Rahaman et al., J Marine Sci Res Dev 2013, 3:2
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9910.1000126
Marine Science
Research & Development
Research Article
Research
Article
OpenAccess
Access
Open
Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton Abundance and Species
Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh
Rahaman SMB1*, Golder J2, Rahaman MS3, Hasanuzzaman AFM1, Huq KA1, Begum S2, Islam SS1 and Bir J1
1
2
3
Fisheries and Marine Research Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
Environmental Science Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
Department of Chemistry, Comilla University, Comilla 3500, Bangladesh
Abstract
The study examined taxonomic composition, abundance and spatial distribution of phytoplankton, and water
quality of three major river systems of the Sundarbans. A total of 134 phytoplankton species were identiied, and
diversity and abundance were found to luctuate with time and space. A total of 97 species were enumerated
in Rupsha-Pashur while 122 and 110 in Khalpatua-Arpangachia and Bhola-Baleswar river system respectively.
Abundance was lowest (3.709×103 ± 4.257×102 cellsL-1) in monsoon and highest (2.174×105 ± 1.723×105cellsL-1) in
summer in Bhola-Baleswar. Species composition was dominated by Bacillariophyta over the area except in summer
in Bhola-Baleswar, where Cyanophyta become dominated. Species diversity, richness and evenness index varied
between 2.03-4.64, 1.2-2.44, 0.77-1.5 in Rupsha-Pashur; 2.47-3.85, 1.8-5.84, 0.78-0.94 in Khalpatua-Arpangachia;
and 0.66-4.27, 1.19-5.12, 0.59-1.29 in Bhola-Baleswar. Water temperature, pH, DO, Transparency and Salinity were
determined between 19.92°C-31°C; 6.7-7.87; 3.93 mgL-1-7.37 mgL-1; 7.5 cm-60 cm; 2-23 ppt, respectively. Nutrient
elements i.e. NO3-, PO43-, NH4+, SiO44- luctuated seasonally from 0.0062 to 1.633 mgL-1, 0.005 to 0.772 mgL-1, 0.038
to 2.467 mgL-1, 3.124 to 27.234 mgL-1, respectively. Chlorophyll-a concentrations were luctuated seasonally within
0.24 to 5.94 µgL-1 and highest phytoplankton biomass was observed in Bhola-Baleswar in summer. Chlorophyll
concentration was found to be correlated positively with transparency, salinity and nutrients.
Keywords: Water quality; Phytoplankton; Biomass production;
Monsoon; River system; Estuary; Sundarbans
Introduction
he Sundarbans; the largest single chunk of tidal halophytic
mangrove forest in the world; lies in the vast delta on the Bay of Bengal
formed by the greater conluence of the Ganges; Brahmaputra and
Meghna rivers. It covers 10,000 sq.km of which about 6000 sq.km
area is within the political boundary of Bangladesh; and the remaining
in India. he area experiences a subtropical monsoonal climate with
an annual rainfall of 1600-1800 mm and severe cyclonic storms.
Enormous amounts of sediments carried by the rivers contribute to its
expansion and dynamics. he Hydro-geochemical environment of this
area is highly dynamic in nature with numerous drainage channels and
signiicant coastal processes [1]. he biodiversity includes about 350
species of vascular plants; 250 ishes and 300 birds; besides numerous
species of phytoplankton; fungi; bacteria; zooplankton; benthic
invertebrates; molluscs; reptiles; amphibians and mammals. Species
composition and community structure vary east to west; and along
the hydrological and salinity gradients. he Sundarbans with diverse
gene pool for lora and fauna provides livelihoods for about 2.5 million
people of Bangladesh [2]. Being in the coastal waters; the abiotic and
biotic resources of the Sundarbans are highly variable in response to
the coastal dynamic processes. he regulation of river lows by a series
of dams; barrages and embankments for diverting water upstream for
various human needs and for lood control has caused large reduction
in freshwater inlow and seriously afected the biodiversity because
of an increase in salinity and changes in sedimentation. Ecological
characteristics; particularly intermixing of saline and fresh water;
seasonally luctuating salinity and the silt brought down by the rivers
greatly inluence the distribution and abundance of algae in the
Sundarbans. he observed distribution of a given species is a function
of diferential adaptations (diferences in reproduction and growth) in
response to environmental factors such as climate; freshwater inlow;
salinity; tidal coverage; sediment type; nutrients; etc.
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
he algal lora of the Sundarbans is very poorly known; but the
available information suggests that the Sundarbans has a highly diverse
algal lora comprised of both benthic and planktonic forms ranging
from the freshwater to marine environments. here was no previous
record of algal lora of the Sundarbans before studies by Islam [3]. A
few works on the phytoplankton community structure and its relation
to abiotic variables in the Sundarbans river systems were hitherto
studied in Bangladesh [4-8]. Various published reports on the algal
lora provide only a patchy picture as they are based on short-term
surveys of small isolated areas. Since algal lora play very important role
in ecological context; the study of phytoplankton community structure
is utmost important. Phytoplankton community structures change be
inluenced by their surrounding environment; physically; chemically;
and biologically; in ways which favor or disfavor their continued
persistence. he study of phytoplankton community response to
these variables is considered useful for interpreting hydro-chemical
variations in coastal areas [9]. So the temporal and spatial composition
of the phytoplankton population may act as an indicator of the water
quality luctuation in response to changing environment.
he present study was conducted to understand the seasonal
variation of phytoplankton population with water chemistry of the
major three river systems (Rupsha-Pashur; Khalpatua-Arpangachia;
*Corresponding author: Dr. SM Bazlur Rahaman, Professor, Fisheries and Marine
Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh, Tel:
+8801914325048; Fax: +88-041-731244; E-mail: riti_rahaman@yahoo.com
Received May 31, 2013; Accepted June 25, 2013; Published June 30, 2013
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA,
et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton Abundance and
Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci
Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/2155-9910.1000126
Copyright: © 2013 Rahaman SMB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 2 of 9
Bhola-Baleswar) in the Sundarbans. hus it can provide clues to do
further research in order to get the factors responsible for disturbance
in ecological imbalance of the Sundarbans; one of the unique aquatic
habitats of the globe.
