Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Zend Avesta, Part 1 of 3: The Vendidad

Rate this book
The etymology of the term Avesta itself is uncertain, but a derivation from middle Persian abestag, 'praise', is a frequently noted possibility.

The texts of the Avesta - which are all in the Avestan language - were collated over several hundred years. The most important portion, the Gathas, in Gathic Avestan, are the hymns thought to have been composed by Zarathushtra (Zoroaster) himself, and date linguistically to around 1000 [BC]. The liturgical texts of the Yasna, which includes the Gathas, is partially in Older and partially in Younger Avestan. The oldest portions may be older than the Gathas, later adapted to more closely follow the doctrine of Zoroaster. The various Yashts are in Younger Avestan and thought to date to the Achaemenid era (559-330 [BC]). The Visperad and Vendidad, which are also in Younger Avestan, were probably composed even later but this is not certain. (Quote from )

About the Author

Thomas Firminger Thiselton-Dyer (1843 - 1928)
Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer FLS FRS KCMG (July 28, 1843-December 23, 1928) was a British botanist.

Thiselton-Dyer was born in Westminster, London. Initially studying mathematics at Oxford University, he graduated in natural science in 1867. He became Professor of Natural History at the Royal Agricultural College in Cirencester and then Professor of Botany at the Royal College of Science in Dublin. In 1872, he became professor at the Royal Horticultural Society in London, being recommended by Joseph Hooker.

Then in 1875, Thiselton-Dyer was offered the Assistant Directorship at Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, under Hooker, where he was to stay for thirty years. Thiselton-Dyer spent considerable time on the Colonies, e.g. introducing rubber to plantations of Sri Lanka

312 pages, Paperback

Published May 7, 2008

Loading interface...
Loading interface...

About the author

Anonymous

791k books3,254 followers
Books can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:

* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author

Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.

See also: Anonymous

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
9 (34%)
4 stars
10 (38%)
3 stars
6 (23%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (3%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Candice.
40 reviews15 followers
Read
June 11, 2024
I’m not going to rate this as I don’t believe in rating religious writings such as this, the Bible or the Qur’an. But I will say that this has opened up my eyes to a brand new perspective regarding how we view theologies. The last couple of Fargards are particularly enlightening, in many respects.

I’ll just leave it at that..,
Profile Image for Fred Dameron.
641 reviews10 followers
September 24, 2024
I may up the rating as I read the next two books, but so far a very litigious religion. I'll see what and how the next two books shake out
Profile Image for Adam.
200 reviews8 followers
March 19, 2021
The translation and footnotes leave a lot to be desired. I'm surprised at how few English translations exist.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.