PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,3/10
4,3 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Dexter Reed tiene una mala racha tras fracasar con otro de sus inventos. Por último, decide volver a Good Burger, donde Ed le recibe con los brazos abiertos y le devuelve su viejo trabajo.Dexter Reed tiene una mala racha tras fracasar con otro de sus inventos. Por último, decide volver a Good Burger, donde Ed le recibe con los brazos abiertos y le devuelve su viejo trabajo.Dexter Reed tiene una mala racha tras fracasar con otro de sus inventos. Por último, decide volver a Good Burger, donde Ed le recibe con los brazos abiertos y le devuelve su viejo trabajo.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Honor Mitchell
- Pickles
- (as Honor Mitchell)
Jack Kingston Shaw
- Onion
- (as a different name)
Reseñas destacadas
After watching the original one, I was excited for the sequel. I had kept my expectations low as I was not sure about the sequel.
For me, the movie was both silly and fun. The story was simple and childish (which it was meant to be) and story's concept was same as the original, the screenplay was an improvement over the original, the direction was simple and good and the performances were good. The humour was uneven, somewhere you laugh and somewhere the jokes fail to make you laugh.
Overall, it is a childish silly movie which is enjoyable to watch with your friends and family just like the original.
For me, the movie was both silly and fun. The story was simple and childish (which it was meant to be) and story's concept was same as the original, the screenplay was an improvement over the original, the direction was simple and good and the performances were good. The humour was uneven, somewhere you laugh and somewhere the jokes fail to make you laugh.
Overall, it is a childish silly movie which is enjoyable to watch with your friends and family just like the original.
Saw another review talking about the "magic" of the first film and how (basically) this movie is a disgrace to the "good burger" name but... come on.... the first movie wasn't really that great either. Ya im sure I enjoyed it more cause I was a kid and if I let myself be blinded by nostalgia I would hate this movie in comparison but both movies have the same ridiculous plot, silliness, corny acting, and over the top childish humor.
I actually kinda enjoyed watching it even though it definitely doesn't deserve anything above a 6/10 - the first movie had some special charm but let's not pretend it was a masterpiece. I actually expected this movie to be really bad so I went in with low expectations but about halfway through I realized it's actually pretty spot on quality wise when compared with the first movie.
That "special charm" of the first movie probably had everything to do with the time it came out and the fact that I was a kid then and that's the target audience! Sure there were some really memorable scenes from the first one but if I really go back and analyze I can't say it was really thaaat much better than this. I'd say the 1st was 6.5/10 (probably a 9/10 in my kid brain) so only a little bit better - I rewatched it in recent years and remember being really underwhelmed and thinking "this didn't age well" and "this was all so much better in my memory."
Point is... its about what you would expect.
I actually kinda enjoyed watching it even though it definitely doesn't deserve anything above a 6/10 - the first movie had some special charm but let's not pretend it was a masterpiece. I actually expected this movie to be really bad so I went in with low expectations but about halfway through I realized it's actually pretty spot on quality wise when compared with the first movie.
That "special charm" of the first movie probably had everything to do with the time it came out and the fact that I was a kid then and that's the target audience! Sure there were some really memorable scenes from the first one but if I really go back and analyze I can't say it was really thaaat much better than this. I'd say the 1st was 6.5/10 (probably a 9/10 in my kid brain) so only a little bit better - I rewatched it in recent years and remember being really underwhelmed and thinking "this didn't age well" and "this was all so much better in my memory."
Point is... its about what you would expect.
If you grew up watching Keenan and kel, All that, and good burger then you will like this movie. Its not going to win any awards but it made me laugh quite a bit with kels stupid antics. Without spoilers there's some epic non good burger cameos that I really appreciated. It's a stupid movie with a whole bunch of stupid jokes based around a really stupid concept in the first place. I really enjoyed it and a firm 3/5 stars is respectable for what it was and could be. It was just great to see both of them dudes back at it and honestly Kel stole the show! This movie was creatively great! So much nostalgia.
