American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014, 5, 2943-2947
Published Online September 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajps
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.520310
Phenolic Compound Profiles of Two
Common Beans Consumed by Rwandans
Owino Joseph1*, Mukashyaka Phelomene1, Ndayisaba Helene1, Habimana Valens1,
Ongol Martin Patrick2, Dil Thavarajah3, Pushparajah Thavarajah3
1
Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
School of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine,
University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
3
School of Food Systems, College of Agriculture, Food Systems and Natural Resources, North Dakota State
University, Fargo, ND, USA
Email: *owinoj@gmail.com
2
Received 2 July 2014; revised 12 August 2014; accepted 29 August 2014
Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Legumes are high-protein, medium-energy and micronutrient-rich food consumed in many parts
of the world including Africa. This study evaluated the levels of specific phenolic compounds in
three legumes. Two varieties of the common bean, (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) soybeans (Glycine max
L.), and peas (Pisum sativum L.) from Rwanda were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The phenolic compounds were identified by comparison
to the chromatographic retention times and UV spectra of known reference compounds. This
study results clearly shows the presence of 11 different phenolic compounds in common beans:
gallic acid, (+)-catechin, (–)-epicatechin, caffeic acid, o-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, quercetin,
4-hydrobenzoic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid and vanillic acid. The concentration ranged from
0.59 to 2.27 mg/kg for epicatechin. High levels of catechin (13.5 to 57.9 mg/kg) ferulic acid (26.1
to 47.6 mg/kg) were also observed. Therefore, the results of this study show that Rwandan common beans are a good source of phenolic acids in particular catechins and ferulic acid.
Keywords
Common Bean, Phenolic Compounds, Rwanda, Identification and Quantification
1. Introduction
Legumes are a source of proteins, minerals, and vitamins for millions of world populations. The common bean
*
Corresponding author.
How to cite this paper: Joseph, O., Phelomene, M., Helene, N., Valens, H., Patrick, O.M., Thavarajah, D. and Thavarajah, P.
(2014) Phenolic Compound Profiles of Two Common Beans Consumed by Rwandans. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5,
2943-2947. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.520310
O. Joseph et al.
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.), one of the food legumes, is a part of daily diets of African, Asian and South American
populations. Common beans being a member of Leguminacea family fixing atmospheric nitrogen provide significant crop rotational advantages, and a contributor towards agricultural sustainability in many parts of the world [1].
Common beans are also a rich source of phytochemicals. Consumption of common beans rich in phytochemicals promotes human health. Among phytochemicals the phenolic class of compounds such as epicatechin, epigallocatechin gallate and catechin flavonoids protect against neurotoxic oxidative stresses. Epicatechins are also
able to cross the blood-brain barrier [2] to reduce lipid peroxidation and inhibit platelet aggregation. In diabetic
red blood cells, epicatechins increase acetylcholinesterase activity [3]. In addition, other phenolic compounds
such as flavonoids have been shown to protect against lung diseases and a range of cancers [4].
Besides positive nutritional benefits of phenolic compounds, polymeric forms of phenolic compound or polyphenols exert negative health effects on protein digestibility and α-amylase activities. For example, heat-stable
tannins inhibit pectinases, cellulase, amylases, β-galactosidases, lipases and several proteolytic enzyme activities.
Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) mineral micronutrient bi-availabilities have been reduced in common beans with high
concentration of certain phenolic compounds [5]. Polyphenols are also a contributor towards off colors and undesirable flavors in beans and other foods.
Common bean is a part of daily diet of majority of Rwandans. It is estimated that Rwandan consumes 60 kg
common beans per person per year [6]. With significant common bean consumption by Rwandans this study
was carried out to determine type and concentrations of phenolic compounds in most widely consumed bean varieties. In addition, common bean phenolic compounds types and concentrations were compared with those of
soybean and peas grown in Rwanda.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Samples
The legumes verities of pink and blue common beans of one kg were purchased in April 2013 from the local
market within two km radius of the University of Rwanda Campus in Kigali, Rwanda. They were washed,
sorted, and powdered using a domestic grinder (Philips, Model No. 2161, Netherlands). The powered samples
kept in refrigerator 4˚C until sample analysis.
2.2. Chemicals and Reagents
All chemicals and reagents used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without
further purification. Ultra-pure water was purchased from Milli-Q plus system from Millipore (Billerica, MA,
USA).
2.3. Extraction
Six ml of 95% ethanol was added to 0.6 g of finely ground dry samples, followed by rigorously mixing (2500
rpm) using a vortex for about 2 minutes. Then the samples were centrifuged at 1400 rpm for 10 minutes at room
temperature and the supernatant was taken for further analysis.
