Añade un argumento en tu idiomaResidents of an old apartment complex in Vancouver's west end interact with the superintendent and the owners of the adjoining grocery store, their lives narrated through songs.Residents of an old apartment complex in Vancouver's west end interact with the superintendent and the owners of the adjoining grocery store, their lives narrated through songs.Residents of an old apartment complex in Vancouver's west end interact with the superintendent and the owners of the adjoining grocery store, their lives narrated through songs.
- Premios
- 6 premios y 31 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
If this isn't a 10 out of 10, then I'm not sure what could be.
The authenticity is undeniable. The characters feel real, their stories feel real.
You see glimpses of these characters in yourself, your family, your surroundings-at work, the grocery store, everywhere.
This is what television should be.
It's a journey of discovery into the lives of real people struggling around us, people whose hardships we may not see or understand.
This show opened my eyes to so many life experiences I hadn't encountered or understood.
The direction is beautifully refined, introducing these lives to us in a gentle, seamless way.
Each episode left me thinking: this is real, and it's why people respond the way they do.
The authenticity is undeniable. The characters feel real, their stories feel real.
You see glimpses of these characters in yourself, your family, your surroundings-at work, the grocery store, everywhere.
This is what television should be.
It's a journey of discovery into the lives of real people struggling around us, people whose hardships we may not see or understand.
This show opened my eyes to so many life experiences I hadn't encountered or understood.
The direction is beautifully refined, introducing these lives to us in a gentle, seamless way.
Each episode left me thinking: this is real, and it's why people respond the way they do.
This show was boring.
For the first thing I do not know at all why this show is on the comedy network.
It clearly is not a comedy show! Second off the show is just boring, I don't like any of the characters and hate all the whining that takes place in the show.
Hank and Lucy from Corner Gas are the exact same two characters they play in that show, one of the reasons they are so boring.
I don't care about the characters or stories, it's just a bad, boring show.
For the first thing I do not know at all why this show is on the comedy network.
It clearly is not a comedy show! Second off the show is just boring, I don't like any of the characters and hate all the whining that takes place in the show.
Hank and Lucy from Corner Gas are the exact same two characters they play in that show, one of the reasons they are so boring.
I don't care about the characters or stories, it's just a bad, boring show.
This is a great comedy-drama that we both loved. Gabrielle Miller is awesome. There are some weak links in the rest of the cast (it is mostly an ensemble type show with a lot of characters getting a lot of story time each), but mostly the acting is average to better than average. Decent writing. I would say it is actually more of a drama with comedy elements than vice versa, but definitely worth watching, just don't expect it to be hilarious because it is more about the characters with just some comedy sprinkled in.
I don't know this for a fact, but I think it was always intended as a limited series. But I could be wrong.
Overall, it was a show about the tenants in the building (Robson Arms) and the lives they lived. Each episode had good quality actors and comedians. All the tenants got an episode or two and a chance to shine. The acting was good and each episode had a few very funny moments. I was hoping for more of the Megan Follows and Mark McKinney storyline to show up though.
I hope CTV saw what they had and tries this format again. I'd watch it again.
Overall, it was a show about the tenants in the building (Robson Arms) and the lives they lived. Each episode had good quality actors and comedians. All the tenants got an episode or two and a chance to shine. The acting was good and each episode had a few very funny moments. I was hoping for more of the Megan Follows and Mark McKinney storyline to show up though.
I hope CTV saw what they had and tries this format again. I'd watch it again.
There's a good idea here: every episode goes behind a different door in the same apartment building - lending itself easily to guest roles and featured bits, without requiring all the cast to be in every episode. Except ...
Well, first up is the first episode, which fails to give us any sense of the overall residents. The second episode dispenses with Ep1's main characters in a cameo, then occupies itself entirely with the residents of another room. Sure, why not? Except it means all the personal suffering we put up with in one has no dramatic meaning to the next; the only real continuity is the building itself. So we're basically getting a different show, just taking place in the same building.
Well, that can be good, right? Except it isn't very; 22 minutes feels a lot longer, and it's not long enough to do anything more than be (of course!) episodic. Which could work for a comedy, but this isn't one: it's a series of vignettes that aren't generally humorous (with the notable exception of the Cantonese-speaking mother-in-law in the convenience store). Of course, some may find it humorous when children speak lines that should be for adults, or when adults speak lines which are childish -- and these can indeed be very funny, and have been in other productions. But they aren't funny here, because the overall tone is one of sadness and disconnection. Yes, the acting is good, but the result tends toward pathetic or depressing (again, excepting the Cantonese-speaking mother-in-law). If that's your idea of comedy, this is your show.
Well, first up is the first episode, which fails to give us any sense of the overall residents. The second episode dispenses with Ep1's main characters in a cameo, then occupies itself entirely with the residents of another room. Sure, why not? Except it means all the personal suffering we put up with in one has no dramatic meaning to the next; the only real continuity is the building itself. So we're basically getting a different show, just taking place in the same building.
Well, that can be good, right? Except it isn't very; 22 minutes feels a lot longer, and it's not long enough to do anything more than be (of course!) episodic. Which could work for a comedy, but this isn't one: it's a series of vignettes that aren't generally humorous (with the notable exception of the Cantonese-speaking mother-in-law in the convenience store). Of course, some may find it humorous when children speak lines that should be for adults, or when adults speak lines which are childish -- and these can indeed be very funny, and have been in other productions. But they aren't funny here, because the overall tone is one of sadness and disconnection. Yes, the acting is good, but the result tends toward pathetic or depressing (again, excepting the Cantonese-speaking mother-in-law). If that's your idea of comedy, this is your show.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesGabrielle Miller and Fred Ewanuick appeared in this series concurrently with their starring roles in Corner Gas (2004).
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Robson Arms have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Robson Arms (2005) officially released in India in English?
Responde