The Gnostics
4/5
()
About this ebook
Related to The Gnostics
Related ebooks
Gnostic Philosophy: From Ancient Persia to Modern Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dedalus Occult Reader: The Garden of Hermetic Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Egregores: The Occult Entities That Watch Over Human Destiny Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Not in His Image (15th Anniversary Edition): Gnostic Vision, Sacred Ecology, and the Future of Belief Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science of the Dogon: Decoding the African Mystery Tradition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gnostics: The First Christian Heretics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gnosticism: New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Oracle of the Illuminati Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gnostic New Age: How a Countercultural Spirituality Revolutionized Religion from Antiquity to Today Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gnostic Writings on the Soul: Annotated & Explained Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gospel & the Zodiac: The Secret Truth About Jesus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Melchizedek and the Mystery of Fire: A Treatise in Three Parts Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Forbidden Universe: The Occult Origins of Science and the Search for the Mind of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Essence of the Gnostics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sun Lady Unveiled Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe gnosis of the mind, The hymn of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPistis Sophia: A Gnostic Gospel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Souls of Black Folk Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Corpus Hermeticum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Trail of Gnosis: A Lucid Exploration of Gnostic Traditions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pistis Sophia Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Abraxas Principle: A Supernatural Concept Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Revelation of Saint John: The Path to Soul Initiation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Return of the Serpents of Wisdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dark Light Consciousness: Melanin, Serpent Power, and the Luminous Matrix of Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Traveler's Guide to the Astral Plane: The Secret Realms Beyond the Body and How to Reach Them Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Spirituality For You
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course In Miracles: (Original Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Belief: My Secret Life Inside Scientology and My Harrowing Escape Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Calendar of Wisdom: Daily Thoughts to Nourish the Soul, Written and Se Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Love Dare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Billion Years: My Escape From a Life in the Highest Ranks of Scientology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gospel of Mary Magdalene Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gay Girl, Good God: The Story of Who I Was, and Who God Has Always Been Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwanted: How Sexual Brokenness Reveals Our Way to Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weight of Glory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You Were Born for This: Astrology for Radical Self-Acceptance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing to Wake the Soul: Opening the Sacred Conversation Within Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Three Questions: How to Discover and Master the Power Within You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Gnostics
25 ratings1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This book is a lyrical meditation on ancient gnosticism as the 'betrayal' of the physical cosmos. It is beautifully written. Lacarriere has heavyweight fans like Lawrence Durrell and Marguerite Yourcenar.Lacarriere nicely conveys the alienated horror the ancient Gnostics felt for the world around them. And he maintains that this is in some ways comparable to our contemporary alienation under capitalism. In this way, an ancient heresy and modern revolution are used to illuminate each other. And our author goes about this in a manner that is very convincing.I found myself also quite interested by the brief criticisms our author permits himself of the so-called Traditionalist School (the discussion occurs towards the end of the book) that begins with René Guénon. For our purposes here, let us say that the Traditionalist maintain that the Truth that all the Great Religious Traditions point to is unsurpassable, and thus they, and only they, are the bearers of Truth.The argument with this is (or so I take Lacarriere to mean) that given the radical evil of the World (according to the Gnostics), we can expect no help from past religions that all spoke to a very different time. Our author argues that this 'cult of the past' "can only distract man from his true quest: the quest for a new consciousness, springing from his immediate experience and contingent on the present."Of course, this is exactly what Guénon feared most. 'Everyone doing their own thing'. While I think Guénon has a point specifically here, Lecarriere is certainly right to argue that Man is no longer the passive recipient of natures blows that he was in either ancient or even medieval times. The modern capitalist industrial / technological revolution has changed all that! The several great religions born in the wake of the Agricultural Revolution and consequent rise of Empire cannot hope to speak to a world in which Man has become an Effective Power.This is radically new. Our author maintains that religious answers to the human condition, if they can be found, must only be in the future, not the past.A Huge If, ...but I agree. Modernity has changed the way people live as much as the Agriculture Revolution once did. The Axial Age Religions arose as a response to this. If the changes wrought by modernity (industry, technology and science, media and the internet) prove to be as profound as those at the dawn of History and continue to endure, it is no longer entirely impossible to imagine a new religion (and religious sensibility / ethos) eventually rising and swallowing up its predecessors.I think that Lecarriere not only imagined this, but hoped for it too
Book preview
The Gnostics - Jacques Lacarriere
Montségur.
INTRODUCTION
Eighteen centuries separate us from the Gnostics. Eighteen centuries during the course of which wars, persecutions and massacres, causing the deaths of thousands, have amply justified the total suspicion in which they held this world and the creatures that inhabit it. In everything that contemporary history sets before our eyes—the ever more blatant contempt for the individual man, the fallacy of ideologies, the wars or military interventions openly carried on for the profit of the combined interests of capitalism and socialism, the daily erosion of liberty and the fascination of violence—in all this, a Gnostic of today would see nothing more than the magnified image of the dramas which were familiar to him, and the inevitable outcome of that everlasting outrage, the very existence of the world and of humanity as they are.
