Exploring the Crack in the Cosmic Egg: Split Minds and Meta-Realities
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
• Explains the process of acculturation and the mechanisms that create our self-limiting “cosmic egg” of consensus reality
• Reveals how our biological development innately creates a “crack” in our cosmic egg--leaving a way to return to the unencumbered consciousness of childhood
• Explores ways to discover and explore the “crack” to restore wholeness to our minds and reestablish our ability to create our own realities
In this classic follow-up to his bestselling The Crack in the Cosmic Egg, Joseph Chilton Pearce explains the process of acculturation and the mechanisms that create our self-limiting “cosmic egg” of consensus reality.
Laying the groundwork for his later classic Magical Child, Pearce shows that we go through early childhood connecting with the world through our senses. With the development of language and the process of acculturation not only do our direct experiences of the world become much less vivid but our innate states of nonordinary consciousness become suppressed. Trapped in a specific cultural context--a “cosmic egg”--we are no longer able to have or even recognize mystical experiences not mediated by the limitations of our culture. Motivated primarily by a fear of death, our enculturation literally splits our minds and prevents us from living fully in the present.
Drawing from Carlos Castaneda’s writings about Don Juan and the sense of “body-knowing,” Pearce explores the varieties of nonordinary consciousness that can help us return to the unencumbered consciousness of our infancy. He shows that just as we each create our own cosmic egg of reality through cultural conditioning, we also innately create a “crack” in that egg. Ultimately certain shifts in our biological development take place to offset acculturation, leaving an avenue of return to our primary state. Pearce examines the creation of the “egg” itself and ways to discover its inherent cracks to restore wholeness to our minds, release us from our fear of death, and reestablish our ability to create our own realities through imagination and biological transcendence.
Joseph Chilton Pearce
Joseph Chilton Pearce (1926-2016) is the author of The Death of Religion and the Rebirth of the Spirit, The Biology of Transcendence, The Crack in the Cosmic Egg, Magical Child, and Evolution’s End. For more than 35 years, he lectured and led workshops teaching about the changing needs of children and the development of human society. He lived in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia.
Read more from Joseph Chilton Pearce
The Biology of Transcendence: A Blueprint of the Human Spirit Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Crack in the Cosmic Egg: New Constructs of Mind and Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Profound Healing: The Power of Acceptance on the Path to Wellness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart-Mind Matrix: How the Heart Can Teach the Mind New Ways to Think Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Children and Near-Death Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpiritual Initiation and the Breakthrough of Consciousness: The Bond of Power Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Secret Dowry of Eve: Woman's Role in the Development of Consciousness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Death of Religion and the Rebirth of Spirit: A Return to the Intelligence of the Heart Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Magical Child to Magical Teen: A Guide to Adolescent Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Conscious Parenting: The Natural Way to Give Birth, Bond with, and Raise Healthy Children Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Exploring the Crack in the Cosmic Egg
Related ebooks
The Life and Insights of Joseph Chilton Pearce: Astonishing Capacities and Self-Inflicted Limitations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadical Nature: The Soul of Matter Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWetiko: Healing the Mind-Virus That Plagues Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Immutable Laws of the Akashic Field: Universal Truths for a Better Life and a Better World Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Death of Religion and the Rebirth of Spirit: A Return to the Intelligence of the Heart Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpiritual Initiation and the Breakthrough of Consciousness: The Bond of Power Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Meaningful Coincidences: How and Why Synchronicity and Serendipity Happen Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sequence of Latent Truths: Exploring Mystical Experiences Without Dogma Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod 4.0: On the Nature of Higher Consciousness and the Experience Called "God" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMerchants of Light: The Consciousness That Is Changing the World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Radical Regeneration: Sacred Activism and the Renewal of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wizard of Us: Transformational Lessons from Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Journey of Possibilities: Are those possibilities restricted by the systems design and programs; Who controls the game? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGender Equity & Reconciliation: Thirty Years of Healing the Most Ancient Wound in the Human Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mind Field: A Personal Essay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWaking Up: Overcoming the Obstacles to Human Potential Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath doesn't exist: The Mother on Death, Sri Aurobindo on Rebirth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMichelangelo's Medicine: How redefining the human body will transform health and healthcare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMyth, Consciousness, and Psychic Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBook of Floating: Exploring the Private Sea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlindSpots: 21 Good Reasons to Think before You Talk Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResurrection: A Channeled Text: (Book One of the Manifestation Trilogy) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hidden Work Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Fall: With Afterword Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Social Implications of Psychic Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLucid Death: Conscious Journeys Beyond the Threshold Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUltimaya 1.0: The Trouble with the Wishes of Leopold Stokes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHearts in Transcendence: Human Consciousness Liberated Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn The Silent Wings of Freedom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Science & Mathematics For You
Outsmart Your Brain: Why Learning is Hard and How You Can Make It Easy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Hacks: 264 Amazing DIY Tech Projects Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Source: The Secrets of the Universe, the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chaos: Making a New Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mothers Who Can't Love: A Healing Guide for Daughters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance---What Women Should Know Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Kind of People: Inside America's Black Upper Class Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No-Drama Discipline: the bestselling parenting guide to nurturing your child's developing mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Carnage: On the Front Lines of the Republican Civil War and the Rise of President Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Alchemy: The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memory Craft: Improve Your Memory with the Most Powerful Methods in History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Joy of Gay Sex: Fully revised and expanded third edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First, We Make the Beast Beautiful: A New Journey Through Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Crack In Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Systems Thinker: Essential Thinking Skills For Solving Problems, Managing Chaos, Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Exploring the Crack in the Cosmic Egg
7 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Exploring the Crack in the Cosmic Egg - Joseph Chilton Pearce
INTRODUCTION
RADICAL SHIFTS IN VIEWPOINT
In my book The Crack in the Cosmic Egg, I described reality as our semantic creation and explored how our minds could enter into that creation and change it. Accept the arbitrary nature of any reality representation, I argued, risk yourself to the transformation of it, and there are no limits to your creative capacity.
My experience since that writing has both verified Crack and yet forced certain revisions. For instance, what I called autistic
thinking in Crack I now call primary process thinking.
The reality-adjusted
thinking of Crack I now refer to as culturally conditioned
thinking. These are not idle metaphoric exchanges, but radical shifts of viewpoint. In Crack, I had failed to grasp certain fundamental principles because of unconsciously accepted cultural assumptions. I was fascinated by the interactions between mind and reality as displayed in metanoia, scientific discovery, spontaneous healings, fire-walking, and other nonordinary phenomena. But I found that signs
and wonders did not alter our cultural plight in the least. And I found that while our cosmic egg
is our own creation, not a given state,
there was a given state,
a primary process
lying untrammelled beyond the reach of our verbal warp. This I had denied previously.
I found, further, that we created a Crack for ourselves right along with our creation of our egg; that is, our biological development keeps our options open to the given state
in spite of our cultural conditioning. Even as we seal ourselves into a word-built world, one function of our intellect breaks that seal and keeps our lines open. These lines
lie not so much in our head as in what don Juan (see Carlos Castaneda’s trilogy on the teaching of don Juan
) calls our body-knowing.
Again the evidence points toward two distinct modes of thinking, as it did in Crack.
Hans Furth (see bibliography) claims that the human intellect grows through living contact with the environment. This growth will take place even where there is no linguistic system available. Furth’s observation runs counter to our acculturated beliefs and surely challenges our educational bureaucracy. A child learns by interacting with reality in what I call our primary program. At the same time, however, the child must cope with the overwhelming impingement of cultural processing. I call this acculturation process our metaprogram. This metaprogram is an abstract semantic construct based not on reality interaction but on fear of reality. The child can only react to that fear with anxiety, and erect buffers to it, until he can intellectually create his own metaprogram concepts. The ability for abstract conceptual creation opens somewhere around the sixth year of life. The child must devote his new capacity to structuring the cultural semantic reality
in order to survive that reality system. As a result, his primary program, biologically endowed, is overlaid and dominated by a cultural reality adjustment.
The process is largely completed by adolescence.
Certain biological shifts, nevertheless, take place to offset this acculturation procedure. By these shifts, our primary program continues development. The organism succeeds in retaining its original biological intent, though it must use nonsemantic
modalities for that end. The existence of this body-knowing,
apparently below our awareness, is one of the issues of this book.
While my exploration involves nonordinary
phenomena, I use such material with reservations. The area of paranormal
phenomena suffers as seriously from the misappropriations of its enthusiasts as from the scoffings of the academicians. So-called psychic
phenomena are natural expressions of our logical possibilities, a biological norm
masked by acculturation. I question the validity of such terms as extrasensory perception
and doubt the validity of using scientific models for the mystery of mind’s interaction with reality. To explore your own Crack, you must first find that Crack. To find the Crack, some understanding of our egg and the texture of shells will help. So in the first half of this work I will explore the egg
itself and how
this spectacular misunderstanding
occurs. The second half will then explore some aspects of the Crack, as far as words can convey this sort of thing.
No hidden powers of the mind
are to be uncovered here. My aim is to bankrupt your semantic hope chests, and empty the coffers of your pipe dreams so readily provided by culture.
As Joel Latner says, to be aware, we must have empty heads.
He then relates my favorite Zen story of Nan-in, a nineteenth-century Japanese Master, who received a university professor coming to inquire about Zen. As Nan-in silently prepared tea, the professor expounded at length on his own philosophies and insights. Nan-in quietly filled his visitor’s cup and then kept right on pouring. Alarmed at the tea spilling all over, ruining the immaculate ceremony, the professor exclaimed: It is full, no more will go in.
Like this cup,
Nan-in said, you are already full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?
So my invitation in the following pages is for you to examine your cup, to discover just how full it already is, and to examine the nature of its contents. Only when we are willing to accept the nature of our cups and contents are we willing to accept emptiness.
Should anyone tell you what happens when your cup empties, he is telling you a tale. Listen if you like—storytelling is fun. But what happens to the empty cup lies beyond all our conjectures, and outside all our speech.
PART ONE
PRELUDE
Our experience is our reality. We are social creatures by nature, and sharing our experience has established a consensus, or common agreement, about reality. We accept this consensus as our culture, that is, the matrix from which our experience is derived. While our consensus functions culturally, the results are destructive. For our agreement acts as an artificial overlay, a semantic screen, blinding us to a process, a given matrix, that is truly cultural.
We are conditioned from birth to accept the overlay as vital to survival, though it fails us in every way, and to react to the flow of our natural matrix as tantamount to death. This contradiction shapes our perceptions of the world, society, and our self. It literally splits our minds and makes of us our own adversary.
I know of no way to explore this contradiction other than treating this overlay as our antagonist. The technique is an old one. To perceive the real instead of the illusory, don Juan, the Yaqui Man of Knowledge,
insists that his apprentice confront and accept his own death, a notion in contradiction to consensus conditioning.
This giving up of life in order to find life
is certain to be sensed as an ultimate threat. Though this is paradoxical on the surface, I hope to show the biological function beneath the covering of words. The issue is truly, as don Juan said, a matter of body-knowing.
1
STABLE SAMENESS
Carlos Castaneda saw some young Mexican bootblacks eating the scraps off plates at a sidewalk cafe. He felt sorry for them, deprived as they were of education, opportunities, and cultural advantages. Don Juan was contemptuous of Carlos’s sentiment, however, and pointed out that any of those boys could become a Man of Knowledge. He further implied that they could do so with greater ease than Carlos, since their heads wouldn’t be filled with as much nonsense.
In my book The Crack in the Cosmic Egg, I examined the way our thinking enters into the structuring of our reality. I showed how transformation of our concepts about reality could change aspects of our reality. My contention, that man’s mind mirrors a universe that mirrors man’s mind,
ran counter to the accepted worldview. Extreme as my claims were, though, they were only suggestive of the radical break implied by don Juan in his reply to Carlos.
