In Conversation: Samuel Wells and Stanley Hauerwas
By Samuel Wells and Stanley Hauerwas
5/5
()
About this ebook
Two contemporary theologians, Samuel Wells and Stanley Hauerwas, add their voices to the ongoing conversation about Christian life in the twenty-first century.
This third book in the In Conversation series dives deeply into the theological and personal ideas and motivations for the work of two prominent Christian thinkers. Readers will discover their thoughts on the Trinity, parish ministry, and non-violence, along with anecdotes and intimate notions on marriage, family, and even baseball. Followers of Wells’s and Hauerwas’s theological and homiletical work will find out what has influenced them most, and where they’d like to go from here.
A fascinating read for Episcopalians and Anglicans, and those who enjoyed the first two In Conversation books.
Samuel Wells
Samuel Wells is vicar of St. Martin-in- the-Fields, London. His previous books include Walk Humbly, Incarnational Ministry, Incarnational Mission, Shaping the Prayers of the People (with Abigail Kocher), and Learning to Dream Again.
Read more from Samuel Wells
Power and Passion: Six Characters in Search of Resurrection Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Then Shall We Live?: Christian Engagement with Contemporary Issues Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Moment of Truth: Reflections on Incarnation and Resurrection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrafting Prayers for Public Worship: The Art of Intercession Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImprovisation: The Drama of Christian Ethics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Preach: Times, seasons, texts and contexts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiving Out Loud: Conversations About Virtue, Ethics and Evangelicalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJoining the Angels Song: Eucharistic Prayers for Sundays and Holy Days Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHanging by a Thread: The Questions of the Cross Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Share in the Body: A Theology of Martyrdom for Today's Church Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Incarnational Mission: Being with the world Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Heart Of It All: The Bible's Big Picture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHanging by a Thread Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Then Shall We Live Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liturgy on the Edge: Pastoral and attractional worship Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHumbler Faith, Bigger God: Finding a Story to Live By Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIncarnational Mission: Being with the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Character of Virtue: Letters to a Godson Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Future That's Bigger Than The Past: Towards the renewal of the Church Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Speaking the Truth: Preaching in a diverse culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiturgy on the Edge: Pastoral and Attractional Worship Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning to Dream Again: Rediscovering the heart of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLove Mercy: The Twelve Steps of Forgiveness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBe Not Afraid: Facing Fear with Faith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Esther & Daniel (Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Cross in the Heart of God: Reflections on the death of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFace To Face: Meeting Christ in Friend and Stranger Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeing With Leaders' Guide: A Course Exploring Christian Faith and Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNorthern Lights: Resurrecting Church in the North of England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to In Conversation
Related ebooks
Approaching the End: Eschatological Reflection on Church, Politics and Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Minding the Web: Making Theological Connections Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Face To Face: Meeting Christ in Friend and Stranger Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSCM Core Text Christian Doctrine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Work of Theology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learning to Speak Christian Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Character of Virtue: Letters to a Godchild Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cross-Shattered Christ: Meditations on the Seven Last Words Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Candles in the Dark: Faith, Hope and Love in a Time of Pandemic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHanging by a Thread Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWith the Grain of the Universe: The Church's Witness and Natural Theology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar and the American Difference: Theological Reflections on Violence and National Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Preaching Radical and Orthodox Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorking with Words: On Learning to Speak Christian Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5In Good Company: The Church as Polis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Theology as Revisionary Metaphysics: Essays on God and Creation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Asceticism: Sexuality, Gender and the Quest for God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters to a Young Theologian Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeaking the Truth: Preaching in a diverse culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Wilderness Zone Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Grammar of Grace: Readings from the Christian Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Cross-Shattered Church: Reclaiming the Theological Heart of Preaching Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Humbler Faith, Bigger God: Finding a Story to Live By Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sign and the Sacrifice: The Meaning of the Cross and Resurrection Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How My Mind Has Changed: Essays from the Christian Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGathered on the Road to Zion: Toward a Free Church Ecclesio-Anthropology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur God Loves Justice: An Introduction to Helmut Gollwitzer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeing Human: Bodies, Minds, Persons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Spirituality For You
A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Love Dare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course In Miracles: (Original Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwanted: How Sexual Brokenness Reveals Our Way to Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gay Girl, Good God: The Story of Who I Was, and Who God Has Always Been Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Calendar of Wisdom: Daily Thoughts to Nourish the Soul, Written and Se Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and Buddha: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Owning Your Own Shadow: Understanding the Dark Side of the Psyche Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dangerous Prayers: Because Following Jesus Was Never Meant to Be Safe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Belief: My Secret Life Inside Scientology and My Harrowing Escape Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Billion Years: My Escape From a Life in the Highest Ranks of Scientology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You Were Born for This: Astrology for Radical Self-Acceptance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hindu View Of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Celebration of Discipline, Special Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for In Conversation
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
In Conversation - Samuel Wells
Introduction
Stanley Hauerwas (SH): One of the things that Sam and I said to one another in preparation for this conversation is we need to try to go beyond our stump speeches. You know, speeches like my claim that Modernity names the time when you produce people who believe they should have no story except the story they choose when they had no story.
We should want this exercise to force us to say things we didn’t know that we thought. You think you’ve heard any of that?
Maureen Knudsen Langdoc (MKL): I do. The conversation we had about people wishing you would have written more about race, that’s something I’ve wondered about and didn’t know your response to until today. And the exchange you and Sam had about human sexuality—I didn’t even know we’d talk about that. But it was interesting for me to watch you two ask questions of each other, to push one another to consider the implications of following a particular logic. That seems like a natural conversation between you two, as friends and theologians.
Samuel Wells (SW): That feels some of the strongest stuff, in the sense that we’re actually doing it, rather than looking back at it as wondrous things we did some twenty years ago.
MKL: And I think there’s been a good bit of conversation about your personal lives, that isn’t in print—
SH: I didn’t know we would get this personal. It’s okay. I just don’t know if anyone will want to read about it.
SW: That’s what I said to Maureen yesterday!
SH: I mean, why should they give a shit what our personal lives have been like?
MKL: I think the personal life stuff matters, at least to the extent that we’ve talked about the relationship between thought and action and the formation of character. When I was your student, I appreciated the classroom discussions about Christian ethics, but I also really wanted to know, where does Stanley Hauerwas buy his groceries?
SH: (laughter)
MKL: How does this all play out? I think readers will find it interesting to know more about your marriage, what you’re afraid of, whose opinion matters to you, what you pray for your children.
Nancy Bryan (NB): It’s very much what I want the series to be—that deeper, more personal conversation overlaid with theological topics.
SW: But what you need to know, Nancy, is that for Stanley, the words deeper and more personal don’t end up on the same side of the divide. Stanley would regard personal as less deep. (laughter) I’m only joking. But trying to get back to twenty years ago before I was in this world, if you will, and if I think about what I’d want to know about Stanley, I think we’ve covered some of those things. In other words, you have all these convictions and are having these conversations with Aquinas and Aristotle, but how does that map out in the intractable relationships of your life?
SH: I think the order of the book will not necessarily be the order of the discussion.
MKL: Oh, I agree, and our conversation hasn’t followed the proposed outline.
SH: I mean, the discussion we’re having right now can be a part of it as far as I’m concerned.
MKL: I assumed there would need to be some rearranging.
SH: So where would you put the first discussion, when we talked about theology as conversation and all that?
SW: I think that belongs in the beginning, doesn’t it?
MKL: I do.
Conversation One
Theology as Conversation / Constantinian-on-a-Stick / Claiming the Everyday / The Role of a Theologian
MKL: As part of the In Conversation series, our time together is designed around the idea that two theologians who happen to be friends come together to talk about theology, the church, their interests and passions, and readers get the privilege of peering around the corner and listening into this conversation between the two of you. So it seems like a good way to begin is to start by talking about theology as conversation. Would you describe theology as conversation? If so, who are the conversation partners? What’s being communicated? Or are there limitations or reasons to resist or qualify describing theology as conversation?
SH: Sam has written about conversation in a very intelligent way, locating conversation as the primary virtue of the university. And what that helps you see is conversations are not just between people who agree but are between people who bring diverse backgrounds and experiences, in which they test out what they think they know by listening to someone else. So listening becomes one of the more important aspects of having a conversation. Whether you have something to say is extremely important, because too often conversation happens between people who think they are already in such agreement that they don’t locate how it is that their conversation is really an exercise in group narcissism. So it’s very important that conversation is understood as a mode of investigation. All that said, Sam and I have had a conversation for how many years, Sam?
SW: Well, it started in 1991, so twenty-eight years.
SH: And when Sam was Dean of the Chapel, we had many, many, many conversations in which we tested our own perceptions of what was going on, as well as exploring theological issues that we hadn’t perhaps known quite how to think through. Sam leaving Duke was one of the most dramatic exits for me. I mean, we still talk constantly, but it’s not quite the same in terms of having a face-to-face kind of conversation. The conversation between Sam and myself has been a conversation between friends. And friendship is absolutely constitutive of the conversation, and the conversation is constitutive of friendship.
SW: I guess the way I think about these things is eschatological. The university portrays to the church something that eschatologically the church hopes, expects, and prays to discover in heaven. If you imagine heaven as a place where there’s nothing to fix, and there’s no deficit to be made up, then whereas popularly people think the biggest issue about heaven is whether you get there, once that issue is taken off the table the real issue is what on earth are you going to do when you’re there? And so, part of the work of theology is to describe the gifts that God gives us in such ways that we can begin to imagine how those gifts are inexhaustible. Otherwise heaven is dull, and you don’t want to see Stanley when he’s bored. So even though I would like to spend a lot of eternity with Stanley, I hope he’s not bored because it won’t always be a pleasure.
SH: Bernard Shaw said that he preferred hell because at least there would be interesting people there.
