The Presidency and Public Policy: The Four Arenas of Presidential Power
()
About this ebook
Spitzer's classic study of presidential power, The Presidency and Public Policy examines the annual domestic legislative programs of US presidents from 1954-1974 to show how and in what ways the characteristics of their proposals affected their success in dealing with Congress (success being defined as Congress's passing the presidents' legislative proposals in the forms offered). Presidential skills matter, but Spitzer demonstrates that the successful application of those skills is relatively easy for some policies and next to impossible for others. Certain consistent patterns predominate regardless of who sits in the Oval Office, and to a great extent those patterns prescribe presidential behavior.
Robert Spitzer
Robert Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. is the President of the Magis Center of Reason and Faith and the Spitzer Center. He was the President of Gonzaga University from 1998 to 2009. He is the author of many books, including Healing the Culture, Finding True Happiness, Five Pillars of the Spiritual Life, The Light Shines On in the Darkness, The Soul's Upward Yearning, and God So Loved the World.
Read more from Robert Spitzer
The Moral Wisdom of the Catholic Church: A Defense of Her Controversial Moral Teachings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience at the Doorstep to God: Science and Reason in Support of God, the Soul, and Life after Death Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFinding True Happiness: Satisfying Our Restless Hearts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul's Upward Yearning: Clues to Our Transcendent Nature from Experience and Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Christ Versus. Satan in Our Daily Lives: The Cosmic Struggle Between Good and Evil Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Christ, Science, and Reason: What We Can Know about Jesus, Mary, and Miracles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFive Pillars of the Spiritual Life: A Practical Guide to Prayer for Active People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Escape From Evil's Darkness: The Light of Christ in the Church, Spiritual Conversion, and Moral Conversion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHealing the Culture: A Commonsense Philosophy of Happiness, Freedom, and the Life Issues Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Light Shines On in the Darkness: Transforming Suffering through Faith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5God So Loved the World: Clues to Our Transcendent Destiny from the Revelation of Jesus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ten Universal Principles: A Brief Philosophy of the Life Issues Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The Presidency and Public Policy
Related ebooks
The Dual Executive: Unilateral Orders in a Separated and Shared Power System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSailing the Water's Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5US politics today: Fourth edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCongressional Districting: The Issue of Equal Representation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPresidential Leverage: Presidents, Approval, and the American State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCongress, the Press, and Political Accountability Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Macropolitics of Congress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElecting Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Framers' Intentions: The Myth of the Nonpartisan Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolarized: Making Sense of a Divided America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComparing Public Bureaucracies: Problems of Theory and Method Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCongress, Presidents, and American Politics: Fifty Years of Writings and Reflections Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPersonal Roots of Representation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPartisan Balance: Why Political Parties Don't Kill the U.S. Constitutional System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Warfare State: The Domestic Politics of Military Spending Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPower without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCuring the Mischiefs of Faction: Party Reform in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPredicting the Presidency: The Potential of Persuasive Leadership Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAccountability in State Legislatures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCongressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsParty, Process, and Political Change in Congress, Volume 1: New Perspectives on the History of Congress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
American Government For You
Enough Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Carnage: On the Front Lines of the Republican Civil War and the Rise of President Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Project 2025: Blueprint for America's Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For Love of Country: Leave the Democrat Party Behind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 9/11 Report: The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/525 Lies: Exposing Democrats’ Most Dangerous, Seductive, Damnable, Destructive Lies and How to Refute Them Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We're Polarized Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Profiles in Courage: Deluxe Modern Classic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwoke: How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Dumpty: The Age of Trump in Verse Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Laptop from Hell: Hunter Biden, Big Tech, and the Dirty Secrets the President Tried to Hide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related categories
Reviews for The Presidency and Public Policy
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Presidency and Public Policy - Robert Spitzer
The Presidency and Public Policy
The Presidency and Public Policy
The Four Arenas of Presidential Power
Robert J. Spitzer
The University of Alabama Press
Tuscaloosa
Copyright © 1982
The University of Alabama Press
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0380
All rights reserved
Manufactured in the United States of America
Hardcover edition published 1982.
Paperback edition published 2012.
eBook edition published 2012.
Typeface: ACaslon
∞
The paper on which this book is printed meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science–Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
Paperback ISBN: 978-0-8173-5746-7
eBook ISBN: 978-0-8173-8667-2
A previous edition of this book has been catalogued by the Library of Congress as follows:
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Spitzer, Robert J., 1953–
The presidency and public policy.
