J. Chem. Eng. Data 2005, 50, 727-731
727
Density and Viscosity Correlation for Several Common Fragrance
and Flavor Esters
Hiannie Djojoputro and Suryadi Ismadji*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Kalijudan 37,
Surabaya 60114, Indonesia
The density and viscosity of several fragrance and flavor esters were measured over a temperature range
of (293.15 to 343.15) K. The esters studied were ethyl formate, cis-3-hexenyl formate, ethyl acetate, butyl
acetate, isoamyl acetate, hexyl acetate, trans-2-hexenyl acetate, cis-3-hexenyl acetate, ethyl propionate,
ethyl butyrate, butyl butyrate, isoamyl butyrate, hexyl butyrate, cis-3-hexenyl isobutyrate, ethyl
isovalerate, ethyl 2-methylbutyrate, and ethyl hexanoate. The experimental data were correlated by
temperature-dependence equations.
Introduction
In the flavor and fragrance industries, aliphatic and
acrylic esters are important materials in manufacturing
processes.1 Most of the esters used in the flavor and
fragrance industries are acetates, and ethanol is the most
common alcohol component. In addition to straight-chain
saturated compounds, branched-chain compounds and
unsaturated compound esters are also important.
Several studies of the thermodynamic behavior and
physical properties of several ester compounds in binary
mixtures have been performed.1-4 However, detailed investigations of the physical properties of pure esters,
especially their densities and viscosities over a wide range
of temperature, are scarce in the literature. Therefore, this
study was undertaken to obtain reliable density and
viscosity data for a number of important flavor esters over
a wide temperature range. The fragrance and flavor ester
compounds chosen in this study with their physical characteristics are given in Table 1.
Experimental Section
Materials. High-purity and AR-grade samples of fragrance and flavor esters were purchased from SigmaAldrich Singapore. The purity of these chemicals was
analyzed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-17A) using
a flame ionization detector with a DB-5 column. Helium
(high purity) was used as the carrier gas. The purities of
these esters are given in Table 1.
Density Measurements. Measurements of the densities
of the pure components were carried out using a Mettler
Toledo density meter type DE50 with an uncertainty of
about 10-5 g‚cm-3. Prior to measurement, the instrument
was calibrated with double-distilled water. The temperature of the measuring cell was maintained at various
temperatures using a Julabo Thermostat model F12-MD
with an uncertainty of 0.1 K.
Viscosity Measurements. For viscosity measurements,
an automatic microviscosimeter (Anton Paar type AMVn)
equipped with an automatic timer ((0.01 s) was used. This
instrument uses the rolling-ball principle according to DIN
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: suryadi@
mail.wima.ac.id. Tel: 62 31 3891264. Fax: 62 31 3891267.
53015 and ISO/DIS 12058, where a gold-covered steel ball
rolls down inside an inclined, sample-filled glass capillary
(diameter 0.16 cm). The uncertainty in time in the range
of (0 to 250) s is less than 0.02 s with a resolution of (0.01
s. The temperature range of this viscosimeter is (283.15 to
343.15) K with an uncertainty of less than 0.05 K. The
instrument was periodically calibrated with double-distilled
water. The uncertainty in the viscosity measurement was
estimated to be better than 0.004 mPa‚s. The measuring
temperature was kept at the desired temperature by
placing the sample-filled glass capillary in a block controlled with a Julabo refrigerating and heating circulator.
All measurements described above were performed at
least three times, and the results were averaged to give
the final values.
Experimental Results
The experimental results of the density and viscosity
measurements of several fragrance and flavor ester compounds are given in Table 2. The density and viscosity of
ethyl formate were measured only at 323.15 K, whereas
for trans-2-hexenyl acetate and cis-3-hexenyl acetate the
density and viscosity were measured only at 333.15 K
because of the low boiling points of these esters. From this
Table, it can be seen that the experimental values of the
density and viscosity are generally in agreement with those
from the literature.1,4-10 However, for several viscosity data
points, the deviation between experimental and literature
data is as high as 0.04 mPa‚s. This deviation is likely due
to impurities in the flavor esters that we used.
