Leonardo da Vinci
5/5
()
About this ebook
This version of Leonardo Da Vinci includes a table of contents.
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) is the founder of the psychoanalytic school of psychology. In 1884 he worked with Breuer which started his investigation, development and birth of psychoanalysis. Freud believed he was able to demonstrate the normal development of the sexual drive present in infants. Then on the basis of an examination of dreams and bungling acts, he claims he was able to determine the resistance of the unconscious that influences everyday thoughts and actions. Freud observed the essential relationship between the psychoanalyst and the patient in what he called transference, establishing its central role in the analytic process. Freud still exerts influence in psychology, psychiatry and psychotherapy, as well as modern Western thought with the common idea of a ”Freudian slip.” He continues to generate extensive and highly contested debate concerning psychoanalysis’s therapeutic efficacy, scientific status, and role.
Read more from Sigmund Freud
33 Masterpieces of Philosophy and Science to Read Before You Die (Illustrated): Utopia, The Meditations, The Art of War, The Kama Sutra, Candide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Three Case Histories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Illustrated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Future of an Illusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Outline of Psychoanalysis Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Studies in Hysteria Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Problem of Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Dreams: Every Meaning Interpreted Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Civilization and Its Discontents (Warbler Classics Annotated Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Civilization and Its Discontents Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Leonardo da Vinci
Related ebooks
A Young Girl's Diary Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Human Nature, and Other Sermons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetaphysics of the Profane: The Political Theology of Walter Benjamin and Gershom Scholem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVivo:The Life of Gustav Meyrink Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Faust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Life of Johnson (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Radical Empiricism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLucian's True History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Benedict de Spinoza Reader Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Confessions Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Poems of Goethe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding: A Critical Exposition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLambent Traces: Franz Kafka Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDubliners Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoman Ingarden's Ontology and Aesthetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll Things are Possible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRuskin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRosalynde: or, Euphues' Golden Legacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Metaphysics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Visages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rodmoor: A Romance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnto This Last Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlways in Trouble: An Oral History of ESP-Disk’, the Most Outrageous Record Label in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Diary of a Chambermaid Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complex Vision Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreative Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
General Fiction For You
The Covenant of Water (Oprah's Book Club) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The King James Version of the Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Man Called Ove: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemist: A Graphic Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of Dreaming Books Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Priory of the Orange Tree Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cloud Cuckoo Land: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Demon Copperhead: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unhoneymooners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life of Pi: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It Ends with Us: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cross-Stitch Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dante's Divine Comedy: Inferno Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone in My Family Has Killed Someone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Babel: Or the Necessity of Violence: An Arcane History of the Oxford Translators' Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paris Apartment: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beartown: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nettle & Bone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Flowers of Alice Hart Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Grapes of Wrath Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ocean at the End of the Lane: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nineteen Claws and a Black Bird: Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related categories
Reviews for Leonardo da Vinci
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Leonardo da Vinci - Sigmund Freud
Chapter 1
When psychoanalyticinvestigation, which usually contents itself with frail human material, approaches the great personages of humanity, it is not impelled to it by motives which are often attributed to it by laymen. It does not strive to blacken the radiant and to drag thesublime into the mire
; it finds no satisfaction in diminishing the distance between the perfection of the great and the inadequacy of the ordinary objects. But it cannot help finding that everything is worthy of understanding that can be perceived throughthose prototypes, and it also believes that none is so big as to be ashamed of being subject to the laws which control the normal and morbid actions with the same strictness.
Leonardo Da Vinci
Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) was admired even by his contemporaries as one of the greatest men of the Italian Renaissance, still even then he appeared as mysterious to them as he now appears to us. An all–sided genius, whose form can only be divined but never deeply fathomed,
[1]heexerted the most decisive influence on his time as an artist; and it remained to us to recognize his greatness as a naturalist which was united in him with the artist. Although he left masterpieces of the art of painting, while his scientific discoveries remained unpublished and unused, the investigator in him has never quite left the artist, often it has severely injured the artist and in the end it has perhaps suppressed the artist altogether. According to Vasari, Leonardo reproached himself during the last hour of his life for having insulted God and men because he has not done his duty to his art.[2]And even if Vasari's story lacks all probability and belongs to those legends which began to be woven about the mystic master while he was still living, it nevertheless retains indisputable value as a testimonial of the judgment of those people and of those times.