In Crack, I wrote of an arbitrary nature to our semantic universe,
but I considered this just the arbitrary nature of our reality. I didn’t realize that a semantic reality
was a cultural artifice. I thought it our given
or natural process. I accepted the necessity of such an artifice without question. Above all, it never occurred to me that culture as a necessary prerogative could itself be the real issue. For culture is so axiomatic
that our minds respond to it just as our bodies respond to gravity. The most formative influences of our lives are beyond awareness and simply happen to us.
A statement from Alfred North Whitehead, used in Crack, is needed again, here: There will be some fundamental assumptions which adherents of all the variant systems within the epoch unconsciously presuppose. Such assumptions appear so obvious that people do not know what they are assuming because no other way of putting things has ever occurred to them.
¹
There is a creative and joyful anarchy inherent within don Juan’s reply to Carlos, but we can’t hear it
because of fundamental cultural assumptions shaping our hearing itself. For who would question that culture represents the highest achievement of life? Or that civilization as practiced by us is not the great goal of evolution?
We have been conditioned to believe this implicitly. We presume that without culture man would be only another animal, a creature of darkness without meaning or purpose.
To assert, then, that culture is not a necessary prerogative, nor indeed even the proper vehicle for man’s venture, seems preposterous. It seems more ridiculous to claim that language is more a tragedy than a blessing precisely because it does just what the academics reiterate: gives to us our enormous heritage of acquired experience and knowledge.
Every war demonstrates anew that we never learn from such acquired experience,
nor benefit from such inherited knowledge.
Nor does sending men into space, and plunging ever deeper into a technological morass, assuage our inner despair.
Leslie White spoke of culture as an organism
with life and death cycles of its own. But the cultural effect, by which we are conditioned, blinds us to a primary process that is our true source of communion and social being. Each of us is born with a life scheme
that is masked, inhibited, and finally dominated by the process of acculturation. For all intents and purposes, this primary program, which is our birthright, becomes nonexistent through acculturation. Once our primary program is masked into noncognizance, culture emerges as the dominant meta program in our organism.
Once this meta program of culture becomes dominant, it shapes our experience into an arbitrary and parallel counterfeit of that which is real. Once this meta program takes over our perceptual apparatus, it is the only mode we then have for interacting with reality. Once that happens we can’t question our culturally conditioned state, since that is our only reality experience.
Our mental-physical organism unfolds from its germ as a leaf from its bud, without assistance from a word-built intellect. But this natural program
is overlaid by the cultural one. The cultural meta program parallels, imitates, and intertwines with our natural process. Gradually it becomes the dominant force in our biological system.
Back in the 1940s, Harry Stack Sullivan made the following comment, which is apropos to don Juan’s contempt of Carlos’s sentiment and germane to this book.
The origin of the self-system [our ego awareness, JP] can be said to rest on the irrational character of culture. Were it not for the fact that a great many prescribed ways of doing things have to be lived up to, in order that one shall maintain . . . relations, or, were the prescriptions for the types of behavior in carrying on relations with one’s fellows perfectly rational [my italics, JP], then, for all I know, there would not be evolved, in the course of becoming a person, anything like the sort of self-system that we always encounter.²
In don Juan, Jesus, certain Zen and Sufi figures, we get a glimpse of what might be possible for a self-system
not dominated by acculturation, and a reality not shaped by the cultural semantic. We then see most of the problems attributed to human nature
as artificial results from acculturation.
Culture operates by taking over
some and heavily influencing other biological functions in each of us. Equally, however, culture is the result of certain biological functions in conflict
with other biological functions. For instance, we possess new brain
processes that are essentially discontinuous with older brain functions. They are capable of operations for which none of our older brain systems seem preparatory
in any way. Our newer brain processes are designed for symbolic representations, abstractions, creative logic, speech, and other aspects of operational thinking,
as Piaget calls it. Our older brain systems, on the other hand, are more involved with homeostasis,
survival, and well-being. These older autonomous systems work to keep a stable relationship between the various parts of our body and our ambient,
or life sphere as a whole.
A tension between these diverse and apparently unrelated mental functions is inevitable. Culture is the end result of our outward projection
of this internal dominance-conflict.*1 The cultural effect results from an intellectual warping
of our survival system, on the one hand, and from our survival system crippling
our intellect, on the other. And which effect comes first
is a chicken-egg kind of riddle.
