Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Sukuk Securities: New Ways of Debt Contracting
Sukuk Securities: New Ways of Debt Contracting
Sukuk Securities: New Ways of Debt Contracting
Ebook378 pages4 hours

Sukuk Securities: New Ways of Debt Contracting

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The essential guide to global sukuk markets worldwide

Sukuk Securities provides complete information and guidance on the latest developments in the burgeoning sukuk securities markets. Written by leading Islamic finance experts, this essential guide offers insight into the concepts, design features, contract structures, yields, and payoffs in all twelve global sukuk markets, providing Islamic finance professionals with an invaluable addition to their library. The first book to fully introduce the market, this book provides a detailed overview of the sukuk market, with practical guidance toward applying these instruments in real-world scenarios. Readers will learn how sukuk securities are regulated and the issues that arise from regulations, and gain insight into the foundation and principles of Islamic finance as applied to these instruments. Extensive tables illustrate t-test comparisons between conventional bonds and sukuk, risk factors, and the issuance of different types of sukuk securities by country to give readers a deeper understanding of the markets.

In 2010, the World Bank recommended sukuk as the best form of lending for growth in developing countries; since then, the value of new issues has grown at 45 percent per year. The market's present size is close to US $1,200 billion, with private markets in major financial centers like London, Zurich, and New York. This book provides comprehensive guidance toward understanding and using these instruments, and working within these markets.

  • Get acquainted with the sukuk market, definitions, classification, and pricing
  • Learn the different approaches to structuring and contract design
  • Discover how sukuk is applied, including regulations, ratings, and securitization
  • Examine payoff structures and suggested sukuk valuation in the context of Islamic finance principles

With the sukuk market growing the way it is, regulators, investors, and students need to fully understand the mechanisms at work. Sukuk Securities is the complete guide to the sukuk markets, with expert insight. July 2014 saw the first sukuk listing in London. Hong Kong and Seoul have also entered this niche market. Predictions are that there will be continued high growth of sukuk debt markets around the world, all providing targeted funding via sukuk contracting modes.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherWiley
Release dateSep 15, 2014
ISBN9781118943748
Sukuk Securities: New Ways of Debt Contracting

Related to Sukuk Securities

Titles in the series (100)

View More

Related ebooks

Banks & Banking For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Sukuk Securities

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Sukuk Securities - Mohamed Ariff

    Preface

    This book is about an emerging financial market that promises to provide effective funding for production activities under a set of safe risk-sharing and profit-sharing finance principles built into the design, and trading of a wholly new form of fixed-income securities called sukuk. In a speech on October 13, 2013, announcing new laws to get London to join sukuk trading, British prime minister David Cameron said that the new investments are possible because of the unique openness of the city of London and because of our commitment to help London lead the way in Islamic finance across the world, just as it has led the way in global finance across the ages.

    Sukuk contracts are based on an entrepreneur and a financier taking a business risk together and sharing the profits while being prepared to incur losses together if the venture goes bust. The sukuk securities market is found in 12 countries, as of 2014. Sukuk trading started in 1998 on a small scale and has grown to its present size of close to US$1.2 trillion. When fully developed, it offers an alternative mode of fund-raising for all users of funds as long as the specific needs are taken into account and a sukuk contract is provided that meets those needs.

    There is no literature dedicated solely to introducing these revolutionary securities markets to the readers in a comprehensive manner or, equally important, to providing a technical introduction to market players to what is described by the financial press as the Islamic (participation) debt market.

    Given the endorsement of the World Bank for this new form of financing for developing countries, the value of new issues has grown 45 percent per year from 2011 to 2013, compared with a 17 percent growth per year from 1998 to 2010. The markets for this new form of debt are becoming more attractive to corporations, which are increasing players in all 12 markets. Governments are substantial players in sourcing infrastructural development funding. Agencies such as central banks and public works and energy firms are also seeking to raise funds in this new form.

    This book attempts to answer a number of questions for both novices and experts in these marketplaces: What is a sukuk security? How should it be classified vis-à-vis bond markets? How is it designed? What are the different types of sukuk contracts that uniquely match the needs of farmers, on the one hand, and the working capital of a manufacturer, on the other hand? How big is the market? Why is its targeted funding mode superior to the general-purpose borrowing through conventional bond funding? How is this market different from the common bond market?

    Commentators have hailed this form of financing with full asset backing as having the potential to reduce the appetite for debt. By design, borrowers could not borrow more than 100 percent of the value of their assets. We look at this new debt instrument in the context of debt overload in both the public and private sectors in the first two decades of the current century. Since 2008, debt has been decreased by governments, corporations, and individuals because the world has taken on too much debt per capita in the last quarter century. According to the World Bank criterion, debt should not be more than 80 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) for the economy to be sustainable.