The densities of pure esters were correlated using a
temperature-dependence equation that has the following
form:
F(T)/g‚cm-3 ) a + b(T/K) + c(T/K)2
(1)
Here, F(T) is the density of the ester at absolute temperature and a, b, and c are fitted parameters. The fitted
density parameters of each ester and standard deviation
(σ) between experimental and calculated data are summarized in Table 3. Figure 1 depicts the experimental
density data and predicted value versus temperature for
several flavor esters. From Table 3 and Figure 1, it can be
seen that eq 1 can predict the experimental data very well.
10.1021/je050001c CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/19/2005
728
Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2005
Table 1. Physical Characteristics of the Esters Used in This Study5
name of
ester
molecular
molecular
formula weight/g‚mol-1
characteristic
purity/%
clear liquid with a slightly pungent,
fruity, ethereal odor
98.2
fruit flavors
green-fruity odor, sweet
97.4
perfume and flavor to impart
fruity-green notes
fruity-smelling liquid with
a brandy note
99.6
fruit and brandy flavors
116.16
liquid with a strong fruity odor
99.7
constituent of apple aroma
130.19
strongly fruity-smelling liquid
98.9
banana flavors
C8H16O2
144.21
liquid with a sweet-fruity,
pearlike odor
99.0
fruit aroma composition
C8H14O2
142.20
fresh-fruity, slightly greensmelling liquid
98.9
fruit flavors
ethyl formate
C3H6O2
74.08
cis-3-hexenyl formate
C7H12O2
128.17
ethyl acetate
C4H8O2
88.11
butyl acetate
C6H12O2
isoamyl acetate
C7H14O2
hexyl acetate
trans-2-hexenyl acetate
used
cis-3-hexenyl acetate
C8H14O2
142.20
fruit aromas and green tea
99.5
fruit flavors
ethyl propionate
C5H10O2
102.13
liquid with fruity odor
reminiscent of rum
99.4
creating both fruity and
rum notes
ethyl butyrate
C6H12O2
116.16
clear liquid with a fruity odor
reminiscent of pineapples
99.6
perfume and flavor
compositions
butyl butyrate
C8H16O2
144.21
clear liquid with a sweet-fruity odor
99.3
fruit flavor composition
isoamyl butyrate
C9H18O2
158.23
clear liquid with a very strong
fruity odor
98.5
fruit flavors
hexyl butyrate
C10H20O2
172.27
liquid with a very strong fruity odor
98.4
fruit flavor composition
cis-3-hexenyl isobutyrate
C10H18O2
170.25
fruity-green odor
96.2
in perfume to create freshness
in blossom compositions
ethyl isovalerate
C7H14O2
130.19
colorless liquid with a fruity odor
reminiscent of blueberries
98.8
fruity aroma composition
ethyl 2-methylbutyrate
C7H14O2
130.19
liquid with a green-fruity odor
reminiscent of apples
99.2
fruit flavor compositions
ethyl hexanoate
C8H16O2
144.21
colorless liquid with a strong fruity
odor reminiscent of pineapples
98.7
flowery-fruity notes in perfume
compositions and fruit flavors
Figure 1. Experimental density data and correlated values for
several flavor esters: b, ethyl formate; 9, cis-3-hexenyl formate;
2, trans-2-hexenyl acetate; [, cis-3-hexenyl isobutyrate.
The viscosity of fragrance and flavor esters is a function
of temperature and can be represented by the following
equation
log(η/mPa‚s) ) A +
B
+ C(T/K) + D(T/K)2
T/K
(2)
where A, B, C, and D are fitted parameters and η is the
viscosity of pure esters in mPa‚s. The fitted viscosity
parameters of each ester and standard deviation (σ)
between experimental and calculated data are summarized
in Table 4. Figure 2 shows the experimental viscosity data
Figure 2. Experimental viscosity data and predicted values for
several flavor esters: b, ethyl acetate; 9, hexyl butyrate; 2, ethyl
2-methylbutyrate; [, isoamyl acetate.
and predicted value versus temperature for several flavor
esters. Table 4 and Figure 2 reveal that eq 2 can also
represent the experimental viscosity data very well.
Conclusions
New experimental density and viscosity data for several
important flavor ester compounds over a wide range of
temperature were obtained. The results were then correlated using temperature-dependence equations. It was
found that the models used in this study represent the
experimental data very well.
Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2005 729
Table 2. Densities and Viscosity of Fragrance and Flavor Esters at Temperatures from (293.15 to 343.15) K
FL/g‚cm-3
compounds
ethyl
formate
T/K
293.15
exptl
0.91782
FL/g‚cm-3
η/mPa‚s
lit
0.916805
exptl
lit
η/mPa‚s
T/K
exptl
lit
exptl
318.15
323.15
328.15
333.15
343.15
0.88741
0.88214
0.883906
0.314
0.300
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.89899
0.89672
0.89416
0.89154
0.88873
0.421
0.400
0.380
0.363
0.346
0.4244
0.4004
0.3854
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.87039
0.86713
0.86472
0.86141
0.85836
0.330
0.315
0.301
0.288
0.275
0.6318
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.85461
0.85078
0.84792
0.84439
0.84177
0.481
0.453
0.428
0.405
0.384
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.86431
0.86014
0.85798
0.85405
0.85107
0.601
0.567
0.536
0.507
0.481
0.402
0.920806
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
0.91206
0.90768
0.89954
0.89150
cis-3-hexenyl
formate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.90915
0.90813
0.90660
0.90495
0.90317
0.90119
ethyl
acetate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.90048
0.89481
0.88714
0.88221
0.87892
0.87451
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.88104
0.87645
0.87130
0.86625
0.86184
0.85732
isoamyl
acetate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.87824
0.87601
0.87594
0.87310
0.87015
0.86732
0.86800-0.878005
0.888
0.827
0.773
0.724
0.678
0.638
hexyl
acetate
293.15
0.87290
1.118
1.0781
323.15
0.84421
0.733
298.15
303.15
0.86730
0.86260
0.873101
0.872609
0.868005
0.863201
0.863609
1.036
0.962
0.9821
328.15
333.15
0.83964
0.83515
0.689
0.649
308.15
313.15
0.85833
0.85490
338.15
343.15
0.83140
0.82630
0.612
0.579
0.901
0.831
0.770
0.715
0.666
0.622
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.87614
0.87281
0.86749
0.582
0.547
0.514
0.893
0.823
0.763
0.708
0.660
0.616
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.87789
0.87521
0.87143
0.576
0.542
0.509
0.523
0.492
0.464
0.441
0.418
0.398
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.86433
0.86089
0.85814
0.85681
0.85348
0.378
0.360
0.344
0.329
0.315
butyl
acetate
0.907606
0.893606
0.908005
0.900305
0.894507
0.882397
0.876307
0.871208
0.866207
0.853501
0.854609
0.381
0.362
0.345
0.329
0.599
0.561
0.527
0.496
0.469
0.443
0.443
0.421
0.399
0.381
0.363
0.346
0.732
0.677
0.628
0.585
0.546
0.512
0.895
0.836
318.15
0.84884
trans-2-hexenyl
acetate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.89784
0.89432
0.89178
0.88846
0.88435
0.88019
0.782
cis-3-hexenyl
acetate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.90082
0.89714
0.89314
0.89028
0.88619
0.88143
ethyl
propionate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.89162
0.88410
0.87931
0.87412
0.87061
0.86734
0.891705
ethyl
butyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.87691
0.87442
0.87013
0.86621
0.86431
0.86132
0.878505
0.8734710
0.662
0.620
0.583
0.549
0.519
0.491
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.85843
0.85444
0.85389
0.85132
0.85004
0.465
0.442
0.420
0.400
0.382
butyl
butyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.87245
0.86914
0.86610
0.86219
0.85894
0.85431
0.870905
0.948
0.876
0.812
0.755
0.705
0.659
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.85147
0.84801
0.84622
0.84403
0.84147
0.618
0.581
0.548
0.517
0.486
isoamyl
butyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.86613
0.86204
0.85914
0.85708
0.85342
0.85011
0.865105
1.044
0.967
0.897
0.836
0.781