Who then were these people, lucid enough to look at creation with eyes stripped of all consoling self-deceptions, sensitive enough to feel, in all its unbearable extremity, the anguish of an eternity forever promised and forever denied, sincere enough to accept in their own lives all the implications of this total rejection of the world, and to behave, everywhere and at all times, as unsubjugated outsiders?
The term Gnostic is vague, encompassing several distinctly different meanings. But, historically speaking, it acquired a particular meaning during the early centuries of our era. On the Eastern shores of the Mediterranean, in Syria, Samaria and Egypt, at the moment when Christianity was feeling its way, and when so many prophets and messiahs were travelling the high roads of the Orient, founding short-lived communities here and there, certain men called Gnostics, that is to say ‘men who know,’ were also setting up important communities, grouped around various masters and female initiates of a teaching that was radically different from all the others.
For the moment, I can do no more than sketch in the broad outlines of this complex, fascinating message, which will be drawn in greater detail throughout the text of the book. Gnosis is knowledge. And it is on knowledge—not on faith or belief—that the Gnostics rely in order to construct their image of the universe and the inferences they drew from it: a knowledge of the origin of things, of the real nature of matter and flesh, of the destiny of a world to which man belongs as ineluctably as does the matter from which he is constituted. Now this knowledge, born out of their own meditations or from the secret teachings which they claim to have had from Jesus or from mythical ancestors, leads them to see the whole of material creation as the product of a god who is the enemy of man. Viscerally, imperiously, irremissibly, the Gnostic feels life, thought, human and planetary destiny to be a failed work, limited and vitiated in its most fundamental structures. Everything, from the distant stars to the nuclei of our body-cells, carries the materially demonstrable trace of an original imperfection which only Gnosticism and the means it proposes can combat.
But this radical censure of all creation is accompanied by an equally radical certainty which presupposes and upholds it: the conviction that there exists in man something which escapes the curse of this world, a fire, a spark, a light issuing from the true God—that distant, inaccessible stranger to the perverse order of the real universe; and that man’s task is to regain his lost homeland by wrenching himself free of the snares and illusions of the real, to rediscover the original unity, to find again the kingdom of this God who was unknown, or imperfectly known, to all preceding religions.
These convictions were expressed through a radical teaching which held almost all the systems and religions of former times to be null and void. In spite of its links with some philosophies of the time, and apart from minor reservations—since they borrowed certain beliefs indiscriminately from various systems, prophets or sacred books—one can say that Gnosticism is a profoundly original thought, a mutant thought.
This rejection of all systems, and of a world governed not by men but by shadows or semblances of men—whom I will call pseudanthropes—forced them to live on the fringes of all established society, and to preach a refusal to compromise with false institutions, a refusal to procreate, to marry, to live in families, or to obey temporal powers, whether pagan or Christian.
To sum up the essential position of the Gnostics in still simpler terms, let us say that in their eyes the evil which taints the whole of creation and alienates man in body, mind, and soul, deprives him of the awareness necessary for his own salvation. Man, the shadow of man, possesses only a shadow of consciousness. And it is to this one task that the Gnostics of the first centuries AD deliberately devoted themselves, choosing paths which were not only unorthodox but which, moreover, greatly scandalized their contemporaries: to create in man a true consciousness, which would permit him to impart to his thoughts and deeds the permanence and the rigour necessary to cast off the shackles of this world.
Let us, then, open the first dossier on this monumental undertaking, launched against the entire universe, against the immensity of the firmament, against man’s original alienation and the falsity of systems and institutions, and let us begin at the beginning ... with the sky.
The Workings of the World
The death of a bee, assassinated by his queen, is charged with as much meaning as the massacres of Dachau.
R. ABELLIO
Les yeux d’Ezéchiel sont ouverts
I
THE PERFORATED VEIL
When all the complicated calculations prove false, when the philosophers themselves have nothing more to tell us, we may be forgiven for turning to the meaningless twitter of the birds or to the distant counterweight of the stars.
MARGUERITE YOURCENAR
Memoirs of Hadrian
What emotions does the sight of the sky inspire in us, if not praise, enthusiasm, and admiration? It is vast, infinite, immutable, omnipresent; it eludes the relative and the measurable; it is a parameter of the incommensurable. But in this concert, which we consider natural and which celebrates dawn, zenith, nadir, and twilight with equal assurance, discordant notes sometimes jar the ear. To be vast is good. To be infinite is too much. To possess planets and stars is an incontestable triumph. But to possess them by the million, to teem with stars which are so many eyes trained upon the world each night as if tracking our dreams, is to wield excessive power, to display a very suspect splendour. Something in this immensity turns and meshes its gears with a regularity so precise as to be disquieting; and exactly for whom—or against whom—this mechanism deploys its flaming wheelworks, we do not know.
