Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA series of demoralizing auditions and an intense movement workshop push a struggling actor towards the edge.A series of demoralizing auditions and an intense movement workshop push a struggling actor towards the edge.A series of demoralizing auditions and an intense movement workshop push a struggling actor towards the edge.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Fotos
Slobodan Gajic
- Waiting Room Actor
- (as Robert Gajic)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Well, here it is. As raw as it can get. Very pleasant experience if you can find it and watch it. Pure boldness pushed it to 8/10 but final minutes deserve at least 9/10.
10globe-2
Okay, this is one of the freakiest, most nightmarish portrayals of an actor's life that you can imagine. I cannot get this film out of my head. It is quiet, it is spare, it is hopeless - and yet I could not look away; I had no idea what would come next (and I hate that people seem to WANT to always know in a film what's going to happen next). There are a handful of films that successfully portray the nightmare of Hollywood (Phantom of the Paradise, Sunset Blvd, Mulholland Drive, Barton Fink) and OK, GOOD deserves to be on that list. To say what it is NOT would spoil it, this is a unique sort of film experience; and oh, amidst the icy tension of it all it has a couple of genuine big laughs (but that might just be my sick sense of humor). I highly recommend this one if you are looking for something different. Very different, deliciously weird, and only frightening because it is so real.
This movie is ok, I suppose. Worth a watch, although it really does feel self-serving at times. It's not as good as The Matrix, however.
Paul Kaplan, played by Hugo Armstrong, is an aspiring actor who finds himself in audition after audition or in a movement workshop in a movie that will keep you searching for any redeemable aspect in its creativity-deprived zone.
Right from the start, we are thrown in an audition with Paul and other actors. The movie sets its own pace in the very first minutes, where audition footage is followed by images of said workshop, with the occasionally follow-through of Paul in his own car, often rehearsing his own audition lines. Daniel Martinico, director and co-writer of the movie, never departs from this formula and ends being a victim of his own simplistic concept. Even with its short runtime of 80 minutes, OK, Good feels overstretched, tiresome, and pointless. Its aim at conveying the struggles of a man trying to make a life as an actor could also be considered as the difficulties of aspiring actors who see in Hollywood a ticket to realize their dreams but also the reason for their impossibility. An interesting theme ineffectively executed.
Besides Armstrong's performance, the only, if somewhat dull, aspect that could be said stands out in the movie is the portrayal of a room, with everything in it, being teared apart. It definitely takes its time to show it, but nonetheless it offers an alluring depiction of how many objects are being broken before our eyes. The real feel it emanates from it can be funny yet sad, but mostly interesting since it symbolizes broken dreams. Overall, OK, Good has some moments here and there, mainly due to Hugo Armstrong, but overall, we are before a series of disjointed and boring group of scenes that testify to, once again, the unoriginality and lack of editing skills masqueraded as artistic freedom often found in independent films.
Right from the start, we are thrown in an audition with Paul and other actors. The movie sets its own pace in the very first minutes, where audition footage is followed by images of said workshop, with the occasionally follow-through of Paul in his own car, often rehearsing his own audition lines. Daniel Martinico, director and co-writer of the movie, never departs from this formula and ends being a victim of his own simplistic concept. Even with its short runtime of 80 minutes, OK, Good feels overstretched, tiresome, and pointless. Its aim at conveying the struggles of a man trying to make a life as an actor could also be considered as the difficulties of aspiring actors who see in Hollywood a ticket to realize their dreams but also the reason for their impossibility. An interesting theme ineffectively executed.
Besides Armstrong's performance, the only, if somewhat dull, aspect that could be said stands out in the movie is the portrayal of a room, with everything in it, being teared apart. It definitely takes its time to show it, but nonetheless it offers an alluring depiction of how many objects are being broken before our eyes. The real feel it emanates from it can be funny yet sad, but mostly interesting since it symbolizes broken dreams. Overall, OK, Good has some moments here and there, mainly due to Hugo Armstrong, but overall, we are before a series of disjointed and boring group of scenes that testify to, once again, the unoriginality and lack of editing skills masqueraded as artistic freedom often found in independent films.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDevin Sidell's debut.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 19 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was OK, Good (2012) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda