Invading a new niche: obligatory weeds at Neolithic Atlit-Yam, Israel

Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 DOI 10.1007/s00334-014-0498-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Invading a new niche: obligatory weeds at Neolithic Atlit-Yam, Israel Anat Hartmann-Shenkman • Mordechai E. Kislev Ehud Galili • Yoel Melamed • Ehud Weiss • Received: 9 February 2014 / Accepted: 22 October 2014 / Published online: 8 November 2014  Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract A characteristic group of obligatory weeds was found in the well of the submerged Pre-Pottery Neolithic C site of Atlit-Yam, Israel. Identifying these finds to species level was crucial for defining them as obligatory weeds. We deal here with the earliest and largest assemblage of obligatory and facultative weeds in the southwest Asian Neolithic. Atlit-Yam may reflect a stage in the establishment of weeds in cultivated fields. Weeds are an important resource for reconstructing the agricultural situation in archaeological sites, as weed-crop interactions reflect an agricultural lifestyle. Some of the weeds of Atlit-Yam grow in fields as well as in Mediterranean herbaceous habitats. This may indicate that the local herbaceous ecosystem was the original habitat of the weeds and the place where the first fields were planted. Presence in a single context of the earliest identified obligatory grain pest beetle (Sitophilus granarius) along with obligatory weeds reflects a novel change made to the ecosystem by the farmers, in which stored crops were invaded by pests. Communicated by F. Bittmann. A. Hartmann-Shenkman
E. Weiss (&) The Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, The Institute of Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, 5290002 Ramat-Gan, Israel e-mail: eweiss@biu.ac.il M. E. Kislev
Y. Melamed The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, BarIlan University, 5290002 Ramat-Gan, Israel E. Galili Israel Antiquities Authority and Zinman Institute of Archaeology, The University of Haifa, POB 180, 3030000 Atlit, Israel Keywords Pre-Pottery Neolithic C (PPNC)
Submerged settlement
Agriculture
Obligatory weeds
Sitophilus granarius Introduction Weeds invade most agricultural land and are therefore considered to be characteristic of cultivated fields. The prehistoric establishment by humans of tilled fields (as well as other disturbed habitats) enabled numerous unwanted plants to invade these newly made habitats and evolve as weeds. Although our herbicide-addicted agriculture is troubling, weed control in ancient farming was an even greater problem. Since weed evolution went hand in hand with crop cultivation, our ancestors had to invest greater efforts to control these field invaders as agriculture advanced. The evolutionary adaptation of these weeds to the agricultural niche moved along multiple paths, which included increasing seed numbers, mimicking cultivars, adapting to the cultivars’ growth cycles, and developing dormancy. We can therefore use weeds as ‘‘index fossils’’ of agricultural ecosystems. In addition, some common weeds are native to southwest Asia, and their origin may be linked to the beginning of cultivation (Harlan 1995; Willcox 2012; Zohary 1950; Zohary et al. 2012). Botanists and ecologists have long dealt with the issue of weeds and their evolution. Generally, weeds were described negatively as being useless, injurious, obnoxious or harmful (Webster 1966), and even homeless (Zohary 1950). For some, like Pieters (1935), weeds took on an anthropocentric cast with epithets such as ‘‘evil’’ or creatures that ‘‘should be destroyed’’. However, weeds are not always the farmer’s nemesis, as they sometimes turn out to produce valuable seeds. The farmer could then plant weed 123 10 seeds, which could then lead to species domestication. For example, several Old World crops are regarded as ‘‘secondary crops,’’ which entered domestication through the back door of weed evolution. Such cases are Avena sativa (oat), Secale cereale ssp. cereale (rye) and Camelina sativa (gold of pleasure), which actually turned from weeds into domesticated plants (Vavilov 1949–1950, 1987; Zohary et al. 2012). In addition, several facultative weed taxa found at the site are edible, for example Chenopodium album, Chrozophora tinctoria, Emex spinosa, Hordeum spontaneum, Scorpiurus muricatus and Silybum marianum (Zohary 1966, 1972; Feinbrun-Dothan 1978, 1986; Dafni 1984; Feinbrun-Dothan and Danin 1998). Therefore we need to consider the possibility that they may also have been gathered for consumption. Importantly, this does not change their role as weeds if they were gathered in the fields. We present here the weed assemblage from Atlit-Yam. The main importance of this paper is that it presents the earliest and largest assemblage of obligatory and facultative weeds in the southwest Asian Neolithic. Moreover, Atlit-Yam is a Pre-Pottery Neolithic C (PPNC) site in the heartland of the Levantine Neolithic, and therefore belongs to a stage following the establishment of the full-fledged agricultural economy of the PPNB. This economy is manifested in the site’s complex of crop plants, weeds and a particular insect pest. The site of Atlit-Yam The village of Atlit-Yam is currently a submerged PPNC settlement (Fig. 1), radiocarbon dated to 9,200–8,500 cal Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 BP. It is located 200–400 m west of the present Mediterranean coastline of Israel, 8–12 m below current sea level. The site was excavated by E. Galili on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority and the University of Haifa. It was a coastal agro-pastoral village that subsisted on agriculture and marine resources. The plant material under discussion, mostly waterlogged, was taken from a single well, Structure no. 11. The fill of the well contained plant remains, large quantities of animal bones and various flint, bone and stone artefacts (Galili and Nir 1993; Galili et al. 1993; Galili and Rosen 2011). It included thousands of seeds and fruit remains belonging to about 90 species. The finds include: • • • • • Grains of domesticated cereals: Triticum dicoccum (emmer wheat), T. parvicoccum (small-grained wheat), T. durum (durum wheat) and H. vulgare (two/six-rowed barley); Pulses: Lens culinaris (lentil) and Cicer arietinum (chickpea); Fruits: Ficus carica (fig), Pistacia atlantica (atlantic pistachio), P. palaestina (terebinth tree), P. lentiscus (lentisk), as well as Vitis sylvestris (wild grape vine); Wild vegetables: Malva parviflora (small-flowered mallow) and Rumex pulcher (fiddle dock); and Herbs and weeds. This rich assemblage of wild and domesticated crop plants indicates the centrality of agriculture to the inhabitants’ life style. Other material remains, such as dwellings and domesticated animal bones, further demonstrate the site’s domesticated culture. Since the crop remains are an admixture with a large assemblage of weeds, we have a unique opportunity to deal with the evolution of weeds and their early appearance during the Neolithic period. The definition of ‘‘weed’’ Fig. 1 The location of the Atlit-Yam site near the coastal plain of Israel 123 The term ‘‘weed’’ has many definitions. In 1935, Pieters (1935) quoted a restricted definition of weeds from the Farmers’ Bulletin: ‘‘A plant that does more harm than good and has the habit of intruding where not wanted’’. Harlan’s (1965) use of the term was broad: ‘‘For the purpose of this discussion, the word weed is taken to mean a species or race which is adapted to conditions of human disturbance (Harlan and DeWet 1965). By this definition, weeds are not confined to plants. Animals such as the English sparrow, the starling, the ‘statuary’ pigeon, the house mouse, Drosophila melanogaster, and others are especially fitted to environments provided by human disturbance’’. These definitions imply that the appearance and abundance of weeds in archaeological material can influence Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 our understanding of ancient cultures. For example, several generations of archaeobotanists have shown methodologically that finding weeds with crop plants in an archaeological assemblage can indicate that grain remains were grown in planted fields. In other words, the presence of weed species in crop remains is associated with past agricultural activities (Zohary 1950; Harlan 1965; Harlan and DeWet 1965; Wasylikova 1981; Greig 1990; Hillman 1991; Fahmy 1997; Colledge 1998; Jones 2002; Kreuz et al. 2005; Fuller 2007; Eliáš et al. 2010; Jones et al. 2010; Kreuz and Schäfer 2011; Willcox 2012; Riehl et al. 2013). Since obligatory weeds (see below) are clearly associated with contemporary farming, they are acceptable indicators for past agricultural activities. Because obligatory weeds do not grow outside fields, their presence in an archaeobotanical context strongly indicates that these plants had already entered the favourable niche of farmed lands. Unfortunately, once