So, in this simple look directed at the celestial vault, the Gnostics find themselves confronted with the ultimate nature of reality: what is this matter which is by turns full and empty, dense and tenuous, luminous and dark, of which our sky is made? Is this dark shore, this tenebrous tissue, this interstitial shadow wherein the stars seem pricked like incandescent pores, constituted of matter or of space? Is the ‘real’ sky nothing but its light, these winking eyes on the ocean of night, or is it at one and the same time that which shines and that which does not, a fire flaming and dark by turns? Do its shores and its black abysses comprise a nothingness, an absence of light, or are they the concrete material which interposes itself between our earth and the distant fires which it obscures?
No doubt this question will seem absurd, or at least premature, in the age of the Gnostics. Nevertheless, it is implicit at the very starting-point of their thought. Since man, in their view, is a fragment of the universe, and since the body of the one and the space of the other proceed from a simple material, both must obey the same laws. Man is a mirror in which one can discover the reduced and condensed image of the sky, a living universe carrying within him, in his body and in his psyche, fires and dark shores, zones of shadow and of light. Are these lights and shadows simply forms split off from a single material, or two materials of opposing nature? All our existence, all our choices as thinking hominids are vitally implicated in this simple question. Thus, the Gnostics searched the splendours and the terrors of the sky to find an answer to our own duality. Never was there asked a more pertinent question and never were the stars scanned so earnestly.
And it seems that what struck these men most forcibly, as they watched throughout the Egyptian nights, is the dark portion of the sky—the vastness, the omnipresence, the heavy opacity of that blackness. It hangs over us like a veil, a wall of shadow encircling the earth, a tenebrous dome through which appear, here and there, through chinks, faults and gaps, the glittering fires of another world. A gigantic black lid seals in our universe and encompasses us with its opacity.
Dark wall, black lid, circle of shadow. And beyond that, in a second circle, the fire of the planets, the stars and all the heavenly bodies. The eye apprehends this other world by means of the luminous dots cut out of the fabric of the darkness in the shape of constellations, the sparkling lace perforating the tissue of the cosmic night. Why did the being—the god or demiurge—who thus perforated the veil of our sky, trace these enigmatic stencilled patterns that echo the familiar shapes of our world? Because, without a doubt, they are the sign of something, the sketch for some plan; they are messages or symbols scattered across the celestial vault. For example, one Gnostic sect, the Peratae (an obscure name meaning Those Who Pass Through), discovered in the constellation of the Serpent or the Dragon the very meaning of the genesis of the cosmos. It is a curious constellation, one of the most vast in the boreal sky, yet one to which little attention is paid. It stretches its sinuous shapes between Ursa Major and Ursa Minor, its tail lost in the direction of Gemini, its triangular head pointed towards the pole star. Its outline lacks the geometric precision of the Bear, the elegance of the Swan (Cygnus), or the severity of the Scorpion (Scorpio). But coiled as it is round the northern pole, as if suckling on the navel of the sky, one can understand why it should quickly become charged with symbolic importance.
The Peratae, who specifically regarded the Serpent as the first Gnostic in the world, the one who possessed primordial knowledge and had tried to communicate it to the first man, in Eden, recognized in this constellation the symbol of the primordial Serpent and his implication in human destiny: ‘If a person has eyes that know how to see, he will look upward to the heavens and he will see the beautiful image of the Serpent coiled there, at the place where the great sky begins. Then he will understand that no being in heaven or on earth or in hell was formed without the Serpent.’
And so, these constellations relate the earliest segment of the world’s history and are distinct signs, well worth deciphering since each has its terrestial counterpart. Up there, the great Serpent, coiled around the roots of heaven. On earth, the Serpent of Eden, coiled around the roots of the Tree of Knowledge. The sky—like the Biblical myths which the Gnostics often interpreted in the manner of modem mythologists, seeking to read the hidden meaning (today we would say ‘unconscious meaning’) that underlies their images, symbols and analogies—the sky, then, is the first source of knowledge.
If one wished to apply a contemporary idiom to Gnostic cosmology, one could say that the first circle (the circle of shadow) represents the strictly solar system, and the second (the fire of the planets) the galactic system to which we belong. But beyond the second circle the Gnostics imagined others—varying in number—right up to the ultimate centre which constitutes the source and the root of the entire universe. These intermediary worlds, these circles ranged in echelons up to the navel of the world, are totally invisible to us. It is through intuition, or rather through revelation, through gnosis, that the Gnostic knows of their existence. For, judging by all the evidence, the Gnostics built a pure mental construction—rather strange and refreshing, like the systems of the physicians of the Ionian school in Greece—upon an a priori vision of the universe.
One could say that these other worlds, presaged and divined by Gnostic speculation, in fact represent what modem astronomy calls nebulae, spirals, and extra-galactic clusters. A Gnostic like Basilides calls this world beyond the second circle, beyond the plants and the sphere of fixed stars, ‘the hyper-cosmic world’. Therein resides the Supreme Being, the God-Nothingness, guardian of