CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.8/10
4.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un cuento de hadas sobre el gran hilandero de cuento de Dinamarca llamado Hans Christian Andersen.Un cuento de hadas sobre el gran hilandero de cuento de Dinamarca llamado Hans Christian Andersen.Un cuento de hadas sobre el gran hilandero de cuento de Dinamarca llamado Hans Christian Andersen.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 6 premios Óscar
- 10 nominaciones en total
Zizi Jeanmaire
- Doro
- (as Jeanmaire The Famous French Ballerina)
Joseph Walsh
- Peter
- (as Joey Walsh)
Peter J. Votrian
- Lars
- (as Peter Votrian)
Lee Aaker
- Little Boy
- (sin créditos)
Patsy Bangs
- Dancer
- (sin créditos)
Arthur Berkeley
- Townsman
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
10arosedec
This was the movie that caused me to fall in love with Danny Kaye. I still love watching this movie more than 20 years after I saw it for the first time on television. I love his gentle nature with the children, in particular the little girl he sings "Thumbalina" to. Fabricated or not, this is one of his best films showing the true diversity of an incredibly talented man. Danny Kaye was surely one of the last of a dying Hollywood breed.
A fictional account of the life of storyteller Hans Christian Andersen. First, if you haven't read his stories, then you probably won't appreciate this movie as much as you should. It's a perfect excuse to read them with your family, then watch the movie. Second, if you're expecting a sophisticated, adult-oriented story, you will be disappointed; however, the morals to Hans' stories, as well as the movie's lessons, are very worthy. That said, the musical numbers are an absolute delight -- Danny Kaye never fails to deliver a wonderful performance, and where else can you learn to sing stories, instead of tell them, for your children? -- and the ballets are great for this venue. We even get to see the movie's choreographer dance in one of the numbers. This movie was nominated for several Oscars. It deserved those nominations. Don't skip this one, especially if you have small children.
10llltdesq
Whoever reviewed this film for Maltin's Guide (I wish they'd indicate who the reviewer is by initials or something. It'd make the book more useful) does not share my tastes. I personally don't care that it bears no relation to Andersen's life. They admit it up front. Judge a film by itself, not on it's supposed relation to reality! Given Andersen's real life and his moody, pessemistic nature, I doubt being more accurate would have been a good thing. The score is beautiful, the sets and Costumes are great and Danny Kaye was wonderful! I haven't seen the movie for a couple of years and I stll remember most of the score! Granted, it's not one of the all-time greats, but it's better than the Maltin review implies. A worthy effort. Recommended.
Every single biopic of a creative artist tells the same story, whether it's true or not: the Philistine World, or some part thereof, rejects the artist, and fails to see his greatness; but later on, perhaps during his lifetime, perhaps not, it sees the error of its ways. That happens here. Hans Christian Andersen is a village cobbler whose compulsive inventiveness is little thought of until he makes good in Copenhagen, after which...
But there's much more going on.
There's no doubt that Andersen was a great artist, in some sense. `The Ugly Duckling' and `The Emperor's New Clothes' are two of the greatest short stories - fables, folktales - all of these - ever composed. But he had his limitations. There were many kinds of stories he just couldn't write. His fertile talent for anthropomorphising was often a millstone. In many respects he seems to have been a childish and naive man. But get this: all of these limitations make it onto the screen. Both the story and Danny Kaye's performance (a great performance) make Andersen into a human being who is NOT the greatest storyteller since Shakespeare, but who can be admired for what he is.
The main story isn't the `unrecognised genius' bit: it's a story of unrequited love. While in Copenhagen Andersen spends most of his time banging his head against the wall over an unattainable ballerina, whose interest in him is, as they say, purely professional. He manages to be quite cruel to a close friend in the process, right up to the point where it's unclear that a reconciliation is possible. (Indeed, it's unclear whether or not one occurs.) When he realises what a fool he's been he just trudges back, defeated, to his village. And it's here we have the obligatory scene where the villagers realise how great he was after all, mainly by singing the highly memorable refrains of the movie's songs, one after the other. Well, the film needed some ending. I'm inclined to forgive this one.
There's also a lengthy Little Mermaid ballet - seven minutes long? more? - danced in its entirety. (We see a LOT of the ballerina's craft in Copenhagen.) This sort of thing wasn't too unusual in the 1950s but it's a genuine gamble in context - and one that I think pays off. By the time the ballet appears the cheery story of an eccentric village storyteller had become surprisingly dark. Vidor, it seems, would rather risk having people leave the cinema than insult those who remain. Good for him. I can't claim that this film works in every respect, and perhaps you won't like it, but I'm sure you won't feel cheated by it.
But there's much more going on.