SW: In John Milbank and Adrienne Pabst’s The Politics of Virtue, the most interesting line in the whole book is—I’m sure it came from Milbank—is that liberalism’s understanding of the past is that people must have been perpetually bored. That’s my favorite line in the whole book.
So conversation is a description of how I engage everything in my experience, from the skills developed in the past, and failures and insights from my own shortcomings, and bring those face-to-face, literally, with another person, or more than one other person, in ways that are like a Van de Graaff generator: they spark and they create problems and they go down side alleyways and so on.
Even the etymology of the word, if you think about the word converse, not understood as a verb, but as con-verse as we pronounce it in England, then you’re talking about turning something over and over in your hand, and you don’t have to read Julian of Norwich and talk about hazelnuts, but the idea of turning something over and over in your hand to reflect on its multi-significance and its multivalence, is obviously a devotional and spiritual activity. To do that as a group together—to turn something over and over in your hand together is a wonderful thing. And the only thing that really stops you from doing it is time. And that’s why it’s so important to call this an eschatological practice, because it depicts what human interaction would be like if time were not a problem.
SH: I think that one of the things that’s part of conversation is a historization of where you are at the time you are engaged in conversation. Sam has this lovely account of developments within Christianity in relationship to the university. The prologue being when Christianity was in complete control and you didn’t know there was an outside. Then chapter one. How do you put that in chapter one?
SW: Well, that was round about the beginning of the twentieth century when the denominations—the judicatories—got the governing bodies and the faculties got the curriculum and they both thought they’d won. And then chapter two as I call it is what we think of as the 1960s, which is now nostalgically looked back to, paradoxically in a way, because that was when universities and the church really mattered. Kent State was at the center of the national attention, Martin Luther King Jr. was a pastor, and in some ways what was being debated was the American constitution. But it was being debated in these kind of places, when academic discourse actually mattered to the whole. Of course, it was really about Vietnam. It was about middle-class kids getting the draft. But people forget that, and they assume it was a sort of heightened awareness in the 1960s.
So basically, what I was saying when I was on campus here was that we were in chapter three. Chapter three is largely characterized by different understandings of the story but is mostly a fight between those who are trying to get back to chapter one and those who are trying to get back to chapter two. But it was really a call to inhabit chapter three. And chapter three, as it might come as no surprise to anyone reading this book, looked surprisingly like Stanley’s idea of a university.
And it was very much about the fact that the church only really got to be interesting if it renounced the right to chair the meeting all the time. So the most dramatic example of that I think during my time at Duke was in my final year. It was the tenth anniversary of 9/11, and this is the kind of thing I used to talk to Stanley in the gym about—how shall I handle this situation?
And so, the chapel choir had performed Mozart’s Requiem
—a nice sort of forty-five-minute piece of commemoration, and then four people were going to speak. And so obviously I had a hand in who those four people were going to be, and the four people that spoke were the mayor of Durham, the president of Duke University, myself, and the Muslim chaplain. (People found it bizarre that as the Dean of the Chapel I advocated for hiring a Muslim chaplain because they assumed that the Dean of the Chapel was in chapter one and was clinging onto the privileges of the role, as long as they could be held on to.)
Anyway, we each only had five or seven minutes to speak, but I made my remarks very Christological. I talked about the questions we had about God the Father, in terms of Providence: How could God let this happen? The way we quite clearly saw the work of the Spirit in terms of the firefighters and their work. But as Christians, we could only see it as a crucifying moment. So I got a letter shortly afterwards saying you’re not allowed to do that. You broke the rules. And I wrote back with all integrity saying you may not have noticed the rules have changed. Once we’ve got a Muslim who can talk about it in the light of 9/11, then the Dean of the Chapel doesn’t have to talk about all people of goodwill anymore, which in chapter one we thought was identical with Christianity but clearly is significantly different. I get to talk about Christianity for the first time. And actually, it ended up not in a hostile relationship with the correspondent. We became friends, we met up two or three times, and he invited me to speak at his synagogue.
SH: This is an example of what it means for Sam to be the Dean of Duke Chapel. I remember when he was offered the position, I said, I certainly hope you’ll take it. It is a preeminent example of a Constantinian church that he would become Dean of Duke Chapel. The office is Constantinian-on-a-Stick. And I said, Use it.
Now that helps, I hope, allay some of the criticism that allegedly I represent a position about Christianity that requires a withdrawal from the world. I’ll oftentimes say I wouldn’t mind withdrawing but there’s no place to withdraw to. You’re surrounded.
I think we are now in a situation that makes it possible for Christians to be free for the first time in many years. Because we lost. We’re no longer in control. We don’t control the conversation. We’ve got to pick it up wherever it seems to be going. And we can use some of the shards that have been left over from Christendom. And we don’t know what the future will look like. But in the meantime, we can have a hell of a lot of fun that the gospel makes possible because we do the odd thing of worshipping Jesus.