PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,9/10
144
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaStory of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.
Stanley Andrews
- Senator Rand
- (sin acreditar)
Oscar Apfel
- Bartender
- (sin acreditar)
Frank Austin
- Settler-Miner in Bar
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesIn keeping with the large-scale budget, the preview trailer for "Sutter's Gold" was ten minutes long and had changeover cue marks printed on the negative - just like a short subject.
- ConexionesEdited into Scouts to the Rescue (1939)
Reseña destacada
"Sutter's Gold" is a notorious film as it cost a fortune to make and lost nearly every penny of the investment. Considering that Universal Studios was teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, the timing couldn't have been worse! So why did it cost so much and why was it such a poor film? As for the cost, I frankly don't know how it cost $2,000,000 to make (a HUGE sum for the time), as the actors were mostly second or third-tier and the director a relative unknown. The money sure didn't go for salaries! Perhaps it was the scope of the film--as it was supposedly set all over the world. But most, if not all of these locations appeared to have been filmed on the Universal back lot! I just don't understand where all the money went!
As to why it's such a poor film, that's pretty easy to determine. The script was syrupy, overly sentimental and boring. That it was boring is because so much of the film comes off as episodic and disconnected. But that it was dull is a surprise because Sutter's life was pretty interesting when I read up on the man. I can only assume that this is because the script rarely bears much semblance to his actual life...and the prologue actually admits that it's mostly fiction! Regardless, it's not a terrible film but one that seems to go on and on and on....and the main character is, for the most part, a lying blowhard.
As to why it's such a poor film, that's pretty easy to determine. The script was syrupy, overly sentimental and boring. That it was boring is because so much of the film comes off as episodic and disconnected. But that it was dull is a surprise because Sutter's life was pretty interesting when I read up on the man. I can only assume that this is because the script rarely bears much semblance to his actual life...and the prologue actually admits that it's mostly fiction! Regardless, it's not a terrible film but one that seems to go on and on and on....and the main character is, for the most part, a lying blowhard.
- planktonrules
- 10 ene 2017
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 2.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 34 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Oro en el Pacífico (1936) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde