Battleships of the World: Struggle for Naval Supremacy, 1820–1945
By John Fidler
()
About this ebook
Related to Battleships of the World
Related ebooks
Warship 2019 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Battleships 1919-1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Depth Charge: Royal Naval Mines, Depth Charges & Underwater Weapons, 1914–1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5British Submarines in Two World Wars Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Grand Fleet Battlecruisers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreadnoughts: An Illustrated History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorld War Two at Sea: The Last Battleships Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5K Boat Catastrophe: Eight Ships & Five Collisions: The Full Story of the 'Battle' of the Isle of May Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe E-Boat Threat Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fishermen Against the Kaiser: Shockwaves of War, 1914–1915 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKing George V Class Battleships Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Town Class Cruisers: Design, Development & Performance: Southampton & Belfast Classes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Destination Dardanelles: The Story of HMS E7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom War to Peace: The Conversion of Naval Vessels After Two World Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTreaty Cruisers: The First International Warship Building Competition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Hunters and the Hunted: The Elimination of German Surface Warships around the World 1914-15 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Naval Warfare 1914–1918: From Coronel to the Atlantic and Zeebrugge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bismarck: The Epic Chase Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Frigates-Sloops & Brigs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5British Battlecruisers, 1905–1920 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5British Warships, 1860–1906: A Photographic Record Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5British Warships in the Age of Sail, 1603–1714: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5First Rate: The Greatest Warship of the Age of Sail Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The British Sailor of the First World War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Outrage at Sea: Naval Atrocities of the First World War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShepherds of the Sea: Destroyer Escorts in World War II Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Southern Thunder: The Royal Navy and the Scandinavian Trade in World War One Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fighting Commodores: Convoy Commanders in the Second World War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Nothing Friendly in the Vicinity ...: My Patrols on the Submarine USS Guardfish During WWII Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Warrior to Dreadnought: Warship Design and Development 1860-1905 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Battleships of the World
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Battleships of the World - John Fidler
Introduction
The battle squadrons of the Royal Navy, assembled at Spithead for the Naval Review of 1914, epitomised the armoured battleship at the height of its prestige. The long columns of majestic vessels represented Britain’s long-held mastery of the sea which had enabled the building of an empire, the defeat of Napoleon and the commercial supremacy of the past century.
The very names of the ships emphasised the traditions of the service: Ajax, Neptune, Conqueror, Orion, Colossus and Thunderer were all named after ships which had fought in the battle line at Trafalgar. An Audacious had fought at Aboukir Bay (the Battle of the Nile), where a Vanguard had been Nelson’s flagship, while another Vanguard and a Hercules had fought the Armada. There had been a Monarch at Copenhagen, a Superb at Algeciras. A Centurion had been Anson’s flagship for his epic voyage around the world and a Bellerophon had seen the surrender of Napoleon.
Now all of these names were borne by massive armoured ships, armed with guns of at least 12-inch calibre, any one of which could have reduced to matchwood an entire fleet of Nelson’s day. Among vessels nearing completion were a Royal Sovereign, a Warspite and a Revenge, inheritors of some of the most famous names, while the most famous of all Victory, launched in 1765, was then still afloat in Portsmouth harbour.
Dreadnought herself was named after a ship which had been in Drake’s squadron in Cadiz in 1587 and in Howard’s fleet in the Channel the following year. A second ship of the name had fought in the Dutch wars of the seventeenth century, a third against the French at Barfleur and Cape Passaro. Yet another had been Collingwood’s flagship in the blockade of Cadiz in 1805 and had fought at Trafalgar. Now the name was given to a new generation of fast, powerful armoured battleships. In 1914 the expectation was that the great issues of the war at sea would still be decided, as they had been for some four centuries, by the battle fleets. That certainty was shaken by the inconclusive nature of the gun duel at Jutland and by the vulnerability of the great ships to mine and torpedo. Finally, it was to be shattered by the aircraft which wrought such destruction at Taranto and Pearl Harbor, which sank Force Z and eventually overwhelmed the Japanese leviathans Yamato and Musashi. By 1945 it was clear that the end of the battleship era had come and the great ships, which were scrapped in the aftermath of the Second World War, were not replaced.
HMS Victory, afloat in Portsmouth harbour.
Chapter One
The Age of Innovation 1820–1870
The great three-decked ships of the line of the early nineteenth century were still in the direct line of development from the Revenge of 1577. The Royal Sovereign of 1642, the Victory of 1765 and the 120-gun Caledonia of 1808, despite the technical improvements in ship design, all had essential features in common. They were wooden-built, dependent on wind and sail, and were armed with broadside-mounted, muzzle loading guns firing solid shot. The revolution in ship design in the mid-nineteenth century saw the advent of iron and steel construction and armour, steam power and turretmounted breech-loading guns firing explosive shells. All of these innovations were greeted with a good deal of caution, and each posed considerable technical problems, but in total they transformed the world’s fighting navies in a generation.
