Geralt de Riv est un chasseur de monstres solitaire qui s'efforce de trouver sa place dans un monde où les gens se révèlent souvent plus cruels que les animaux.Geralt de Riv est un chasseur de monstres solitaire qui s'efforce de trouver sa place dans un monde où les gens se révèlent souvent plus cruels que les animaux.Geralt de Riv est un chasseur de monstres solitaire qui s'efforce de trouver sa place dans un monde où les gens se révèlent souvent plus cruels que les animaux.
- Nommé pour 4 prix Primetime Emmy
- 9 victoires et 36 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'The Witcher' series is lauded for Henry Cavill's performance as Geralt, captivating fantasy world, and impressive action sequences. The show's visual effects and character chemistry receive high praise. However, it is criticized for its intricate and occasionally confusing narrative, pacing problems, and deviations from the original material. Some express dissatisfaction with casting decisions and character development. Replacing Henry Cavill has sparked significant backlash, with many fearing it will diminish the show's quality and viewer interest.
Avis en vedette
Netflix has once again released a series that has incredible potential, but has been undermined by horrible writing and extremely weak casting choices. Henry Cavill was an inspired choice as Geralt of Rivia, and obviously brings a lot of knowledge and fondness to the role. He gives the series a luster that is unfortunately quickly dimmed by the horribly dimwitted writing. Eels??? What is with the Eels??? Note: that didn't need a spoiler alert. If you've seen the series, you'll know what I am talking about, and if you haven't, you will know when you witness that silly travesty.
The sets are lush and well done, the costumes are good, and the music fits well with the setting. The exception to the music is when Dandelion goes from Medival to something akin to "Pop Harp". Grating doesn't even begin to describe it. I did like the action scenes, as Henry Cavill is very believable as a athletic monster slayer.
So overall, I give a 9 to Cavill and the great atmosphere of the series. The supporting cast are sporadic and generally weak, and rate no more than a 5 or 6. The writing, and in particular the scenes added to the script that were never in the original books, was extremely weak, and garnered no more than a 2 or at the most 3. I gave the show a 6. Mildly entertaining, but falls far short of the original books and the three Witcher games.
The sets are lush and well done, the costumes are good, and the music fits well with the setting. The exception to the music is when Dandelion goes from Medival to something akin to "Pop Harp". Grating doesn't even begin to describe it. I did like the action scenes, as Henry Cavill is very believable as a athletic monster slayer.
So overall, I give a 9 to Cavill and the great atmosphere of the series. The supporting cast are sporadic and generally weak, and rate no more than a 5 or 6. The writing, and in particular the scenes added to the script that were never in the original books, was extremely weak, and garnered no more than a 2 or at the most 3. I gave the show a 6. Mildly entertaining, but falls far short of the original books and the three Witcher games.
What can I say... Seasons 1 & 2 were excellent.
Solid writing with enough following to the source material.
Really good cast and acting.
Topped with some decent special effects and set design resulted in a very enjoyable dark fantasy adventure.
Then, along came season 3.
Oh dear... oh dear oh dear oh dear.
It feels as if they're trying to achieve the same as the first two seasons but with half the budget and deplorable writing.
Every scene feels cheapened and like a soap opera.
What on earth happened?
No wonder Henry Cavill left. This is nowhere near the caliber if the first two seasons and an epic disappointment.
The forth season will undoubtedly be doomed to failuref this is anything to go by.
Seasons 1 & 2 = 8/10 Season 3 = 5/10.
Solid writing with enough following to the source material.
Really good cast and acting.
Topped with some decent special effects and set design resulted in a very enjoyable dark fantasy adventure.
Then, along came season 3.
Oh dear... oh dear oh dear oh dear.
It feels as if they're trying to achieve the same as the first two seasons but with half the budget and deplorable writing.
Every scene feels cheapened and like a soap opera.
What on earth happened?
No wonder Henry Cavill left. This is nowhere near the caliber if the first two seasons and an epic disappointment.
The forth season will undoubtedly be doomed to failuref this is anything to go by.
Seasons 1 & 2 = 8/10 Season 3 = 5/10.
Now in no way is this show as bad as people thought it would nor is it as good as some of the other reviewers here think it is either.
First of, Henry Cavill as Geralt is the best part of this show 100%. No doubt about that. The show is worth watching just for his portrayal. He really cares about the character and it shows.
Pros:
-Henry Cavill as Geralt. Can't say this enough.
-The fight Choreography is just insane. GOT could have really used some of the insane fight sequences from the witcher series.
-The Really amazing moments between Jaskier(Dandelion) and Geralt. They did Jaskier perfectly in my opinion.
-Roach
Cons:
-Really bad casting choices like Triss,Foltest and the Driads. Also they butchered an entire portion from the books which was one of my favorite parts from the Last Wish actually.
-Nilfgaard Armour. Like who in the right mind actually thought that it looked even remotely good. I wanted to skip the parts where they came up in the screens.
-Very unfriendly to people not familiar with the books or games. This is a fan-service. Not entirely a con but you get the point.
-DESTINY THIS DESTINY THAT. GOD STFU. I know destiny is a main focal point in the books but it was over done even there. I just got so tired of that word after watching for a while.
All in all its worth the watch if you're a fan of the Witcher games/books. I can't praise Henry enough for his performance though. Seriously.
All in all its worth the watch if you're a fan of the Witcher games/books. I can't praise Henry enough for his performance though. Seriously.
The one real issue i have with the show is that it doesn't do a great job of distinguishing between current and flashback scenes.
Don't usually write reviews but this 3rd season was so bad. Boring, weak soap opera, forcing narrative, been there done that garbage. The future is not bright for this show. The only bright spot was the monsters and they were few and far between.
It started as if it was going to be a great season, maybe one of the best scenes in the series but went stale instantly. Wayyyy to talky, very little action. The story was all over the place and the recaps were the only value. You can probably watch the recaps and be done with it. I'm not sure how episode 7 made it to the screen. And out of nowhere the narrative hits the bard... cmon when will this nonsense end.
Watch and you'll probably feel like you've seen everything in this season before in multiple shows and movies. Very dissatisfying and disappointing.
It started as if it was going to be a great season, maybe one of the best scenes in the series but went stale instantly. Wayyyy to talky, very little action. The story was all over the place and the recaps were the only value. You can probably watch the recaps and be done with it. I'm not sure how episode 7 made it to the screen. And out of nowhere the narrative hits the bard... cmon when will this nonsense end.
Watch and you'll probably feel like you've seen everything in this season before in multiple shows and movies. Very dissatisfying and disappointing.
Stars of "The Witcher" in Real Life
Stars of "The Witcher" in Real Life
See some of our favorite photos of Anya Chalotra, Henry Cavill, Freya Allan, and their "Witcher" co-stars.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesHenry Cavill's training for the role consisted of extensive sword-training (besides the rigorous bodybuilding required to prepare his physique for the camera). He said, "I spent all of my free time, and when I wasn't on set, with a sword in my hand. It was getting used to the weight of the sword, using it day in and day out. I had three swords where I lived, and four at work. And it was just non-stop practice, practice, practice."
- GaffesAt various instances, the incorrect sword type is used by Geralt. Geralt carries two swords: the dark-hilted sword with Renfri's broach on the crossguard is made of steel while the white-hilted sword is coated in silver. It is established that only silver works against monsters, especially for ensuring a killing blow. This straight-forward rule is not followed in various episodes of the series despite being mentioned in the first episode (and in latter episodes as well).
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Witcher have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Thợ Săn Quái Vật
- Lieux de tournage
- Ogrodzieniec, Slaskie, Pologne(castle)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant