Türkler Geliyor: Adaletin Kilici

They claim to have spent a huge budget on production but the cheap CGI and costumes were a huge disappointment.

The actors? Who are these lead actors? The main character Sungur is a horrible actor. Why did they choose a nobody for this role? Do you know how painful it is to watch bad acting for 2 hours. Everytime this Sungur character was to show emporium it was horribly exaggerated. His crying scenes, when he was using his "sword of justice", when he was giving his speech to the other raiders everytime this face was terrible. Why didn't this producer choose someone with real acting skills?

The girl played by ECE. Where do we start. Another nobody actor. Bad acting skills to match her "costar". Their scenes together didn't move me one moment.

This film maybe could have been saved with actors who have actual acting skills. Instead of these no names with no skills. There is nothing worse than watching a film with bad acting.

Next time spend less money on this production and pay some real actors to star in your film. I can see how only 500,000 people saw this film. I couldn't recommend it to be seen by anyone.

In this movie the christians are not unconditionally angelic. In this movie the Turks are not animals or barbarians. In this movie the muslims are fighting against evil. In this movie the Serbian king is depicted as an evil person. If these FACTS will bother you, then don't even consider watching this movie. This is not a documentary, and hence it won't be historically 100% accurate. There will be fiction added, like any other movie. If these will give you a headache then don't watch this movie.

But, for everybody else, this is a great action movie.

This is meant to be a Turkish history movie. The actings were very bad, scenerio was awful, if you aren't a kid, I mean Mehmet Bozdag has a great popularizm and influence but he chosed this movie to become a propaganda tool. Take these movies seriously. Because of these films there are no Turkish history movie tradition or casting. In our history movies there is either a bad guy or a good guy. This is so irrational. This looks like it is cheap American Hollywood movie but with cheaper production. They can save the day with CGI. WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH BUDGET so please have more Labor on the movie scripts.

The film is more than good compared to those that have a higher rating. We are aware that individuals will give a lower rating due to political or religious differences. Especially from those who are presented here as villains. Just as history is written by the victors, so the country that makes the film positions itself as a benefactor, a winner... As for the film itself, it is in many ways better than some Greek and Viking mythologies. Not to mention Bollywood movies. Let's put that aside historical facts, the film is well thought out, of course every film depends on the budget. The costumes are more than solid, the fight scenes are attractive, the actresses and actors have their own charisma and the acting is not bad. Turkish cinematography is expanding and better films can be expected.

So basically the previous reviewers are upset that a movie is not a documentary? The movie itself is great. Action adventure and good story telling.

It appears the reviewers overlook the self glorification in western movies (which generally are also devoid of facts) and take offence that the good guys for once are not English/American/European/Christian. And in fact they are actually the bad guy!