0.731
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.84578
0.84231
0.84073
0.83545
0.83276
0.686
0.646
0.609
0.575
0.545
0.898005
0.878878
0.4948
lit
730
Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2005
Table 2 (Continued)
FL/g‚cm-3
compounds
T/K
lit
exptl
0.865205
hexyl
butyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.86073
0.85100
0.84652
0.84151
0.83746
0.83465
cis-3-hexenyl
isobutyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.88508
0.87812
0.87361
0.87034
0.86522
0.86149
ethyl
isovalerate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.86623
0.86401
0.86012
0.85598
0.85179
0.84739
ethyl
2-methylbutyrate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.86973
0.86500
0.86148
0.85788
0.85341
0.84932
ethyl
hexanoate
293.15
298.15
303.15
308.15
313.15
318.15
0.87901
0.87253
0.86931
0.86674
0.86328
0.86019
FL/g‚cm-3
η/mPa‚s
exptl
0.865605
0.868905
0.871005
lit
η/mPa‚s
T/K
exptl
lit
exptl
1.351
1.234
1.131
1.014
0.961
0.889
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.83078
0.82819
0.82677
0.82381
0.82076
0.825
0.768
0.716
0.669
0.627
1.024
0.941
0.868
0.804
0.741
0.690
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.85738
0.85244
0.84844
0.84531
0.84009
0.650
0.606
0.560
0.535
0.503
0.805
0.752
0.703
0.659
0.620
0.581
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.84624
0.84235
0.84007
0.83631
0.83362
0.544
0.516
0.485
0.457
0.431
0.831
0.774
0.723
0.677
0.635
0.597
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.84674
0.84159
0.83841
0.83548
0.83146
0.563
0.532
0.503
0.476
0.452
0.816
0.757
0.704
0.656
0.614
0.576
323.15
328.15
333.15
338.15
343.15
0.85642
0.85193
0.84788
0.84532
0.84146
0.541
0.509
0.482
0.456
0.429
lit
Table 3. Parameters for the Density Correlation for the Fragrance and Flavor Esters
compounds
a
b
c
σ
ethyl formate
cis-3-hexenyl formate
ethyl acetate
butyl acetate
isoamyl acetate
hexyl acetate
trans-2-hexenyl acetate
cis-3-hexenyl acetate
ethyl propionate
ethyl butyrate
butyl butyrate
isoamyl butyrate
hexyl butyrate
cis-3-hexenyl isobutyrate
ethyl isovalerate
ethyl 2-methylbutyrate
ethyl hexanoate
1.46554
0.67480
1.99860
1.69608
0.59007
1.20940
0.74015
1.19615
1.97642
1.47568
1.42365
0.95837
2.09934
1.33005
1.31271
1.23053
1.11638
-2.44133 × 10-3
1.83502 × 10-3
-6.24971 × 10-3
-4.48155 × 10-3
2.30538 × 10-3
-1.34331 × 10-3
1.66995 × 10-3
-1.23970 × 10-3
-6.25409 × 10-3
-3.31059 × 10-3
-2.93727 × 10-3
-1.78027 × 10-5
-7.22490 × 10-3
-2.08366 × 10-3
-2.24912 × 10-3
-1.63423 × 10-3
-8.93011 × 10-4
1.96192 × 10-6
-3.53118 × 10-6
8.53568 × 10-6
5.80616 × 10-6
-4.50699 × 10-6
6.6227 × 10-7
-3.86207 × 10-6
7.94135 × 10-7
8.69699 × 10-6
4.33167 × 10-6
3.61375 × 10-6
-1.01675 × 10-6
1.02082 × 10-5
1.91639 × 10-6
2.48654 × 10-6
1.37424 × 10-6
2.68015 × 10-7
0.0041
0.0006
0.0016
0.0006
0.0026
0.0011
0.0011
0.0016
0.0021
0.0026
0.0021
0.0026
0.0021
0.0016
0.0026
0.0011
0.0016
Table 4. Parameters for Viscosity Correlation for the Fragrance and Flavor Esters
compounds
ethyl formate
cis-3-hexenyl formate
ethyl acetate
butyl acetate
isoamyl acetate
hexyl acetate
trans-2-hexenyl acetate
cis-3-hexenyl acetate
ethyl propionate
ethyl butyrate
butyl butyrate
isoamyl butyrate
hexyl butyrate
cis-3-hexenyl isobutyrate
ethyl isovalerate
ethyl 2-methylbutyrate
ethyl hexanoate
a
-5.06064
-6.01904
-4.74308
-5.49829
-5.02068
-4.40456
-5.31784
-5.33417
-5.14522
-5.17455
-7.18299
-5.23957
-5.56517
-5.36123
-4.72611
-5.12216
-6.42963
b
737.37681
954.74783
659.9798 103
1000.90027
865.50152
856.32033
976.68866
976.77772