2.4. Chromatographic Conditions
The sample analysis was performed on a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with PDA detection
(Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan). The analyte separation column was Shim-Pack VP-ODS C18
column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) Shim-Pack VP, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan. The DAD
detector was applied to scan the phenolic compounds of interest to ascertain their maximum absorbance wavelengths and acquire other spectral information within a range of 200 to 400 nm. A gradient solvent system was
employed with solvent A being water-acetic acid (97:3, v/v) and solvent B being acetonitrile. The elution profile
had the following proportions (v/v) of solvent B: 0.00 - 5.00 min, 0% - 8.5%; 5.00 - 16.50 min, 8.5% - 2.0%;
16.50 - 35.00 min, 2.0% - 18%; 35.00 - 50.00 min, 18% - 20%; 50.00 - 65.00 min, 20% - 30%; 65.00 - 70.00
min, 0% - 30%. The separated peaks were identified at 255, 260, 275 280, 304, 324 and 360 nm. The column
temperature was maintained at 30˚C with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. All the prepared solutions and samples were
filtered through 0.25 μm membranes (Minisart, Sartorium Stedim Biotech, Russia) prior to analysis.
2944
O. Joseph et al.
2.5. Calibration Curves
Solutions of the phenolic standards were prepared in the mobile phase. Separate calibration curves were used for
phenolic compounds at four different concentrations. Quantifications were validated using inter laboratory analysis of selected phenolic compounds at both at University of Rwanda (UOR), Kigali, Rwanda and North Dakota
State University (NDSU), ND, USA. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and calculation of correlations and regression with SPSS 16.0
statistical software (IBM Corporation, USA). Differences between means were evaluated using the Duncan’s
multiple range test. The difference was considered significant p < 0.05.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Phenolic Compounds Separation and Identification
The chromatographic conditions of the phenolic compounds were optimized prior to sample analysis. The peaks
of all analytes were well resolved, and a representative chromatogram is shown in Figure 1. The standard curves
of all phenolic compounds correlations were 0.99 or higher. Therefore, we are certain that peak identification
and sample quantification are accurate. Inter laboratory validation between the UOR and NDSU also confirmed
selected peak identification and quantification. Chromatographic identification and confirmation of phenolic
compounds were based on comparing retention times with authentic standards. The relative concentrations at
different wavelengths were calculated from the calibration curves [7].
3.2. Bean Phenolic Compound Quantification
Beans are good source of phenolic compounds. In this study sample phenolic compound detailed results are
shown in Table 1. The levels of phenolic compound varied from 16.78 - 25.01 mg/kg for gallic acid, 18.18 29.64 mg/kg for 4 hydroxy benzoic acid, 10.69 - 13.33 mg/kg for vanillic acid, 23.17 - 24.06 mg/kg for chlorogenic acid, 11.8 - 41.9 mg/kg for caffeic acid, 14.1 - 31.3 mg/kg for syringic acid, 13.5 - 57.9 mg/kg for catechin,
0.59 - 2.27 mg/kg for epicatechin, 12.57 - 27.1 mg/kg for o-coumaric acid, 26.1 - 47.6 for ferulic acid and 16.73
- 19.23 mg/kg for quercetin. From the results there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in epicatechin, quercetin, catechin and ferulic acid in the four samples analyzed implying that consumption of the samples will result in the same amount of the named phenolic compounds. In blue dry beans, catechin had the highest concen10
7.5
E
5.0
V.A
CH
G.A
S
2.5
4-HBA
C.A
0.0
0.0
5.0
10
15
20
25
C
Q
O-Q.A
F.A
30
Min
35
40
Figure 1. Representative HPLC chromatogram of 11 different phenolic compounds. GA: Gallic Acid, 4-HBA: 4-Hydroxy
Benzoic Acid, V.A: Vanillic Acid, CH: Chlorogenic, C.A: Caffeic Acid, S: Syringic, C: Catechin, E: Epicatechin, O-Q.A:
O-Qoumaric Acid, F.A: Ferulic Acid, Q: Quercetin.
2945
O. Joseph et al.
Table 1. Composition of the phenolic compounds.
Gallic 4-Hydroxy Vanillic Chlorogenic Caffeic Syringic
Coumaric
Catechin Epicatechin
acid
benzoic acid
acid
acid
acid
acid
acid
16.78a ±
26.84a ±
10.69a ±
23.36a ±
41.9c ±
14.4a
57.0c ±
1.10b ±
12.57a ±
BLUE BEAN
0.24
1.15
0.07
0.53
1.04
±1.11
0.80
0.00
0.37
25.01c ±
27.17a ±
11.54a ±
23.59a ±
25.5b ±
14.1a
13.5a ±
2.27c ±
16.66a ±
PINK BEAN
2.77
0.54
0.08
0.08
3.20
±0.34
0.50
0.04
0.65
20.28b ±
18.18a ± 10.91a ±
23.17a ±
40.3c ± 18.7b ± 57.9c ±
1.06b ±
27.1a ±
SOYA
0.09
0.53
0.16
0.08
9.47
0.25
1.64
0.08
1.19
20.48b ±
29.64a ±
13.33b ±
24.06a ±
11.8a ± 31.3c ± 18.1b ±
0.59a ±
15.34a ±
PEA
0.67
3.10
1.85
1.10
0.45
2.13
3.83
0.42
0.02
SAMPLES
Ferulic
Quercetin
acid
26.1a ± 16.77a ±
0.01
0.24
36.0b ± 17.21a ±
1.44
0.15
27.1a ± 16.73a ±
1.19
2.49
47.6c ± 19.23a ±
3.39
1.83
tration of 57 mg/kg while epicatechin had the lowest concentration 1.1 mg/kg. Similar trend was observed in a
study of quantitation of phenolics from the seeds of green beans in which levels of catechin was 407.5 mg/kg
while epicatechin was 207.6 mg/kg [8]. In pink dry beans ferulic acid had the highest concentration of 36 mg/kg
while epicatechin had the lowest concentration of 2.7 mg/kg. In soybean, catechin had the highest concentration
of 57.9 mg/kg while the lowest concentration was observed in epicatechin at 1.06 mg/kg. For pea, highest concentration was seen in ferulic acid at 47.6 mg/kg and the lowest was epicatechin at 0.59 mg/kg. The low levels
of epicatechin could be attributed to an epimerization reaction which converts epicatechin to its epimer catechin
during the extraction process [9].