Revision of the author’s thesis (Ph.D.)—Cornell University
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
1. Presidents—United States. 2. Executive power—United States. 3. United States. Congress. I. Title.
JK585.S65 1982 353.03'1 81-19802
ISBN 0-8173-0109-7 AACR2
to Bill and Jinny Spitzer
Contents
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
Preface
1. Studying the Presidency
The Policy Approach
The President’s Policy Proposals
Levels of Analysis
The Presidency in Perspective
President as Politician
President as Power Seeker
President as Policy Maker
Definitions
Outline of Presentation
2. Policy Typologies and Policy Theory
Utilizing Policy Frameworks
The Arenas of Power
Critiques
Refining the Arenas
The Arenas and the Presidency
Hypotheses
The Four Presidencies
Summary
3. Distributive and Constituent Policies: Political Stability
Distributive Cases
Presidential Distribution
Constituent Cases
Constituent Patterns
4. Regulation and Redistribution: Political Conflict
Regulatory Cases
Regulatory Patterns
Redistributive Cases
Redistributive Patterns
Summary
5. President and Congress: The Policy Connection
The President and Congress
Past Empirical Studies
Presidential Boxscores
Data by Administrations
Electoral Cycles
Resubmission of Bills
6. Policy Patterns and Congressional Floor Activity
Selecting the Bills
The Committee and the Floor
Differences between the House and the Senate
Floor Activity
Partisan Support
Substantive Analysis
Summary
7. The Four Presidencies and the Policy Environment
Presidential Interactions and Policy Types
Applications to Existing Analysis of the Presidency
Of Presidents and Policies
Extending the Analysis
Concluding Thoughts
Appendix
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Tables and Figures
Tables
1. Summary of Case Studies
2. Responsibility for Passage of Major Legislative Proposals
3. Bills Proposed in the President’s Annual Legislative Program, Grouped by Policy Areas
4. Averages of Bills Proposed in Policy Areas, Grouped by Presidential Administrations
5. Bills Proposed in the President’s Annual Legislative Program: Relations between Domestic-Policy Areas, 1954–74
6. Rates of Success for Bills Proposed by the President in His Annual Legislative Program
7. Number of Years Where Policies Are Ranked Highest to Lowest
8. Averages of Success for Bills Proposed Annually by the President, Grouped by Presidential Administrations
9. Average Percentage of Bills Proposed, Arrayed by Years in Electoral Cycle, 1954–74
10. Average Percentage of Bills Passed, Arrayed by Years in Electoral Cycle, 1954–74
11. Percentages of Bills Previously Submitted by the President to Congress and Denied
12. List of 165 Bills Categorized by Policy Areas
13. List of 165 Bills, Categorized—Number of Roll Calls, Number of Bills, and Means for Bills in House
14. List of 165 Bills, Categorized—Number of Roll Calls, Number of Bills, and Means for Bills in Senate
15. Number of Bills with No Roll-Call Votes in Either House (by Bill)
16. Number of Bills with No Roll-Call Votes in One House
17. Comparison of the Numbers of Roll-Call Votes in the House and in the Senate, Bill by Bill
18. Percentage of Noncontroversial Recorded Votes in the House
19. Percentage of Noncontroversial Recorded Votes in the Senate
20. Index of Likeness for Recorded Votes in the House
21. Index of Likeness for Recorded Votes in the Senate
22. Index of Likeness for Recorded Votes in the House According to Substantive, Pass and Conference, and Procedural Votes
23. Index of Likeness for Recorded Votes in the Senate According to Substantive, Pass and Conference, and Procedural Votes
24. Rank Orderings for Types of Bills According to Presidential Influence, Presidential Involvement, and Political Conflict
Figures
1. Copernican Schema of the Executive Universe
2. Types of Coercion, Types of Policy, and Types of Politics
3. Revised Arenas-of-Power Scheme
4. Bills Proposed in the President’s Annual Legislative Program, Distributive and Constituent Policies
5. Rates of Success for Bills Proposed by the President in His Annual Legislative Program by Domestic Policy Areas, 1954–74
6. Percentages of Bills Previously Submitted by the President to Congress and Denied, 1954–74
7. The Arenas of Power Applied to Presidential Policy Making
Acknowledgments
In many ways the most pleasurable task connected with the production of this work is reflected on this page. The book’s writing (and rewriting, and rewriting, and rewriting . . .) was a satisfying and rewarding experience, but many of its pleasures stemmed directly from exchanges with many good people, whose help I gratefully acknowledge here.