I am not the target audience for this type of movie. I only got it, on DVD, because my public library added it. So all it "cost" me was perhaps 90 minutes of my retiree time. I didn't watch the original "Good Burger" so all I had was to judge this one on its own merits.
I usually know if I am invested in a movie after 15 minutes. At 9 minutes into this one I was pretty sure I would not. It was confirmed after 15 minutes. Where to start?
It opens with Ed having a dream, it turns out he was asleep on the counter of Good Burger. Then when he starts talking he has what might be the most annoying voice ever in a move role. Then it degrades from there.
There is a story, of risking everything, even the money of friends and family, for a chemical that renders a home impossible to burn. In the inaugural demonstration, complete with audience in lawn chairs, including investor Mark Cuban, it fails badly.
The rest of the movie is to save face and reject a plan to have the Good Burger sold.
Frankly I don't know who the audience might be for this movie. The characters are overly silly, the story is overly silly, and the resolution is overly silly. For me, a big, big miss.
I usually know if I am invested in a movie after 15 minutes. At 9 minutes into this one I was pretty sure I would not. It was confirmed after 15 minutes. Where to start?
It opens with Ed having a dream, it turns out he was asleep on the counter of Good Burger. Then when he starts talking he has what might be the most annoying voice ever in a move role. Then it degrades from there.
There is a story, of risking everything, even the money of friends and family, for a chemical that renders a home impossible to burn. In the inaugural demonstration, complete with audience in lawn chairs, including investor Mark Cuban, it fails badly.
The rest of the movie is to save face and reject a plan to have the Good Burger sold.
Frankly I don't know who the audience might be for this movie. The characters are overly silly, the story is overly silly, and the resolution is overly silly. For me, a big, big miss.
The best way to describe this film is definitely "for the fans".
Chances are 26 years after the first film, that most of the audience will be older now, but it's chance to relive nostalgia for those, and make them feel like children again. It still contains lots of silly jokes. In my opinion, it's not as good as the first, but considering how low my hopes were for this film since the actors are older, also using a different director, I was pleasantly surprised.
Lots of surprise collaborations such as Yung Gravy, Kai Cenat, Mark Cuban, Pete Davidson etc which made the film feel like a fever dream at some points.
The film does seem to follow a similar plot to the last one, but still retains that "stupid" humor while managing to be somewhat new.
If you're thinking of watching this film without watching the other, don't bother. Watch the first film, then this or you probably won't get it. This film is not to stand out or make any marks, it's simply for the fans.
Chances are 26 years after the first film, that most of the audience will be older now, but it's chance to relive nostalgia for those, and make them feel like children again. It still contains lots of silly jokes. In my opinion, it's not as good as the first, but considering how low my hopes were for this film since the actors are older, also using a different director, I was pleasantly surprised.
Lots of surprise collaborations such as Yung Gravy, Kai Cenat, Mark Cuban, Pete Davidson etc which made the film feel like a fever dream at some points.
The film does seem to follow a similar plot to the last one, but still retains that "stupid" humor while managing to be somewhat new.
If you're thinking of watching this film without watching the other, don't bother. Watch the first film, then this or you probably won't get it. This film is not to stand out or make any marks, it's simply for the fans.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesSinbad, who voices the business manager, played Dexter's teacher Mr. Wheat in the first film.
- PifiasEd said that he talks since he was 8. However in the first movie he said that he spoke his first words at 6 while on "All That" in the "Good Burger"-Sketches he said that he said his first words at 11.
- Citas
Dexter Reed: Ed, are you using a plunger to unclog the shake machine as in the same plunger we use to unclog the toilet?
Ed: Uh, no?
- Créditos adicionalesThe closing credits show the cast and crew singing "He's a dude" and also a few additional scenes.
- ConexionesFeatured in Cinematic Venom: The Reboot: Good Burger 2 (2023) (2024)
- Banda sonoraIt's a Great Day for a Good Day
Performed by Kel Mitchell, Alexa Kahn, James III, and David Chen
Written by Kevin Kopelow, Heath Seifert, and Oak Felder
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Good Burger 2?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Buena hamburguesa 2
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Good Burger 2 (2023)?
Responde