Paura nel buio

Umberto Lenzi is perhaps best known for his zombie and cannibal movies of the early '80s: the derivative but gory Eaten Alive!, the silly but fun Nightmare City, and the spirited nasty Cannibal Ferox. He's certainly not so fondly remembered for his later movies, which include this frustratingly dull psycho thriller that possesses a mean-spirited tone, and boasts a fair amount of sleaze, yet still manages to be both tedious and rather dumb.

Joe Balogh plays rich kid Mark Glazer, who cruises the highways in his daddy's Winnebago picking up young hitchhikers to torture, rape and kill. After seeing pretty blonde Daniela Foster (Josie Bissett) dancing at a campsite, he decided to make her his next victim: when she storms out of a bar following an argument with boyfriend Kevin (Jason Saucier), Mark is there to offer her a lift to the bus station. She doesn't make it. Instead, she spends days shackled in the RV being abused by crazy Mark, who has confused the girl for his long-gone mother, who ran off with the tennis coach when Mark was ten. Meanwhile, Kevin is combing the area for his missing girlfriend.

Much of the movie focuses on the mind games played by captor and captive, and with neither Balogh or Bissett being great actors, these scenes are interminably boring. The film is much better when its being more exploitative: the opening murder of a gorgeous blonde is promisingly lurid; Daniela's attempted seduction of Mark delivers lots of nudity; a wet t-shirt competition at a family waterpark is totally unnecessary, but welcome; and the torture of Kevin provides the gore (the nut-job carving the word 'PIG' into Kevin's chest with a switchblade).

As far as the dumb stuff goes, the daftest scene sees Daniela wasting a prime opportunity to smash a vodka bottle over a sleeping Mark's head, although the twist ending is almost as unbelievable (it was apparently tacked on leave things on a happy note).

This film has to be viewed with this in mind first: it is ridiculous and not meant to be scary.

I like "Hitcher in the Dark" a lot. It's no award winner, but what do you want? It's a low budget, late-80's slasher/thriller with a good dose of comedy and sleaze thrown in for good measure. I doubt Lenzi was even trying to make it scary. The 'killer' is a preppy looking RV driver cruising the Virginia Beach coast on his daddy's dime. He picks up a girl and makes her life hell for a few days, and ends up paying for it in the end. Thrown in between is a cheesy plot, an angry boyfriend, lots of 80's beach people getting drunk and listening to horrible music, and some pretty nice looking chicks.

For the time it came out, it was a little ahead of it's time, too. Pretty much all the new thrillers are 'real life' terror rides like "Hitcher in the Dark." For what it is, "Hitcher in the Dark" is a lot cooler than any teen horror movie of today. And it's funny as hell!!!

5 out of 10, kids.

Before putting in Hitcher in the Dark, I expected the usual lost in translation quality that haunts so many films made in America by European directors, but the script is stronger than expected with some interesting psychological things going on and the acting isn't terrible either. The interplay between rich boy psycho and kidnapped victim is interesting and it's nice to see a victim try to make the right choices to escape every now and then.

Firstly, you can't be paying movies like this your fullest attention. This is the kind of movie you watch when getting through a stack of ironing or playing a monkey bloons game. Secondly, these midday horrors have to be watched accelerated somehow.

Ok, so the story is straight out of 80's slasher heaven. It's a jump in my ride of death movie. Acting is pure B gold. So rich guy uses camper van to catch female hitchhikers is kill them. The movie is full of one liners, thats about the depth of the dialog. Don't bother unless you are seriously into B thrillers.

This movie has some things going for it. It features some really beautiful scenery of the American South. It features some really beautiful scenery of a young, lovely Josie Bisset. And it is not quite Umberto Lenzi's worst movie ever. It has a lot of problems though. First, the dialogue is terrible. (Maybe these ridiculous conversations would sound better if they were badly dubbed and delivered with Italian accents). Second, the acting is wretched. The aforementioned Bisset is even worse than she was on "Melrose Place". The only time her acting is halfway tolerable is the scene where she is being photographed naked and sexually assaulted, and that is only because she has been mercifully drugged unconscious. The killer is played by a Christopher Atkins look-alike who is not only just as bad as Bisset but woefully miscast to boot. A five-foot-tall, effeminate pretty boy wearing Vaurnet sun-glasses and driving around in a RV camper is just NOT scary.

The amazing thing though is director Umberto Lenzi who started out as a great director with classic Italian giallo like "Paranoia" in the late 60's, but seemed to get worse with each film. His infamous cannibal and zombie movies in the early 80's were awful but at least they elicited some reaction. This movie and its Florida-lensed follow-up "Nightmare Beach" don't even do that. At the rate he was going here, if Lenzi's still working at all he's probably making amateur porn videos and forgetting to take off the lens cap. I can certainly understand why Lenzi started using a cinematic pseudonym about this time, but why did he choose the name "Humbert Humphrey" recalling classic literature's most infamous pedophile?(Would that make Josie Bisset "Lolita")? What a strange, strange guy.