    Since the onset of the global financial crisis as well as the Eurozone debt crisis, economic agents are quickly limiting debt across the world to make their economies crisis-resistant. The design features explained in this book on sukuk offer a better choice than the radical idea of fully backed banks or the idea of returning banks to the same mode as corporations in backing equity at about 30 percent of total assets. These calls are being made by analysts to stabilize the financial system without examining the merits of sukuk as an alternative to the same malady.

    This new debt instrument locks the producer and the financier to the profit-and-loss outcomes of a project before asking for rewards from a venture. Such a mode of finance, along with the limiting of loans to no more than 100 percent of the asset value of a borrower, is extolled by many scholars and international institutions as a solution to the debt overload at current period. It appears that this debt overload is the servitude of humanity to modern financial corporations predicted by Thomas Jefferson in the 19th century at the birth of fractional banking. Under fractional banking, banks create money with very little asset backing compared to the 100 percent asset backing by the borrower when a sukuk contract is made.

    In a sermon in August 2013, Pope Benedict XVI commented that modern lending practices are basically faulty in logic and harmful to the world order and natural justice. Could the new form of debt described in this book be a long-term solution to the ills of modern debt practices based on one-sided contracts in which risk is not shared?

    Acknowledgments

    This book is a result of a major scholarship grant from the Khazanah Nasional Holding (a Sovereign Wealth Fund) to the University Putra Malaysia. This led to an international collaboration, with one of the authors of this book coming from Australia to Malaysia over a seven-year period to do joint research. Apart from our sincere gratitude to this funding source, our sincere gratitude is also extended to the Maybank Endowment at the University Putra Malaysia, which facilitated the joint research.

    Several industry people extended their helping hands. Two we would like to name are Meor Amri Meor Ayob of Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia and Dr. Yeah Kim Leng of Bond Rating Agency Malaysia, both of whom made it possible for us to access data and expertise at their respective firms. Mervyn Lewis, in Adelaide, Australia, and Michael Skully and Abdullah Saeed, both in Melbourne, Australia, deserve a special mention for their continued joint work on Islamic finance research that has added a fair amount of new knowledge to this fledgling field of study.

    To the numerous others who participated in the making of this book, we owe an intellectual debt for sharing their ideas, time, and expertise.

    We owe an intellectual debt to Peter Casey for his permission to reproduce a chapter on regulatory lessons (Chapter 9). He is an experienced regulator of sukuk markets with experience in the United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Equally important, we thank Abdullah Saeed and Omar Salah for their elucidation in Chapter 3 on the theoretical aspects of sukuk structures. They have all added great insights on the regulatory framework.

    The professional staff at John Wiley & Sons has been very helpful in the long process of converting the manuscript into a book. We would like to specially mention the four whom we got to know: Nick Wallwork, Jeremy Chia, Gladys Ganaden in Singapore, and Kimberly Monroe-Hill in Hoboken, New Jersey, United States of America.

    About the Authors

    Meysam Safari, PhD, is a senior lecturer at SEGi University, Malaysia. With a scholarship from Khazana Holdings Malaysia, he spent five years researching the topic of sukuk under the guidance of the other two authors at the University Putra Malaysia. He holds an undergraduate engineering degree and a doctoral degree in finance from the University Putra Malaysia.

    Mohamed Ariff, PhD, a professor of finance at the Bond University, Australia (and the University Putra Malaysia), is widely considered a specialist on Asian Pacific finance and Islamic finance. He served in 2004–2007 as the elected president of the 26-year-old Asian Finance Association. He is a coauthor of Investments, a leading McGraw-Hill textbook, and has authored or coauthored 33 other books. His scholarly articles have appeared in leading economics and finance journals.

    Shamsher Mohamad, PhD, is a professor at the International Centre for Education in Islamic Finance, also known as INCEIF. He has served in various capacities over 31 years, rising to his last position as dean of the economics faculty at the University Putra Malaysia. He has authored or coauthored several books (including Efficiency of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange and Stock Pricing in Malaysia). He has published scholarly papers in finance journals.

    PART One

    The Foundation of Sukuk Securities

    CHAPTER 1

    Introduction to Sukuk Markets

    On Christmas Eve 2013, Pope Francis, in his first apostolic exhortation, pleaded for a return of economics and finance to an ethical approach which favors human beings. Instituting an ethical approach to finance is the purpose of Islamic financial markets, which have created securities that conform to Islamic scripture and traditions. In some countries this form of contracting has been dubbed participation finance to emphasize the profit-sharing aspect of this new market practice. Islamic securities are specially tailored financial products that conform to the set of ethical and common law–based financial transaction principles laid out in Shari’ah, or Islamic law. Shari’ah literally means the way, and it takes its body of principles from the Quran and the Sunnah (an account of the normative behavior of the Prophet Muhammad). Those principles are strictly applied when designing the financial contracting terms that cover such products. Compliance is assured by a committee of experts working at each financial institution, and the institutions must abide by the rulings of both the national and international committees on compliance standards.

    Although sovereign laws enacted by various governments originated with some strong ethical foundations in order to protect people, these were watered down in recent centuries by the power of the moneyed class, which includes modern banks. The result is that some of the high moral edicts that governed the financial behavior of human societies are no longer taken into consideration in the design, marketing, and sale of financial products. There has been a call in recent years to go back to human ethics, since the world has witnessed how new and untested financial innovations could wreck the wealth of societies. It is a call for finance that favors human beings against the interests of the moneyed class.

    For example, in the environment of close to zero percent interest rates that has prevailed since 2010, banks are now going back to the old bad habit of offering bets on future events to entice bank depositors to bring their savings to the banks with a bet. If the bets are won, the contracted low interest rate will be increased by the banks. Of course, the experience of depositors in the United States in 1994–2008 was that bets like these made lots of people lose money. Although such bets are just another form of gambling, bank regulators have yet to move aggressively to outlaw these contracts being offered by regular (versus investment) banks that cater to the common person with little savings.

    ISLAMIC (PARTICIPATION) DEBT SECURITIES

    Islamic financial instruments, constructed with some extra elements of ethical precepts, have helped to form a niche market for financial products in 76 countries today. The total assets of this niche market are no more than a small fraction of the world’s conventional securities markets. These Islamic securities may be classified into four major groups: stocks, mutual funds, money markets, and sukuk (bonds that comply with Shari’ah requirements).

    Sukuk certificates are Islamic debt securities held by the lenders. This book is about these new instruments, which are currently issued and traded in 12 markets; the first public issue was in 1998. In October 2013, Britain announced its intention to start a sukuk market in 2014–2015. This book describes the foundation of sukuk as Islamic securities, sometimes also called participation debt certificates or participation debt securities to connote the risk-sharing aspect of sukuk debt contracting.

    The principles to which Islamic securities adhere are quite different from those used in the design of conventional securities, but some modern terms are shared by the two practices, borrowed from conventional financial contracting. The modern financial principles that guide the design of conventional debt securities evolved over two and a half centuries without much reference to the type of ethical principles that have been applied in designing Islamic financial products in historical times as well as today.

    The vast majority of the lending for production funding was secured by the invention of fractional reserve banking around 1850 CE. This new form of banking was revolutionary, and it has secured widespread acceptance from regulators. This revolution started about four decades after the papal edict that made lending at interest permissible for the adherents of the Roman Catholic Church.

    Production funding that existed before this papal edict was not based on interest, nor did it shirk risk sharing in lending. Loans were based on profit sharing and risk sharing, but this slowly gave way to a one-way contract in which the return and risk of a production loan became divorced from the outcomes of lending. The voyages of Christopher Columbus were designed as risk-sharing and profit-loss-sharing contracts. Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain secured 70 percent of Columbus’s profits on goods, including slaves, that managed to survive the risk of transatlantic navigation.

    Today’s mode of funding is based on the entrepreneur taking the full risk of a venture; the lender takes no risk of failure but is assured of a prenegotiated reward if the venture succeeds. Fractional banks can therefore offer much cheaper loans than the risk-shared loans of historical times.

    This is not the case with Islamic financial securities. The financial contracts designed under the Islamic (participation) label require strict adherence to some fundamentally different principles for all kinds of securities, be they publicly traded bills, shares, debtlike sukuk, stocks and derivatives, or privately traded instruments.

    Islamic financial instruments can be classified into four core types of contracts:

    Musharakah securities. Ownership and control of a firm’s assets through the purchase of shares of stock makes this class very similar to common stock ownership. The shares of stocks are securities that give the owner a claim to the profits only if the profits are earned after the risk of the project has been shared.

    Sukuk securities. These are mostly finite-period debt (rarely equity) or funding arrangement contracts, mostly without managerial control of the project funded but with unique fractional ownership of a set of income-producing assets of a borrower. These assets are set aside by the borrower as asset-backed or asset-based contracts held in a special purpose company (SPC) owned by the fund providers, whose payoff is based on profit sharing from the assets of the SPC.

    Takaful (insurance).Takaful contracts are risk-transfer arrangements that contain the provision that the insurance premiums collected from the insured parties are to be invested only in approved (i.e., permissible by Shari’ah) securities. Takaful uses mutual insurance principles; hence, the excess profits of the insurance operator are distributed at regular intervals to members based on a prenegotiated profit ratio.

    Islamic mutual funds. These are investment funds managed on behalf of clients for a fee and recovery of the costs incurred in managing the portfolios. Return of profits occurs after the management costs are recovered. These funds are to be invested only in socially beneficial production activities, not antisocial (as defined by Shari’ah) projects.

    This simple four-category division of Islamic financial products may resemble the conventional security classes of stocks, bonds, insurance, and mutual funds. However, there are significant differences in their structure, in the mode of pricing them, in collateralization, and in what economic production activities may have access to the funds.

    For example, the pricing of Islamic securities is done through profit-sharing and risk-sharing contracts under the ethical principle of giving rewards only after the risks are shared. Conventional securities are priced by interest-based payments to investors, usually prenegotiated, with no risk shared. Some Islamic securities may even have special features, such as a strange form of diminishing principal repayments with profit sharing. Thus, profit payments are reduced as the entrepreneur takes more control of the production. This is called diminishing musharakah. There are other exotic contracts, all tied to the specific funding needs in the production process.

    These and other characteristics make participatory financial instruments very different from conventional instruments. The appearance of similarity is somewhat exaggerated by critics not knowing that the important structural differences are meant to safeguard both borrowers and lenders and to ensure ethics-based funding arrangements.

    Since Islamic securities, once issued as publicly traded instruments, are also traded in financial markets, we have to also include two more categories of Islamic financial instruments: Islamic capital markets, and private equity (or private sukuk, private takaful, or private mutual funds). The latter category is a separate group of securities when such securities are not traded in public markets, so we may also call them nontraded private Islamic securities.

    Thus, we have six categories of Islamic financial transaction modes. We have provided these introductory remarks to set the stage for our discussion of only one of these classes, sukuk, in the rest of the book. We now proceed with this task by examining sukuk securities as a class by itself.

    THE ORIGIN OF SUKUK STRUCTURES

    Historical research in the Mediterranean region, traditionally known as the cradle of civilization, indicates that lending for production purposes was done through profit-sharing and risk-sharing contracts. Further, the loan was given only if the borrower had some assets or was likely to acquire some as a result of the financing. The exception to this rule was borrowing by kings and governments and perhaps also by the moneyed class as well as those in financial difficulty.

    Historical records allude to the creation of sukuk as a borrowing instrument that Islamic legal scholars in the Turkish empire helped to design for public financing when the emperor needed to borrow large sums of money for reconstruction after the devastation of the empire after five crusades that ended in 1285 CE. The innovation of fund-raising consistent with Islamic ethics of borrowing differed considerably from Christian practices at that time, which were based on Babylonian and Greco-Roman laws.

    A financial contract must have the following characteristics under the Islamic participatory finance principles of borrowing and funding. Ownership and control contracts must be based on profit sharing by participating in the risk of the project so that the profit accrues to lenders after the fund is used for the project. The outcome of such funding is the profit earned, which is shared in proportion by the financier and the business. The important issue is that it is a shared arrangement even though the sukuk is a borrowing instrument for a limited period. One brings the capital and the other entrepreneurship to make things useful for the society under a joint arrangement.

    The rewards to the financier depend on the outcome of the funds being applied, which includes a small chance of losses. The parties have a mutual interest in securing a good outcome of the business activity; the project risk is not shifted entirely to the entrepreneur. This enhances society’s welfare. The interests of the moneyed class engaged in the lending are thus subject to the welfare of the community in which the moneyed class resides.

    When no ownership and control is involved with the assets of an enterprise, a sukuk instrument is agreed upon as follows: (1) The fund provider has a share of that part of the borrower’s assets transferred to a special legal body, the SPC, to be owned by the lenders; (2) the borrower earns rewards from the income of the set-aside assets to service the borrowed money at the end of the contract period; and (3) the earnings of the SPC assets could provide periodic incomes to be paid as rewards if the contracts provided for such payoffs at regular intervals as ordinary annuity.

    In a sense, then, to borrow, a producer firm must have part of its assets removed from the producer firm’s control so that the lender has income from those set-aside assets to service the fund provider. While the asset transfer makes such debt riskier, it also ensures that the borrower is limited to borrowing only to the extent that the assets have value. The principle is Have assets, can borrow.

    Borrowing for any purpose other than economic usefulness to society is discouraged. The setting aside of assets of a producer firm ensures an income as return to the lender, which is meant to make the borrowing contract more secure—two-sided or asynchronous. That is not the case in current conventional bond markets, although without risk sharing with prenegotiated interest payments, conventional debt contracts may still be less risky.

    Borrowing in conventional bond markets is usually based on the good credit reputation of the borrowers. Certainly, the assets are not owned from day one of the funding, nor are risks shared before payoffs occur. Under the modern laws applying to conventional lending, a lender may still have to take the borrower to court under the provisions of the corporate laws to make a claim for the assets owned by the borrower, the producing firm. This is a costly process.

    A sukuk contract, in contrast to a conventional bond, was agreed upon by the Turkish emperor to raise money by setting aside some of the treasury assets to be owned by the lending public to rebuild the infrastructure of the empire.

    Another characteristic in sukuk funding is that the reward that the

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1