PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,9/10
2,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un equipo de estafadores planea una nueva estafa consistente en apostar en un combate de boxeo, pero una de sus antiguas víctimas pretende vengarse eliminando a todo el grupo.Un equipo de estafadores planea una nueva estafa consistente en apostar en un combate de boxeo, pero una de sus antiguas víctimas pretende vengarse eliminando a todo el grupo.Un equipo de estafadores planea una nueva estafa consistente en apostar en un combate de boxeo, pero una de sus antiguas víctimas pretende vengarse eliminando a todo el grupo.
- Nominado para 1 premio Óscar
- 1 nominación en total
José Pérez
- Carlos (Lonnegan's Guard)
- (as Jose Perez)
Francis X. McCarthy
- Lonnegan's Thug
- (as Frank McCarthy)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesA further 'Sting' movie was planned around the time of the production and release of this sequel. This film was intended to be prequel to El golpe (1973) and cover the early life of Henry Gondorff who was played by Paul Newman in the original. The prequel was to show him being mentored El buscavidas (1961)-style by famed con man Soapy Smith. When 'The Sting II' failed at the box office, plans for this third 'Sting' movie were dropped.
- PifiasBoth times that Hooker rides the Coney Island roller coaster, his cap stays neatly in place, on his head, for the entire ride. In reality, that type of coaster can reach speeds of 60-70mph. His cap should've blown off during the first drop.
- Citas
Fargo Gondorff: [Pointing his finger] Don't you ever call me a hustler.
- ConexionesFeatured in At the Movies: The Stinkers of 1983 (1983)
- Banda sonoraThe Chrysanthemum
Written by Scott Joplin
Reseña destacada
I loved the first film, but when I saw that there had been a sequel, I was suspicious: normally, they are always much weaker than the originals. And so it was! This film is nothing more than a pale shadow of its predecessor. It attempts to follow up the story of the con artists from the first film, with a script set four to five years later, however it is a much weaker, disjointed, conventional and predictable story. It's not really worth summarizing: suffice it to say that the crooks are back to avenge a comrade who was killed.
The cast is completely different from the original film, and that was one of the first red flags for me, even before the start. If the first film was a nest of first-rate artists like Robert Shaw, Robert Redford or Paul Newman, this film relies on weaker actors because the first ones didn't want to return to the project. And my red flags raised higher when I saw that it was another director, Jeremy Kagan. I don't know him, but I wasn't impressed with his work here.
When we talk about the actors, the best we have is Jackie Gleason. He's not great, but he does a good job, with commitment and some talent, that deserves a very positive note. Mac Davis is much less successful, not going much beyond average. The same can be said of Karl Malden and Teri Garr, who do not shine in their roles. It's very little and doesn't meet the expectations at all, especially those of the public who saw the original film.
Technically, the film shines due to its cinematography, good color and initial credits, which are a nod to the original film. This was very enjoyable and gave the film a really nice family comedy feel. I also liked most of the sets and costumes, as well as the period recreation. The problem is the soundtrack. If the first film used intelligently a series of melodies by Scott Joplin, one of the great composers in vogue at the time, this film was completely unable to do a similar exercise. However, the original soundtrack made by Lalo Schiffrin was good enough to deserve an Oscar nomination. The only nomination, which is still another bad note if we consider that the first film was nominated ten times and "cleaned" the auditorium by taking seven statuettes.
The cast is completely different from the original film, and that was one of the first red flags for me, even before the start. If the first film was a nest of first-rate artists like Robert Shaw, Robert Redford or Paul Newman, this film relies on weaker actors because the first ones didn't want to return to the project. And my red flags raised higher when I saw that it was another director, Jeremy Kagan. I don't know him, but I wasn't impressed with his work here.
When we talk about the actors, the best we have is Jackie Gleason. He's not great, but he does a good job, with commitment and some talent, that deserves a very positive note. Mac Davis is much less successful, not going much beyond average. The same can be said of Karl Malden and Teri Garr, who do not shine in their roles. It's very little and doesn't meet the expectations at all, especially those of the public who saw the original film.
Technically, the film shines due to its cinematography, good color and initial credits, which are a nod to the original film. This was very enjoyable and gave the film a really nice family comedy feel. I also liked most of the sets and costumes, as well as the period recreation. The problem is the soundtrack. If the first film used intelligently a series of melodies by Scott Joplin, one of the great composers in vogue at the time, this film was completely unable to do a similar exercise. However, the original soundtrack made by Lalo Schiffrin was good enough to deserve an Oscar nomination. The only nomination, which is still another bad note if we consider that the first film was nominated ten times and "cleaned" the auditorium by taking seven statuettes.
- filipemanuelneto
- 12 sept 2023
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Sting II?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 6.347.072 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 3.106.108 US$
- 21 feb 1983
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 6.347.072 US$
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was El golpe II (1983) officially released in India in English?
Responde