Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH Vol. 56, No. 4 (2016) DOI: 10.1515/jppr-2016-0062 Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus (Stefanski, 1915) Cobb, 1917 (Nematoda: Mononchina) Soheila Shahabi1, Ahmad Kheiri2*, Farshad Rakhshandehroo3, Salar Jamali4 1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14515-775, Tehran, Iran 2 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111, Karaj, 31587-11167, Iran 3 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14515-775, Tehran, Iran 4 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Guilan University, P.O. Box 14115-336, Rasht, Iran Received: June 27, 2016 Accepted: November 21, 2016 Abstract: The distribution of nematodes was studied in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran, from 2014 to 2016. Nematode biodiversity of 250 soil and root samples was examined. Thirty nematode species were identified morphologically, including plant parasites, microbivores and mycetophagous and predator species. Molecular techniques were also used for further identification of three plant parasitic species. Indicators of population were also estimated. Spiral nematodes (Helicotylenchus crenacauda Sher, 1966 and H. digitiformis Ivanova, 1967) and stunt nematode (Tylenchorhynchus agri) were the predominant parasitic species identified. Among other species, three mononchid species were identified namely Mononchus aquaticus, Mylonchulus sigmaturus and M. polonicus. The species M. polonicus was found and reported in Iran for the first time. The two plant parasitic species T. agri and Xiphinema index were reported in association with rice in Iran for the first time. To evaluate the distribution and incidence of Aphelenchoides besseyi (rice white-tip nematode) in different regions of Guilan province, a total of 255 fresh seed samples were collected/inspected, of which, about 40% of them were infested with A. besseyi. Of the 16 studied counties, the highest percentage of infected seeds came from fields around the city of Astara (69.2%) and the second highest infection was observed near the city of Anzali (60%). Key words: Aphelenchoides besseyi, free-living nematodes, plant-parasitic nematodes, Tylenchorhynchus agri, Xiphinema index Introduction Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the primary staple crops internationally and is the second most important crop in Iran (Mousanejad et al. 2009). It is susceptible to several disease agents during its growth (Sayari et al. 2014). This crop is cultivated in 15 provinces in Iran but at least 69% of the rice production is found in two northern provinces, Mazandaran and Guilan. The average rice production of Guilan province, as the second largest rice producing province, is about 750,000,000 kg. This amount accounts for 40% of the country’s production, and 31% of the total area of the province is under rice cultivation (Mohammadi et al. 2015). Rice is grown traditionally in these areas, using the most common method of rice cultivation which involves transplanting manually. Currently there are 230,000 ha of rice paddy fields in Guilan province (Ashouri 2012). Many genera and species of plant parasitic nematodes are associated with rice, but only some of these are known or suspected to cause yield loss (Bridge et al. 2005). Aphelenchoides besseyi Christie, 1942, Hirschman*Corresponding address: kheiri.ahmad@gmail.com niella oryzae (Van Breda de Haan 1902) Luc & Goodey, 1963 and Heterodera elachista Ohshima, 1974 are the most important species which have been found in rice-growing regions of Iran (Kheiri 1971; Minassian and Barooti 1997; Tanha Maafi et al. 2003). A few studies have been done on the identification of plant parasitic nematodes in Guilan province (Pedramfar et al. 2001; Soleymanzadeh et al. 2016), but identification and distribution of nematodes have not yet been studied in rice fields of Guilan province, even in some recently conducted studies (Aliramaji et al. 2015; Pedram and Pourjam 2014; Pedram et al. 2015; Roshan-Bakhsh et al. 2016). The aim of our study was to perform a comprehensive survey on the identification and distribution of nematodes across the rice fields of the province. Since most soil-inhabiting nematode taxa can be beneficial and may have roles in the decomposition of organic matter they could be regarded as important soil quality indicators (Yeates and Coleman 