PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,6/10
512
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Tony Harris intenta demostrar la veracidad de misteriosas fotos y grabaciones que muestran fenómenos aparentemente paranormales.Tony Harris intenta demostrar la veracidad de misteriosas fotos y grabaciones que muestran fenómenos aparentemente paranormales.Tony Harris intenta demostrar la veracidad de misteriosas fotos y grabaciones que muestran fenómenos aparentemente paranormales.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
I am a believer in the paranormal/supernatural. I love to watch programs which deal in 'is this fast or fiction'. An annoying aspect of many programs is the way the scenes are edited with anxiety-causing sounds as part of the transition. This show does not play any of those tricks with sound and/or using strobing. The best part of the show is watching them present the photo/video//sounds then they have respected specialists look at them using their tools to do their analysis. Great job! I hope this show continues to a second season.
To be honest, I love looking at the unusual things around us and trying to figure it out with logic, science and common sense. This show leaves me divided. I know that many things we see on the show can be misidentified, optical illusions or very rare, and some are complete hoaxes, but I also know that not all things can be easily explained even with science.
The scientific method requires the same results repeatedly, so when they speak to 1 expert for their 'opinion' without actually showing the scientific method, I am still left with doubts of credibility.
I love that they start by analyzing the video for inconsistencies since AI and video compositing can produce realistic results. This should be the first test in all cases. If it's a fake, stop there.
However, there's a 'Marine Biologist'... thats the only title. No credentials, no PHD or title or accolades to build credibility, who gives her opinion in debunking animal related incidents and that is 'fact'? I'm not saying she's not correct, it's still her words, opinions and observations. A generic title doesn't make an 'expert' and an opinion from this 'expert' isn't proof. I wish there were a little more science in some of the episodes and less opinion to quickly dismiss things that still could be something else.
The scientific method requires the same results repeatedly, so when they speak to 1 expert for their 'opinion' without actually showing the scientific method, I am still left with doubts of credibility.
I love that they start by analyzing the video for inconsistencies since AI and video compositing can produce realistic results. This should be the first test in all cases. If it's a fake, stop there.
However, there's a 'Marine Biologist'... thats the only title. No credentials, no PHD or title or accolades to build credibility, who gives her opinion in debunking animal related incidents and that is 'fact'? I'm not saying she's not correct, it's still her words, opinions and observations. A generic title doesn't make an 'expert' and an opinion from this 'expert' isn't proof. I wish there were a little more science in some of the episodes and less opinion to quickly dismiss things that still could be something else.
I have only watched a couple of episodes of ''The Proof is Out There'' but already find it a compelling show to watch, the experts who comment on each presentation are credible and the host Tony Harris keeps it interesting and moving at a nice pace.
''The Proof is Out There'' is presented like a Court Jury studying the evidence available and then making a decision on their findings, I like this format as it is not the decision of a single person, and you hear the different views of the experts followed by a summing up by the host Tony Harris, leaving you to form your own opinion after considering all that has been said.
Good to hear that it is continuing to a second season, and I will be happy to spend some time catching up on more episodes, recommend for anyone with a curious and inquiring mind.
''The Proof is Out There'' is presented like a Court Jury studying the evidence available and then making a decision on their findings, I like this format as it is not the decision of a single person, and you hear the different views of the experts followed by a summing up by the host Tony Harris, leaving you to form your own opinion after considering all that has been said.
Good to hear that it is continuing to a second season, and I will be happy to spend some time catching up on more episodes, recommend for anyone with a curious and inquiring mind.
First off I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. Having said that am I the only person to notice that Mr. Tony Harris is always in & only ever wears gray pants & a black shirt? Lol. I can't be the only one to notice this! Lol. I love Ya Tony Harris but come on, change up the wardrobe now & then. Lol. Although, in my opinion, you do look mighty fine in those black shirts & gray pants. Thanks for listening to my feedback. I'd absolutely love to hear back from somebody cuz I really do LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. So thanks for bringing something new to watch that studies all of these issues & stories that maybe weren't taken seriously or didn't get reported for fear of not being believed. I appreciate your efforts to bring these issues to light when maybe nobody else took them seriously before. I do know absolutely that there are many more stories out there that haven't been reported for fear of not being believed as well as the fear of being ridiculed for what some may consider as unbelievable tall tales. I say thank u to everyone who chose to continue their fights to be recognized & heard. I hear you & I believe you regardless of if you have proof of your encounters or any way of proving yourself or not & I truly believe that there are more people out there who believe you more than not & the people who dont believe you usually they are the people in a position to know if these things are happening or not.
So, I enjoy scientificly geared shows about strange events and phenomena... Ufo, Bigfoot etc. But this has a slight bias towards the truly wacky theories they barely need to present. Many "experts" are pretty good at explaining what's happening as normal, natural etc, but I'm not sure the show is really trying so hard to fully evaluate every video or photo. Maybe it's just me, but any history channel show that talks about ancient aliens before the reasonable archeological or anthropological explanations is filling up time or perpetuating Graham Hancock nonsense. Still a good way to find "urban legend" or famous alleged phenomena.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Everything New on Hulu in July
Everything New on Hulu in July
There's a whole lot to love about Hulu's streaming offerings this month — get excited for brand-new series premieres and film favorites to watch at home.
- How many seasons does The Proof is Out There have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Proof is Out There
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was La prueba está ahí fuera (2021) officially released in India in English?
Responde