Materials and Methods
Sampling strategy
Fiteen stations were selected for the examination of water
quality indices. Rupsha; Passur; Shibsha; Arpangachia; Khalpatua;
Malancha; Raymangal; Baleswar; and Bhola are major rivers of the
Sundarbans. Sampling stations were designed to cover the three major
river systems of the Sundarbans such as Rupsha-Pashur; KhalpatuaArpangachia; and Bhola-Baleswar (Figure 1). Samples were collected
temporally namely in monsoon (June-October); winter (NovemberFebruary); and summer (March-May) from 5 stations of RupshaPashur river system namely (1) Karamjol (89º35.962''E; 22º25.97'N) (2)
Karamjol Canal (89º35.445'E; 22º25.737'N); (3) Joymoni (89º37.757'E;
22º21.053'N); (4) Harbaria (89º36.563'E; 22º17.974'N); and (5) Harbaria
Canal (89º36.985'E; 22º17.998'N); and from 6 stations of KhalpatuaArpangachia namely (1) Pashurtala (89º11’934”E; 22º14'038”N);
(2) Pashurtala Canal (89º12’043”E; 22º14'077”N); (3) Kalagashi
(89º14’541”E 22º12'685”N); (4) Kalagashi Canal (89°14'638"E;
22°12'392"N); (5) Nildumur (89º14’708”E; 22º14'828”N); and (6)
Arpangachia (89º18’581”E; 22º12'406”N); and also 4 stations of BholaBaleswar namely (1) Bogi (89º50'21.9"E; 22º12'54.4"N); (2) Sharankhola
(89º48'42.4"E; 22º12'35.6"N); (3) Supati (89º49.07'E; 22º03.442'N); and
(4) Supati Canal (89º48.93'E 22º3.128' N ).
Sample collection
For phytoplankton community structure study; 20 L of water
collected from surface water of the study area was passed through
a plankton net (20 µm mesh sized; silk bolting cloth or nylon
monoilament screen cloth). hen the concentrated samples were
preserved with Lugol's Solution (20 g potassium iodide and 10 g iodine
crystals dissolved in 200 ml distilled water containing 20 ml glacial
acetic acid). For chlorophyll a estimation 200 m3 volume samples were
collected in the same way using plankton net and samples for nutrient
analysis were collected using a grab sampler. For nutrient analysis water
samples were collected from surface; middle bottom of the particular
location which was iltered immediately through pre-cleaned 0.45 µm
pore-size cellulose ilters. he samples were preserved in deep frozen in
the dark before analysis.
Sample analysis
Temperature; pH; transparency; DO; and salinity were measured
Study points
Figure 1: Location of the study points in Rupsha-Pashur, Khalpatua-Arpangachia, Bhola-Baleswar river systems of the Sundarbans.
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 3 of 9
in-situ and water samples collected for analyzing nutrients (NO3-;
PO43-; NH4+; SiO44-); chlorophyll a and phytoplankton community
composition were measured later in the laboratory. Water temperature
was measured with a Centigrade Mercury thermometer; pH with a
Microprocessor pH meter (HANNA instruments; pH 211); salinity
with a TDS meter (HI 9635; portable multirange conductivity/TDS
meter; HANNA); transparency with a secchi disc; and DO in Winkler’s
method (APHA 1992).
Quantitative estimation of phytoplankton was done by SedgewickRater counting chamber (S-R cell) method [6] using Labomed
Imaging Device (ivu 15000 microscope). Phytoplankton genera
and species were identiied [10-18]. Chlorophyll a was determined
by spectrophotometric method (APHA 1992); and nutrients were
measured by colorimetric methods described in Yin et al. [19].
Species richness; diversity and evenness index calculation
Species richness index (d); species diversity index (H); and evenness
index were calculated according to following equations
•
Species richness index (d) [20]
d=(S–1)/ Log N
Where:
d=Species richness index
S=Number of species in a population
N=Total number of individuals in S species.
•
Species diversity index (H) [21]
Hs=∑ Pi 1ogPi
Where
Hs=Diversity Index
i=Counts denoting the ith species ranging from 1–n
Pi=Proportion that the ith species represents in terms of numbers
of individuals with respect to the total number of individuals in the
sampling space as whole.
•
Evenness index (j) [22]
j=Hs / Log S
Where
J=Equitability index
Hs=Shannon and weaver index
S=Number of species in a population
Data analysis
To establish diferences of the phytoplankton community
descriptors among the iteen sites; one-way ANOVA was carried out.
Two tailed Pearson correlation was performed to identify relation
among various physico-chemical and biological parameters. Analyses
were performed using the sotware package SPSS Statistics 17.0.
Results
Water quality
Water quality parameters namely temperature; pH; transparency;
dissolved oxygen; salinity; nitrate; phosphate; ammonium; silicate; and
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
chlorophyll a were determined temporally in 15 stations situated in
three major river systems of the Sundarbans presented in Table 1.
Temperature: Mean water temperature luctuated seasonally. In
Rupsha-Pashur river system temperature ranged from 20.02°C-31°C;
highest in summer and lowest in winter. In Khalpatua-Arpangachia and
Bhola-Baleswar River systems it was within the range 22.17°C-30.45°C;
and 19.92°C-30.25°C respectively and also showed the same kind of
seasonal variability of higher values in summer and lower values in
winter.
pH: In Rupsha-Pashur; Khalpatua-Arpangachia and BholaBaleswar river system pH varied from 7.29-7.87; 7.31-7.82; and 6.7-7.53
respectively. In Rupsha-Pashur pH values showed a seasonal trend of
variation with higher values in monsoon then showed a slight gradual
reduction through winter and summer. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia
and Bhola-Baleswar river system no clear seasonal trend was observed.
Transparency: In all three river systems; transparency values
were very low throughout the year; but also showed a seasonal
trend of variation. In both Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar river
system; transparency was the lowest in monsoon but was found to rise
gradually in winter and summer. It ranged from 8cm-36cm in RupshaPashur with highest in Harbaria during summer and lowest in Joymoni
during monsoon. he transparency ranged between 18 cm and 36 cm
in Bhola-Baleswar highest in Sharankhola during summer and lowest
in Bogi during monsoon. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia River system
the transparency was lower in monsoon but rose in winter and again
fell in summer. It was found within the range of 16 cm-66 cm; highest
in Pashurtala canal during winter and lowest in Kalagashi during
monsoon. Annual mean transparency also was highest (34.66 ± 18.84
cm in Pashurtala) in Khalpatua-Arpangachia.
Dissolved oxygen: Dissolved Oxygen concentration (DO)
luctuated spatially and temporally. In Rupsha-Pashur; KhalpatuaArpangachia; and Bhola-Baleswar river systems; DO varied from 4.37
mgL-1 to 7.37 mgL-1 (highest at Harbaria Canal in monsoon & lowest
at Karamjol Canal in summer); 3.93 mgL-1 to 6.4 mgL-1 (highest at
Kalagashi Canal in monsoon & lowest at Kalagashi in summer); and
4.88 mgL-1 to 5.65 mgL-1 (highest at Sharankhola in summer & lowest
at Supati Canal in monsoon) respectively. In Bhola-Baleswar DO
luctuated very little and not showed any seasonal trend of variation.
But in Rupsha-Pashur and Khalpatua-Arpangachia a little luctuation
of seasonal trend was observed with higher values in monsoon and
gradually decreased over the winter and summer period. he highest
annual mean value was found 6.25 ± 0.80 mgL-1 at Harbaria Canal
(Rupsha-Pashur).
Salinity: he highest salinity was observed (23‰) at Nildumur
in winter. In Rupsha-Pashur; Khalpatua-Arpangachia; and BholaBaleswar river systems salinity ranged from 5.17‰ to 16‰ (highest at
Harbaria in summer and lowest at Harbaria in monsoon); 9‰ to 23‰
(highest at Nildumur in winter and lowest at Arpangachia in summer);
and 2‰ to 16‰ (highest at Supati in summer and lowest at Bogi in
monsoon) respectively. In both Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar
river system salinity showed similar seasonal variation of lower values
in monsoon then rose through the period of winter and summer. But in
Khalpatua-Arpangachia salinity was low in monsoon; and then rose in
winter and again dropped in summer. Lowest annual mean salinity was
8.29% ± 4.50‰ (Sharankhola) in Bhola-Baleswar river system.
Nitrate: In maximum sampling stations annual mean nitrate (NO3) concentrations were lower than 1 mgL-1. he highest concentration
(>1 mgL-1) was observed in Bhola-Baleswar in summer. In Rupsha-
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 4 of 9
Bhola-Baleswar River System
Bogi
Sharankhola
Supati
Supati Canal
Geographical
Location
89°50'21.9"E,
22°12'54.4"N
89°48'42.4"E,
22°12'35.6"N
89°49.07'E, 22°03.442'N
89°48.93'E, 22°3.128'N
Temperature(°C)
25.39 ± 3.72
25.19 ± 3.76
25.95 ± 4.09
25.71 ± 4.05
pH
7.04 ± 0.21
6.87 ± 0.14
7.19 ± 0.23
7.23 ± 0.30
Transparency(cm)
25 ± 5.72
28.33 ± 6.55
25.33 ± 5.25
24.66 ± 4.11
DO(mgL-1)
5.43 ± 0.03
5.53 ± 0.08
5.29 ± 0.16
5.16 ± 0.21
Salinity
9.17 ± 5.24
8.29 ± 4.50
10.33 ± 5.72
9.72 ± 5.40
Nitrate(mgL-1)
0.603 ± 0.73
0.425 ± 0.48
0.470 ± 0.54
0.433 ± 0.49
Phosphate(mgL-1)
0.015 ± 0.005
0.029 ± 0.011
0.011 ± 0.005
0.023 ± 0.012
Ammonium( mgL-1)
0.041 ± 0.037
0.038 ± 0.018
0.064 ± 0.039
0.066 ± 0.041
Silicate( mgL-1)
16.106 ± 6.81
17.56 ± 9.22
16 ± 8.27
17.20 ± 9.56
Chlorophyll-a(µgL 1)
2.82 ± 2.28
1.71 ± 0.87
2 ± 0.87
2.33 ± 1.45
Rupsha-Pashur River System
Karamjol
Geographical
Location
Karamjol Canal
Joymoni
Harbaria
Harbaria Canal
89°35.962'E,22°25.97'N 89°35.445'E,22°25.737'N 89°37.757'E,22°21.053'N 89°36.563'E,22°17.974'N 89°36.985'E,22°17.998'N
Temperature(°C)
27.15 ± 4.48
27.32 ± 4.49
27.57 ± 4.30
27.05 ± 4.63
pH
7.55 ± 0.18
7.55 ± 0.24
7.51 ± 0.18
7.64 ± 0.14
26.78 ± 4.79
7.67 ± 0.10
Transparency(cm)
13.33 ± 2.36
20 ± 7.48
16 ± 5.66
23.33 ± 11.09
22.66 ± 8.99
DO( mgL-1)
6.1 ± 0.81
5.91 ± 1.09
5.93 ± 0.94
6.06 ± 0.76
6.25 ± 0.80
Salinity
9.96 ± 3.13
9.86 ± 3.64
9.22 ± 2.52
11.22 ± 4.51
10.54 ± 3.72
0.317 ± 0.21
Nitrate( mgL-1)
0.322 ± 0.26
0.627 ± 0.42
0.375 ± 0.27
0.404 ± 0.30
Phosphate( mgL-1)
0.449 ± 0.26
0.215 ± 0.17
0.291 ± 0.14
0.168 ± 0.12
Ammonium( mgL-1)
0.050 ± 0.025
0.052 ± 0.026
0.049 ± 0.022
0.051 ± 0.023
0.047 ± 0.025
Silicate( mgL-1)
12.19 ± 5.61
14.04 ± 4.50
11.45 ± 6.22
13.11 ± 7.36
12.19 ± 6.29
Chlorophyll-a
(µgL-1)
1.38 ± 0.81
1.12 ± 0.57
1.44 ± 0.86
1.53 ± 1.04
1.63 ± 1.07
Pashurtala
Pashurtala Canal
Kalagashi
Kalagashi Canal
Nildumur
Arpangachia
Geographical
Location
89°11'934"E,
22°14'038"N
89°12'043"E,
22°14'077"N
89°14'541"E,
22°12'685"N
89°14'638"E, 22°12'392"N
89°14'708"E,
22°14'828"N
89°18'581"E,
22°12'406"N
Temperature(°C)
27.02 ± 3.40
27.17 ± 3.25
27.12 ± 3.19
27.26 ± 3.49
27.15 ± 3.57
27.21 ± 3.56
pH
7.48 ± 0.19
7.64 ± 0.09
7.63 ± 0.11
7.65 ± 0.13
7.60 ± 0.02
7.65 ± 0.16
Transparency(cm)
34.66 ± 18.84
34 ± 22.69
24.33 ± 7.93
30.66 ± 13.70
31.33 ± 10.66
29.66 ± 10.34
0.256 ± 0.10
Khalpatua-Arpangachia River System
DO( mgL-1)
4.96 ± 0.50
5.02 ± 0.79
4.94 ± 0.72
5.08 ± 0.99
5.18 ± 0.84
5.04 ± 0.54
Salinity
14.91 ± 4.69
15.39 ± 4.27
14.66 ± 5.46
14.72 ± 5.90
14.72 ± 5.94
14.22 ± 6.03
Nitrate( mgL-1)
0.269 ± 0.26
0.247 ± 0.13
0.083 ± 0.03
0.123 ± 0.04
0.091 ± 0.003
0.145 ± 0.02
Phosphate( mgL-1)
0.108 ± 0.03
0.109 ± 0.03
0.099 ± 0.01
0.119 ± 0.008
0.118 ± 0.04
0.108 ± 0.03
Ammonium( mgL-1)
0.153 ± 0.19
0.117 ± 0.13
0.176 ± 0.16
0.155 ± 0.17
0.109 ± 0.12
0.121 ± 0.14
Silicate( mgL-1)
9.404 ± 6.32
10.689 ± 8.30
9.98 ± 7.26
9.98 ± 7.06
8.238 ± 5.17
8.311 ± 4.26
Chlorophyll-a(µgL-1)
0.813 ± 0.24
1.14 ± 0.91
0.87 ± 0.35
0.806 ± 0.39
1.17 ± 0.84
0.89 ± 0.52
Table 1: Annual mean values of water quality variables in Rupsha-Pashur, Khalpatua- Arpangachia and Bhola-Baleswar river systems.
Pashur river system it ranged from 0.021 mgL-1 to 1 mgL-1 (highest at
Karamjol Canal in winter & lowest at Karamjol in monsoon); and in
Bhola-Baleswar it varied from 0.0062 mgL-1 to 1.633 mgL-1 (highest at
Bogi in summer & lowest at Supati in monsoon). Both of these river
systems showed a seasonal trend of lower NO3- values in monsoon and
higher values in winter and summer. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia
NO3- values were found within the range of 0.05 mgL-1-0.65mgL-1 and
no clear seasonal trend was observed.
Phosphate: hroughout the study areas; phosphate (PO43-)
concentrations were found lower than 1 mgL-1. In Rupsha-Pashur;
Khalpatua-Arpangachia; and Bhola-Baleswar river systems it was
observed within the range of 0.04 mgL-1-0.772 mgL-1 (highest at
Karamjol in summer & lowest at Harbaria in monsoon); 0.063 mgL1
-0.161 mgL-1 (highest at Kalagashi Canal in monsoon & lowest at
Pashurtala Canal in winter); and 0.005 mgL-1-0.045 mgL-1 (highest at
Sharankhola in monsoon & lowest at Supati in winter); respectively. In
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
Rupsha-Pashur; and Bhola-Baleswar river systems PO43-concentrations
showed no signiicant seasonal trend of variation. But in KhalpatuaArpangachia river system a seasonal trend with higher concentrations
in monsoon and summer and lower concentrations in winter were
observed. Annual mean PO43- value was the lowest (0.011 ± 0.005 mgL-1
in Supati) in Bhola-Baleswar river system.
Ammonium: Mean Annual ammonium (NH4+) value was found
the lowest (0.038 ± 0.018 mgL-1 in Sharankhola) in Bhola-Baleswar
river system. NH4+ values varied from 0.015 mgL-1-0.087 mgL-1 (highest
at Karamjol Canal in winter & lowest at Karamjol in monsoon) in
Rupsha-Pashur river system. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia and
Bhola-Baleswar river systems NH4+ values ranged from 0.008 mgL-10.434 mgL-1 (highest at Pashurtala in monsoon & lowest at Pashurtala
in winter); and 0.008 mgL-1-0.102 mgL-1 (highest at Supati Canal in
winter & lowest at Supati both in monsoon ans winter) respectively.
In Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar NH4+ values were lower in
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 5 of 9
monsoon and higher in winter and summer. But in KhalpatuaArpangachia trends were found diferent here NH4+ values were much
higher in monsoon and lower in winter and summer season.
Silicate: Silicate (SiO44-) concentration was observed extremely
high throughout the study area. Annual mean SiO44- concentration
was found within the range of 8.238 ± 5.17 mgL-1-17.56 ± 9.22 mgL1
(highest in Sharankhola; Bhola-Baleswar and lowest in Nildumur;
Khalpatua-Arpangachia). Both Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar
showed similar seasonal trend with lower values in monsoon and
higher values in winter and summer. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia
SiO44- concentrations were recorded lower in monsoon; and it rose in
winter and again fell in summer.
Chlorophyll: Concentration of chlorophyll a luctuated within the
range of 0.24 µgL-1-3.11 µgL-1 in Rupsha-Pashur; 0.42 µgL-1-2.43 mgL-1
in Khalpatua-Arpangachia; and 0.57 µg/L-5.94 µg/L in Bhola-Baleswar.
In Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar river systems; phytoplankton
biomass showed a seasonal trend with lower values in monsoon and
gradually raised levels in winter and summer. But in KhalpatuaArpangachia it was lower in monsoon; rose in winter and again
dropped in summer. Annual mean biomass production was the highest
(2.82 ± 2.28 µgL-1 in Bogi) in Bhola-Baleswar river system.
here were signiicant diferences in water quality data (p<0.05)
among river systems and also sampling sites.
Phytoplankton community composition
hroughout the study areas a total of 134 phytoplankton species
dominated by diatoms were identiied. 99 species from 41 genera of
Bacillariophyta; 18 species from 6 genera of Pyrophyta; 12 species from
9 genera of Chlorophyta; 4 species from 4 genera of Cyanobacteria; and
1 Species of Ochrophyta were present. here were signiicant diferences
(p<0.05) in abundance and diversity of phytoplankton communities.
In Rupsha-Pashur; Khalpatua-Arpangachia; and Bhola-Baleswar river
systems; abundance varied in the range of 3.755×103 cellsL-1-1.015×105
cellsL-1 (highest at Harbaria Canal in summer & lowest at Karamjol in
monsoon); 2.951×103 cellsL-1 to 4.197×104 cellsL-1 (highest at Kalagashi
in winter & lowest at Kalagashi Canal in summer); and 3.246×103
cellsL-1-5.031×105 cellsL-1 (highest at Bogi in summer & lowest at Bogi
in monsoon) respectively. In Rupsha-Pashur and Bhola-Baleswar
similar seasonal trend was observed with lower density in monsoon
and then rose rapidly through winter and summer. But in KhalpatuaArpangachia phytoplankton density was low in monsoon; rose in
River System
Rupsha-Pashur
Khalpatua-Arpangachia
Bhola-Baleswar
winter and again dropped in summer. Annual average density was the
highest (8.347×104 cellsL-1) in Bhola-Baleswar river system (Table 2).
Species diversity: Most diverse genera were Coscinodiscus with 12
species; Protoperidinium with 11 species; halassiosira with 10 species;
Chaetoceros and Paleurosigma with 7 species. Maximun species
diversity was observed in Khalpatua-Arpangachia during winter (Table
3).
