The Journal of Holocaust Research
ISSN: 2578-5648 (Print) 2578-5656 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rdap21
Motherhood During and After the Holocaust:
Testimonial and Fictional Perspectives
Helena Duffy
To cite this article: Helena Duffy (2020) Motherhood During and After the Holocaust:
Testimonial and Fictional Perspectives, The Journal of Holocaust Research, 34:2, 91-94, DOI:
10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856
Published online: 30 Apr 2020.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 90
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rdap21
THE JOURNAL OF HOLOCAUST RESEARCH
2020, VOL. 34, NO. 2, 91–94
https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856
INTRODUCTION
Motherhood During and After the Holocaust: Testimonial and
Fictional Perspectives
Helena Duffy
Turku Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Hitler stated that ‘one gestating Jewish mother posed a greater threat [to Aryan purity] than
any fighting man’1 and claimed that ‘every child that a [Jewish] woman brings into the world
is a battle […] for the purity of race.’2 These pronouncements point to the fact that the Nazis
made annihilation of Jewish mothers their strategic objective. However, until recently, mainstream Holocaust historiography paid scant attention to the specificity of the mothers’
experience, instead adopting a gender neutral, not to say male-centered, position.3 In
other words, historians – including some female ones – assumed that men and women
experienced Nazi persecution in essentially the same way. Consequently, they ignored significant challenges presented by uniquely feminine experiences, such as menstruation, amenorrhea and the correlated risk of infertility, pregnancy, and childbirth.4 Jewish women were
also exposed to enforced sterilization and abortion, and, whether in ghettos, camps, hiding
or resistance groups were often victims of sexual assault. Finally, it was equally as a result of
their biological role as child bearers and their socially constructed role as main child carers
that Jewish women saw their survival chances drastically reduced. For instance, while in
some ghettos, pregnancy was punishable with deportation, arriving in a concentration
camp visibly pregnant or accompanied by small children usually meant instant death. For
survivors, these experiences caused long-lasting traumas which, in the absence of a
context propitious to their articulation, were particularly slow to heal.
Even if the specific predicament of Jewish mothers still occupies a relatively small space
in historical studies, it has found its way into literature, both testimonial and fictional. The
aim of the present special issue of the Journal of Holocaust Research is to explore how
mothers have been represented in narratives across languages and cultures. Offering readings of individual texts or favoring a comparative approach, the four articles collated in the
present volume address a range of literary texts from a variety of perspectives. They also do
so with reference to a wealth of theoretical studies concerning motherhood and, more
specifically, the distinctiveness of women’s experience of Nazi persecution.
The special issue opens with Carmelle Stephens’s critical examination of two testimonies that have by now achieved canonical status: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: A Woman
CONTACT Helena Duffy
helena.duffy@utu.fi
1
S. Lillian Kremer, Women’s Holocaust Writing: Memory and Imagination (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1999), p. 2.
2
Ibid., p. 149.
3
Pascale Rachel Bos, “Women and the Holocaust: Analysing Gender Difference,” in Elisabeth R. Baer and Myrna Goldenberg
(eds.), Experience and Expression: Women, the Nazis, and the Holocaust (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2003),
pp. 25–30 (p. 24).
4
Lucy Dawidowicz, The War against the Jews: 1933–1945 (New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1975); Hannah Arendt, Eichmann
in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking, 1963).
© 2020 The Weiss-Livnat International Center for Holocaust Research and Education, at the University of Haifa
92
H. DUFFY
Survivor’s True Story of Auschwitz (1947), first published in French a year earlier as Souvenirs de l’au-delà, and Isabella Leitner’s Fragments of Isabella (1978). Stephens’s article
begins with the extension to mothers of the observation that iconic images of Jewish children serve to strengthen our sympathy for Holocaust victims through reinforcement of the
simplistic Manichean construction of the Nazi genocide in terms of innocent victims and
evil perpetrators. Lengyel’s memoir achieves this by mobilizing tropes and rhetorical
figures, such as the mater dolorosa, which recast the Holocaust in metaphysical terms
and anticipate the advent of an ‘aesthetically and ethically attractive victimology.’ Stephens
argues that Lengyel’s narrative of her experience of killing other women’s babies in order
to save the mothers, while being a bereaved mother herself, relies on ‘the morally inflected
symbol of maternal martyrdom.’ This helps the author to mitigate her sense of culpability
engendered by the misguided and ultimately fatal decisions she took in regard to her
family in a world of inverted values. While equally conceived of as a martyr, in Fragments
of Isabella the mother is additionally cast as a saintly figure attached to the author’s nostalgia-imbued vision of her life in prewar Hungary. As Stephens posits, Leitner’s mother is
aligned with the ideal of maternal self-sacrifice, which, in Esther Hertzog’s view, may overshadow a critical reception of the Holocaust.5 This danger is counterbalanced, however, by
the capacity of idealized motherhood to heal the trauma resulting from the writer’s experience of Auschwitz, where she lost her mother and one of her siblings. Finally, Leitner’s
glorification of the maternal infuses her concentrationary past with metaphysical
meaning and helps her to reposition the Holocaust within the ‘meta-narrative of death
and rebirth.’