There's no doubt that Andersen was a great artist, in some sense. `The Ugly Duckling' and `The Emperor's New Clothes' are two of the greatest short stories - fables, folktales - all of these - ever composed. But he had his limitations. There were many kinds of stories he just couldn't write. His fertile talent for anthropomorphising was often a millstone. In many respects he seems to have been a childish and naive man. But get this: all of these limitations make it onto the screen. Both the story and Danny Kaye's performance (a great performance) make Andersen into a human being who is NOT the greatest storyteller since Shakespeare, but who can be admired for what he is.
The main story isn't the `unrecognised genius' bit: it's a story of unrequited love. While in Copenhagen Andersen spends most of his time banging his head against the wall over an unattainable ballerina, whose interest in him is, as they say, purely professional. He manages to be quite cruel to a close friend in the process, right up to the point where it's unclear that a reconciliation is possible. (Indeed, it's unclear whether or not one occurs.) When he realises what a fool he's been he just trudges back, defeated, to his village. And it's here we have the obligatory scene where the villagers realise how great he was after all, mainly by singing the highly memorable refrains of the movie's songs, one after the other. Well, the film needed some ending. I'm inclined to forgive this one.
There's also a lengthy Little Mermaid ballet - seven minutes long? more? - danced in its entirety. (We see a LOT of the ballerina's craft in Copenhagen.) This sort of thing wasn't too unusual in the 1950s but it's a genuine gamble in context - and one that I think pays off. By the time the ballet appears the cheery story of an eccentric village storyteller had become surprisingly dark. Vidor, it seems, would rather risk having people leave the cinema than insult those who remain. Good for him. I can't claim that this film works in every respect, and perhaps you won't like it, but I'm sure you won't feel cheated by it.
"Once upon a time there lived in Denmark a great storyteller named Hans Christian Andersen. This is not the story of his life, but a fairy tale about the great spinner of fairy tales." This is a roundabout way of saying that this story of Andersen is NOT actually a biography and any resemblance to him and his life is strictly coincidental!! For folks like me who are retired history teachers, this is a very bad way to begin a story.
The story is very much a mixed bag. On the positive side, Danny Kaye is incredibly charming in the title role, at least most of the time. The film also is beautifully made...and looks marvelous. A few of the songs are delights. But what keeps this film from being better is the story....and Andersen's creepy fixation on a young ballerina. This actually isn't too far fetched for the real Andersen...as he had a habit of becoming infatuated with unattainable women. But this portion of the film ALSO brought with it ballet...lots and lots and lots of ballet. In fact, a very large chunk of the film consists of ballet...which is just fine if you like ballet AND thought the film was mostly about ballet. However, for me, it just frustrated the heck out of me...and eventually I found myself fast forwarding through this...it was just something I didn't enjoy and it seemed very much out of place in a family film. I am sure a lot of kids loved parts of the film...and practically died as they had to sit through all that dancing!
The story is very much a mixed bag. On the positive side, Danny Kaye is incredibly charming in the title role, at least most of the time. The film also is beautifully made...and looks marvelous. A few of the songs are delights. But what keeps this film from being better is the story....and Andersen's creepy fixation on a young ballerina. This actually isn't too far fetched for the real Andersen...as he had a habit of becoming infatuated with unattainable women. But this portion of the film ALSO brought with it ballet...lots and lots and lots of ballet. In fact, a very large chunk of the film consists of ballet...which is just fine if you like ballet AND thought the film was mostly about ballet. However, for me, it just frustrated the heck out of me...and eventually I found myself fast forwarding through this...it was just something I didn't enjoy and it seemed very much out of place in a family film. I am sure a lot of kids loved parts of the film...and practically died as they had to sit through all that dancing!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIn order to cover the necessary camera tricks, and to add "magic" to the Little Mermaid ballet, it was decided that, rather than presenting it as an actual ballet, they would have Hans imagine how it would look. This allowed them to do things on the screen which would be impossible on the stage.
- ErroresDuring the "Wonderful, Wonderful Copenhagen" song the concertina player directly behind the singer never moves his fingers on the keys.
- Créditos curiososOpening credits: "Once upon a time there lived in Denmark a great storyteller named Hans Christian Andersen. This is not the story of his life, but a fairy tale about this great spinner of fairy tales."
- ConexionesFeatured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: The Movies We Loved as Kids (1991)
- Bandas sonorasThe King's New Clothes
(uncredited)
Music and Lyrics by Frank Loesser
Sung by Danny Kaye and children
Reprised by Kaye, children, and Chorus in the Finale
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Hans Christian Andersen?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Hans Christian Andersen und die Tänzerin
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 4,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 52 minutos
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Hans Christian Andersen (1952) officially released in India in English?
Responda