1982; Ingham et al. 1985; Spedding et al. 2004; Ravichandra 2013). Therefore the free living forms of the collected species Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus… of nematodes were also identified. The purposes of this study were quantifying nematode biodiversity, preparing information on population dynamics and investigating the incidence and distribution of A. besseyi in rice growing areas in Guilan province. Three plant parasitic taxa were also identified by using molecular techniques. The species, M. polonicus (Stefanski, 1915) Cobb, 1917 was reported in Iran for the first time. Materials and Methods During 2014–2016, a total of 250 soil samples were taken from the rhizosphere of rice at a depth of 5–25 cm, in different regions of rice fields in Guilan province, northern Iran. The samples came from near almost all the villages of the province under rice cultivation in 16 counties. The distribution map of the sampling areas is shown in Figure 1. Each of the 250 samples was composed of 25–30 subsamples collected from 1–2 ha. To deal with variability in the field, a systematic zigzag pattern was used for collecting sub-samples. Each sample was stored at 4°C before extracting the nematodes. Nematodes were extracted from soil using the centrifugation sugar-flotation technique (Jenkins 1964). Nematodes were also extracted from collected roots (5 g root) by maceration in a waring blender at 3,000 rpm for 2 min and extracted with a Bearmann funnel. After extraction, samples were evaluated under a dissecting microscope at 40x magnification. All nematode genera were counted with the aid of counting slides and recorded before fixing. Nematode population 421 levels were determined and expressed as numbers per 500 cm3 soil and 5 g root. The data obtained were subjected to community analysis to determine the ecological index according to Norton (1978) as follows: the absolute frequency = number of samples containing a genus ×100/number of samples collected; relative frequency = frequency of a genus × 100/ sum of frequency of all genera; absolute density = average population density (nematodes/100 cm3 soil); relative density = average number of individual genus × 100/average number of all nematode genera; prominence value = absolute density × absolute frequency square for each certain nematode genus (absolute frequency); relative prominence = prominence value of a genus × 100/sum of prominence values of all genera. After counting, nematode specimens were killed, fixed, processed in dehydrated glycerin and mounted on glass slides according to De Grisse (1969). For the fresh seed samples survey, 255 fresh seed samples from 16 locations were collected. The number of seed samples for each location is shown in Table 1. Nematodes were extracted from 50 g of fresh seeds (out of 500 g), randomly collected from each point, then they were extracted using the Coolen and D’Herde technique (1972). The extracted nematodes were counted and fixed. Species characterization in this survey was based on morphological and morphometric characters using available literature and their original descriptions (Hopper and Cairns 1959; Loof and Luc 1990; Nickle and Hooper 1991; Jairajpuri and Ahmad 1992; Hunt 1993; Handoo 2000; Siddiqi 2000; Andrássy 2009; Ahmad and Jairajpuri 2010). Fig. 1. Distribution map of the samples taken from rice fields in different areas of Guilan province (with the capital city, Rasht), northern Iran. Sample locations are shown with white squares; triangles indicate location of majorcounties for this study Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM 422 Journal of Plant Protection Research 56 (4), 2016 Table 1. Incidence of Aphelenchoides besseyi in fresh seed samples of rice in Guilan province Sampling locations Number of samples Amlash 10 Number of seed samples Percent of seed samples Average numbers of infested with A. besseyi infested with A. besseyi A. besseyi per 1,000 seeds 1 10.00 0–38* Anzali 10 6 60.00 0–760** Astane 15 18 53.33 0–605** Astara 13 9 69.20 0–770** Foman 16 9 56.30 0–515** Lahijan 15 5 33.33 0–167* Langrood 12 3 25.00 0–60* Tavalesh 28 13 46.42 0–560** Masal 11 2 18.18 0–90* Rasht 11 6 54.54 0–598** Rezvanshahr 10 1 10.00 0–98* Roodbar 28 2 7.00 0–54* Roodsar 26 9 34.61 0–22* Shaft 14 5 35.71 0–258* Siahkal 20 8 40.00 0–560** Somesara 16 6 37.50 0–480* *low infestations (0–500 nematodes per 1,000 seeds); **moderate infestations (500−1,000 nematodes per 1,000 seeds) For molecular identification purposes, three selected individuals of plant parasitic taxa (A. besseyi, H. oryzae and H. elachista) were further identified by using molecular markers. Two genomic fragments, 28S rDNA D2/D3 and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) regions, were sequenced. Each individual was transferred to a small drop of AE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, 0.5 mM EDTA; pH 9.0, QIAGEN Inc., Valencia CA, USA) on a clean slide and crushed using a cover slip. The suspension was collected by adding 20 μl AE buffer. DNA samples were stored at –20°C until used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Primers used for D2D3 amplification were forward primer D2A (5’-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGT-3’) and reverse primer D3B (5’-TGCGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3’) (Nunn 1992). The ITS1 region was amplified using forward primer TW81 (5’-GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3’) and reverse primer AB28 (5’-ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGC GGGT-3’) as described in Vovlas et al. (2008). The information of PCR is according to Panahandeh et al. (2015). The PCR products were sequenced in both directions using PCR primers with an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Bioneer Corporation, South Korea). Newly obtained sequences for these species were deposited in GenBank database (accession numbers KX622689, KX622690 and KX622691 for 28S rDNA D2/D3 fragments of A. besseyi, Tylenchorhynchus agri and H. elachista respectively, and KX622692 for ITS of H. elachista). Results In this study, thirty species of soil inhabiting nematodes were identified. Free-living nematodes were more diverse in the number of species (about 70%) compared with plant parasitic nematodes (about 30%). Tripylla sp. and Mononchus sp. (with 4.8% and 4.4% frequency) had the highest populations among free-living nematodes. In comparison to the populations of other groups, the order Mononchida Jairajpuri, 1969 (Jairajpuri 1969) and other beneficial predatory nematodes showed the lowest populations in the studied areas (Table 2). The results of this survey indicated that the plantparasitic nematodes, Helicotylenchus spp. (33%) and T. agri (31.4%), were found to be the predominant genera compared with others in the studied fields. Heterodera elachista (1.79%) was the next most populous and Criconemella paragoodeyi Choi & Geraert, 1975 was the least populous (0.1%). The rice white-tip nematode, A. besseyi, was observed at low frequency in soil but had a moderate population in fresh seed samples compared with soil in the studied areas. Among the 255 fresh seed samples, 113 seed samples (40.4%) were infested with A. besseyi in the studied area. Of these samples, 33.3% had low infestations (0–500 nematodes per 1,000 seeds) and 67.98% had moderate infestations (500–1,000 nematodes per 1,000 seeds). Among the studied locations, Astara and Anzali had the largest percent of infected fresh seed samples and also the highest level of infection. Roodsar had the lowest number of infestation (0–22 nematodes per 1,000 seeds). Fukano (1962) determined the economic damage threshold density for A. besseyi to be 3,000 live nematodes per 1,000 seeds, which provides a useful basis for damage prediction (Bridge et al. 2005). Based on this threshold, about 67% of the infected fresh seed samples had more than 500 nematodes per 1,000 seeds, a threshold creating a need for management programs in order to prevent greater crop losses. In the present study M. polonicus was found for the first time in Iran’s nematode fauna. Morphometric data of the species are given in Table 3. It is characterized by having a medium sized body, smooth cuticle (under light microscopy), about 2.5–3.0 μm wide at midbody, Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus… 423 Table 2. List of nematodes identified in rice fields in Guilan province of Iran and some of their ecological features calculated according to Norton (1978). Root (5 g)/Soil (500 cm3) Nematode species/character Absolute frequency [%] Relative frequency [%] Absolute density Prominence value [%] Aphelenchoides spp. (Aphelenchoides besseyi, A. bicaudatus) 0.29 0.29 1.60 5.30 Aporcelaimellus obtusicaudatus 0.95 0.95 5.30 5.35 Aquatides