Species diversity index; richness index and evenness index values
showed spatial and temporal variation. Annual mean diversity index
was highest (2.63 ± 0.49) in Khalpatua-Arpangachia. It ranged from
1.31to 4.64 (highest at Karamjol in winter & lowest at Karamjol in
monsoon) in Rupsha-Pashur; 1.58to 3.85 (highest at Arpangachia in
winter & lowest at Nildumur in winter) in Khalpatua-Arpangachia;
and 0.66 to 4.27 (highest at Bogi in winter & lowest at Supati in
summer) in Bhola-Baleswar. Richness values were found in the range
of 1.21-4.99 in Rupsha-Pashur; 1.18-11.24 in Khalpatua-Arpangachia;
and 1.19-5.12 in Bhola-Baleswar; and evenness index varied from 0.77
to 1.5 in Rupsha-Pashur; 0.82 to 0.97 in Khalpatua-Arpangachia; and
0.59 to1.21 in Bhola-Baleswar. All these index values showed no clear
seasonal trend of variation (Table 2).
hroughout the study area over all three river system Bacillariophyta
dominated the community composition. It was 81.82%-100% in
Rupsha-Pashur; 64.63%-96.57% in Khalpatua-Arpangachia river
system. But in Bhola-Baleswar river system Bacillariophyta dominated
the composition in monsoon and winter (81.81%-98.48%); but during
summer Cyanophyta dominated the composition (54.42%-78.76%)
(Figure 2).
Discussion
Phytoplankton community in the Sundarbans river systems
showed with noted abundance and diversity with spatial and temporal
variation to some extent. he observed diferences are likely related
to local forcing functions such as transparency; salinity and in some
cases with nutrient concentrations variations in addition with some
unknown reasons in this study.
Phytoplankton community in relation to water quality
condition
Concentration of nitrate (NO3-); phosphate (PO43-); ammonium
(NH4+); and silicate (SiO44-) play important role as nutrient both
Item
Quantity
Total Species
93 species
Range of Variation
Abundance
2.28×104 cellsL-1 (Average)
3.755×103-1.015×105 cellsL-1
Diversity Index (H)
2.39 (Average)
1.31-4.64
Richness Index (d)
2.32 (Average)
1.21-4.99
Evenness Index(j)
0.94 (Average)
0.77-1.5
Total Species
122 species
Abundance
1.052×104 cellsL-1 (Average)
2.951×103-4.197×105 cellsL-1
Diversity Index (H)
2.63 (Average)
1.58-3.85
Richness Index (d)
3.36 (Average)
1.8-11.24
Evenness Index(j)
0.90 (Average)
0.82-0.97
Total Species
110 species
Abundance
8.347×104 cellsL-1 (Average)
3.246×103-5.03×105 cellsL-1
Diversity Index (H)
2.80 (Average)
2.47-3.85
Richness Index (d)
2.75 (Average)
1.8-5.84
Evenness Index(j)
0.89 (Average)
0.78-0.94
Table 2: Annual mean values of phytoplankton species abundance in three major river systems.
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 6 of 9
River systems
Rupsha-Pashur
Seasons
Species
Monsoon
Thalassiosira oestrupii, Thalassiosira ecentrica, Thalassiosira decipens, Coscinodiscus centralis, Coscinodiscus
concinus, Coscinodiscus spiniferus, Cyclotella striata, Roperia tesselata, Nitzschia lorenziana
Winter
Thalassiosira wongii, Coscinodiscus granii, Cyclotella stylorum, Chaetoceros afinis, Chaetoceros debile, Skeletonema
costatum, Thalassionema nitzschioides, Synedra ulna, Pleurosigma angulatum, Cylindrotheca fusiformis,
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Summer
Ditylum brightwelli, Anabaena cf. los-aquae and Spirulina platens
Monsoon
Thalassiosira ecentrica, Thalassiosira oestrupii, Thalassiosira decipens, Thalassiosira angulata, Coscinodiscus
centralis, Coscinodiscus spiniferus, Coscinodiscus angsti, Coscinodiscus concinus, Cyclotella striata, Cyclotella striata,
Pleurosigma angulatum, Pleurosigma directum, Pleurosigma cf. elongatum, Cerataulina bicornis, Thalassionema
nitzschioides, Ceratium fusus
winter
Thalassiosira wongii, Thalassiosira punctigera, Thalassiosira pseudonona, Thalassiosira anguste-lineata,
Coscinodiscus marginatus, Coscinodiscus wailesii, Coscinodiscus radiatus, Coscinodiscus pavillardi, Actinocyclus
anulatus, Actinocyclus Pruniosus , Cylindrotheca closterium, Pleurosigma normani, Navicula meninscus, Ditylum
brightwelli, Odontella sinensis, Odontella mobiliensis, Bacillaria paxillifera, Surirella gemma, Entomoneis sulcata,
Entomoneis paludosa, Leptocylindrus minimus, Cladopyxis hemibrachiata, Protoperidinium biconicum, Protoperidinium
subinerme, Protoperidinium claudicans, Protoperidinium leonis, Ceratium furca, Eudorina elegans, Netrium oblongum
Khalpatua-Arpangachia
Not available
Summer
Bhola-Baleswar
Monsoon
Thalassiosira ecentrica, Thalassiosira oestrupii, Thalassiosira decipens, Coscinodiscus centralis, Coscinodiscus
spiniferus, Nitzschia behrei, Roperia tesselata, Cerataulina dentate, Eudorina elegans, Hydroductyon etc.
Winter
Thalassiosira lundiana, Thalassiosira wongii, Coscinodiscus angsti, Skeletonema costatum, Cylindrotheca
fusiformis, Fragilaria sp., Entomoneis sulcata, Entomoneis paludosa, Chaetoceros afinis, Actinocyclus anulatus,
Pleurosigma estuarii, Odontella mobiliensis, Cladopyxis hemibrachiata, Ceratium furca, Protoperidinium punctulatum,
Protoperidinium subinerme, Netrium oblongum, Pediastrum simplex, Pediastrum duplex etc.
Summer
Anabaena cf. los-aquae, Microcystis sp, Spirulina platens, Anacystis aeruginosa etc
Table 3: List of the most abundant phytoplankton genera found in the Sundarbans river-systems at different seasons.
Monsoon period
Winter time
Summer season
100%
100%
100%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%
40%
40%
40%
20%
20%
20%
0%
a
0%
Ka
KaC
Joy
Pyro
100%
Har
a
HarC
0%
Ka
KaC
Joy
Cyano
Baci
Pyro
Har
a
HarC
100%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%
40%
40%
40%
20%
20%
0%
b
Pa
PaC
Cyano
Ka
Chlo
KaC
Pyro
Nil
Arp
0%
Pa
PaC
Ka
Chlo
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
KaC
Pyro
Nil
Arp
Baci
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
c
Bo
Sha
Chlo
Sup
Baci
SupC
Joy
Har
HarC
Pyro
Baci
KaC
Pyro
Nil
Baci
0%
b
Baci
KaC
Cyano
100%
20%
Ka
Baci
c
Bo
Sha
Chlo
Sup
SupC
Pyro
Baci
b
Pa
PaC
c
Ka
Chlo
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Bo
Cyano
Sha
Chlo
Sup
Pyro
Arp
SupC
Baci
Figure 2: Spatial distribution of relative abundance of phytoplankton at different measuring stations of (a) Rupsha-Pashur, (b) Khalpatua-Arpangachia and (c) BholaBaleswar river system during monsoon, winter, and summer respectively.
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 7 of 9
again fell in summer. Growth and production of phytoplankton in an
area is a function of environmental factors prevailed in that area [29]. By
pearson correlation analysis (Figure 3) we found biomass production
i.e. chlorophyll a was positively correlated with transparency; salinity;
and nitrate (NO3-) in Rupsha-Pashur river system. In KhalpatuaArpangachia it was positively correlated with transparency; salinity
and silicate (SiO44-); and negatively correlated with temperature
and phosphate (PO43-). But in Bhola-Baleswar positive signiicant
correlation was observed with transparency; salinity; nitrate (NO3); ammonium (NH4+); and silicate (SiO44-). hat is; in all three river
systems chlorophyll a didn’t show strong and uniform correlation with
temperature and all nutrient elements.
for phytoplankton growth and production. hese were estimated
on a seasonal basis during the study. Results showed no uniform
seasonal trend of all these nutrient elements. Nitrate (NO3-) followed
a seasonal trend of lower concentration in monsoon and increased
through winter and summer in Rupsha-Pashur; and Bhola-Baleswar.
But in Khalpatua-Arpangagchia; it showed no clear seasonal trend.
Phosphate didn’t show any seasonal pattern in Rupsha-Pashur; and
Bhola-Baleswar; but in Khalpatua-Arpangachia it showed a trend of
lower amount in monsoon then rose in winter and again dropped in
summer. Only in Bhola-Baleswar a seasonal pattern of Ammonium
(NH4+) was observed with lower values in monsoon; and gradual higher
values through winter and summer. In Rupsha-Pashur silicate (SiO44-)
showed a pattern of lower concentrations in monsoon and higher in
winter and summer. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia it was diferent;
higher concentrations were found in winter and lower in monsoon and
summer. his signiicant variation suggests the coexistence of diferent
processes in water quality conditions. In marine coastal systems; there
can be many sources of nutrients like upwelling; river input; sediment
resuspension or remineralization; aquaculture eluents; and urban;
agricultural; and industrial wastewater; thereby making it diicult to
determine the relative contribution of nutrient sources to coastal water
quality [23,24].
Water temperature and transparency are most important among
various physical factors afecting the distribution and seasonal
variation of phytoplankton growth [30]. In the present study we
have found signiicant positive correlation with transparency but
no signiicant positive correlation with temperature. It may be due
to the cross interaction between temperature and transparency. In
summer temperature and transparency both are high and biomass
production was also high; but in monsoon temperature was high but
low transparency limited the light penetration and as a result limited
the growth [31].
Concentration of Chlorophyll a (algal biomass) is normally
used as an index of the productivity [25] and trophic condition of
estuaries; coastal and oceanic waters [26-28]. It relects the net result
(standing stock) of both growth and loss processes. here is generally
a good agreement between planktonic primary production and algal
biomass. Algal biomass is associated with the visible symptoms of
eutrophication. It is considered the principal variable to use as a trophic
state indicator. Present study analyzed algal biomass production in
terms of chlorophyll a concentration on seasonal basis. hroughout the
study area highest biomass production (5.94 µgL-1) was observed in the
Bhola-Baleswar river system in summer. Rupsha-Pashur and BholaBaleswar river systems showed the similar trend of seasonal variation
with lower concentrations in monsoon and gradually increased value
through winter and summer. But in Khalpatua-Arpangachia river
system concentrations were lower in monsoon; rose in winter; and
Phytoplankton abundance and biomass production both showed
similar trend of seasonal variation in Rupsha-Pashur and BholaBaleswar river systems with highest production in summer but difered
in Khalpatua-Arpangachia with lower production in summer. his
noncompliance may be due to the late sampling time for the summer
season in Khalpatua-Arpangachia (26th May-2011); when early
monsoonal impact (144mm rainfall in May-2011) has already started.
Silicate concentrations varied a great deal among the sites and
seasons. It was found within the range of 3.201 mgL-1-26.122 mgL-1.
hese higher concentrations of SiO44- may result from the shrimp-farm
eluents and nutrient export from the harbor that enriched the coastal
water with nutrient [32]. Oten; SiO44- acts as a limiting nutrient for
diatom growth; and it could therefore control replacement of diatoms
by dinolagellates in conditions of Si deiciency; which means that SiO44-
Silicate*
Silicate
Silicate**
Ammonium
Ammonium
Phosphate
Phosphate**
Nitrate**
Nitrate
Salinity**
Salinity**
DO**
DO
DO
Transparency**
Transparency**
Transparency*
pH**
pH*
pH
Temperature
Temperature**
Temperature
a
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
b
Ammonium*
Phosphate
Nitrate**
1st Qtr
-1
-0.5
Salinity**
0
0.5
1
c
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Figure 3: Pearson correlation between phytoplankton biomass and different water quality parameters in (a) Rupsha-Pashur, (b) Khalpatua-Arpangachia, and (c) BholaBaleswar river systems (* indicate signiicant correlation at 0.05 level (2 tailed) & ** indicate signiicant correlation (2 tailed) at the 0.01 level).
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 8 of 9
can play an important role in phytoplankton community-structure
changes [33]. High inputs of SiO44- could also cause an imbalance of the
normal phytoplanktonic communities by stimulating diatom growth;
some of which may have harmful efects.
he salinity is also one of the main parameters that can be
attributed to the phytoplankton diversity and acts as a limiting factor
which inluences the distribution of planktonic community [34-37].
Generally; changes in the salinity of the brackish water habitats such as
estuaries; backwaters and mangrove are due to the inlux of freshwater
from land run of; caused by monsoon or by tidal variations. Presently
recorded higher values in dry season could be attributed to the higher
degree neritic water dominance from sea [38,39].