there, they have remained an agricultural curse for thousands of years, through to our own times. Classification of weeds In weed research, weedy taxa are clustered into several categories. The main groups are obligatory and facultative weeds, which were defined by Michael Zohary (1950): Obligatory weeds are ‘‘not found as yet outside segetal [field] habitats. Many of them are rather widespread…. These are, undoubtedly, ancient plants which have lost their primary habitats [i.e. natural vegetation] during the long history of cultivation. Many of them are known from prehistoric times. They have been termed archaeophytes…’’ Facultative weeds are ‘‘plants occurring in both segetal and primary habitats.’’ We relate here to both of these groups. However, following the terminology of Zohary and other previously mentioned researchers, obligatory weeds are the best markers for agricultural activity in archaeobotanical assemblages. This is because, in most cases, their only habitats are cultivated fields. Materials and methods Sampling The first stage of sampling was on site. The samples were excavated underwater with dredger suction, mostly in 20 cm layers of the well depth. The divers took the samples to shore in bags, which were placed separately into plastic boxes with fresh water. On the shore, large stones and artefacts were removed manually from the boxes and the 11 fine material underwent several stages of sieving: floating and hovering waterlogged organic material was collected in a 0.5 mm strainer, while the heavy material sank to the bottom of the box. Some of the material was collected by picking. The waterlogged organic material was kept in sealed jars for wet storage and analysis. Laboratory work The analysis work was conducted in the laboratory. The carbonized material was taken out of the water and dried. The waterlogged material was left in the water. To prevent mould development, we replaced the original water with a 4 % solution of the fungicide Nipagin (methyl paraben/ para-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester; 4 g of Nipagin per 1 l of water). Sorting the samples was carried out using a stereoscopic microscope at a magnification of up to 509; mainly seeds and fruits were sorted out (other types of remains were mostly disregarded). The plants were identified mainly on the basis of their morphology, following sorting into types, sizes, shapes and surface textures. The identification was aided by our reference collection. We followed Fragman-Sapir et al. (1999) for English plant names. Finally, some of the seeds were photographed by stereoscopic light microscope using an Olympus SZX10, or by SEM using an XL 30 FE (field emission), FEI. The SEM samples were coated with gold and examined at 200–500x magnifications. Results Some 8,500 seeds and fruit remains representing some 90 species were identified from the well. The implication of the large number of weed species there is discussed below. The weed assemblage The obligatory and facultative weeds from Atlit-Yam are an important resource for reconstructing the agricultural activities of its inhabitants. Following Zohary’s grouping (1950), we found remains of weeds representing some 35 species representing two groups, five obligatory and 30 facultative weed species (Table 1; Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). The weeds and other finds were distributed throughout the various depths of the well assemblage (Table 2). As far as we know, this is the earliest and largest assemblage of weeds from the southwest Asian Neolithic. Furthermore, identifying these five obligatory weeds to species level is significant, as all of them are non-monotypic, so they have other species in their genera. Undoubtedly, another species of the genus could have a 123 12 Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 Table 1 The weeds of Atlit-Yam; all these species still function as weeds in cultivated fields, those with an asterisk also grow in Mediterranean semi-steppe herbaceous habitats (see text; see Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) Fig. 2 Bupleurum subovatum. Mericarp, dorsal view. The fruit is long, ovoid, prominently ribbed and densely tuberculate in the wide, shallow furrows (SEM) totally different ecological signature and could not serve as a proxy for agricultural activity. Luckily, the excellent preservation of these waterlogged samples allowed for species level identification. The identification to species also provides us with an improved understanding of weed emergence. Some of these weeds (see Table 1, the asterisked species) still grow in local fields, as well as in Mediterranean semi-steppe herbaceous habitats (Zohary 1962). These examples may indicate that the herbaceous ecosystem was their original, 123 Fig. 3 Lolium temulentum. Grain, ventral view. The narrow ventral furrow becomes wider and shallower on the upper part of the grain (SEM) pre-weed habitat, and that the first fields originated in this ecosystem. The obligatory weeds The following are the descriptions and the identification criteria of the obligatory weeds from Atlit-Yam. Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 13 Fig. 6 Tordylium aegyptiacum. a ventral wall of flattened, small mericarp; b recent mericarp with distinct, somewhat moniliform margin for comparison, dorsal view. Unfortunately, the delicate mericarp was broken during photo processing, revealing the dorsal ridge. The inner part of the margin is viewed at the perimeter, while its moniliform outer part is missing (stereo microscope photo) Fig. 4 Phalaris paradoxa. Grain, side view. The fertile grain is enveloped by the lemma and the palea. The minute two lemmas (at the bottom) are actually reduced sterile florets (SEM) characters that distinguish this species, which is exclusively segetal in Israel. The second character is the fusion of two mericarps into a single dispersal unit (Zohary 1972; Danin 2004), which are similar in length and width to those of T. parvicoccum grain. The fused mericarps, which are unique to the genus and also unusual in the Apiaceae, suggest that the fruit of the segetal B. subovatum adapted to the T. parvicoccum grain in shape and size. Moreover, the wide and generally perfoliate shaped leaves of the two species are unique to their genus. This resemblance might suggest that B. subovatum evolved from the closely related B. lancifolium. Lolium temulentum L. (Poaceae), Darnel Fig. 5 Raphanus raphanistrum. Sterile portion of the siliqua upper joint, side view. The neighbouring joints are fertile (SEM) Bupleurum subovatum Spreng. (=Bupleurum lancifolium var. lancifolium; B. intermedium Poir.) (Apiaceae), False thorow-wax Two mericarps were found (Fig. 2), one at a well depth of 310–350 cm, and the second is from an unknown depth. They are characteristic in shape and pattern (Zohary 1972). Beupleurum subovatum was formerly the typical variety of B. lancifolium, of which the other varieties are nonweedy, wild plants, and which still belong to the last species. A 4 mm long mericarp is one of the two main A single carbonized grain without hulls was identified (Fig. 3), found at an unknown depth in the well. Lolium grains have a small and elliptic embryo, and a hilum in a longitudinal furrow which equals the length of the grain (Bor 1968). The grain was identified to this species because of its relative size, width and elliptic shape. Phalaris paradoxa L. (Poaceae), Bristle-spiked Canary grass Nine carbonized hulled grains of Phalaris paradoxa were found (Fig. 4), all of them from a depth of 250–270 cm. It was easy to identify its genus, thanks to the characteristic shape of the grain, where its thickness is much greater than its width. In addition, the grain is tightly enclosed by the palea and glossy lemma, which are clearly visible in the archaeological find. One of the grains was subtended at its base by 2 min, unequal lemmas of sterile florets (Feinbrun- 123 14 Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 Table 2 Crop and weed species (?pest beetle) with depth (cm) in the Atlit-Yam well Dothan 1986). Based on these sterile lemmas, other Phalaris species were rejected. Raphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae), Wild radish Two carbonized and two waterlogged degraded portions of the siliqua upper joint were found (Fig. 5), all of them from 123 a depth of 250–270 cm. They are characteristic of this species in shape, pattern, texture and dimensions. The upper joint has 2–8 seeded portions (and sometimes a few sterile ones) with constrictions between them, readily breaking into longitudinally ridged 1-seeded (or sterile) portions. In Israel, this species is common in the coastal plain (Zohary 1966). Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 Tordylium aegyptiacum (L.) Lam. (Apiaceae), Egyptian hartwort Six waterlogged umbel peripheral mericarps were found (Fig. 6), all of them from a depth of 250–270 cm. They are strongly flattened, orbicular to suborbicular, somewhat notched at base and apex. The middle dorsal ridge can be observed. We compared our remains with all local species of the tribe Peucedaneae, especially the other species of Tordylium, as well as the closely related Peucedanum junceum, but they were not similar to our finds. Discussion This large group of weeds from Atlit-Yam is a case-study for weed research, because it represents their very early establishment in cultivated fields. In addition, the weeds provide persuasive evidence for the antiquity of the interrelationship between weed flora and agricultural fields. There are several broad implications of this study. (a) Atlit-Yam is the earliest known assemblage of obligatory weeds: In order to understand the obligatory weed community from Atlit-Yam in relation to contemporary agricultural communities, we checked archaeobotanical assemblages from other Pre-Pottery Neolithic southwest Asian sites. Although many PPN sites revealed domesticated crops, their weed finds are remarkably limited. In most reports, obligatory weeds are completely absent. Some PPN sites include finds which can potentially be regarded as obligatory weeds. However, these taxa were only identified to genus or sp./cf. level, not to species level (Table 3). As we mentioned earlier, weeds are useful ecological markers only if they are identified to species level. There are several earlier reported cases where obligatory weeds were identified to species level, all in southwestern Asian Pre-Pottery Neolithic B agrarian sites. Galium tricornutum was found in Can Hasan III, Turkey (Hillman 1972, 1978), and in Yiftah’el, Israel (Garfinkel et al. 1988). Lolium temulentum was found at Ramad; Vaccaria hispanica was found at Aswad and Ramad, Syria (van Zeist and Bakker-Heeres 1982 (1985)), and also in PPNA M’lefaat (Savard et al. 2003). Two possible additional sites are Tepe Ali Kosh, Ali Kosh phase, where Phalaris cf. paradoxa was found (Helbæk 1969) and Nevali Çori where Lolium cf. temulentum was found (Damania et al. 1998). The comprehensive ensemble of weeds from Atlit-Yam includes five obligatory and 30 facultative weeds. It represents, therefore, the establishment of weeds as a characteristic group within the agricultural cycle. This is, of course, not the ‘‘beginning of weeds,’’ but rather the earliest representation of a complex weed population and not the sporadic appearance of a single weed. 15 (b) Weed-crop relationships reflect local agriculture: Contemporary observations have shown that particular weeds have a preference, or adaptation, for specific crops, or group of crops (Harlan 1965). At Atlit-Yam, we can distinguish a group of obligatory weeds, typical of cereal fields with P. paradoxa, L. temulentum, B. subovatum, R. raphanistrum and T. aegyptiacum (Zohary 1941). Therefore, the combined plant assemblage of crops and weeds from Atlit-Yam can give additional information regarding the establishment of agriculture in the PPNC. Even in this prehistoric period we can see the state of coevolution between certain obligatory weeds and their crops. (c) A grain pest beetle and obligatory weeds invade the same human-made ecological niche: Interestingly, in addition to the noxious weeds from Atlit-Yam, we also identified the remains of some 27 specimens of S. granarius (granary weevil). Their numbers are based on finds of the prothorax, the fore segment of the thorax, which is the largest and hardest part of the insect and bears the front pair of legs (Fig. 7). In addition, the samples also contained six elytra, the protective wing cases that generally protect the functional wings, the latter being only vestigial in this species. Sitophilus granarius is a locally extinct pest beetle of stored grains, reviewed by Kislev et al. (2004). Together with contemporary finds from Hacılar, southwest Anatolia, Turkey (Helbæk 1970), these remains are the earliest known evidence of a pest associated with domesticated grains. Today, this beetle is widespread, mainly in the north temperate zone, and it is naturally absent from our warmer region. The best conditions for its development are cool environments, down to 11 C, with high relative humidity, and the beetle is therefore more successful in temperate regions (Howe 1965; Dobie et al. 1991). It seems that the cooler and more humid climate prevailing in the prehistoric southwest Asian Neolithic (Bar-Matthews et al. 1997; Kislev et al. 2004), along with human grain storage, enabled the spread of S. granarius to our region. Later, when the area became warmer and drier, S. granarius suffered extinction. The remains of obligatory weeds together with grain weevils suggest that Atlit-Yam represents an advanced agricultural economy of crop growing and storage. In addition, agriculture not only served to provide food, but also functioned as a significant ecological factor that influenced a vast array of organisms taking up residence in new human-made ecological niches. Conclusions Atlit-Yam was occupied some 2,000 years after the beginning of sowing and some 1,000 years after the first morphological signs of domesticated cereals. 