UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
Digital Culture and Social Media Slang of Gen Z
Eliza M. Jeresano1 and Marigrace D. Carretero2
1,2
Sorsogon State University, Philippines
Email: elizajeresano@gmail.com and 2nenne565@gmail.com
1
Abstract— Social media slang has been widespread due to fast emerging trend of online platforms. These slang in fact
manifest the culture of the digital natives called the Gen Zers or those who belong to Generation Z. This study focused
on digital culture and social media slang of Gen Z. It sought to determine the digital culture present in their language and
its perceived effect to their conversational language and essay. This is a descriptive study which used quantitative and
qualitative methods. Documentary analysis was used to determine the Gen Z slang used by the Grade 10 students of
Pamurayan Integrated School, SY 2020-2021. The students’ Facebook posts and messages in Messenger were the corpora
utilized in the analysis. Meanwhile, semi-structured interview and survey questionnaires were the tool utilized to gather
the data and to investigate the perceived effects in conversational language and essays of students and how do teachers
respond to it. It was found out that the Gen Z slang undergone specific and sometimes multiple morphological processes
and reflect its digital culture. It also aids students in language fluency, communication skills and help gain confidence but
create language barrier to older generation and have negative impact in their writing skills. Therefore, Gen Z slang was
not encouraged during class discussions and in writing essays, but allowed when talking only among themselves. Based
on the results of this study, the researcher developed a self-learning guide entitled Flexin’ the Trend to address the
communication gap in the school community which is composed of different generation.
Keywords— Digital Culture, Social Media Slang, Gen Z.
INTRODUCTION
Language plays an important role in human lives
because it is the medium of expression in which people
communicate. It is inseparable with social and cultural
evolution in mankind. When society and culture
undergo change, so as language which only confirms its
adaptive phenomenon.
Language is always changing, evolving, and adapting to
the needs of its users. As long as the needs of language
users continue to change, so will the language. It reflects
our changing lives, culture and experiences. It also
enables us to accommodate innovations through
people’s creativity. English language has changed
dramatically over the last millennium.
Language change is affected by many factors such as
social interaction, technology and lifestyle. For instance,
technology and innovations can lead to emergence of
new words. Constant communication within and across
territorial boundaries can cause language alterations or
borrowing. Language change is also affected by lifestyle
in which how people live. One concrete example is the
life during pandemic. There are many words that are
officially added to Oxford Dictionary including Covid19, WFH, lockdown and many others.
According to Global Language Monitor, around 5,400
new words are created every year; it’s only the 1000 are
so deemed to be insufficiently widespread use that make
it into print. In addition, Martini (2015) stated that
generation by generation, pronunciations evolve, new
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
words are borrowed or invented and its rate of change
varies.
Furthermore, the majority of the changes that occur in
our language often start with young adults and teens
(Thump, 2016). They begin to focus on belonging to a
self-organized group of peers, teammates and friends
and becoming the “we” generation. As they interact, the
language begins to grow differently and made them
remarkably distinctive from the previous generations.
For instance, the Generation Z are the nation’s youngest
people. According to Sladek & Grabinger (2014), Gen
Z are those born between 1996 to 2009. In addition, they
are characterized as the most racially and ethnically
diverse, and are on track to be the best educated, in U.S.
history. The biggest distinction for Gen Zers is that
technology is such a central part of their upbringing. It
is the first generation to come of age with technological
advances such as smartphone not as something new to
be adopted, but simply as an accepted part of everyday
life (LeDuc, 2019).
According to Maghirang (2019), Filipino Gen Zers are
characterized as cognizant of the power of technology,
eager to share their knowledge and eager for more
human interaction. Almost all of the time of young
Filipino adults are consumed on their smartphones.
They are well adept in executing results through the use
of their gadgets. There were many applications that can
be installed in their mobile phones like Twitter,
Instagram, Facebook and the likes for social interaction.
11
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
More often than not, many terms that are unfamiliar
outside of their generation are being encountered
everyday not only on their posts but on how to write
their comments and send messages with their families
and friends. These new coined terms and phrases created
by them are called Gen Z slang. They have come up with
their own slang, much of it tied into the media culture
they've grown up with.
Gen Zers are undeniably the first digital natives that are
born with estimable technological advances and are
exposed to social media, smartphones and instant
accesibility of information. Thus, technology is highly
regarded as a major contribution to generation-shaping
on the rapid development of how people communicate,
interact and specifically, to language evolution.
Moreover, the trending means of communication in this
current generation is through the use of social platforms.
Thus, it has even more intensified due to community
lockdowns since physical distancing is highly
recommended. Culture has started to be established
digitally and so as language through the emergence of
social media slang.
According to DepEd K to 12 Basic Education
Curriculum, language learning involves recognizing,
accepting, valuing and building on students’ existing
language competence, including the use of non-standard
forms of the language, and extending the range of
language available to students. They learn to control and
understand the target language to reflect on and critically
analyze their own use of language and the language of
others (https://www.deped.gov.ph). Therefore, DepEd
is widely aware of the dynamics of language and that its
main purpose is to have functional and critical literacy
skills. It does not limit the learners in learning the
conventions but be open to what is really happening
around. Therefore, the emergence of this new language
trend, Gen Z slang is one of the non-standard forms that
learners must learn to critically analyze and utilize.
Further, this language trend has reached the small
barangay of Pamurayan in the city of Sorsogon. The
older and the recent generation has sometimes fall into
communication dispute due to the words often used by
the Gen Zers.
Moreover, it has been observed among the students
especially in their FB (Facebook) posts that they are
using other terminologies that are called Gen Z slang
which creates language barrier between the teachers and
the students of Pamurayan Integrated School (PIS). PIS
is composed of 398 students, which 287 are junior high
school students with 163 males and 124 females. 111 are
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
senior high school students; 57 males and 54 females.
All of them belong to the Generation Z.
As observed, nowadays, the only means of
communication between the teachers and the students
are online platforms like messengers and using text
messaging. There are instances that the students
unintentionally create communicative barrier when they
use these slangs during informal conversations. There
are also some instances that these words are even used
in their formal writing which is read and assessed by the
teachers. In this case, the teachers really need to seek
some assistance to fully grasp what these words mean.
Generation outside the Gen Z need to ask what do these
mean to establish understanding. Thus, becoming
familiar with Gen Z slang and being acquainted with
their underlying meanings could help establish
meaningful conversation between different generations
of individuals in this institution.
In response to the expanding social media slang and the
language barrier that it may bring, it is with such premise
the present study was conducted so as to determine the
digital culture and social media slang of Gen Z.
Likewise, this would also seek its effect on the language
learning of students.
This study determined the digital culture and social
media slang of Gen Z. Specifically, it sought to answer
the following inquiries:
1.
2.
3.
4.
What are the Gen Z slang that students use on
social media?
What are the teachers’ perceptions on the
effects of Gen Z slang on:
a. Conversational Language Use
b. Essay
How do teachers respond to their use of Gen Z
slang in the mentioned students’ variable?
4.What self-guide in learning Gen Z slang can
be proposed?
METHODOLOGY
This study determined the digital culture and social
media slang of Gen Z students in Pamurayan Integrated
School and its effect to their language learning. This
study focused mainly on Grade 10 junior high school
students, school year 2020-2021. A mixed method of
qualitative and quantitative method was used in the
present study and is descriptive in nature. According to
Creswell (2002), qualitative research is intended to
deeply explore, understand and interpret social
phenomena within its natural setting. By using a
qualitative research methodology, researchers want to
collect richer information and get more detailed picture
12
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
of issues, cases or events (Arora and Stoner 2009). Also,
the students’ use of language is involved in this
undertaking which is called the corpus of this study.
Corpus is a collection of linguistic data used for
research, scholarship and teaching (Nordquist, 2020).
Therefore, the study used descriptive qualitative method
for it requires in-depth analysis of the Gen Z slang
attributes in their social media posts and messages on
their social media posts, in which serves as the corpus.
Moreover, analysis on the teachers’ responses regarding
the use of Gen Z slang in conversational language and
essays which was gathered through interview explained
their justification in detail with the use of qualitative
method. While descriptive quantitative research is
defined as creating meaning through objectivity
uncovered in the collected data through statistical
analysis (Creswell, 2003). The perceived effects of Gen
Z slang were gathered through survey questionnaires
and were ranked from highest to lowest through the
derived average per question. Highest value has the
interpretation of strongly agree, and lowest value has
strongly disagreed interpretation. Ranking is the
relationship between two mathematical values where
each value can be less than, greater than, or equal to the
second value (Jackson,2021). Consequently, the data
collected from quantitative method will validate the
qualitative analysis which is subjective according to
Jardim (2016). Therefore, the effects of Gen Z slang in
conversational language and essays will cross validate
the teachers’ responses which will be explored through
quantitative method.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
1. Gen Z slang used on social media
Language is always changing. We have seen that
language changes across space and across social group.
Language also varies across time. Here are the social
media posts of the Grade 10 students of Pamurayan
Integrated School in which they use the Gen Z slang.
Table 1: Gen Z slang used by the Grade 10 students
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
13
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
The above table shows the Gen Z slang, its
morphological process and the actual usage of the term.
There are fourteen morphological processes that have
been observed from the data. These are initialism,
initialism in a single word, spelling distortion,
compounding, compounding of two different languages,
fancy formation or new creation, suffixation,
connotation, lighter connotation, multiple process,
euphemism, reversed form, clipping, and lexical
borrowing. In the next discussion would be the in-depth
analysis of the morphological processes that are present
in how Gen Z slang are created, how they use it and the
digital culture that reflects it.
Clipping
It is the reductive process that shortens words and thus
shortens the effort involved in speech and writing, albeit
by a tiny increment (Postan, 2020). In the cited data
below, the word clipped is actually from another
language variety.
Figure 1: Group chat excerpt as sample for clipping
Figure 1 shows example of clipping, the term char and
charot. These two terms share similar meaning. It is used
as an expression when someone is just kidding. Charot
is the original word created then it was evolved into char
through clipping. It is Further, charot belongs to Gay
Lingo (Rosales and Carretero, 2017). It further proves
the previous findings that Gen Zers are adoptive and
adaptive. On the other hand, in language teaching, the
same with other slang processes, teachers must
emphasize that these terms must be used in proper
context because these may lead to misunderstanding.
Connotation
According to Cambridge Dictionary, connotation is the
feeling or idea that is suggested by a particular word
although it need not be a part of the word’s meaning, or
something suggested by an object or situation
(https://dictionary.cambridge.org/). The cited example
can be shown in the figure.
Figure 2: Group chat excerpt as for connotation
Figure 2 displays the word, kanser, pabuhat, and,
nadurog. These are already Filipino terms that can be
seen in the Filipino dictionary. However, as how they
are used today, they have different meanings. The term
kanser does not mean the disease kanser (cancer) but it
is used to describe someone as who is not doing any
good to the situation and adding trouble instead. Pabuhat
does not have its denotative meaning but it pertains to
someone that do not bring any help in a situation and is
very dependent to others. Nadurog also has a
connotative meaning in this context. It does not literally
mean pulverized but lost in a competition badly. Since
connotation is a feeling or idea that is suggested by a
particular word although it need not be a part of the
word's meaning, or something suggested by an object or
situation, this supports the idea of Lihawa, et.al, (2020)
stated that Gen Zers modify word to hide its real
meaning to exclude others from their conversation.
Pradianti (2013) also agreed that they use them to
confuse other people. In addtion, Yuliati (2013) added
words can have more than one meaning.
Compounding
Another morphological process noted in the data is
compounding. It is a way of creating new word with
joining of two separate words into a single form to
describe something new (Rahayu, 2014).
Figure 3: Group chat excerpt as sample for
compounding
The term used in figure 3 is happy pill which pertains to
a person that brings joy and happiness to someone. The
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
14
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
process used to create this new word is compounding. It
simply suggests that Gen Zers use compounding to form
slang. Gime (2020) also added that they develop new
words to change in meaning.
Compounding of two different languages
This process is the same with the compounding.
However, the two terms joined together are from two
different languages. As cited in the next figure, it is an
English and Filipino term.
search for milder alternatives to express their opinions
whenever they feel their words might sound abrupt or
offensive. This implies that aside from the other
morphological processes in Gen Z slang, they also
modify insensitive words to downsize its meaning and
to make it more acceptable. This has a positive impact
in language especially to those who are not used to using
vulgar terms. Moreover, language pragmatics manifests
what kind of culture a person possess and explains what
kind of context he is in. This may help a person adjust
his language according to its context and have a more
successful communication.
Fancy formation/ New creation
It has been notably remarkable the rise of new terms in
the present generation. This process is called new
creation or fancy formation.
Figure 4: Facebook post sample for compounding
Figure 4 shows the gen z slang, sana all and its distorted
form, sanaol. The word formation present in this gen z
slang is compounding. However, what make it distinct
from the compounding process, the words combined
were from different language, English and Filipino.
This implies the creativity of the present generation that
includes the compounding of two different languages. It
supports the survey created by Adobe poll, about the
creativity of different generation, and it reveals that Gen
Zers are considered as creative and most creative
compared to other prior generations (Swain, 2020).
Figure 6: Facebook post sample for fancy formation
Figure 6 shows the gen z term jowa, it is new creation or
fancy formation of word. It simply means boyfriend or
girlfriend. It caters the fancy formation of words. This
implies that Gen Zers are creative and still validates
Swain (2020) stating that they are the most creative.
Initialism
Initialism is the process of creating new word with
forming the initial letters of a set of other words. The
newly newly-created words are pronounced not as a
single word but separately (Lihawa, et.al, 2021).
Euphemism
Another process to be underscored if euphemism. As
defined by Oxford dictionary, euphemism is the use of a
mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one
considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to
something
unpleasant
or
embarrassing
(https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/). They
create new term in order to omit the insensitive feeling
of the word.
Figure 7: Facebook post and group chat Sample for
initialism
Figure 5: Facebook post sample for euphemism
Figure 5 shows the term shuta which is a euphemism of
the word ‘tanga’. It is changing the first part of the word
and remain the last part. According to Arif (2015) people
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Figure 7 shows the use of gen z slang- BTW, MBTC,
OTW, and, pm. BTW means by the way, OTW means
on the way, MBTC means more birthdays to come and
PM means personal message. These words of Gen Z
15
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
slang follow the word formation process of initialism.
As observed, the beginning of each word was taken to
make the word shorter.
The use of initialism implies that Gen Zers are more
comfortable to shorten the words to easily convey the
message and to adapt to fast pace communication online.
Solano (2017) stated that they use their editing skills in
order to convey messages within short character
limitations.
Initialism in a single word
It is the same with the initialism morphological process.
However, there is only single word and the letters lifted
to make its initials, are the beginning letter and the letter
in the middle part of the word as cited in the figure
below.
Figure 10 shows yawa which is a Visayan word which
means devil. However, in Gen Z slang it is only
expression when someone always engages in conflict.
Hence, yawa was borrowed from Visayan dialect to their
own slang then they make its meaning lighter. This may
affect the dialect positively because it is widely used.
Hence, this may help preserve the dialect when people
constantly utter it in conversation.
Lighter connotation
There is another variation of connotation that has been
analyzed from the data. It is lighter connotation. It bears
almost the same meaning with the connotation but it
does not depart totally from its original meaning.
Figure 8: Sample initialism in a single word from
Facebook post
Figure 8 presented above used nf which means
notification. In the process of word formation, it
somehow used initialism however there is only one
word and the middle letter was taken to add to the
beginning letter. The beginning letter ‘n’ and middle
letter ‘f’ were put together to shorten the word
notification. It is an initialism in a single word. It also
implies that even a single word can be shortened to
respond to the demand of fast pace online
communication.
Initialism may aid the demand of quick responses
occurring online. However, it may affect the beginning
readers in absorbing the process of reading the words
through the letters’ sound and not how it is called. This
may cause add to complexity of learning the English
language along with its other phonological complexities.
Lexical borrowing
Lexical borrowing has been evident too from the data
gathered. It is defined as a process by which a word from
one language is adapted for use in another (Nordquist,
2019).
Figure 9: Sample lexical borrowing from a Facebook
post
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Figure 10: Facebook post sample of lighter connotation
Figure 10 exhibits the gen z terms legend which means
someone is great at something, relate which means
something is relatable, legit which means something is
true, basic which means normal or conventional, and
squad which means pertaining to a group of friends.
These Gen Z terms are commonly used and have not
totally alter the meaning of the original word but has
lighter connotation and are being widely used to make it
part of the Gen Z slang. Moreover, Lihawa,et.al. (2020)
also agree that young generation used to use words from
the past but integrate another meaning to it. This simply
suggests that Gen Zers have been recycling other old
words then attach connotation into it to make it part of
their language generation. Moreover, connotation adds
to the richness of language which makes reading even
more stimulating and will motivate more readers.
Multiple Process
It has been noted as well from the data that some Gen Z
terms evolved from one process to another. As shown in
the figures below, the examples can have more than a
16
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
single morphological process and it is called multiple
process.
Figure 11: Facebook post sample for multiple process
Figure 11 displays the term sorna which means sorry na,
owshiee which means the expression oh shit, and awit
means aw ang sakit (oh it’s painful). The word formation
process used in the figure presented includes multiple
process. It is a way of creating a new word with more
than one processes. As observed the terms mentioned
are composed of two words and some part of the words
were clipped. The processes involved in the examples
are clipping and compounding. Clipping is the process
of reducing the elements of word while compounding is
the process of joining two separate words into a single
form to create new words (Rahayu, 2014). As observed
the gen Z terms in the figures are clipped from sorry to
sor, shit to shi/shie/it. Then these clipped words are
joined to other words like na, ow and aw. Specifically,
the word sorna was from compounding of Engalog
(English and Tagalog) then clipped these words before
compounding. This finding reveals that slang can be
created using multiple process. Lihawa, et.al. (2020)
agreed that multiple process is one of the morphological
process present in Gen Z slang. This implies that Gen
Zers are liberated in manipulating their language and
owning it. This implication can be a teacher’s
motivation in language learning.
In figure 12, the reversed forms were sakalam, erp and
lods. This is meant that words are pronounced backward
and it presents different form when the words are read
from forwards (Lihawa, et. al, 2021). In the exhibit
shown, sakalam is a reversed form of the word malakas
(strong) and erp is a reversed form of pre/pare which
means male friend. In fact, the word pare is already an
evolution of the word kumpare which means the
godfather of someone’s child. Lods, on the other hand
is developed and clipped from another gen z slang lodi
and adding -s at the last part. Lodi is a reversed form of
the word idol. The lods term can be categorized under
miltiple process. Further, this reversed form
morpholigical process is just a comeback during 60s
(Lumabi, 2020). It only explians that Gen Zers are
adoptive to the trend before and adaptive as well, by
adding a little twist to this process and make them
popularized today.