My former advisors at Cornell University provided the initial guidance necessary to keep the project on track when it was a dissertation. My thanks go to E. W. Kelley, Peter Katzenstein, and Benjamin Ginsberg, and especially to Theodore Lowi for his intellectual and personal guidance throughout the writing and rewriting process.
Two individuals read the entire manuscript and provided detailed, careful comments and suggestions. I extend heartfelt thanks to Werner Dannhauser and Richard Bensel for their efforts.
A number of other good friends and acquaintances have provided less systematic, but incisive (and, fortunately, irreverent) comments and suggestions. My thanks to Michael Brown, Gary Bryner, Bruce Detwiler, Arch Dotson, Peter Galderisi, Edward Harpham, John Green, Patricia Leeds, John Mearsheimer, Jack Moran, Peggy Murphy, Steve Newman, G. Olivia O’Donnell, Martin Shefter, Henry Steck, and Jeff Tarbox.
I would also like to gratefully acknowledge the impartial efforts of the director of The University of Alabama Press, Malcolm MacDonald, and the comments of one of the Press’s readers, Bert A. Rockman of the University of Pittsburgh.
Finally, I would like to thank Gertrude Fitzpatrick for her fine efforts in typing and editing the initial manuscript, and Jean Fowler for her patience and efficiency in typing revisions and alterations.
Preface
Students of history and politics have long been enamored of the great leaders of history and their impact on their political times.¹ Indeed, analysis of political history often centers on the biographies of famous men associated with important events. In the United States, the political figure most often associated with the compelling moments of history has been the president. While military men fulfill this role in most nations (through military means), America’s lack of a military tradition has encouraged its military leaders to seek greater influence through civilian political office, leaving aside the military rank and trappings (though not the initial popularity associated with successful military ventures). The military men we are most likely to remember in the United States are those who assume the highest civilian office.
Quite clearly, Americans reserve a special place for the chief executive. What heart has not been stirred by the genius of Thomas Jefferson, the dynamism of Andrew Jackson; the foresight of Abraham Lincoln, the determination and strength of Franklin Roosevelt, or the youthful vigor of John Kennedy? Even mediocre men are assessed in the light of their great moments,
and bad presidents are censured because they do not measure up to the standards of greatness,
leaving aside for the moment the question of what those standards might be.²
If this form of hero worship were simply a part of American political mythology, it would be innocent enough. But it does not stop there. It permeates much of what we refer to as the scholarly literature
on the presidency. It manifests itself in various contexts, from historical biographies to contemporary analyses of power (see Chapter 1 for examples and a more detailed discussion of this).
The academic version of this normative bias, to label it thus, has yielded a very particular perspective on the presidency. Simply stated, the fates and fortunes of presidents have been ascribed heavily, indeed too heavily, to each president’s own personal political acumen, skills, resources, desires, and dispositions. As much as any other student of the presidency, Richard Neustadt has perpetuated this image of presidential rugged individualism.
To wit: success as a president (meaning the successful exercise of presidential power) accrues to those presidents who master the persuasive arts—that persuasion being successfully employed by bargaining. Presidents who have mastered the bargaining skills are thus likely to be the ones written about by adoring presidential antiquarians. This perspective has cultivated at least two dubious assumptions: that the more power a president exercises, the more good he can do, and therefore the better off both he and the country will be; and that presidential success or failure, however defined, rests fundamentally with the president himself.
The first assumption has been subject to a fair amount of revision since Vietnam and Watergate. It took a forced resignation by a less-than-revered president to make us realize that Watergate was not an anomaly, but the logical extension of the presidential activism extolled by most students of the presidency. In spite of this rethinking, most of us still secretly hope for the man on the white horse to lead us from our present travails. Though it is comforting to conjure up such daydreams, we know that to try to bring them to life would be to court political tyrannies and excesses antithetical to our constitutional traditions.
If we are indeed a government of laws and not of men, then are we not fools to pin our hopes solely on good men
(as if voters thought they were electing a crook when they voted for Nixon)?³ To be more specific, if we do not have the kind of presidents or presidency that we want, and if we are confused by the behavior of both, ought we simply to look at the men in the office, and the effects they have upon it? The point is that leadership, while important, is by its character highly situational. But its variable nature from one administration to another is seldom taken into account. More than that, to focus solely on leadership in the presidential context is to limit one’s view of the office by ignoring other, fundamental consistencies.
It may be evident to the reader that I am suggesting another avenue that, by contrast, is regular and indeed inescapable. That avenue, stemming from the very apparatus of the state, employs the concrete products of presidents and the presidency—policy. When we refer to presidential accomplishments and achievements, we are usually referring to the policies enacted and implemented by presidents. Policies are definable, measurable, and comparable, insofar as we can rely upon what is written into policy proposals and law. If we view policies as the expressed intentions of government, then we can consider them in the context of presidential policy making to be the best (or worst) efforts of presidents, that is, the tangible products of an administration.
Beyond the focus on presidential policies and policy making, there is another component to the argument, set in contradistinction to the second assumption mentioned above—an assumption that, by and large, has not been questioned. The second element of my argument is that there are some very particular factors associated with policies and policy types that have specific, verifiable effects on the behavior of presidents, the nature of the political process they must deal with, and by extension the ultimate outcome. The political forces that result from policies to be identified herein, emanating from basic policy characteristics, are not easily manipulated by presidents or other actors in the short term, though this does not constitute a denial of the importance of basic political skills. Again, my view rests not on some vague attribution of presidential outcomes to the currents of history or macroeconomic and political forces; rather, it identifies specific characteristics of policies proposed by presidents that shape what the president can do and how well he can do it. In other words, policies structure the interests involved and help to determine the political arenas in which decisions are contested or made. Policy attributes can be identified, observed, and compared across administrations, and they incorporate the full range of presidential policy-making activities, not simply a few great moments and critical decisions. For all the attention that has been focused on a few compelling decisions and policies—the Cuban missile crisis, the seizure of the steel mills, and integration at Little Rock, Arkansas, for example—one would think that presidents act as leaders only in times of crisis. Obviously, this is not so. And there are significant limits to what we can learn about the presidency from a few critical, atypical cases.
Here, then, is the indictment: against the great-man
view of the presidency, against presidential rugged individualism,
against looking at power without seriously examining the question, Power to do what? Here also is the alternative to be explored: to examine the presidency as an ongoing institution, focusing on the products of presidential efforts (policies), but arguing that the nature of those products, as seen in the political process associated with their formation, actually shapes what presidents can do and how the political environment responds.
Specifically, this study will examine the president’s annual domestic legislative program (his policy proposals to Congress) over a twenty-year period, in order to see how and in what ways the characteristics of those proposals affect his success in dealing with Congress (success being defined as Congress’s passing the president’s legislative proposals in the forms offered). The effects of policy characteristics will be observed throughout the legislative process. Presidential skills matter, but I will show that the successful application of those skills is relatively easy for some policies and next to impossible for others. In the end it will be clear that certain consistent patterns predominate regardless of who sits in the Oval Office, and that to a great extent those patterns prescribe presidential behavior.
In addition, advance knowledge of policies and policy characteristics should allow us to predict, at least in broad outline, the quality of the political obstacles presidents may face in their dealings with Congress. This has certain prescriptive implications, which will be discussed in the final chapter.
1: Studying the Presidency
We know almost everything about
Presidents . . . but far too little
about the Presidency.
—James MacGregor Burns
The presidency of the United States has sometimes been described as the most powerful office in the free world, if not on earth, and at other times the president has been likened to the wretched Sisyphus, who was condemned forever to roll a stone up a hill in Hades, only to watch it roll down again as soon as he neared the top. What is odd about these two characterizations is that they exist simultaneously, even in harmony, as descriptions of the American presidency. This peculiar conjunction of power and impotence reflects both the complex reality and the general lack of understanding of the presidency. If the best wisdom that can be offered of a political institution is that it both possesses and lacks the same set of characteristics, then we are sorely lacking in wisdom. Such an acknowledgment assumes even more startling dimensions when the presidency is described as the most important political institution in American life.
¹ Students of the presidency are just now coming to grips with the conceptual, methodological, and substantive gaps in our understanding. While the literature on the presidency is voluminous (a recently published annotated bibliography of works on the presidency cites over twenty-five hundred entries published since the New Deal era), it is notably deficient in basic empirical research
² and systematic scholarly study.
³ Anthony King has delivered this severe indictment:
To read most general studies of the United States presidency . . . is to feel that one is reading not a number of different books but essentially the same book over and over again. The same sources are cited; the same points are made; even the same quotations (bully pulpit,
etc.) appear again and again. In addition, the existing literature is mainly descriptive and atheoretical: general hypotheses are almost never tested. Largely for this reason, a subject that might be thought to bristle with difficulties has so far aroused remarkably little scholarly—as distinct from purely political—controversy, about either methodology or substantive research findings.⁴
There are several reasons or, perhaps more properly, excuses that attempt to explain this lacuna in the study of the presidency. First, access to information about presidents is sometimes limited for reasons of national security. Much presidential activity involves matters of defense and international affairs. The military and political sensitivity of some material allows the use of the national-security justification for maintaining secrecy. Beyond that, many other presidential dealings are conducted in secret and are revealed only at the discretion of the president himself.⁵ Such disclosures are seldom made voluntarily, unless disclosure works to the president’s advantage.⁶ While the published accounts of former presidential aides and confidants abound, such works have a reputation for being selective and self-serving. The same has been said of presidential memoirs as well. As a former presidential aide dryly observed, The inaccuracy of most Washington diaries is surpassed only by the immodesty of their authors.
⁷
Second, few numerical indicators can be readily utilized. There are no roll calls, judicial votes, or survey research available. Indeed, the existence of masses of readily available data from the Institute for Social Research, the National Opinion Research Center, the Gallup, Harris, and Roper organizations, and the like indicate how the existence of readily available data can spawn research, as these data have for the study of voting, attitudes, and mass behavior. In the case of studying the president, it is not clear what the level or unit of analysis should be, nor how hypotheses might be operationalized and tested.⁸
Third, the structure and evolution of the institution of the presidency itself is viewed as largely idiosyncratic and accidental. Many have noted, for example, how the assassinations of William McKinley, Lincoln, and Kennedy dramatize, especially to those who engage in what if . . .
history, the important role of unanticipated events in shaping the presidency.⁹ Clinton Rossiter emphasizes the role of chance in the formation of the presidential institution. The ambiguous nature of article two of the Constitution and the uncertainty surrounding it at the Constitutional Convention, as compared with article one, left open to interpretation many of the prerogatives and initiatives that were later to become accepted norms.¹⁰
A fourth factor contributing to the absence of systematic research is the simple fact that the institution of the presidency is tied to the man occupying the Oval Office. On that basis, obvious difficulties attend any attempt to generalize from thirty-nine cases over a two-hundred-year period. While there is clearly a great deal of continuity in terms of both internal and external forces and structures, the standard way of cutting up
the presidency analytically is by the successive administrations of each president. One assumes that each man leaves his own unique mark on the office. Each president’s style, temperament, personality, skill, and charisma
all contribute to the perceptions of individuality by which each administration is viewed, despite continuities in institutional and environmental forces.¹¹
Another factor that surely inhibits the application of social-scientific rigor is the fact that many, if not most, of the important scholarly writers on the presidency have themselves been intimately bound up not just in a presidential administration, but with the chief executive himself. Such authors as James MacGregor Burns, Stephen Hess, Emmet J. Hughes, Richard Neustadt, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., and Rexford Tugwell have all had personal ties to one or more presidents. Personal experience is certainly important in obtaining a fuller understanding of how the presidency operates, but such experiences surely have had an effect on how presidents and their administrations are evaluated and compared. Few would not be awed by the majesty of the office and the presence of the chief executive. It is a recurrent problem among journalists covering the White House.¹² To be personally tied to a president is undoubtedly useful for obtaining certain kinds of detailed information about presidents, but it also creates a situation of observer-as-participant, which strikes directly at the ideals of dispassionate third-person analysis that lie at the heart of social-science research. Perhaps this factor more than any other is responsible for what has been identified by political scientists as the Presidential worship that has pervaded our professional literature.
¹³
Finally, there is often more than a little ambiguity over exactly what is being studied. Does a reference made to the presidency
point only to the man in the Oval Office, or does it include the White House Office as well? What about the Executive Office, the cabinet, and the departments under each cabinet head? What about the rest of the bureaucracy? These are primarily organizational and definitional questions, which should pose no great obstacle. But terms such as the president, the presidency and the executive branch have been used interchangeably.
Taken together, these difficulties do present an obstacle; but obstacles exist to be overcome.¹⁴ One should not lose sight of the fact that the presidency is a political institution founded in a long constitutional, legal, and political tradition. Consequently, the president and his minions behave in certain systematic, even predictable ways in the context of that institution. In this investigation, similarities and parallelisms existing across administrations will be sought out and analyzed by turning traditional frameworks on their heads. The argument I will advance is that policy determines presidential behavior.