PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,4/10
18 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Los cazarrecompensas del futuro transportan a un piloto de carreras condenado a la ciudad de Nueva York en 2009, donde su mente será reemplazada por la de un multimillonario muerto.Los cazarrecompensas del futuro transportan a un piloto de carreras condenado a la ciudad de Nueva York en 2009, donde su mente será reemplazada por la de un multimillonario muerto.Los cazarrecompensas del futuro transportan a un piloto de carreras condenado a la ciudad de Nueva York en 2009, donde su mente será reemplazada por la de un multimillonario muerto.
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesSir Anthony Hopkins (McCandless) called it "a terrible film" in a later interview.
- PifiasWhen Alex is fleeing from Vacendak right after Julie Redlun first encounters Alex in the year 2009, Alex rams a car chasing him and then turns sharply to throw a random bad guy from the hood. As he makes the turn, the camera shows him shifting using a manual transmission in the center console and engaging the clutch, but when he throws the car back into gear it shows a shot of an vehicle with an automatic transmission with the shifter on the side of the steering column.
- ConexionesFeatured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: Memo to the Academy - 1992 (1992)
- Banda sonoraHit Between the Eyes
Written by Klaus Meine (as K. Meine), Rudolf Schenker (as R. Schenker), Herman Rarebell (as H. Rarebell) and Jim Vallance (as J. Vallence)
Performed by Scorpions
Courtesy of Mercury/PolyGram Records Inc.
Reseña destacada
I lap up anything with Emilio Estevez. I've always thought he was extremely underrated. Sometimes, he picks the silliest scripts. I did have some fun with this movie, but It's far from a good movie. The futuristic storyline has been done to death, and nothing really stands out about it. It has some entertaining action, good humor, and a great cast to keep you watching. As much as I love Emilio, he's not really the action star type. That being said, he managed to pull it off with his natural charisma. He borders on cockiness at times, but his charisma manages to keep him likable and easy to root for. Mick Jagger is terrible as the villain. He should have kept his day job, in lieu of dabbling into acting. Anthony Hopkins is here for a paycheck, nothing more. Rene Russo is classy as usual. She takes a one-dimensional part and makes it worthwhile. That's what genuine talent is able to do.
I enjoy it for what it is! Then again, I dig anything that is enjoyably cheesy. This movie falls under that category. They were obviously aiming for much more, but they weren't able to pull it off. Keep your expectations low, and you'll have a decent time
5.5/10
I enjoy it for what it is! Then again, I dig anything that is enjoyably cheesy. This movie falls under that category. They were obviously aiming for much more, but they weren't able to pull it off. Keep your expectations low, and you'll have a decent time
5.5/10
- callanvass
- 16 abr 2015
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Freejack?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Freejack
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 30.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 17.129.026 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 6.736.243 US$
- 20 ene 1992
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 17.129.026 US$
- Duración1 hora 50 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Freejack: Sin identidad (1992)?
Responde