What was it that removed the personality of Leonardo from the understanding of his contemporaries? Certainly not the manysidedness of his capacities and knowledge, which allowed him to install himself as a player of the lyre on an instrument invented by himself, in the court of Lodovico Sforza, nicknamed Il Moro, the Duke of Milan, or which allowed him to write to the sameperson that remarkable letter in which he boastsof his abilities as a civil and military engineer. For the combination of manifold talents in the same person was not unusual in the times of the Renaissance; to be sure Leonardo himself furnished one of themost splendid examples of such persons. Nor did he belong to that type of genial persons who are outwardly poorly endowed by nature, and who on their side place no value on the outer forms of life, and in the painful gloominess of their feelings fly fromhuman relations. On the contrary he was tall and symmetrically built, of consummate beauty of countenance and of unusual physical strength, he was charming in his manner, a master of speech, and jovial and affectionate to everybody. He loved beauty in theobjects of his surroundings, he was fond of wearing magnificent garments and appreciated every refinement of conduct. In his treatise[3]on the art of painting he compares in a significant passage the art of painting with its sister arts and thus discusses the difficulties of the sculptor: Now his face is entirely smeared and powdered with marble dust, so that he looks like a baker, he is covered with small marble splinters, so that it seems as if it snowed on his back, and his house is full of stone splinters, and dust. The case of the painter is quite different from that; for the painter is well dressed and sits with great comfort before his work, he gently and very lightly brushes in the beautiful colors. He wears as decorativeclothes as he likes, and his house is filled with beautiful paintings and is spotlessly clean. He often enjoys company, music, or some one may read for him various nice works, and all this can be listened to with great pleasure, undisturbed by any poundingfrom the hammer and other noises.
It is quite possible that the conception of a beaming jovial and happy Leonardo was true only for the first and longer period of the master's life. From now on, when the downfall of the rule of Lodovico Moro forced him to leave Milan, his sphere of action and his assured position, to lead an unsteady and unsuccessful life until his last asylum in France, it is possible that the luster of his disposition became pale and some odd features of his character became more prominent. The turning of his interest from his art to science which increased with age must have also been responsible for widening the gap between himself and his contemporaries. All his efforts with which, according to their opinion, he wasted his time instead of diligently filling orders and becoming rich as perhaps his former classmate Perugino, seemed to his contemporaries as capricious playing, or even caused them to suspect him of being in the service of the black art.
We who know him from his sketchesunderstand him better. In a time in which the authority of the church began to be substituted by that of antiquity and in which only theoretical investigation existed, he the forerunner, or better the worthy competitor of Bacon and Copernicus, was necessarily isolated. When he dissected cadavers of horses and human beings, and built flying apparatus, or when he studied the nourishment of plants and their behavior towards poisons, he naturally deviated much from the commentators of Aristotle and came nearerthe despised alchemists, in whose laboratories the experimental investigations found some refuge during these unfavorable times.
The effect that this had on his paintings was that he disliked to handle the brush, he painted less and what was more often thecase, the things he began were mostly left unfinished; he cared less and less for the future fate of his works. It was this mode ofworking that was held up to him as a reproach from his contemporaries to whom his behavior to his art remained a riddle.
Many of Leonardo's later admirers have attempted to wipe off the stain of unsteadiness from his character. They maintained that what is blamed in Leonardo is a general characteristic of great artists. They said that even the energetic Michelangelo who was absorbed in his work left many incompleted works, which was as little due to his fault as to Leonardo's in the same case. Besides some pictures were not as unfinished as he claimed, and what the layman would call a masterpiece may still appear to the creatorof the work of art as an unsatisfied embodiment of his intentions; he has a faint notion of a perfection which he despairs of reproducing in likeness. Least of all should the artist be held responsible for the fate which befalls his works.
As plausible assome of these excuses may sound