These processes that occured in one word then create a
new word again simply implies language is changing
continuously. Lihawa, et.al, (2020) also mentioned that
Gen Zers create new words from past slang to fulfill
their language needs. This adds to richness of language
because it shows the innovation and inventiveness of the
present generation. However, language learners may be
confused as to where and when these terms can be used
appropriately.
Spelling Distortion
It is a process that involves the distortion of the original
spelling. They misspelled the words not unconsciously
but intentionally.
Reversed form
Reversed form is a process where words are created by
reversing the way of reading the words. This process has
been popularized in the past generation and just has been
reappearing nowadays.
Figure 12: Sample reversed form from group chat
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Figure 13: Sample spelling distortion from Facebook
posts
17
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
Figures 13 manifests the words brad which comes from
the English term brother and they use it in addressing a
friend, hakdog which comes from the English term
hotdog, and they use as a nonsensical meme expression,
usually in response to "ha" to make fun of whatever their
responding to, jwk which comes from the English term
joke and it has the same meaning with the original term
which means something is humorous, tenkyu which
comes from the English term Thank you and used to
express gratitude, and peyn which comes from the
English term pain and express the same meaning.
The above figure shows that gen z slang tried to distort
the spelling of the original word to express a twist on the
old word to make it somehow new. This implies that
they spell the words as how they sound. It validates the
findings of Nazman, et.al. (2020) which reveals that
younger generation distorts spelling in terms of its
inflections so as to fit some sounds. Distorted words
were deliberately coined to appear trendy. However, it
may affect the language learning of the students
negatively especially to those who are not fully aware of
its correct spelling and may be adopted and accepted by
many as its correct form.
Suffixation
Another process that has been observed from the
students’ language use is suffixation. It is the process
which pertains to the process of adding suffixes in the
roots or the bases.
Figure 14: Facebook post sample for suffixation
Figure 14 shows the gen z slang-galawan. It is from the
root word “galaw” means movement but in this context,
it means what the person is up to. Gen Z slang used
familiar terms but put a different or additional meaning
into it. It implies that Gen Zers add suffix to a root word
to form new word and add another meaning into it. This
process is called suffixation which pertains to the
process of adding suffixes in the roots or the bases.
Lihawa et.al. (2020) further confirms that Gen Zers
create or modify slang due to fulfil their language needs.
Compounding and suffixation alike add to the language
evolution. Naturally, language is dynamic and it proves
the emergence of these morphological processes. Martin
(2018) initiates that anyone who does not accept the
reality of language variation should not teach English.
Change is siginificant because what is considered as
appropriate in one situation may not apply in another.
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
The following findings reveal that slang is widely used
by students. This has been affirmed by Arran (2017)
stating that slang is widely used and that it is already part
of students’ lives. Moreover, they also create their own
language and includes different morphological
processes that manifests their digital culture. Gime
(2020) seconded that Gen Zers developed language
transformation process of changing word to word
change in meaning and creating expressions. The
findings of Hashmi, et.al, (2019) also sustained the
results of the present study as they found out that current
generation develop slang words while talking via digital
device.
The morphological processes present in the slang
exhibited in the study supported the idea of Lumabi
(2020) when he explained that slang is created due to
physical limitation in which it demands speed of typing
and secondly, by internet culture. That is why the
present generation creates specific code of symbols that
bears meanings. Pradianti (2013) also agreed that they
use slang to say something in an easy way. Further, the
dynamism found out in the present study validated
Barseghyan (2013) which mentioned that slangs added
to new communicative dimensions.
The findings imply that through the rapid development
of technology, the transformation of the language had
become extensive as well. Also, Gere (2008) further
validated that digital culture was a result of rapid
development of digital technologies. He added that
digital culture and internet slang are interdisciplinary
categories.
2. Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effects of Gen Z
slang on conversational language and essay
While most people in the present generation are
perfectly capable of speaking like anybody else, many
of them have adopted a new kind of language. It came
with the advent of social media where messages tend to
be written quickly. However, when this language is used
in conversation with the older generation, for instance,
with the teachers, a different effect may occur between
interlocutors.
2.a. Teachers’ Perception on the Effects of Gen Z
slang on their conversational language
Teachers of Grade 10 students of Pamurayan Integrated
School were given survey questionnaire after the
interview. Based on the data the table shows the effects
of Gen Z slang on students’ conversational language.
Data presented were the average of the responses, its
interpretation and its ranking relative to the questions on
its effects on conversational language per se.
18
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
Table 2: Teachers’ Perception on the Effects of Gen Z
slang on their conversational language
Effects of Gen Z slang on conversational
language
Rank
Students use slang to communicate to their
classmates and friends.
Students are more engaged in
communication when using slang.
Slang does not create barrier in the
communication process among students.
It aids students confidently speak more the
language.
Students use slang to communicate to their
teacher and parents.
It aids students in improving
communication skills.
It helps students improve vocabulary.
It aids student’s language fluency.
Slang does not create barrier in the
communication process between teacher
and students.
Slang does not create barrier in the
communication process between students
and other older generation.
1
2
3
4.5
4.5
6
7.5
7.5
9.5
9.5
Table 2 shows the effects of Gen Z slang on
conversational language. The first in rank is students use
slang to communicate to their classmates and friends
and it means that teachers strongly agree. Second in rank
is students are more engaged in communication when
using slang. Third in rank is slang does not create barrier
in the communication process among students. Next in
rank is, it aids students confidently speak more the
language and students use slang to communicate to their
teacher and parents. Sixth in rank is it aids students in
improving communication skills. Next in rank is that
Gen Z slang helps students improve vocabulary and it
aids students’ language fluency. Last in rank is that it
does not create barrier in the communication process
between teacher and students, and between students and
other older generation.
The findings reveal that they actually use the language
to communicate, more engaged in conversation if they
are using it, and it aids to confidently speak the
language. However, it not a guarantee that it helps in
language fluency, improving communication skills, and
vocabulary. Moreover, though it does not create barrier
among students but it does create barrier between
students and teachers, and between students and other
older generations. It simply implies that Gen Z can be
utilized to activate student’s interests in engaging in the
lesson because it is relatable to them however, it also
implies that the use of Gen Z slang should have
limitation especially when talking to the teachers.
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Moreover, the results of the present study challenged the
result of the study of Hasanah (2019) which states that
colloquial words improve their vocabulary and the
statement of Barseghyan (2013) that Internet language
has increase the expressive richness of language. On the
other hand, Monash University agreed on the results that
slang is imprecise and is open to misinterpretation and
can be inaccessible to non-native speakers that’s why
teachers are neutral that it does not create
communication barrier between students and teachers
and students and other older generations.
2.b. Teachers’ Perception on the Effects of Gen Z
slang on their essay
Teachers of Grade 10 students of Pamurayan Integrated
School were given survey questionnaire regarding the
effects of Gen Z slang on their essay. Data presented in
the table were the average of the responses, its
interpretation and its ranking relative to the questions on
its effects on essay.
Table 3: Teachers’ Perception on the Effects of Gen Z
slang on their essay
Effects of Gen Z slang on essay
Rank
Students use slang in answering open- 1.5
ended questions in LAS.
Students also use slang in their written 1.5
outputs like slogan, poems, script
writing, stories, songs, etc. and not
only in essays.
Students are more engaged in writing
3
activities if they use slang.
Students use Gen Z slang in writing
4
essay.
Slang does not create barrier in the
5
communication process between
teacher and students.
It helps students improve spelling.
6.5
Students’ style of writing is influenced
by this slang positively.
It helps students improve grammar
and sentence structure.
6.5
8
Table 3 shows the teachers’ perceptions on the effects of
Gen Z slang on essay. Prior in rank, teachers agree that
students use slang in answering open- ended questions
in LAS and students also use slang in their written
outputs like slogan, poems, script writing, stories, songs,
etc. and not only in essays Next in rank is that students
are more engaged in writing activities if they use slang.
Fourth in rank is students use Gen Z slang in writing
essay. Fifth in rank, slang does not create barrier in the
communication process between teacher and students.
19
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
Next in rank are it helps students improve spelling and
students’ style of writing is influenced by this slang
positively. In the last rank, they disagreed that it helps
students improve grammar and sentence structure.
The findings reveal that teachers agree that students use
slang in answering open- ended questions in LAS and in
their written outputs like slogan, poems, script writing,
stories, songs, etc. It also revealed that they are more
engaged in writing activities if they are allowed to use
slang. However, teachers are neutral that they use it in
their essay and that it does not create communication
barrier between teacher and students. In addition, they
disagreed that Ge Z slang can affect students’ writing
style positively, it helps students improve grammar and
sentence structure.
The results suggest students are absorbed by the
language that they use it in their school-based outputs
however, using it on their essays and written outputs
have negative impact in their writing skills. It implies
that Gen Z slang should be discouraged in their formal
writing. The study of Hashmi et.al (2019) supported the
present findings that use of slang has influenced their
academic writing.
On the other hand, the result of the present study
contests the result of Sirivedin & Wongsothorn’s (2018)
study that social media significantly improve writing
skills. Wilson (2018) supported the results when he
established that virtual platfroms have negative effects
on spelling ability of the students which affects the
conventional way of writing.
3. Teachers’ response on the use of Gen Z slang on
conversational language and essay
The present generation have long enjoyed creating
secret languages and codes to communicate. The rise
and ubiquity of Gen Z slang among teens has become its
own sort of language. Older generations are often left
either fascinated or confused whenever they read or
heard a Gen Z term. Therefore, in this study, the
researcher gathered the teachers’ responses on the use of
Gen Z slang on conversational language and essay.
3.a. Teachers’ response on the use of Gen Z slang on
conversational language
A one-on-one interview was conducted to the Grade 10
teachers of Pamurayan Integrated School. They were
asked about their responses on the use of Gen Z slang in
conversational language. The given responses were
collected from the participants as indicated in the cited
interview below. They were also interviewed using
semi-structured interview.
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
From the responses of the participants, findings are
validated by presenting the result after the emerging
themes.
Table 4: Themes on the use of gen z slang on
conversational language based on teachers’ response
Acceptance
Unacceptance
Unacceptance on the
Acceptance on
the Use of Gen Z Use of Gen Z slang
while talking to other
slang on
older generations like
conversational
teachers and parents
language during
teachinglearning
discussion
Acceptance on
the Use of Gen Z
slang on their
social media
Unacceptance on the
Use of Gen Z slang in
school related tasks
The emerging themes on the use of Gen Z slang on
conversational language based on teachers’ response is
shown in Table 4. The themes have two major categories
which are the responses under acceptance and
unacceptance. In acceptance, teachers allow the use of
Gen Z slang during teaching-learning discussions and on
their social media while in unacceptance, teachers do not
allow do not allow the use of slang when talking to older
generations and in school related tasks.
The discussions on the emerging themes are as follows
based on their major category. The first category to be
thoroughly analyzed is acceptance.
Acceptance
Acceptance on the Use of Gen Z slang on
conversational language during teaching-learning
discussion
Some people say that classroom is a place where you
teach the standards. Only formal language is accepted
but there are teachers who are accepting the use of Gen
Z slang during teaching-learning discussion. As Teacher
Q said:
Considering na amo na talaga ang usual,
amo. (Considering that they use it, so be it.)
Gen Z slang is also the typical form of language that they
use in conversing with their friends and it motivates
them to speak and express themselves more. When it
comes to discussion, it is easier for students to affirm or
negate someone’s idea and it would lead to meaningful
exchange of thoughts and insights. At the end of the day,
the by-product of education is being aware of the world
20
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
through learning. How can teachers stimulate
meaningful conversation if they are not allowed to speak
in the language they are comfortable with? Therefore,
Teacher A’s response has been seconded by Teacher M
when he said:
Pero usually an ingagamit ninda relatable
man sa aton. Sa pag monitor okay lang. Sa
presentation sa klase okay lang para may
interaction. (Some of what they use are
relatable to us (teachers). While monitoring,
it’s okay. In presentation in class, it is okay as
well for interaction.)
Teacher Q and Teacher M have accepted the use of gen
z slang in conversational language during teachinglearning discussion. It is because, this is their language
already and they feel belonged and part of the discussion
when they use it. Their responses have been supported
by Heiman (1967) mentioning that the excitement of
students in using a slang dialect can be transferred to
their learning.
