The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich

A leader of low intellect who specialises in insulting people and inventing racial lies, with the help of big business, finds himself leader of the country, despite polling a minority of the votes. Blaming all of the nation's trouble on foreigners and minorities, and vows to create an employment surge while make the country great again. Not that there are any parallels in the world today (2017). This ought to be required viewing for every schoolchild and, in fact, everybody , as it is a comprehensive, detailed look at the reasons why one limited individual with only a twisted philosophy of hate rose to become a murderous monster, wreaking terror across Europe. Aided by sparing use of witness interviews and Shirer's own comments, this is a towering account of a horrific era.

This documentary showcases the Hitlerian strategy for conquering hearts and minds by exploiting people's capacity to hate, something as relevant in our time as it seems to have been in his. This is a lesson which is especially worth remembering at this point in history.

I might also add that the IMDb has goofed here, and that the narrator is not Richard Basehart, but in fact whoever it is is never identified in the titles. Also, while the music is darkly effective, it turns out that for some odd reason Lalo Schifrin reprises a prominent piece of his MISSION IMPOSSIBLE score (a march) even though that show was still running in prime time when this came out in 1968.

This also leads me to another point -- one of the other reviewers here made the bizarre comment that the Cold War was over in connection with this documentary; to the contrary, in 1968 it was still going strong, heated as it was by the escalating war in Vietnam. That reviewer also gets his dates wrong with regard to the United States; it entered the war against Hitler in December, 1941, not 1944. Before Christmas, 1942, the US not only had a significant presence at sea fighting German U-boats (it had actually begun that months before hostilities between the two were formally declared in 1941), but it had been an equal partner (at least) of the British in carrying out the invasion of North Africa. By the end of 1943 it had been the leading actor in conquering Sicily and invading Italy, and had began striking Germany in the European war's only daylight strategic bombing campaign.

The only problem I have with this version is that it is way too abbreviated, and Richard Basehart is not the narrator! I saw a longer abbreviated version on TNT in the early 1990s, but have never been able to find it. The Wolper office at UC will not release the original 6 hour version for some very unexplainable reason. What a shame for such a great documentary. The person I spoke with on the phone did not give a reason for this. This is a great film version of Shirer's book with the same title. It is a great summary of life in Germany from 1918-1945, a period of unbelievable importance to today's world, a period which indeed did change the world.

Based on the best-selling book by the same name, this film documents the events that led to Germany transitioning from a democracy to a totalitarian state and from there to complete ruin. True to much of the book this documentary focuses mainly on the methods used by Adolf Hitler to achieve complete domination upon his subjects and the pure evil which resulted. Perhaps the most powerful point of this film was the way the Nazis treated the Jews and it was brought home very poignantly by the drawings of Jewish children on a wall prior to being led to their execution. Although quite sad it also serves as a very powerful indictment as well. Now, while I would have certainly preferred more details on the Russian Front as well as that by the Allies, this documentary provides more than enough historical information to keep the attention of most viewers from beginning to end. I have rated the film accordingly. Above average.

Unfortunately the aftertaste is very bitter. Yes because of the unthinkable mass killings done by Nazis but even more so because of a subjective way of introducing facts when it was time to recognize the leading role of Russia in defeating Hitler! First, I thought to myself - finally! Americans are showing the history in an unbiased and truthful way. Well, not exactly. It was going well until Germans aimed at Russia. Stereotypes and propaganda prevailed. Of course, Why give up stereotypes - they work! Russians just had to be shown as evil, despite the fact that Nazi took 20 million lives in the former SU. Not just Jews as it is more popular to feature. This number is incomparable to the rest of the world losses in that war. Sure, the American audience must hear about all the minuscule loses in Europe, but skip a big paragraph about without e enormous damages Nazi brought to Russia. Yes, it is convenient for the authors of this film to mention rapes done by Russians in Berlin, and call it the Russian occupation and completely forgetting about equal actions done by Americans. The cold war was over years ago, why keeping the old thinking? Portraying the glorious American army that won the war but completely eliminating the fact that US would not enter the war until 1944 when the war outcome was obvious and suffering minimal losses in comparison to any other looses in that war. Yes, at that time two dictators met on the battle field. Russia, however, never had any plans to conquer the world. Russians had to fight for their lives to defend their country. This film could have been better, if the authors did not purposefully skip the most important part of that terrible war. They did not even have enough strength to recognize that the Fall of the Third Reich did not come simply from the EAST - IT CAME FROM Russia!