Although steam power conferred the immense advantage of independence from the wind, it suffered from massive drawbacks. Engines were prone to breaking down in the early years. Aboard a wooden warship even the galley fire was a hazard and boiler rooms seemed terribly vulnerable to gunfire; paddle wheels were similarly vulnerable and even more exposed. Moreover the rate of consumption of coal meant that no vessel intended for the open sea could be solely dependent on her engines. However, by the 1820s, the navies of France, Britain and the USA were among those using steam paddle tugs for harbour work. Experiments with the far more efficient screw propeller were made in the following decades, with the Americans launching the first screw warship in 1843, the 10-gun sloop Princeton. Two years later the Admiralty staged the famous duel in which the screw sloop Rattler was lashed stern to stern with the paddle steamer Alecto, of similar size and power, in a tug-of-war. Alecto suffered the indignity of being dragged backwards, while at full power, at almost three knots.
The duel between Rattler and Alecto.
The screw frigate Ajax was the first of a series of warships to be built as a result and by 1850 screw propulsion was being applied to firstrates, the 90-gun Agamemnon among them, while existing ships were converted to steam.
However, for the next twenty years steam was regarded as providing auxiliary power only and a full sailing rig was an essential part of any warship. Moreover, an emphasis on sail-drill and seamanship as the priority, at times hindered development.
The use of the explosive shell was not unknown in naval warfare in the eighteenth century. The ungainly bomb-ketches of the time mounted one or two mortars amidships, the whole vessel having to be aligned in the direction of fire. The explosive was detonated by a fuse of slow match, lit before the propellant charge of gunpowder was fired. This was not only a hazardous operation aboard a wooden ship, but the rate of burning of the fuse was unreliable. Resulting accidents suggested that the shell was not really suited to naval warfare until, in 1824, the invention of a French artillery officer solved the problem. Colonel Henri-Joseph Paixhans tested a shell-firing gun in which the fuse of the shell was lit by the flash of the propellant, so that until the gun was fired, the shell was safe.
HMS Agamemnon.
Around the same time came experiments with breech loading and with rifling, to improve accuracy, but difficulties with the construction of a reliable breech mechanism led the Royal Navy to the continued reliance on muzzle-loaders until 1879. Then an accident occurred when a 38-ton muzzle-loader in Thunderer burst. It was discovered that the gun which had misfired, had been reloaded again by mistake and that the double charge had shattered the barrel. Muzzle-loaders of the time were reloaded by being depressed in line with angled reloading tubes set in the deck, with the charges and shells inserted by a hydraulic ram. The noise had been so deafening that the gun crew had failed to realise that one gun had misfired. Such an error would, of course, be impossible in a breech-loaded gun.
Guns of this size and larger (a 100-ton gun was produced by Armstrongs in 1876) could not be carried in large numbers by the wooden ships of the line, so a form of mounting had to be devised to bring the main armament to bear on either broadside. Guns were either mounted in a revolving turret, or on a turntable behind an armoured barbette; the first experiments with turret-ships were made in the 1860s.
Armour was clearly vital for protection from shell-firing guns: the destruction of an unarmoured Turkish squadron by the Russians at Sinope in the Black Sea in 1853 was proof of this, if proof were needed. The earliest ironclads were simply wooden ships fitted with an armoured belt, though it must be remembered that by 1820 such vessels also had ribs of iron. The first ironclad was the French Gloire, a two-decked screw vessel cut down to a single gun deck and given a simpler sail rig and armour in 1853. Two sister vessels were similarly altered and a fourth ship, Couronne, was laid down. These singularly ugly ships stirred the Admiralty into action and in 1859 the first British ironclad, Warrior, was laid down. Along with her half-sister Black Prince and Couronne, she was the first iron battleship, although classed as a frigate since she had only one gun deck.
HMS Warrior.
Of 9,200 tons displacement, Warrior was the largest ship then built, was capable of 14 knots and mounted thirty-two muzzle-loaders on the broadside. Reclassified as an armoured cruiser in 1867, she and Black Prince were placed in reserve in 1871 and then withdrawn from service in 1883. Black Prince saw service as a training ship before being scrapped in 1923, but Warrior survives. She became part of the Navy’s Torpedo Establishment at Portsmouth in 1904 as Vernon III, her own name being transferred to a new armoured cruiser. Twentyfive years later she was towed to Pembroke Dock at Milford Haven where she served for fifty years as an oil jetty under the inglorious name Oil Fuel Hulk C77. With her deck concreted over and a line of huts and street lamps along it, she refuelled over 5,000 ships in these years, before restoration became an issue. Ownership was transferred to the Maritime Trust in 1979 and she was towed to Hartlepool for the work to be carried out. Restored, she was towed to Portsmouth in 1987, where she still dominates the harbour.
Figurehead of HMS Warrior.
Oil hulk.
CSS Virginia (ex-Merrimack).
USS Monitor.
By 1862 then, the three innovations of steam power, armour and shell-firing guns had been accepted as the basis of naval design. But apart from some minor actions, there had been no battle to test the new ships. Neither the British nor the French navies saw action in the 1860s, but the Americans had been well abreast