806.15186
852.90821
1161.06978
959.94502
1119.93544
1021.97306
759.09741
884.82001
1054.49049
c
0.01075
0.01202
0.01145
0.0086087
9.9597 × 10-3
7.3099 × 10-3
9.0022 × 10-3
9.0874 × 10-3
0.01028
0.01003
0.01531
9.2246 × 10-3
8.0075 × 10-3
8.5427 × 10-3
0.01110
9.8046 × 10-3
0.01315
d
σ
10-5
-1.16726 ×
-1.14524 × 10-5
-1.41899 × 10-5
-6.69263 × 10-6
-1.05078 × 10-5
-7.10792 × 10-6
-8.12428 × 10-6
-8.27495 × 10-6
-1.04632 × 10-5
-9.94419 × 10-6
-1.49862 × 10-5
-8.38321 × 10-6
-5.49352 × 10-6
-7.19934 × 10-6
-1.41134 × 10-5
-9.89965 × 10-6
-1.29215 × 10-5
0.0011
0.0006
0.0006
0.0011
0.0006
0.0006
0.0016
0.0006
0.0011
0.0006
0.0006
0.0011
0.0011
0.0011
0.0006
0.0006
0.0011
Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2005 731
Literature Cited
(1) Indraswati, N.; Mudjijati; Wicaksana, F.; Hindarso, H.; Ismadji,
S. Density and Viscosity for a Binary Mixture of Ethyl Valerate
and Hexyl Acetate with 1-Pentanot and 1-Hexanol at 293.15 K,
303.15 K, and 313.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2001, 46, 134-137.
(2) Indraswati, N.; Mudjijati; Wicaksana, F.; Hindarso, H.; Ismadji,
S. Measurements of Density and Viscosity of Binary Mixtures of
Several Flavor Compounds with 1-Butanol and 1-Pentanol at
293.15 K, 303.15 K, 313.15 K, and 323.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data
2001, 46, 696-702.
(3) Sastry, N. V.; George, A.; Jain, N. J.; Bahadur, P. Densities,
Relative Permittivities, Excess Volumes, and Excess Molar
Polarization for Alkyl Esters (Methyl Propanoate, Methyl Butanoate, Ethyl Propanoate, and Ethyl Butanoate) + Hydrocarbons
(n-Heptane, Benzene, Chlorobenzene, and 1,1,2,2-Tertrachloroethane) at 308.15 K and 318.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1999, 44,
456-464.
(4) Nikam, P. S.; Mahale, T. R.; Hasan, M. Densities and Viscosities
for Ethyl Acetate + Penta-1-ol, + Hexan-1-ol, + 3,5,5-Trimethylhexan-1-ol, + Heptan-1-ol, + Octan-1-ol, and Decan-1-ol at
(298.15, 303.15, and 308.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43,
436-440.
(5) Bauer, K.; Garbe, D.; Surburg, H. Common Fragrance and Flavor
Materials: Preparation, Properties and Uses, 4th ed.; WileyVCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001.
(6) Emmerling, U.; Figurski, G.; Rasmussen, P. Densities and
Kinematic Viscosities for the Systems Benzene + Methyl Formate,
Benzene + Ethyl Formate, Benzene + Propel Formate, and
Benzene + Butyl Formate. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 289292.
(7) Chandrasekhar, G.; Venkatesu, P.; Rao, M. V. P. Excess Molar
Volumes and Speed of Sound of Ethyl Acetate and Butyl Acetate
with 2-Alkoxyethanols at 308.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2000,
45, 590-593.
(8) Visak, Z. P.; Ferreira, A. G. M.; Fonseca, I. M. A. Densities and
Viscosities of the Ternary Mixtures Water + Butyl Acetate +
Methanol and Water + Ethyl Propionate + Methanol at 303.15
K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2000, 45, 926-931.
(9) Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakano, T. K. Organic Solvents:
Physical Properties and Methods of Purification, 4th ed.; John
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1986.
(10) Resa, J. M.; Gonzalez, C.; de Landaluce, S. O.; Lanz, J. Density,
Refractive Index, and Speed of Sound at 298.15 K, and Vapor
Liquid Equilibria at 101.3 kPa for Binary Mixtures of Methanol
+ Ethyl Butyrate and Vinyl Acetate + Ethyl Butyrate. J. Chem.
Eng. Data 2002, 47, 1123-1127.
Received for review January 1, 2005. Accepted January 20, 2005.
JE050001C