Only p-coumaric and ferulic acid were reported in a study [10], from the flour and hull of the navy beans. In a
study on phenolic acids content of fifteen dry edible bean varieties, caffeic acid was quantified at 1.1 mg/100mg
in black beans, p-coumaric acid was 12.4 mg/100g, ferulic acid was 26.6 mg/100g and sinapic acid 9.4 mg/
100mg [11]. The observed values are much higher for caffeic and ferulic acid compared to the study samples.
This difference can be attributed to various factors such as variety, assay procedure, growing and storage conditions, agronomic practices (irrigation, fertilization, pest management), maturity at harvest, post harvest storage
and climatic conditions [12]-[14].
Most studies in literature reports on the total phenolic content, which makes it not possible for, direct comparison with our study. However, this may be the first study from Rwanda reporting detailed phenolic compound results. Since polyphenols exert both beneficial and negative effects, further studies using common bean
phenolic compounds on cell culture, animal models and human subjects will provide real human nutrition benefits.
4. Conclusion
Eleven phenolic compounds in common bean samples were analyzed and quantified using high-performance
liquid chromatography-diode array detection. This study shows that Rwandan beans are a good source of phenolic compounds in particular catechins and ferulic acid.
References
[1]
Broughton, W.J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P. and Vanderleyde, J. (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)—
Model Food Legumes. Plant and Soil, 252, 55-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146710611
[2]
Vivanco, J.M., Bais, H.P., Vepachedu, R., Gilroy, S. and Callaway, R.M. (2003) Allelopathy and Exotic Plant Invasion:
From Molecules and Genes to Species Interactions. Science, 13, 77-80.
[3]
Maria, A., Janeiro, P. and Oliveira, B. (2004) Catechin Electrochemical Oxidation Mechanisms. Analytica Chimica
Acta, 518, 109-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.038
[4]
Woods, R.K., Raven, J.M., Wolfe, R., Ireland, P.D., Thien, F.C.K. and Abramson, M.J. (2003) Food and Nutrient Intakes and Asthma Risk in Young Adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 414-421.
[5]
Oatway, L., Vasanthan, T. and Helm, J. (2001) Phytic Acid. Food Reviews International, 17, 419-431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/FRI-100108531
[6]
MINAGRI (2012) CIA World Factbook. MINAGRI, Rwanda.
[7]
Robbins, J.R. and Bean, S.R. (2004) Development of a Quantitative High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Photodiode Array Detection Measurement System for Phenolic Acids. Journal of Chromatography A, 1038, 97-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.03.009
[8]
Escarpa, A. and Gonzaez, M.C. (2000) Identification and Quantitation of Phenolics from Green Beans by High-Per-
2946
O. Joseph et al.
formance Liquid Chromatography. Chromatographia, 52, 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02490789
[9]
Kofink, M., Papagiannopoulos, M. and Galensa, R. (2007) (−)-Catechin in Cocoa and Chocolate: Occurrence and
Analysis of an Atypical Flavan-3-ol Enantiomer. Molecule, 12, 1274-1288.
[10] Sosulski, F.W. and Dabroski, K.J. (1984) Composition of Free and Hydrolysable Phenolic Acids in the Flours and
Hulls of Ten Legume Species. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 32, 131-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00121a033
[11] Luthria, D.L. and Pastor-Corrales, M.A. (2006) Phenolic Acids Content of Fifteen Dry Edible Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19, 205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003
[12] Dixon, R.A. and Paiva, N.L. (1995) Stress-Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism. Plant Cell, 7, 1085-1097.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085
[13] Ninfali, P. and Bacchiocca, M. (2003) Polyphenols and Antioxidant Capacity of Vegetables under Fresh and Frozen
Conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 2222-2226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf020936m
[14] Hakkinen, S. and Torronen, R. (2000) Content of Flavonols and Selected Phenolic Acids in Strawberries Vaccinium
Species: Influence of Cultivar, Cultivation Site and Technique. Food Reviews International, 33, 517-524.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00086-7
2947