Añade un argumento en tu idiomaAn over confident cricketer who ruins his career must prove his worth by starting all over againAn over confident cricketer who ruins his career must prove his worth by starting all over againAn over confident cricketer who ruins his career must prove his worth by starting all over again
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
Harman stars as Vijay Shekhawat, a small-town kid, brimming with batting potential, who gets selected to play for the Indian cricket team. His is an overnight success story. From anonymous newcomer to Next Big Thing, it doesn't take long for him to fall in the wrong company - in this case a cunning talent manager (played by Gulshan Grover) who lands him big endorsement deals, but also distracts him from the game and gets him addicted to wine, women and wealth. By the time our hero realises he's lost everything that's dear to him, it's a tad too late. But nothing that a lazy screenplay-writer can't solve by resorting to the oldest clichés in the book.Victory too is more predictable than the weather in Alaska.Victory, unfortunately, is a completely forgettable film whose scenes play out exactly how you'd expect them to. Sports films often follow the same blueprint; there's rarely any surprise in how a film about cricket or football or hockey will turn out - the hero's side always wins. You see, the trick is not in the ending, but in how you reach the ending. Think about it - were you surprised that the villagers beat the British in "Lagaan", or that the Indian women's hockey team won the match in "Chak De India"? No, you knew that was going to happen twenty minutes into both films. It's the journey up to that expected ending that made both those films special. The problem with Victory is, there is nothing to discover, nothing to surprise you, and nothing exciting at all about how it reaches its expected ending. Amateurishly directed by Ajitpal Mangat, the film is laughable in its supposedly emotional scenes, and too long by at least twenty minutes. The climax, a real hoot, is inspired much from Indian cricket history, with creative liberties thrown in for good measure. So you have six sixers back-to-back, and one final one that smashes the floodlights. All this delivered by our hero who's bleeding profusely from the head, his vision blurred from the injury. Now the big question - has Harman improved since "Love Story 2050"? Well, he's lost some of his stiffness, and his acting's a lot less labored for sure. But it's going to take a much better film and a less stereotyped character for him to show what he's really got. I would recommend, additionally, that he fire his make-up man instantly - the patches on the forehead, the uneven pancake really doesn't make much of an impression. Amrita Rao is wasted as our hero's childhood love; and Anupam Kher hams it up as Shekhawat's upright father, cracking you up with his rhythmic paralytical spasms. It is a film that reduces real heroes like Harbhajan Singh and Brett Lee to junior artistes in the background. Watch it only if you have a high threshold for pain.
Watched it because I had a few hours to kill and in hindsight I should have just wasted those three hours staring at the sky then watching this movie.
An impressive list of cricketers make their debut with this movie though most of them can be seen only for a few seconds each. The story was PATHETIC. I didn't think Harman Baweja could sink lower than Love Story 2050 but he has managed to do that. The story simply did not make much sense and most of the cricket scenarios are extremely difficult in real life. Getting selected for the Indian team after just one national match is something even Sachin Tendulkar could not manage. It was as if every ball he faced would go outside the boundary which is nearly impossible in real life. Even the reasons why the mob attacks his house are flimsy.
The only saving grace were the various cricketers from around the world. Harman Baweja does not know how to act. Amrita Rao looked pretty. Anumpam Kher was good.
Trust me, save yourself the admission fees and donate it instead. The entire theater (which would be around 10 people on the first day of release) was laughing at every point in the story because of its stupidity, even the "tragic" moments at the end of the movie.
PS : Show me one cricketer who can hit a ball so high and hard, that it would break the floodlights :P
An impressive list of cricketers make their debut with this movie though most of them can be seen only for a few seconds each. The story was PATHETIC. I didn't think Harman Baweja could sink lower than Love Story 2050 but he has managed to do that. The story simply did not make much sense and most of the cricket scenarios are extremely difficult in real life. Getting selected for the Indian team after just one national match is something even Sachin Tendulkar could not manage. It was as if every ball he faced would go outside the boundary which is nearly impossible in real life. Even the reasons why the mob attacks his house are flimsy.
The only saving grace were the various cricketers from around the world. Harman Baweja does not know how to act. Amrita Rao looked pretty. Anumpam Kher was good.
Trust me, save yourself the admission fees and donate it instead. The entire theater (which would be around 10 people on the first day of release) was laughing at every point in the story because of its stupidity, even the "tragic" moments at the end of the movie.
PS : Show me one cricketer who can hit a ball so high and hard, that it would break the floodlights :P
Victory is perhaps one of the best sports movies i have ever seen. Of course its predictable but so are all sports movies. Harman's acting was the only reason why i didn't vote it 10/10. The script is taut, emotional and very racy. I loved amrita rau;s performance, she's very pretty too. Victory is beautiful because its not a typical bollywood flick, the romance is not typical bollywood, there's no dancing and prancing around the trees and there's no melodrama despite being strong on emotions. The simple story of a cricketer who rises from ashes to glory is very simply put without going overboard with fancy gimmicks or fancy camera movements. In fact i remember Richard attenborough's quote after Gandhi that "the best films are the ones which are most simply told without complicating issues and without letting technique overtake the storytelling" and i would say the director ajitpal mangit has done exactly that. He is a master storyteller, one of the best from bollywood. VICTORY TO VICTORY
Only rated it 10 for pure inspiration(NOT FOR FILM MAKING//I know I am sure there are many high budget movie projects happening all around the globe everyday//but this one has place in realistic INDIAN inspiration//looks very real Tragedy). I think it is more inspiring than Lagan. I do not care about the less business/ratings of this one in comparison. Victory is well made better subject/worked than lagan(No issues with that actor,infact I like tare zameen par also) but Victory (Looks Intelligent/Realistic both with story & intelligent title). Most importantly Great cricketers of 2000's generation are covered in this one irrespective of countries. Wish Dale steyn was also included in this one though & climax shows Rohit Yuvraj(disguised as Pankaj or something) but why not??? incidences of VIRENDER SEHWAG?? Sh. Akhtar ,,,,Sachin Tendulkar Ricky Punter were included. No issues with brett lee(nice Bond work) side(I only like him in sports when in India. NOT when in Australia//must be great rival respectful bowler for his birth country though). Average yet entertaining. START IS FILMED REALLY INTELLIGENT(on overall Religious coverage).
10manasb85
With Victory Hanman Baweja has proved the kind of talent he has.Its one of the best sports movies I've ever seen.And the presence of International Cricketers like Brett Lee & Graeme Smith really put loads of realism in the story.
In todays world when cinema goers can like stupid movies like Dhol & Dhamaal, Victory was miles ahead in every sense of the word.The only negative point in the movie was the the shallow footage given to a talented actress like Amrita Rao.It was Harman's movie all the way.Anupam Kher was very good and so were other actors in their respective roles.Music was nothing to write about, except "Balla Ghooma, Chakka Laga".
Hritik look alike or not Harman will surely carve a niche for himself in the near future provided he picks and chooses his projects carefully.
In todays world when cinema goers can like stupid movies like Dhol & Dhamaal, Victory was miles ahead in every sense of the word.The only negative point in the movie was the the shallow footage given to a talented actress like Amrita Rao.It was Harman's movie all the way.Anupam Kher was very good and so were other actors in their respective roles.Music was nothing to write about, except "Balla Ghooma, Chakka Laga".
Hritik look alike or not Harman will surely carve a niche for himself in the near future provided he picks and chooses his projects carefully.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAnil Kapoor was signed for Gulshan Grover's role but opted out due to realizing the role was too small.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Victory: From Ashes to Glory
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 39.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 513.779 US$
- Duración2 horas 40 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Victory (2009) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde