Instructions on Dealing with Physicists   In my experience, as perhaps the most famous Time-Traveler in History, one of the most daunting and annoying aspects of the experience of trying to communicate about that experience of travel thru the 4th/5th dimension is that Physicists, despite their obvious wit, intellect, and abundance of knowledge, are not usually ‘up to’ the task of communicating or responding to a Time-traveler with any kind of candor or honesty. This might well be due to the purported/claimed “CPC” issue (i.e., “Chronal Protection Conjecture”) which was proposed by the late Astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, former Lucasian Professor at Cambridge University.  The Lucasian Chair was first held by my 4th cousin 9x removed, Isaac Newton, who discovered Relativity long before Albert Einstein, and barely bragged about it at all.  Einstein, on the other hand, was a talented musician who (like me) was very fond of Mozart’s compositions, which often contain clues (in code) which time-travelers can easily understand and use to orient themselves in the plenum of Possible Universes and Times. Stephen Hawking was my 12th cousin 2x removed, although Sir Admiral John Hawkins (who vanquished the Spanish Armada and has been regarded as both a great naval genius and pirate, and cousin of Sir Francis Drake) was my 12th great grandfather, so I suspect I actually have perhaps a closer kinship than I can currently calculate with Hawking. Einstein was very open and honest about having ‘plagiarized’ his Theory of Relativity from Mozart, stating that “Mozart’s Symphonies were like Truth waiting to be discovered”, and acknowledging that the Theory of Relativity was primarily based on Mozart. This seems obvious to me, since I am frequently mentioned in the Mozart compositions, from one hundred or more years before my birth.  The fact is (and it is undeniable) that the name “Meyler” (my surname) is quite frequently ‘modeled’ or ‘synthesized’ within the text of sonorities of many musical compositions.  This is attributable to multiple avenues of causation, including the fact that Mozart (for example) was a Freemason, and that the World’s largest collection of Freemason literature exists at a location known as “Meyler’s Library” (which is named after W. Meyler, a poet and bookseller of the 18th century). Notwithstanding this, of course, Mozart is curiously interested in some of my companions and acquaintances from Princeton University: Saul Kripke, Christopher Gocke, Kathryn (Hookie) Schlesinger, Jody Savin (a major model in the Mozart 41st “Jupiter” Symphony), etc.  I suppose it would be fairest and most inclusive to also add that much of the subtext of Bach’s “Brandenburg” concerti involves me (as protagonist), friends, etc.  In fact, unlike Mozart, but 50 years prior to his compositions, Bach is a relative of mine, as was the Margrave of Brandenburg for whom Bach composed the famous concerti. Unfortunately, Physicists still seem to turn a very deaf ear to this phenomenon (still very well-recognized by Objective Science, actually) of speech-synthesis being performed solely by instrumental means which contains Information from ‘anachronistic’ sources: prechronal, antechronal, etc.  Music such as the Mozart Symphonies (14, 40, and 41, for instance) clearly contain references to persons who had not yet been born (some of whom I have mentioned).  It wasn’t until Karlheinz Stockhausen, probably the greatest 20th century composer; who studied Phonetics with Physicist Werner Meyer-Eppler, that the mathematics and science of speech-synthesis was most formally demonstrated.                                                                                         -2-     Stockhausen is very interesting, because he claimed to come from another Star System (i.e., Sirius).  Of course, the Nobel Committee awarded author Doris Lessing the Nobel Prize for Literature for her creation of the “Sirius Trilogy”, but this is only a passing reference to Stockhausen, in my opinion.  Karlheinz had an enormous ‘library’ of audio tapes of all kinds of sounds (natural and artificial) which he used in his amazing compositions.  My research has focused on Stockhausen simply because his work is the most ‘modern’ and scientific on this subject, of which I am aware.  Another composer, Iannis Xenakis, also wrote marvelous music and mathematical texts about the Physics of Music, emphasizing concepts from quantum mechanics, like ‘granularity’ of sound and phonons.  Xenakis, himself, in “Musiques Formelles”, states that “The Composer, like God” is capable of reversing Eddington’s “Arrow of Time”, referring to the principle of Time’s passage and Entropy, and the previously believed concept of the irreversibility of Time itself. Even long after Proust and Einstein died, Physicists still mostly claim that Time cannot be reversed, and that travel to the Past is impossible.  This is clearly false, or the Mozart Symphonies, Bach, Stockhausen, etc. would not contain so much Information from the future.  I’ve sometimes tried to have this conversation with my friend, a Harvard PhD in Music that I’ve known since 1972, but even he is unable to reciprocally respond to me on any level I would consider to be legitimate. As I mentioned above, I personally think that the subject of “Time-Travel” is rather taboo, among Scientists who are not fully versed in its intricacies.  I can provide a list of well-known and brilliant Physicists who have published research on Time-Travel (very openly) yet who are too constrained by the bounds of ‘convention’ or ‘propriety’ to respond directly to me.  Even my cousin, Nobel-winner Norman Borlaug (sometimes credited with saving one billion lives with his research) was quite reluctant to discuss or respond to my research. This could be primarily a Sociological issue, or it could be related to “CPC” (Chronal Protection).  I am inclined to believe it is mostly Sociological, and Psychological as well – in the sense that “Paranormal” facts are considered ‘weird’ or ‘unrelatable’.  Still, we live in a day and age where paranormal or spiritual phenomena are more common than ever, and more widely recorded.  I wonder why it is that Physicists haven’t kept up with the times. My suggestions for ‘dealing with Physicists’ would primarily be (1) patience, (2) compassion, (3) ‘friendly persuasion’, and (4) treating them like people we would want to be friends with.  It is only through a reciprocal process that we can enable them to understand our circumstances.  We must respect their obvious fear (even terror) of the unknown and inexplicable.  Yet, I think, if we are persistent and patient, we will be able to overcome this bias and bigotry against the temporal discontinuity we sometimes exhibit.