Las edades de Lulú

In Madrid, the teenager Lulu (Francesca Neri) has a crush on Pablo (Oscar Ladoire), who is the best friend of her brother Marcelo (Fernando Guillén Cuervo). One day, they go together to a concert and Lulu loses her virginity with Pablo. However, he travels to the United States and Lulu misses him.

When he returns, they meet each other and Pablo proposes Lulu to marry him. Soon they befriend the travesty Ely (María Barranco) and play sexual games with her. Later they have a daughter, Ines.

One day, after a party, Pablo blindfolds Lulu and proposes a threesome; when Lulu discovers that she had an incestuous relation with Marcelo, she leaves Pablo to live with Ines in an apartment. Lulu feels bored and soon she is addicted in kinky and bizarre sex with gays in the underground of Madrid. Her erotic journey descends to hell when she meets the dangerous Remy (Juan Graell) that invites her to the world of sadomasochism.

"Las Edades de Lulú" is a film by Bigas Luna immediately after the cult "Angustia" that discloses the erotic and dramatic journey of a Spanish woman to the underworld of the bizarre sex in Madrid. I saw this movie for the first time in the early 90's (last time was on 29 Aug 1999 on VHS), and today I have just seen it again on DVD and this film has not aged.

Francesca Neri is very beautiful and sexy and I did not recall that "Las Edades de Lulú" is the debut of Javier Bardem in a feature. I would like to highlight that this movie is sexually violent and perverted reaching the boundary with pornography and is only recommended for very specific audiences. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "As Idades de Lulu" ("The Ages of Lulu")

How the hell did the great actor Javier Bardem agree to work in this piece of garbage. He is in a couple of graphic sex scenes with bothe men and women.

Francesca Neri is beautiful and plays the title character Lulu from the age of fifteen(Neri was twenty-five) when she hooks up with a much older friend of her brother and within the first ten minutes, Pablo has her sitting in a chair while he proceeds to shave her private area with a razor. I am astounded that this was released as a mainstream film.

The pair are constantly in heat and Lulu gives birth to a daughter. Pablo has a threesome and Lulu leaves and becomes fascinated by the sex lives of gay men and joins in their couplings.

Please avoid this trash.

Bigas Luna's adaptation of Almudena Grandes' provocative novel arrives with visual flair but struggles to transform literary sensuality into compelling cinema. The film's atmosphere oscillates between Madrid's sun-drenched streets and shadowy underground spaces, creating a visual dichotomy that mirrors its protagonist's journey from innocence to experience. Luna's camera work captures intimate moments with a voyeuristic intensity, though the cinematography occasionally feels more calculated than organic, particularly during the film's more explicit sequences.

The cast delivers uneven performances across the board. Francesca Neri brings a magnetic presence to the titular Lulú, embodying both vulnerability and awakening desire with natural charisma. Her performance anchors the film's emotional core, even when the script veers into melodramatic territory. Óscar Ladoire as Pablo provides adequate support as the older lover who initiates Lulú's sexual awakening, though his portrayal lacks the complexity needed to make their relationship truly compelling. The supporting cast, including a young Javier Bardem in his film debut, offers glimpses of talent that would later flourish, but here serves more as atmospheric texture than substantial character development.

Luna's direction shows ambition in tackling themes of sexual liberation and self-discovery, yet the execution feels uneven. The film's pacing drags during certain sequences while rushing through others that deserve more contemplation. The explicit content, while integral to the story's exploration of female sexuality, sometimes feels gratuitous rather than genuinely revealing of character or theme. The movie's attempt to balance art house sensibilities with mainstream appeal results in a work that satisfies neither camp completely.

The production design effectively captures early 1990s Madrid, with locations ranging from bourgeois apartments to seedy nightclubs creating a believable world for Lulú's transformation. However, the film's exploration of dangerous sexual territory feels more sensationalist than psychologically truthful, undermining its pretensions toward serious drama about female empowerment and sexual agency.

As some films those has been a dime for cinephiles here another nugget to pin as favourite on the board. The actors very keenly learned acting and staged it with a good practice of reading. Yeah they nailed it.

I have been shocked and stunned by saw "Love (2015)" by Gaspar noe and thought he was the first to break the laws of film certifications but now I'm struct between the melodies and cinematography in this film. I even said to myself that "we found father of noe"

This must be one of the inspiration for Gaspar. It's obvious. And in 1990's period oh my god I couldn't think how mature the writers and the Director was.

Plus I donno why it got so low rating for a monumental modern script. Well if it would be screen now I'm solid this would reach every laptops on the movie lovers

This is the story of a woman through told pretty much through her sex life. As the film progresses we watch as her life goes from one of normalcy to one on the fringes of "normal" society, and its a course mirrored by her sex life. It is a very lurid film that pretty much covers every sexual subject you can think of, and probably some you can't. Its a well made movie that is so close to being an explicit film that one wonders why they didn't bother to go all the way and not shy away from showing it all. But its not really about the sex, since this is a smutty film that has the belief that its about something other than just showing hot sweaty sex. I'm not sure if thats true or not. Actually I'm not sure what I think of this film. frankly its one of those movies that you see and aren't enthused by, but which you find yourself haunted by none the less. There is something about the film that keeps me wondering if its not better than I think it is. Then again it maybe the desire to see the hot sweaty sex again (It really is steamy)

If you're not prudish and ready to deal with sex in all of its varieties then by all means dive in and give it a try. If you are offended by anything other than straight forward heterosexual sex, then stay away.