Nathalie Ségeral’s article examines two narratives whose protagonists strive to become
mothers again in hope of neutralizing ‘the de-gendering effects of the Nazi policy that
specifically targeted women for their reproductive capabilities.’ Ségeral analyzes Chava
Rosenfarb’s short story ‘Little Red Bird’ (1994), which first appeared in Yiddish as ‘Royt
feigele,’ and Valentine Goby’s French ‘biofiction’ Kinderzimmer (2004). The two texts
share their preoccupation with the profound trauma resulting from women’s wartime
loss of children, and with the cathartic/pathological dimensions of motherhood. In contrast to Goby’s heroine, who reclaims her life after Ravensbrück by fostering the child
of a dead fellow inmate, the central character of Rosenfarb’s story, Manya, fantasizes
about kidnapping an infant from a maternity ward and, in the process fails to care for
her dying husband. Ségeral’s reading of the two texts draws our attention to the inadequacy of traditional narrative paradigms when it comes to conveying the specifically feminine experience of historical trauma. ‘Little Red Bird’ and Kinderzimmer respond to this
inadequacy by, for example, subverting the genre of the fairy tale. Ségeral also detects in
Goby’s and Rosenfarb’s narratives a potential for critiquing institutionalized motherhood
as a cultural construct, before discussing their depiction of the traumatic memory of
deportation as ‘a life-long, unproductive pregnancy.’
The subject of France Grenaudier-Klijn’s contribution is Jacqueline Saveria Huré’s
autobiographically inspired and so far untranslated narrative Ni sains ni saufs (1954)
[Neither Safe nor Sound]. Structuring her reading of this deportation novel by a nonJewish writer sent to Ravensbrück for resistant work with Julia Kristeva’s theory of the
abject, Grenaudier-Klijn examines the character of Madame Buze, a maternal figure
5
Esther Hertzog, “Subjugated Motherhood and the Holocaust,” Dapim: Studies on the Holocaust 30, no. 1 (2016): pp. 16–34.
THE JOURNAL OF HOLOCAUST RESEARCH
93
embodying ‘the (self)abjecting which characterizes the deportee and her world.’ The originality of Grenaudier-Klijn’s approach thus stems not only from bringing Ni sains ni saufs
out of the shadows, but also from applying Kristeva’s theory of abjection to l’univers concentrationnaire. While Kristeva herself mentions the Shoah only fleetingly in this context,
Grenaudier-Klijn figures the camp as an essentially abject place where nothing can remain
‘propre’. Since in French the word can mean either ‘clean’ or ‘own,’ it implies the dissolution of the border between morality and immorality, order and disorder, or human and
animal. The experience of life in the camp is crystalized, for Grenaudier-Klijn, in the
maternal that, in Kristeva’s theory, is irrevocably tainted with abjection since, to attain
its own identity, the (male) subject needs to separate itself from the mother. Animallike and stupid, Madame Buze is the abject incarnate; it is thus through abjecting this surrogate mother that the novel’s protagonist, Florence, recovers her prewar identity of a
sexually attractive woman, even if, once liberated, she falls under the influence of her
own and equally abject mother. Without losing sight of Saveria Huré’s ‘non-compromising pessimism,’ Grenaudier-Klijn concludes by praising Ni sains ni saufs for simultaneously recasting abjection as inherent to human nature (and not only to the
concentrationary universe) and making us forget its powers.
This special issue closes with my own article that, like all the other contributions,
addresses the protracted after-effects of women’s wartime brutalization and loss.
