't care more about Famke's character, her motivations are so shallow together with Ikki, who is there mainly so there's a final fight. We have Mitsumasa who isn't Mitsumasa. The VFX looks straight from a 2012 PS3 game. There are so many futuristic ships I didn't know if the movie was supposed to be an alternative world or 20 years in the future.

But the main thing for me is that the movie didn't feel like Saint Seiya, it was like someone who saw the anime 30 years ago tried to explain it to a Hollywood producer who didn't bother to watch the original content and stick to the description given to him. In the end it didn't have the sense of humanity against gods and the sense that even when Seiya lost all his senses he would never give up.

I am not part of the target audience for this movie. Keep that in mind.

If someone made a movie about the ancient Greek Gods for the 21st Century, and used Asian martial arts action cinematic techniques, then this would be the movie they made. And they did.

The soundtrack is loud and obnoxious. All of the dialogue is ego-oriented; i.e. "Listen to how clever I am." And the fights scenes are out of late night Kung Fu fare from the 1980s.

For all that, it's technically a competent film like all big budget films, but it's agenda is about letting female energy reign in spite of a lot of hijinks by the males, ironically led by a female character., and it's a female instructor that teaches the main protagonist how to fight.

So ... it's pretty cliche and predictable, but is it a bad movie? Eh, I'm not really partial to it, I could see all the plot points and story oriented character moments coming a mile away, including the whole "date outside your social circle" motif, and the feminine angle regarding the responsibility of wielding power and who should and why.

It's a film made for teens and so-called "geek culture". I gave it a chance, and all I can say is that I liked it better than the first Guardians of the Galaxy, but again this is a movie made for the teen comic-book crowd, and not for an older individual like me.

Loud, over the top, predictable, lots of ego oriented moments, if you're looking for some updated martial-arts action with god like powers thrown in, then look no further than this movie. But don't expect high art.

If you are not from Central or Eastern Europe, most probably you won´t be familiar with a name of Tomasz "Tomek" Baginski. He was credited for his brilliant work on the "Legendy polskie" ("The Polish Legends"), a series of short movies bringing the old Slavic mythology into a screen with an extremely modern adaptation. If you are a fan of "The Witcher" series you may remember something like "Oh, yeah, isn´t it a guy who produced the first season?" If you are not, the sentence would rather be "Look, I´ve never read fantasy books and I´ve never played any games. So, where the hell this whole "Witcher" thing comes from?"

There is a purpose in this intro: Baginski has been in the movie industry for more than 20 years but "Knights of the Zodicac" is the first ever feature film which he directed.

Apparently, the idea was similar: it is a known fantasy story, so we bring it to the modern time, trying to make a dynamic and fun movie for all kind of spectators. There was only one problem: this is neither any longer the Slavic mythology, nor an adaptation of a fantasy book which plot is based on Europe´s "Dark Ages". It is a story from a completely different culture with completely different traditions and a very different vision on the things. And, for what it worth, you would make it with their money and under Sony, one of their most conservative studios. If Tomek thought they will allow him to do a sort of "The Japanese Legends", I´m afraid he was very mistaken.

We have to greet Sony as well: every time when it looks like they really cannot go lower, they make a new attempt which amazes even the most skeptical. This time they simply have not selected a right person for a right task. And, by the way, I´m not even mentioning this part or the script where "a good man helps an evil woman with kidnapping and killing children". If Sony thinks this will be welcome by parents who will watch "Knights" with their children, they are probably very mistaken.

As for Tomek, I only wish he chooses a right project next time, something where he really can contribute. If you want my opinion, it would be "Twardowski 3.14" and the expansion of the universe based on the Slavic mythology. I´d say the world would welcome these ones much more than yet another re-boot of some old glory which resulted in a questionable script, questionable characters and very questionable future for all involved personnel.

Having not read the manga on which this is based, I can only judge this as a film. And the reasons to see it are for the hand-to-hand combat scenes (which are well-shot and full of energy) and for the few satisfying moments of personal redemption and self-forgiveness sprinkled throughout.

Sadly these positives are few and far between, and the movie is too often bogged down by dialogue that's inhuman and stilted, a plot that's somehow generic and excessively convoluted, and visual effects that are laughably underfunded and unfinished.

The cast is full of capable supporting actors who aren't helped by the unintentionally funny script nor by the charisma-free lead actor.

Lastly, the movie takes itself far too seriously, and this makes the goofy stuff hard to watch rather than campy and enjoyable.

It had the pieces to be good, but it just dropped too many of them to work.

Another poorly made manga adaptation. If you claim it to be adapted from a source, then you should stick to it. Do not change the names, do not change the settings, do not change the plot. I mean, if you take the fairy godmother out of the story, replace the prince with an old man, and then turn the glass slippers into a pair of steel boots, can you still call it Cinderella? You get what I'm saying here? The name changes are atrocious, not to mention the costumes. Seiya's Pegasus armor was supposed to be lean and shiny, not robotic and grim looking. The only thing that's similar to the manga was only Athena's staff. I'm so disappointed, so I'm just gonna give it 5 stars. I should've given it a lower ratings, but I know that a lot of people have worked hard to make this movie. So I'm not gonna be a jerk here.