Jaws of Los Angeles

Is money so worthless that people throw it at backing movies like this???

Worst director ever. As with all of his movies, 90% of the "film" is padding, and the other 10% is overexposed, under-lit, shaky, or grainy. This is as unwatchable as everything else he's done. Here's an offbeat idea Dustin, next time you make a shark attack movie, consider adding a shark attack.

The cast of characters remains the same. Mel Novak, Brinke Stevens, Dawn Heisey, Ken May, etc. None of these people would be working actors but for the existence of this director. Wooden and lifeless, just like the film.

Do we have the technology yet to create a shock collar that prevents Dustin Ferguson from ever holding a camera again?

Lots and lots of stock footage of fish swimming serenely under water, people walking along the beach, long range footage of a shark swimming, etc but no footage of a shark actually attacking somebody. Interspersed with extremely bad acting. Add a terrible script and a director who doesn't know or care what he is doing.

The only redeeming feature was that some of the songs on the soundtrack were not bad.

A 10 dollar budget filmed on a 5 dollar camera with free "actors".

Quite atrociously bad in every respect. No story to speak of, certainly no followable plot, absolutely no acting, and without seeming offensive (as I'm certainly no looker), some of the ugliest people I've ever seen on film that are supposedly attractive!

Add to the list of awfulness the fact that there is, visually speaking, NO shark attacks what so ever, then you get what is basically a lot of stock footage interspersed with chronic camerawork and no story line.

Seriously, put your body parts in a blender and watch them liquify - it's more fun to see.