Written by male writers and placing male survivors center stage, Art Spiegelman’s
graphic memoir Maus (1980–1999) and Philippe Claudel’s Brodeck (2007) (originally
published in French as Le Rapport de Brodeck) appear to marginalize the mother’s perspective. Similarly, they seem to reproduce the stereotypical depiction of female victims
of Nazi violence as passive, helpless and reliant for their survival on men, while enclosing
their female characters within silent and obedient domesticity. By stressing the two narratives’ postmodern aura, I argue that Maus and Brodeck inscribe the motif of female victimhood only to challenge it, even if, determined by their respective autobiographical or
fictional contingencies, they do so in different ways. Spiegelman, for example, critiques
his father’s dismissal of the distinctiveness of his wife’s experience of Birkenau, and
Vladek’s correlated desire to shape Anja’s story in accordance with his idealized image
of her as a physically and mentally vulnerable woman. Both Maus and Brodeck also
engage in an intertextual dialogue with texts of European culture, such as ancient Greek
myths, fairy tales and works of visual art. In so doing, they expose these texts’ contribution
to the entrenchment of patriarchal social order, which in turn facilitated the Nazis’ misogynistic policies, including those directed against Jewish women as (potential)
mothers. Indeed, I contend that Spiegelman and Claudel connect the specificity of
women’s experience of Nazi violence to their ability to bear children. They equally
bring to the fore and implicitly condemn the postwar silencing of the stories of sexual violence and maternal loss, which are unquestionably gendered and which have been dwarfed
in both memorial and fictional writings by the dominant male perspective.
Despite their different specific foci, the four articles share their attentiveness to the
themes of sexuality, maternal loss, infanticide and the regenerative potential of mothering.
They also draw attention to the prominence and power of the traditional understanding of
motherhood in our culture. Communicated through religious symbols or secular art, this
understanding revolves around maternal love, suffering, self-sacrifice and self-effacement,
and generates expectations that women should prioritize their children’s welfare over their
94
H. DUFFY
own. Even though it has recently been challenged by the constructivist understanding of
motherhood as an imposed or assumed role, the essentialist conception of motherhood as
a woman’s destiny and as a primary justification for the woman’s existence, is shown to
have been largely internalized by women themselves. As the four articles demonstrate,
it has also inevitably filtered into literary representations of the lives and death of
mothers during the Nazi terror. Furthermore, the articles brought together by this
special issue show that, as opposed to narratives addressing the male or even the child’s
experience of the Shoah, literary representations of Holocaust mothers have so far
attracted relatively little scholarly interest. Finally, the four analyses foreground the
two-faceted nature of motherhood as represented in Holocaust writing. Namely, in the
majority of cases, the woman’s ability to bear children reduces her chances of survival.
Should she survive, her wartime experience of mothering is shown to have detrimental
impact on her physical and mental well-being, rehabilitation and self-fulfillment in the
post-war period. Other women, however, benefit from the therapeutic potential of
mothering, in the sense that it helps them to overcome their wartime trauma and restores
them to society.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes on contributor
Helena Duffy (MSt Oxon, PhD Oxford Brookes) is Collegium Researcher at the Turku Institute for
Advanced Studies in Finland, where she is completing a monograph on literary representations of
Jewish mothers during the Holocaust and where she lectures French and Comparative Literature.
She is also coordinator of an international study circle operating under the auspices of the Nordic
Summer University and dedicated to narrativizations of violence. Prior to her present appointment,
Duffy was Teaching Fellow in French and Comparative Literature at Royal Holloway, University of
London, where she also held the highly prestigious Marie Curie Research Fellowship. Duffy had
taught French language and culture at other UK universities (Hull, Oxford Brookes), and in Australia (University of Queensland, University of New England), Poland (University of Wrocław) and
France (Clermont-Ferrand). She is the author of a recently published monograph, World War II in
Andreï Makine’s Historiographic Metafiction (Brill, 2018) and of more than forty journal articles,
book chapters, essays and book reviews. Her publications have appeared in French Studies,
French Forum, FMLS, Modern and Contemporary France, and Holocaust Studies. Her second
monograph, Inventing the Infranovel: The Aesthetics, Ethics and Politics of Holocaust Representation
in Postmodern French Fiction, is to be published next year by Legenda. Among her other forthcoming publications is a chapter on Antoine Volodine, to appear later this year in Contemporary Fiction
in French (Cambridge UP), and a chapter on François Ozon’s film Frantz (2016), included in a collective volume on the French director’s work (Edinburgh UP).
ORCID
Helena Duffy
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9952