123 16 Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 Table 3 Potential obligatory weeds in Pre-Pottery Neolithic southwest Asian sites Studying the site has enabled us to demonstrate aspects of the complex interactions operating in a more advanced agriculture. Aside from the domesticated cereals and pulses found there, we have identified the earliest and largest weed assemblage from the southwest Asian Neolithic. There are several plant associations where herbs could have turned into weeds. These include semi-steppe and savanna-like vegetation, such as the Ziziphus spina-christi vegetation association in the southwest Golan and eastern lower Galilee, and open woods, such as the Quercus 123 ithaburensis-Styrax officinalis and Ceratonia siliqua-Pistacia lentiscus associations, both of which can be found near Atlit-Yam (Zohary 1962). Some of these weeds may indicate that the original habitats of various contemporary weeds were in the Mediterranean herbaceous ecosystem, which was also the ecosystem of the first fields. D. Zohary described the adaptation of annual crops to their new field habitats’’ as follows: ‘‘Unconscious or automatic selection brought about by the fact that the plants concerned were taken from their original wild Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 Fig. 7 Sitophilus granarius. Prothorax of an adult beetle, dorsal view. The punctures are distinctly oblong. In each of them there is a short hair, most of them are preserved (SEM) habitat and placed in new (and usually very different) human-made or human-managed environments. The shift in the ecology led automatically to drastic changes in selection pressures. Numerous adaptations vital for survival in the wild environments lost their fitness under the [new] sets of conditions’’ (Zohary 2004). We suggest that the weeds-to-be were also adapted to the field habitat by similar unconscious selection. Only those herbs that succeeded in adapting to their new ecosystems could pass over various ecological (and possibly evolutionary) barriers and become weeds. Acknowledgments We would like to thank E. Donahaye of the Department of Plant Protection, Beit-Dagan, Israel, for confirming the identification of S. granarius; J. Langsam for the SEM micrographs; Y. Mahler-Slasky for the stereo-microscope pictures and we thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We also thank the COST program, action TD0902, SPLASHCOS of the European Commission, the National Geographic Research Foundation, CARE Archaeological Foundation, MAFCAF Foundation, and Sandy and Joseph Lepelstat for their financial support of research on the submerged Carmel coast sites. The Israel Antiquities Authority, the Israel Prehistoric Society and Haifa University are acknowledged for their financial and administrative support of the underwater excavations. References Bar-Matthews M, Ayalon A, Kaufman A (1997) Late Quaternary paleoclimate in the eastern Mediterranean region from stable isotope analysis of speleothems at Soreq cave, Israel. Quat Res 47:155–168 Bor NL (1968) Lolium L. In: Townsend CC, Guest E, Al-Rawi A (eds) Flora of Iraq. Iraq Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, pp 90–99 Colledge S (1998) Identifying pre-domestication cultivation using multivariate analysis. In: Damania A, Valkoun J, Willcox G, Qualset CO (eds) The origins of agriculture and crop domestication. ICARDA, Aleppo, pp 121–131 Dafni A (1984) Edible wild plants of Israel. Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, Jerusalem 17 Damania AB, Valkoun J, Willcox G, Qualset CO (1998) The origins of agriculture and crop domestication, 1st Harlan symposium. ICARDA, Aleppo Danin A (2004) Distribution atlas of plants in the Flora Palaestina area. Israel Academy for Science and Humanities, Jerusalem De Moulins D (2000) Abu Hureyra 2: plant remains from the Neolithic. In: Moore AMT, Hillman GC, Legge AJ (eds) Village on the Euphrates: from foraging to farming at Abu Hureyra. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 399–416 Dobie P, Haines CP, Hodgers RJ, Prevett PF, Rees DP (1991) Insects and arachnids of tropical stored products: their biology and identification. Revised by Haines CP, 2nd edn. NRI, Slough Eliáš P, Hajnalová M, Eliasova M (2010) Historical and current distribution of segetal weed Lolium temulentum L. in Slovakia. Hacquetia 9:151–159 Fahmy AG (1997) Evaluation of the weed flora of Egypt from Predynastic to Graeco-Roman times. Veget Hist Archaeobot 6:241–247 Fairbairn A, Martinoli D, Butler A, Hillman G (2007) Wild plant seed storage at Neolithic Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Veget Hist Archaeobot 16:467–479 Feinbrun-Dothan N (1978) Flora Palaestina, vol 3. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem Feinbrun-Dothan N (1986) Flora Palaestina, vol 4. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem Feinbrun-Dothan N, Danin A (1998) Analytical flora of Eretz-Israel. Cana, Jerusalem Fragman-Sapir O, Plitmann U, Heller D, Shmida A (1999) Checklist and ecological data-base of the flora of Israel and its surroundings. Miflalot ‘‘Yeffe Nof’’ & The Middle East Nature conservation promotion association, Jerusalem Fuller D (2007) Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Ann Bot 100:903–924 Galili E, Nir Y (1993) The submerged Pre-Pottery Neolithic water well of Atlit-Yam, northern Israel, and its palaeoenvironmental implications. Holocene 3:265–270 Galili E, Rosen B (2011) Submerged Neolithic settlements off the Mediterranean coast of Israel. In: Benjamin J, Bonsall C, Pickard C, Fischer A (eds) Submerged prehistory. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 272–286 Galili E, Weinstein-Evron M, Hershkovitz I, Gopher A, Kislev M, Lernau O, Kolska-Horwitz L, Lernau H (1993) Atlit-Yam: a prehistoric site on the sea floor off the Israeli coast. J Field Archaeol 20:133–157 Garfinkel Y, Kislev M, Zohary D (1988) Lentil in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B Yiftah’el: additional evidence of its early domestication. Isr J Bot 37:49–51 Greig JRA (1990) Practical ecology: experiments in growing traditional cornfield weeds and a comment on their archaeological records in Britain. In: Robinson DE (ed) Experimentation and reconstruction in environmental archaeology. (Symposia of the Association for Environmental Archaeology 9). Oxbow, Oxford, pp 41–62 Harlan JR (1965) The possible role of weed races in the evolution of cultivated plants. Euphytica 14:173–176 Harlan JR (1995) The living fields. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Harlan JR, DeWet JMJ (1965) Some thoughts about weeds. Econ Bot 19:16–24 Helbæk H (1969) Plant collecting, dry-farming, and irrigation agriculture in prehistoric Deh Luran. In: Hole F, Neely JA, Flannery KV, Helbæk H (eds) Prehistory and human ecology of the Deh Luran Plain. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 383–428 123 18 Helbæk H (1970) The plant husbandry of Hacılar. In: Mellaart J (ed) Excavations at Hacılar. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 189–244 Hillman GC (1972) Plant remains. In: French DH, Hillman GC, Payne S, Payne RJ, Excavations at Can Hasan III 1969–1970. In: Higgs ES (ed) Papers in economic prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 182–188 Hillman GC (1978) On the origin of domestic rye—Secale cereale: the finds from aceramic Can Hasan III in Turkey. Anatol Stud 28:157–174 Hillman GC (1991) Phytosociology and ancient weed floras: taking account of taphonomy and changes in cultivation methods. In: Harris DR, Thomas KD (eds) Modelling ecological change. Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, pp 27–40 Howe RW (1965) A summary of estimates of optimal and minimal conditions for population increase of some stored products insects. J Stored Prod Res 1:177–184 Jones G (2002) Weed ecology as a method for the archaeobotanical recognition of crop husbandry practices. Acta Palaeobot 42: 185–193 Jones G, Charles M, Bogaard A, Hodgson J (2010) Crops and weeds: the role of weed functional types in the identification of crop husbandry methods. J Archaeol Sci 37:70–77 Kislev ME (1997) Early agriculture and paleoecology of Netiv Hagdud. In: Bar-Yosef O, Gopher A (eds) An early Neolithic village in the Jordan valley, Part I: the archaeology of Netiv Hagdud. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 209–236 Kislev ME, Hartmann A, Galili E (2004) Archaeobotanical and archaeoentomological evidence from a well at Atlit-Yam indicates colder, more humid climate on the Israeli coast during the PPNC period. J Archaeol Sci 31:1301–1310 Kreuz A, Schäfer E (2011) Weed finds as indicators for the cultivation regime of the early Neolithic Bandkeramik culture? Veget Hist Archaeobot 20:333–348 Kreuz A, Marinova E, Schäfer E, Wiethold J (2005) A comparison of early Neolithic crop and weed assemblages from the Linearbandkeramik and the Bulgarian Neolithic cultures: differences and similarities. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:237–258 Neef R (2003) Overlooking the steppe forest: a preliminary report on the botanical remains from early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe (southern Turkey). Neo-lithics 2:13–16 Pasternak R (1998) Investigations of botanical remains from Nevali Çori PPNB, Turkey – A short interim report. In: Damania AB, Valkoun J, Willcox G, Qualset CO (eds) The origins of agriculture and crop domestication, 1st Harlan symposium. ICARDA, Aleppo, pp 170–177 Pieters AJ (1935) What is a weed? J Am Soc Agron 27:781–783 Riehl S, Zeidi M, Conard NJ (2013) Emergence of agriculture in the foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran. Science 341:65–67 Savard M, Nesbitt M, Gale R (2003) Archaeobotanical evidence for Neolithic diet and subsistence at M’lefaat (Iraq). Paléorient 29:93–106 Van Zeist W, De Roller GJ (2003a) Some notes on the plant husbandry of Aşikli Höyük. In: Van Zeist W (ed) Reports on 123 Veget Hist Archaeobot (2015) 24:9–18 archaeobotanical studies in the Old World. The Groningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Groningen, pp 115–142 Van Zeist W, De Roller GJ (2003b) The Çayönü archaeobotanical record. In: Van Zeist W (ed) Reports on archaeobotanical studies in the Old World. The Groningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Groningen, pp 143–166 Van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH [1982 (1985)] Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant, 1. Neolithic Sites in the Damascus Basin: Aswad, Ghoraifé, Ramad. Palaeohistoria 24:165–256 Van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH [1984 (1986)] Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant, 3. Late-Palaeolithic Mureybit. Palaeohistoria 26:171–199 Van Zeist W, Waterbolk-Van Rooijen W (1985) The palaeobotany of Tell Bouqras, eastern Syria. Paléorient 11:131–147 Vavilov NI (1949–1950) Phytogeographic basis of plant breeding. In: Vavilov NI (ed) The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica. Mass., Waltham, pp 46–54 Vavilov NI (1987) Origin and geography of cultivated plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Wasylikova K (1981) The role of fossil weeds for the study of former agriculture. Zeit Arch 15:11–23 Webster Third New International Dictionary (1966) GC Merriam Company. Springfield, Massachusetts Willcox G (2001) Présence des Céréales dans le Néolithique Préceramique de Shillourokambos à Chypre. Paléorient 26: 129–135 Willcox G (2008) Nouvelles données archéobotaniques de Mureybet et la néolithisation du moyen Euphrate. In: Ibañez J (ed) Le site néolithique de Tell Mureybet (Syrie du Nord), en hommage à Jacques Cauvin. (BAR International Series 1843). Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 103–114 Willcox G (2012) Searching for the origins of arable weeds in the Near East. Veget Hist Archaeobot 21:163–167 Willcox G, Herveux L (2013) Late Pleistocene/early Holocene charred plant remains: preliminary report. In: Mazurowski RF, Kanjou Y (eds) Tell Qaramel 1999–2007. Protoneolithic and early Pre-Pottery Neolithic settlement in northern Syria. PCMA, Warsaw, pp 120–130 Willcox G, Fornite S, Herveux L (2008) Early Holocene cultivation before domestication in northern Syria. Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:313–325 Zohary M (1941) The weeds of Palestine and their control. Hassadeh, Tel-Aviv (in Hebrew) Zohary M (1950) The segetal plant communities of Palestine. Plant Ecol 2:387–411 Zohary M (1962) Plant life of Palestine. Ronald Press, New York Zohary M (1966) Flora Palaestina, vol 1. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem Zohary M (1972) Flora Palaestina, vol 2. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem Zohary D (2004) Unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Econ Bot 58:5–10 Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E (2012) Domestication of plants in the old world, 4th edn. University Press, Oxford