Thinking is an act, a process. To think is to react to, respond to, or interact with, reality. Much reality interaction takes place that is nonverbal and even non-verbal.
We are consciously aware
of only certain end products of thinking, even though thinking is an all-inclusive act. Any aspect of thinking tends to incorporate all other aspects of thinking. Homeostasis, for instance (a survival process to be discussed shortly), is as active a part of thinking as talking but takes place largely outside our ego awareness.
Our thinking apparatus is elaborate and mysterious. It involves our entire body and encompasses even more than just our organism. Charles Tart, of the University of California at Davis, relates an experiment in which a subject sat in a soundproofed room designed for sensory-deprivation studies. The subject was wired up
for brain-wave recordings, skin resistance, heart rate, muscular activity, respiratory changes, and so on, all recorded on a polygraph
machine. Down the hall, in a similar chamber, an agent
or sender was electrically shocked at random intervals. The subject was asked to guess when the sender was being shocked. The subject’s polygraph reading indicated significant physiological changes at those instants when the agent was randomly shocked. But the subject’s conscious guesses at when the shocks occurred showed no relation to the actual events as related by his polygraph readings.³
We say the event did not register on the subject’s conscious mind.
But obviously he was conscious of the event—on a fundamental, biological level. The subject’s body apparently knew of these happenings that his roof-brain
or ego awareness did not know about. Tart’s experiment gives us a glimpse into what don Juan meant by body-knowing.
Two mental modes of function are involved, as I outlined in my book Crack.
Tart’s example indicates a kind of knowing
connected with our environ,
or life envelope. The way Tart designed his experiment determined the nature of the subject’s temporary environ
and determined the kind of data selected from the flow
of that environ. In the same way, our primary program selects from the flow
around it those aspects vital to our individual organism. But just as Tart’s subject had no ego awareness of his body-knowing’s response, so, as acculturated people, we suffer a communication gap
between these fundamental modes of our mind. This gap leaves us feeling alienated from our life process, an isolation and despair that all the technologies of our creation cannot assuage.
Our newer brain functions give unique capacities for reflective thinking and creative logic, functions offering an infinitely open possibility. But because of our split of self, we suffer a failure of nerve
when our creative thinking starts to move us beyond our known stable sameness carried autonomously within our older brain-body systems. These biological survival drives are too well ingrained for transformation. Yet the strength of our newer, intellectual-creative processes will not be denied completely. And culture’s semantic reality
is the creative stasis resulting from these thinking dynamisms in conflict.
In the following chapters I will show how culture forces each of us to create this pseudoreality
structured around the semantic effect of language, and how culture substitutes
a semantic reality for a direct reality interaction. Culture’s word-built world acts as a stimulus substitute that replaces, changes, curtails, or mutates stimuli from a real world. What we experience as acculturated people is never the free interaction with our life flow, that for which we are designed by our primary programming.
Rather, we experience a life flow filtered through an ideation scheme sharply altering our real world.
Culture arises from and rests squarely on what I call a death concept.
This is a notion resulting from reflections on death, and a belief in a universal hostility
toward life. This intellectually conceived notion confuses and disorients the intellectual and survival drives, the two apparently opposed
modes of mind. The semantic reality
results in an ideation scheme that serves as an intermediary between our senses and our percepts. This mediant effect interprets as a buffer
between self and hostile world. Mediant means meditation, literally going between.*2 Since the semantic mediant is an imaginary creation, we can imaginatively change it within our heads. This gives us the illusion of prediction and control over our environment. This maneuver interprets as successful death avoidance.
The assumption that the universe is hostile to life is never clearly formulated. In fact, it would be denied by most of us, even with embarrassment. Yet this notion is manifested on every hand, by implication and inference. The assumption induces a cast of thinking in each of us that actually produces results accordingly. A kind of mass cultural projection mirrors this judgment against life,
which is then seen outwardly as the universe’s judgment
against us.
Culture as a paradigm of life couldn’t take place without the anxiety effect of this death concept.
The anxiety effect of this notion is a large part of the fabric