Acceptance on the Use of Gen Z slang on their social
media
Since Gen Z slang has been used widely in social media
and daily conversation, teachers agreed on the use of
Gen Z slang on their social media. Teacher J said:
Sa mga fb welcome naman na yun mas
nasasabutan kun nano talaga an gusto ninda
na sabihon. (In FB (Facebook), it is welcomed
because it is easier to understand what they
really wanted to express).
The response cited simply explained that Gen Z slang is
acceptable when used in their social media because they
can freely express what they truly feel. After all, social
media is a place where you are free to express and share
their status. Moreover, they have countless opportunities
to engage with social media. It gives them an
opportunity to engage virtually with the bigger world
around them.
They use social media in order to communicate to their
friends, family, community and even to strangers.
Especially, at this trying time that hinders face to face
interaction, social media has become a great avenue to
connect and reconnect.
The next major category on the teachers’ response on the
use of Gen Z slang on conversational language is
unacceptance. It has been scrutinized in the following
discussion.
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Unacceptance
Unacceptance on the Use of Gen Z slang while talking
to other older generations like teachers and parents
Despite the acceptance of Gen Z slang to other teachers,
there are still other teachers who did not accept the use
of slang when talking to older generations. Teacher R
said:
Siguro kasi kung yun yung freedom of
expression ninda. Kaya lang aram man dapat
ninda kun sino an aadressan sada. Sa mga fb
welcome naman na yun mas nasasabutan kun
nano talaga an gusto ninda na sabihon.
(Maybe because that is their freedom of
expression. However, they should know whom
to address their speech. In FB, it is already
welcome because it is easier to understand
what they wanted to say.)
Teacher R clearly emphasized that students must know
who they are talking to because this might cause
confusion in the communication. Teacher E also agreed:
Ayun nga dapat kung maggamit sila sinda
sinda lang magkaeredad pero kun sa lola
ngaya, dili nagkakasarabutan syempre
lowgets. (If they are going to use it, they must
use itonly among themselves for instance if they
are going to use it converse to their
grandmother, she will not be able to easily
comprehend what they wanted to express).
Teacher E said that they can use their language only
among themselves but when they are talking to elders,
they must be careful because they might not easily
recognize what they wanted to say. Teacher D also
affirmed Teacher E’s insight when it comes to using the
slang in conversing to elders. She also emphasized that
there is a chance of gap in communication as she
mentioned:
Sainda okay lang nagkakasarabutan sinda,
kaya lang pag ang kausap ninda adult baga
lain masyadong nakakagets mejo nagkakaron
ng gap ang conversation. (It’s okay if they use
it in their own group but if talking to adults, it
isn’t because they will not easily understand
and there will create gap in conversation.)
Teacher D also agreed that they can only use it only
among themselves but she also added that slang can not
be used to communicating to elders but to teachers as
well as reflected from what she said:
Gamit lang para sa conversation nila pero
hindi sa pakistoryahn sa teacher. (They can use
it among themselves but not acceptable when
used to talking to their teacher).
21
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
The responses transcribed clarified that it is acceptable
to use Gen Z slang when they are conversing with the
same group of generation who understand this slang but
not acceptable when used to converse to older
generations and to their teachers. This implies that
students must learn to set parameters in using it.
Unacceptance on the Use of Gen Z slang in school
related tasks
Teacher R insisted that slang is not acceptable in doing
school-related tasks. It is apprarent in his response:
Diri kay nagccreate sinda confusion lalo na sa
mga classmates ninda na lain man aram lain
man nagpaparagamit sada. Minsan maooffend
ka sa ingamit ninda dili mo aram intitiawan ka
na palan. Dapat ineexplain man ninda kun
nano an ibig sabihon. (No, because they are
creating confusion especially to their
classmates who does not know these terms and
those who are not acquainted of using these.
Sometimes, you’ll feel offended because you do
not know if they are already insulting you. They
should have explained what do they really
mean.)
Teacher R clearly objects the use of Gen Z slang in
school as he continued:
Sa normal na pagistoryahan mawawara na an
essense san communication. (In normal
conversation, the real essence of conversation
will vanish).
Teacher R opposed and it has been agreed by teacher D
when she said:
Hindi kasi makakasanayan mahihirapan na
tayong icorrect kapag palagi nilang ginagamit
yun at least habang maaga pa nakukuha
nanatin ang atensyon nila at naitatama ang
dapat nilang gawin. (No, they will be used to it
and it will be hard to correct them if they
constantly use it. We should catch them as
early as possible to correct them.)
Teacher R and D both opposed the use of Gen Z slang
in school-related tasks given that school is formal
context where people should use formal language. When
they become use to it, it will be hard to correct them. It
would be better that as early as now, they know when
use the language appropriately.
Further, based on the narration, teachers object the use
of Gen Z slang in school related tasks because other
students who are not using these slangs cannot
understand and the teachers most especially. The
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
findings revealed were affirmed by Monas University
that slang is open to misinterpretation and Yuliati (2013)
stated that slang could have more than one meaning.
However, findings also revealed that it can be used when
they are only conversing among themselves because
they can understand each other well. Eble (2009) and
Partridge (1935) agreed that they use it to create
belongingness.
To sum up, the results imply that students should refrain
from using it during class discussions. However, slang
is allowed to be used when talking only among
themselves considering the freedom of speech.
3.b. Teachers’ response on the use of Gen Z slang on
their essay
A one-on-one interview was conducted to the Grade 10
teachers of Pamurayan Integrated School. They were
asked about their response on the use of Gen Z slang in
conversational language. The given responses were
collected from the participants as indicated in the cited
interview below. They were also interviewed using
semi-structured interview.
From the responses of the participants, findings are
validated by presenting the result after the emerging
themes.
Table 5: Themes on the use of gen z slang on their
essay based on teachers’ response
Acceptance
Unacceptance
Acceptance if already Unacceptance on the Use
used, but they still need of Gen Z Slang in essays
to be reminded
Acceptance in informal
writing but not in
formal writing
The emerging themes on the use of Gen Z slang on their
essay based on teachers’ response is shown in Table 5.
The themes have two major categories which are the
responses under acceptance and unacceptance. In
acceptance, teachers accepted Gen Z slang if it is already
used but they still need to be reminded and its
acceptance in informal writing but not in informal
writing while in unacceptance, teachers do not allow do
not allow the use of slang in essays.
The discussions on the emerging themes are as follows
based on their major category. The first category to be
thoroughly analyzed is acceptance.
Acceptance
Acceptance if already used, but they still need to be
reminded
22
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
Teacher Q, on the other hand, cannot deny the fact that
students nowadays tend to forget the standard and when
given a task, that stimulates their interest, they just let
their expression flow at the expense of using nonstandard language. Hence, Teacher Q considered the use
of Gen Z slang when it is already included in their
outputs but Teacher Q assures that she reminds her
students on what is appropriate. She said:
Pag yada na ireremind mo na lang (na hindi
pwede) pero tatanggapon. (You will accept
their output but you will remind them that it is
unacceptable).
Therefore, it is only accepted as form of consideration
but they still need to prevent using it in formal writing.
This has been affirmed by Solano (2017) that students
use slang in their schoolwork.
Acceptance in informal writing but not in formal writing
Teacher M expressed her opinion that in informal
writing, it can be considered but totally rejected when it
comes to formal writing. She mentioned:
Yun ang problem. Di man sya common. Pag
essay baga formal. Pero sa Math wara man kay
wara man essay. Kung sa express your own
ngaya pwede iaccept pero pag formal writing
di siguro. (That’s the problem, it is uncommon.
In writing essay, it should be formal. But I
don’t observe that in Math because essays are
rare in Mathematics. However, if expressing
own opinion it can be but in formal writing,
no.)
The response noted justified the use of gen z slang in
informal writing but not in formal writing. There are
some outputs that required from the students that are
informal and really requires the use of it to emphasize
certain impact in writing for instance in creative
informal writing (stories and poems), free writing,
journal writing and diaries. Thus, Ellis (2020) explained
that in informal writing, slang can encourage the
students to voice their opinion and share their views
more openly.
The next major category on the teachers’ response on the
use of Gen Z slang on their essay is unacceptance. It has
been scrutinized in the following discussion.
Unacceptance
Unacceptance on the Use of Gen Z Slang in essays
Teachers are fully aware that informal is inappropriate
to formal writing. Therefore, teacher J mentioned that
she can observe Gen Z slang in essays but understanding
these terms is quite a challenge as cited in her response:
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
Igwa sa mga essays, pero may term na di mo
masabutan kun nano an gusto ninda na
sabihon, so hindi. (Yes,in essays, there are
terms that cannot be understood what they
really mean so I don’t accept)
Teacher E has strong perception that in formal writing,
students should follow the standard but in the case of
feature writing in which the purpose is to feature the
slang itself, it can be considered. This can be proven in
her transcribed answer:
Kung formal writing lain sya mayad. Minsan
amo na an may impact kay dapat may standard
kita na insusunod. Sa formal writing negative
pero kung feature writing ngaya okay lang. (In
formal writing it is unacceptable, sometimes
that’s the impact (of using Gen Z) because we
have some criteria to follow. In formal writing,
its effect is negative but in feature writing, it
can be).
Speaking of following standards, Teacher D, instead of
ignoring these slangs, she tried to correct them as to
follow what is acceptable. She said:
Ay nako Ma’am marami akong napapansin n
aganyan. Ang ginagawa ko itinatama ko
nilalagyan ko talaga ng marka. Yung word
namali yung spelling namali tapos nilalagay ko
yung tama. ( I can observe (Gen Z slng) a lot.
What I did is I correct them by putting some
notes. I noted the misspelled word then write it
correctly.)
Teacher D also added that if not given enough attention,
they can be used to it as she mentioned:
Makakasanayan din nila. Namamali yung
spelling. Hindi naman kasi yan pwede. (They
will be get used to it. They tend to misspell the
words and is unacceptable.)
Teacher M also totally affirms Teacher D’s response
when she said:
Makakasanayan niya tapos makakalimutan na
ang tamang spelling. Mawawara na an tama
na spelling. di bale na lang kun iallow na san
mga linguists. Nagviviolate ka sa grammar nan
sa spelling. Dapat niyan pa lang icorrect na sa
pormal. (They will get used to it and they will
forget the right spelling. If allowed by the
linguists, it can be. If not, students are violating
the grammar and spelling and as early as now,
it should be corrected in formal context.)
Teacher J added that there is set of criteria when
evaluating students’ output. Therefore, teachers have an
23
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
authority to reject the use of slangs in formal writing like
essays. This has been revealed in her transcription:
So far wara man ako napapansin sada sa
Science kay wara man essay nakikita man yan
sa mga ESP, Filipino ngaya. May criteria na
ingagamit kaya, may rubric. (So far, I have not
observed them, I don’t notice it either in
Science because there is no essay. Maybe, it
can be observed in ESP or Filipino).
The responses above show conviction that teachers do
not allow the use of Gen Z slang in formal writing, i.e.
essays. It is because there are certain criteria and rubric
that are used in evaluating the output. They will misspell
the words and it can only be accepted if approved by the
linguists to be part of the dictionary and can be used in
formal writing.
In conclusion, all the responses transcribed do not agree
on using Gen Z slang in formal writing like essays.
Moreover, there are certain criteria and rubric that are
utilized in evaluating the output. They will misspell the
words and it can only be accepted if approved by the
linguists to be part of the dictionary and can be used in
formal writing. Moreover, Wilson (2018) agreed to the
findings when he said that the use of slang in language
learning is solely negative and has negative effects in
their spelling ability. It opposed the idea of Martin
(2018) mentioning that slang can be a help to language
learning. It only implies that students should refrain
from using it in formal written works.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Slang is widely used by students. There are
morphological processes present in the slang exhibited
in the study. These are initialism, acronym, spelling
distortion, compounding, fancy formation, suffixes,
connotation, clipping, euphemism, reversed form,
borrowing, and multiple processes. The used slang of
the students revealed their digital culture which
demands speed of typing or say something in an easy
way, creates specific code of symbols that bears
meanings to prove that they are part of a certain group,
introduces new trends, shows their creativity,
adoptability and adaptability as well.
The use of Gen Z slang helps students to confidently
speak the language but does not guarantee that it helps
language fluency, communication skills, and
vocabulary. It does not create barrier among students but
impede successful communication between students and
teachers, and between students and other older
generations. Though students use Gen Z slang on their
school-based outputs, teachers perceive that they have
negative impact in their writing skills. Teachers object
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
in using Gen Z slang in their school related tasks but are
free to use when talking to their peers who have
knowledge about the slang. Teachers disagreed in using
Gen Z slang in writing essays. A self-guide dictionary
entitled Flexin’the Trend is proposed to be utilized in
order to bridge the communication gap among intergeneration for effective conversation. It has been
recommended that Gen Z slang may be used as a basis
in understanding the behavior and culture of younger
generation. Students may be allowed to use Gen Z in
informal context but not in formal writing. Gen Z slang
may be a tool for teachers to entice students’ interests in
lessons but they must set parameters in using it.
REFERENCES
BOOKS
[1] Arran, A. (2017, August). How does social media
slang affect learning? United States of America.
[2] Ellis, E. (2020). Is it acceptable to use slang in work
and content? United Kingdom.
[3] Gere, C. (2008). Digital Culture. London UK:
Reaktion Book Ltd.
[4] LeDuc, D. (2019, 20 May). Who is generation z.
Washington, DC, United States of America.
[5] Lumabi, B. C. (2020). The Lexical Trend of
Backward Speech among Filipino Millenials on
Facebook. International Journal of English and
Comparative Literary Studies .
[6] Sladek, S., & Grabinger, A. (2014). The First
Genertaion of the 21st Centruy has Arrived. XYZ
University.
[7] Partridge, E. (1935). Salng: To-day and Yesterday.
New York: Routledge.
PUBLISHED MATERIALS
[8] Arif, N. (2015). Social and Cognitive Implications
of Using Euphemisms in English. International
Journal of English Linguistics.
[9] Creswell, J. (2013). Quantitative Inquiry and
Research Design. Washington DC: SAGE
Publications, Inc.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Hashmi, M., Mahmood, M., & Naz, T. (2019).
Impact of Mass Media in the Use of English Slang
Words/ Short Forms among Pakistani Students.
JES.
Heiman, E. (1967). The Use of Slang in Teaching
Linguistics. The English Journal.
Lihawa, K., Mukaji, M., Malingkas, S., & Fatsah,
H. (2020). WORD FORMATION PROCESS OF
GEN
Z
SLANG
IN
CALLAHAN'S
GENERATION Z DICTIONARY.
Martin, I. P. (2018). Reconceptualizing English
Education in a Multilingual Society. Quezon City
Philippines: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Martini, O. (2015). Factors Affecting Language
Change. SSRN.
24
UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 03, Issue 04, 2022 | ISSN: 2582-6832
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
Pradianti, W. (2013). The Use of Salng Words
Among Junior High School Students in Everyday
Conversation. EJournal UPI.
Rahayu, P. (2014). Word Formation Processes of
the Terms Use by Clothes Online Shops in
Blackberry Messenger.
Reducing Informality in Academic Writing. (2021).
Virginia.
Rosales, H., & Carretero M. (2019). The Stylistics
Variation: Understanding Gay Lingo in Social
Perspectives. The Normal Lights Jpurnal on
Teacher Education.
Sirivedin, P., & Wongsothorn, A. (2018). Effects of
Facebook usage on English learning behavior of
Thai English teachers. Science Direct.
Swain, M. (2020, November 3). Generation Zers
believe they are the most creative, according to
Adobe poll.
Thump. (2016, June). The evolution of language
why we create new words.
Wilson, F. (2018). The Effect of Social Media on
the Spelling Ability of Students: A Case Study of
Federal College of eDUCATION (fce) Yola.
Research Gate.
Yuliati (2013). A Study on Internet Slang Used By
Students' Facebook Of English Department.
University Of Muhammadiyah Malang Institutional
Repository.
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
Maghirang, T. (2019). Get ready for tech-savvy
Gen Z! The Manila Times. Retrieved from
https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/03/24/business/
sunday-business-i-t/get-ready-for-tech-savvy-genz/530014 on April 12, 2021
Nordquist, R. (2019, June 30). The Definiton of
Borrowing
Language.
Retrieved
from
www.thoughtco.com:
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-borrowinglanguage-1689176 on April 11, 2021.
Postan, L. (2020) Clipping and Word Formation.
Retrieved
from
https://www.getblend.com/blog/clipping-wordformation/#:~:text=Clipping%20is%2C%20of%20
course%2C%20a,albeit%20by%20a%20tiny%20in
crement.&text=Clipping%20also%20reduces%20f
ormality on April 12, 202.
Solano, A. (2017, December 16). The Transforming
Students' Language. Retrieved from Press Reader:
http://www/pressreader.com
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/
Thump. (2016, June). The evolution of language
why we create new words. Retrieved from
https://www.thumped.co.uk/evolution-languagecreate-new-words/ on April 12, 2021
ELECTRONIC SOURCES
[24] Barseghyan, L. (2013). ON SOME ASPECTS OF
INTERNET SLANG. Retrieved from Graduate
School
of
Foreign
Languages:
http://ysu.am/files/Liana%20BARSEGHYAN.pdf
on April 12, 2021
[25] Eble, C. (2009). Slang and the Internet. Retrieved
from
Media
Neliti:
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/32896
6-the-lexical-trend-of-backward-speech-amo48f9029d.pdf on May 8, 2021.
[26] Essay. (n.d.). Retrieved from Brittanica:
https://www.britannica.com/art/essay on March
5,2021
[27] Gime, A. (2020, July 10). WikaGenZ: Bagong Anyo
ng Filipino Slang sa Pilipinas. Retrieved from
Consortia Academica: www.consortiacademia.org
on April 12, 2021
[28] Hasanah, D. (2019). The Use of Colloquial Words
in Improving Students' Speaking Through
Teacher;s Daily Assessment. Retrieved from
Atlantis Press: www.download.atlantis-press.com
on on March 16,2021.
[29] Jackson, C (2021). Order and Ranking Data:
Process,
Example.
Retrieved
from
https://study.com/academy/lesson/orderingranking-data-process-example-lesson-quiz.html on
August 13, 2021.
[30] Jardim, M. (2016). Is Qulatitaive Research
Subjective?.
Retrieved
from
https://medium.com/@mariliabombomjardim/isqualitative-research-subjective-f37d944fa2b8 on
April 12, 2021.
All rights are reserved by UIJRT.COM.
25