Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Are women the authority on Dharma?: A study on Ūñcal in the marriage ceremony of Tamil Brahmins

This is the abstract of my paper presented in the 18th World Sanskrit Conference 2023 ( Session on Dharmaśāstra and Arthaśāstra). 1. The Dharmasūtra-s and the Smṛti-s maintain that only men well versed in Dharma/śiṣṭa are the authority on Dharma, it is generally held. 2. But the fact is that the authors of Dharmasūtra-s, Dharmaśāstra-s and Gŗhyasūtra-s state that one has to seek the guidance of elderly people and women whenever they fail to arrive at a conclusion depending on the scriptural authority. 3. Through this paper, I just want to highlight this fact that women were held as an authority on Dharma by the authors of Dharmasūtra-s, Dharmaśāstra-s and Gŗhyasūtra-s. And that this stand has been held by tradition as well. My point is that not only theorists and researchers on Dharma, but feminist thinkers too have failed to recognize this fact.

Are women the authority on Dharma?: A study on Ūñcal in the marriage ceremony of Tamil Brahmins. N. K. Sundareswaran The Dharmasūtra-s and the Smṛti-s maintain that only men well versed in Dharma/śiṣṭa are the authority on Dharma, it is generally held. But the fact is that the authors of Dharmasūtra-s, Dharmaśāstra-s and Gŗhyasūtra-s state that one has to seek the guidance of elderly people and women whenever they fail to arrive at a conclusion depending on the scriptural authority. They explicitly state that one has to get to know the customs and practices which are not ordained in the texts from women and the elderly people in the family or village. आवृतश्चास्त्रीभ्यः प्रतीयेरन्। [ आपस्तम्बगृह्यसूत्रम् द्वितीयः खण्डः सूत्रम् 16 (2.16) ] - तात्पर्यदर्शनम् - आवृतः क्रियाः वैवाहिक्यः अविशेषात् समन्त्रका अमन्त्रकाश्च तास्सर्वा आस्त्रीभ्यः सर्ववर्णेभ्यः सकाशादवगम्य प्रतीयेरन् कुर्वीरन् विवोढारः। स्त्रीभ्यः सर्ववर्णेभ्यश्च धर्मविशेषान् प्रतीयादित्येक इत्येके। 16।। (आपस्तम्बधर्मसूत्रम् द्वितीयप्रश्ने एकोनत्रिंशी कण्डिका।) This simply means that women are authority on Dharma. Nay, it is to be put the other way round. Women are the final authority on Dharma, at least on some customs and practices. But these instructions are seldom cited or practiced. However in the existing scheme of domestic rituals that is practiced, there are spaces exclusively reserved for women. But as the performance of domestic rituals has been confined to the ritualistic domain, such spaces and the significance of such customary practices are seldom recognized. In the marriage ceremony of Tamil Brahmins, there is a cluster of ceremonial rites to be performed by women. They are governed by traditional custom only (in contrast with a majority of the rites which are governed by the instructions of Gŗhyasūtra-s). Immediately before the kanyakādāna and pāņigrahaņa, the bride and bridegroom are seated on a swing (ūñcal) and some customary rites are performed by married ladies. These rites include sumaṅgali-s circumambulating the couple, holding auspicious objects like lamp, water-filled-kalaśa-s, and rice-filled-vessels and anointing the feet of the couple with milk. And most significant item is the offering of Pāluṃ paẕamuṃ , which in fact is the transformed version of Madhuparka, a ritualistic reception prescribed in the Dharmasūtra-s, and Gŗhyasūtra-s. Through this paper, I just want to highlight this fact that women were held as an authority on Dharma by the authors of Dharmasūtra-s, Dharmaśāstra-s and Gŗhyasūtra-s. And that this stand has been held by tradition as well. My point is that not only theorists and researchers on Dharma, but feminist thinkers too have failed to recognize this fact.