Diferences among sites in dissolved oxygen concentrations; as
well as seasonal changes within sites; result from the balance between
physical (e.g. turbulence; difusion and solubility of oxygen) and
biogeochemical (e.g.; consumption; production; remineralization)
processes [40]. In the study area comparatively higher values were
observed in monsoon and lower in summer. In monsoon it may be due
to precipitation and higher turbulence and in summer which could be
a function of lower turbulence and warmer water temperatures that
increase respiration and decrease solubility of oxygen.
Phytoplanktonic community composition as bioindicator
he phytoplankton community structures in coastal Sundarbans
were determined as signiicantly dynamic with respect to spatial and
temporal level. hese diferences in phytoplankton production may be
related to a variety of environmental factors in aquatic environment
[29].
he number of phytoplankton species identiied in major three
river systems of Sundarbans; relecting the high species richness
characteristics of tropical coastal areas [41]. In general diatoms
dominate the whole area. But in Bhola-Baleswar Cyanophyta
dominate the composition in summer. Dinolagelates are common
only in Khalpatua-Arpangachia. Chlorophytes are abundant in BholaBaleswar. hese variations in species composition suggests; however
hydrological connectivity exists among these river systems; it was local
hydrological conditions that determined phytoplankton community
structure at each site.
Silicate concentrations were much higher in the study area. It
probably acted as a factor for stimulating diatom growth [33]. In BholaBaleswar community composition was dominated by Cyanophyta and
in summer; when highest NO3- concentrations were observed among
all sites. his NO3- enriched condition probably stimulated the growth
of Cyanophyta [42]. his community composition indicated high
nutrient status and the presence of toxic contaminants [43-45]. It also
relects the possibility of anthropogenic activities for the enrichment of
nutrient [42].
Phytoplankton community structural changes are a good indicator
of water quality or aquatic ecological status as they show complex
and rapid responses to luctuations of environmental conditions [46].
Skeletonema costatum is an abundant species in the study areas. It is a
eurytharmal and euryhaline species. So its presence is an indicator of
stress environmental condition. halassionema nitzschioides was also
abundant throughout the area; and its presence indicates resuspension
and remineralization processes happening there. Amphora sp. and
Nitzschia sp. etc. are benthic diatoms. hese were mostly abundant in
Khalpatua-Arpangachia river system. heir presence indicates higher
concentrations of SiO44- and resuspension of sediments. Nitzschia
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
longissima and Protoperidinium were also abundant throughout the
area. hese are opportunistic and indicator species of shrimp farm
eluents [24,47].
Conclusion
he Sundarbans which environmental conditions are highly
dynamic and variable in nature is rich in phytoplankton community.
Variation both in abundance and diversity is due to rainfall;
transparency; salinity and nutrient concentartions. Variable water
quality conditions at spatial and temporal level indicates the inluence
of various climatic and local forcing functions. A relationship among
local water quality characteristics with phytoplankton community is
noticed. Favorable climatic condition and nutrient status of water led
to a blooming condition in summer. he study will provide a number
of information regarding water chemistry of the Sundarbans river
systems and phytoplankton community structure in order to ind
factors responsible for biodiversity loss.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Grants for Advanced Research in Science
from the Ministry of Education (MoE) of Bangladesh. The authors are thankful to
the laboratory staff of Fisheries & Marine Resource Technology Discipline and
Environmental Science Discipline of Khulna University for their cooperation during
sample analysis. Thanks are due to the graduate and undergraduate students
for their generous cooperation during ield visit and laboratory analysis. The
writers acknowledge the support given by the authorities of Forest Department
of Bangladesh for providing necessary support to carry out ield observation and
sampling in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest. The writers would also like to thank
the many others who have been involved in the ield observations.
References
1. Wahid SM, Babel MS, Bhuiyan AR (2002) Hydrologic monitoring and analysis
in the Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem, Bangladesh. Journal of Hydrology
332: 381-395.
2. Hasanuzzaman AFM, Sayeed MAB, Rahaman SMB, Huq KA (2010)
Implications of climate change for isheries and aquaculture in the Sundarbans
region of Bangladesh, Khulna University Studies Special Issue 73-82.
3. Islam AKMN (1973) The algal lora of Sundarbans Mangrove forest,
Bangladesh. J Bot.
4. Nazrul-Islam AM (1995) Ecological conditions and species diversity in
Sundarban mangrove forest community, Bangladesh.
5. Hossain MZ, Chowdhury AH (2008) Phytoplankton abundance in relation to
phyco-chemical conditions of the Sundarbans estuary. J Asiat Soc Bangladesh
34: 103-112.
6. Shah MMR, Hossain MY, Begum M, Ahmed ZF, Ohtomi J, et al. (2008)
Seasonal Variations of Phytoplanktonic Community Structure and Production
in Relation to Environmental Factors of the Southwest Coastal Waters of
Bangladesh. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 3: 102-113.
7. Mamun MM, Golam MG, Ali MA, Rahaman SMB, Huq KA (2009) Abundance
and Distribution of Plankton in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest. J Innov Dev
Strategy 3: 43-54.
8. Aziz A, Rahman M, Ahmed A (2012) Diversity, Distribution and Density of
Estuarine Phytoplankton in the Sundarban Mangrove Forests, Bangladesh. J
Bot 41: 87-95.
9. Troccoli GL, Herrera-Silveira JA, Comı´n FA (2004) Structural variations of
phytoplankton in the coastal seas of Yucatan, Mexico. Hydrobiologia 519: 85102.
10. Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG (1990) The Diatoms: Biology and
Morphology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747.
11. Hendey NI (1973) The plankton diatoms of the Southern Seas. 16: 151-364.
12. Lebour MV (1925) The dinolagellates of northern seas. The Marine Biological
Ass. UK.
13. Hasle GR, Syvertsen EE, Steidinger KA, Karl Tangen, Tomas CR (1996)
Identifying Marine diatoms and Dinolagellates 598.
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton
Abundance and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/21559910.1000126
Page 9 of 9
14. Blaze KL (1984) Morphology and taxonomy of Diplomenora gen:nov.
(Bacillariophyta). Br Phycol Journal 19: 217-225.
15. Dodge JD (1985) Atlas of Dinolagellates: A Scanning Electron Microscope
Survey. London: Farrand Press.
16. Subrahmanyan R (1971) The Dinophyceae of the Indian Seas. Part 2: Family
Peridiniaceae Schutt emend Lindemann. Marine Biological Association of
India, Memoir II, Cochin, India.
17. Taylor FJR (1987) The Biology of Dinolagellates. Bot Monogr 21 Blackwell &
Univ Calif Press, 786.
18. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water.
American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.
19. Yin K, Qian PY, Wu MCS, Chen JC, Huang L, et al. (2001) Shift from P to
N limitation of phytoplankton biomass across the Pearl River estuarine plume
during summer. Marine Ecological Progress Series 221: 17-28.
20. Margalef R (1951) Species diversity in natural comunidales. Publ Inst Biol Apl
9: 5-27.
21. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communicatio.
Univ. Illinois Press. Illinois, 125.
22. Pielou EC (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley, New
York, 286.
23. Gobler C, Boneillo GE (2003) Impacts of anthropogenically inluenced
groundwater seepage on water chemistry and phytoplankton dynamics within a
coastal marine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 255: 101-114.
24. Alvarez-Góngora C, Herrera-Silveira JA (2005) Variations of phytoplankton
community structure related to water quality trends in a tropical karstic coastal
zone. Mar Pollut Bull 52: 48-60.
25. Yao P, Yu Z, Deng C, Liu S, Zhen Y (2010) Spatial–temporal distribution of
phytoplankton pigments in relation to nutrient status in Jiaozhou Bay, China.
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 89: 234-244.
33. Tilstone GH, Figueiras FG, Lorenzo LM, Arbones B (2003) Phytoplankton
composition, photosynthesis and primary production during different
hydrographic conditions at the Northwest Iberian upwelling system. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 252: 89-104.
34. Kouwenberg JHM (1994) Copepod distribution in relation to seasonal
hydrographic and spatial structure in the north-western Mediterranean (Gulf du
Lion). Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sci 38: 69-90.
35. Ramaiah N, Nair V (1997) Distribution and abundance of copepods in the
pollution gradient zones of Bombay Harbour-Thana Creek-Bassein Creek,
west coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 26: 20-25.
36. Chandramohan P, Sreenivas N (1998) Diel variations in zooplankton population
in mangrove ecosystem at Gaderu canal, South-east coast of India. Indian J
Mar Sci 27: 486-488.
37. Sridhar R, Thangaradjou T, Kumar SS, Kannan L (2006) Water quality and
phytoplankton characteristics in the Palk bay, southeast coast of India. J
Environ Biol 27: 561-566.
38. Subramanian B, Mahadevan A (1999) Seasonal and diurnal variations of hydro
biological characters of coastal waters of Chennai (Madras) Bay of Bengal.
Indian J Mar Sci 28: 429-433.
39. Senthilkumar S, Santhanam P, Perumal P (2002) Diversity of phytoplankton
in Vellar estuary, south-east coast of India. AFSIB, Mangalore and AeA,
Bhubanewar, India, 245-248
40. Corbett DR, Kump L, Dillon K, Burnett W, Chanton J (2000) Fate of wastewaterborne nutrients in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA. Marine Chemistry
69: 99-115.
41. Philippart C, Cade´e G, Raaphorst W, Riegman R (2000) Long-term
phytoplankton nutrient interactions in a shallow sea: algal community structure,
nutrient budgets, a denitriication potential. Limnology & Oceanography 45:
131-144.
26. Steele JH (1962) Environmental control of photosynthesis in the sea. Limnology
and Oceanography 7: 137-150.
42. Domingues RB, Anselmo TP, Barbosa AB, Sommer U, Galvão HM (2011)
Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth in the freshwater tidal zone of a
turbid, Mediterranean estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 91: 282297.
27. Cullen JJ (1982) The deep chlorophyll maximum Comparing vertical proiles of
chlorophyll a. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39: 791-803.
43. Nwankwo DI (1998) Seasonal changes in phytoplankton population and
diversity in Epe Lagoon, Nigeria. Acta Hydrobiologia 40: 82-92.
28. Boyer JN, Kelble CR, Ortner PB, Rudnick DT (2008) Phytoplankton bloom
status: Chlorophyll a biomass as an indicator of water quality condition in the
southern estuaries of Florida, USA. Ecological Idicators 9: S56-S67.
44. Vanlandingham SL (1982) Guide to the identiication and environmental
requirements and pollution tolerance of freshwater blue-green algae
(cyanophyta). US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-60.
29. Cetin AK, Sen B (2004) Seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in Orduzu Dam
Lake (Malatya, Turkey). Turk J Bot 28: 279-285.
45. Nwankwo DI, Akinsoji A (1992) Epiphyte community of water hyacinth,
Eichhornia crassipes (MART) Solms in coastal waters of South Western
Nigeria. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 124: 501-511.
30. Mosisch TD, Bunn SE, Davies PM, Marshall CJ (1999) Effects of shade and
nutrient manipulation on periphyton growth in a subtropical stream. Aquat Bot
64: 167-177.
31. Bouman HA, Nakane T, Oka K, Nakata K, Kurita K, et al. (2010) Environmental
controls on phytoplankton production in coastal ecosystems: A case study from
Tokyo Bay. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 87: 63-72.
32. Reyes-Rodrı´guez MA (2001) Hidrologı´a y estado tro´ico de la columna de
agua de la zona marina costera de Sisal. Instituto Tecnolo´gico de Me´rida
MsC Thesis 217.
46. Pa´ez-Osuna F, Guerrero-Galvan SR, Ruiz-Fernandez AC (1998) Discharge of
nutrients from shrimp farming to coastal waters of the Gulf of California. Marine
Pollution Bulletin 38: 585-592.
47. Jones AB, O’Donohue MJ, Udy J, Denison WC (2001) Assessing ecological
impacts of shrimp and sewage efluent: biological indicators with standard
water quality analyses. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52: 91-109.
Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS
Group submissions
Unique features:
•
•
•
User friendly/feasible website-translation of your paper to 50 world’s leading languages
Audio Version of published paper
Digital articles to share and explore
Special features:
Citation: Rahaman SMB, Golder J, Rahaman MS, Hasanuzzaman AFM, Huq
KA, et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variations in Phytoplankton Abundance
and Species Diversity in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh. J
Marine Sci Res Dev 3: 126. doi:10.4172/2155-9910.1000126
J Marine Sci Res Dev
ISSN:2155-9910 JMSRD, an open access journal
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
250 Open Access Journals
20,000 editorial team
21 days rapid review process
Quality and quick editorial, review and publication processing
Indexing at PubMed (partial), Scopus, EBSCO, Index Copernicus and Google Scholar etc
Sharing Option: Social Networking Enabled
Authors, Reviewers and Editors rewarded with online Scientiic Credits
Better discount for your subsequent articles
Submit your manuscript at: www.editorialmanager.com/environsci
Volume 3 • Issue 2 • 1000126