aquaticus 1.01 1.02 2.80 10.71 Chronogaster sp. 2.98 3.07 4.50 19.64 Criconemella paragoodeyi 0.11 0.11 2.00 1.78 Dorylaimoides elegans Helicotylenchus crenacauda 0.47 0.47 8.00 1.78 24.22 31.00 11.94 60.71 Helicotylenchus digitiformis 8.90 9.70 11.50 23.21 Heterodera elachista 1.79 1.82 6.00 8.90 10.71 Ischiodorylaimus cognatus 1.19 1.20 3.30 Labronemella labiata 0.29 0.29 2.50 3.57 Laimydorus pseudostegnalis 1.49 1.51 3.10 14.20 Leptonchus sp. 0.23 0.23 4.00 1.78 Lindseyus costatus 1.20 1.21 2.60 14.20 Mesodorylaimus litoralis 1.55 1.57 2.60 17.85 Mononchus aquaticus 4.47 4.67 7.50 17.85 Mylonchulus spp. (M. polonicus & M. sigmaturus) 0.169 0.16 3.00 3.00 Oxydirus oxycephalus 0.40 0.47 4.00 3.57 Paractinolaimus decraemerae 0.35 0.35 3.00 5.35 Plectus spp. (P. aquatilis & P. parientinus) 3.20 3.31 11.00 8.90 Rhyssocolpus vinciguerrae 1.40 1.40 12.00 3.57 Tylenchidae (Basiria graminophila, Neopsilen chusmagnidens, Irantylenchus clavidorus, Filenchus facultativus & F. polyhypnus) 1.61 1.64 2.45 19.64 31.40 45.00 11.19 83.90 1.19 1.20 1.25 28.57 Tylenchorhynchus agri Thornenema baldum Tobrilidae (Tobrilus, Eutobrilus) 3.80 3.95 9.20 12.50 Tripyla sp. 4.80 5.04 8.10 17.85 Xiphinema index 0.29 0.29 5.00 1.78 Table 3. Morphometric characters for female Mylonchulus polonicus (Stefanski, 1915) Cobb, 1917 (measurements are in μm except “L” in mm) Population characters Present study Khan et al. 2002 Andrássy, 2009 n 4 7 – L 1.91±0.4(1.87–1.95) 1.8±0.1(1.6–2.0) 1.6–2.5 1.82 28–38 33.10 a 28.1±1.4(27–29.2) b 3.6±0.34(3.4–3.8) c 19±1.4(18–20) c’ 2.1±0.2(2.0–2.3) 36.7±2.1(33–41) 3.8±0.2(3.6–4.3) 17.01±0.5(16–18) 2.8±0.1(2.6–3.0) Mulvey, 1961 – 3.2–3.7 3.50 16–25 20.10 2.8–4.0 – 62.50 V 62.5±2.4(61–64) 63.5±1.3(61–66) 56–66 Buccal cavity diameter 20.5±1.8(19–22) 19–23 18–22 – 36.7±1.5(35.5–38) 32–36 33–36 – Buccal cavity length Pharynx length 505±22.1(490–520) 453–536 480–510 – Nerve ring from ant. end 194±7.5(188–200) 133–145 – – G1 7.4±0.1(7.4–7.6) – – – G2 9.6±0.1(9.5–9.7) – – – Anterior genital gonad length 255±4.8(250–260) – – – Posterior genital gonad length 197.5±2.7(195–200) – – – Tail length 94±2.1(93–96) 107.5±6.3(95–117) 80–120 – n – number of nematodes counted; L – nematode total length; a – body length/greatest body diameter; b – body length/distance from anterior to esophagointestinal valve; c – body length/tail length; c’ – tail length/tail diameter at anus or cloaca; V – %distance of vulva from anterior; G1 – overall length of the anterior ovary from vulva × 100/body length; G2 – overall length of the posterior ovary from vulva × 100/body length Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM 424 Journal of Plant Protection Research 56 (4), 2016 Fig. 2. Female Mylonchulus polonicus: A – head; B – pharyngo-intestine junction; C – vulva region; D – tail; E – whole body C-shaped open body upon fixation, amphids cup-like with oval aperture, papillae slightly protruding, wide buccal cavity with thick walls, a small dorsal claw like tooth, directed forward and situated in the anterior half of the buccal cavity, its apex at 71–74% of length of buccal cavity length from its base, two smaller sub median teeth, the large dorsal tooth apex facing forward, sub ventral small teeth and irregular rasp-like denticles in 6–7 rows, vertical walls of prominent buccal cavity and barrel-shaped buccal capsule with a tapering base (Fig. 2). A nerve ring encircles the pharynx at the anterior end of the body, transverse vulva, pars refringens vaginae appearing as two triangular-like sclerotized pieces, advulval papillae absent, the female reproductive system didelphic-amphidelphic, small ovaries and reflexed with a single row of oocytes, except at the tip of the ovary, rectum about equal to the diameter of the anal body, sphincter present, female tail rather long, ventrally arcuate, bluntly-conoid and three caudal glands distinct in tandem (Fig. 2D). Currently, eight species of the genus Mylonchulus have been reported in Iran [M. brachyuris (Bütschli, 1873) Cobb, 1917; M. cf. hawaiiensis (Cassidy, 1931) Goodey, 1951; M. kermaniensis Shokoohi, Mehrabi-Nasab and Mirzaei, 2013; M. lacustris (Cobb in Cobb 1915) Andrássy, 1958; M. minor (Cobb, 1893) Cobb, 1916; M. nainitalensis Jairajpuri, 1970; M. paitensis Yeates, 1992; M. sigmaturus Cobb, 1917] (Farahmand et al. 2009; Ghaderi et al. 2012; Koohkan et al. 2014). Mylonchulus polonicus closely resembles M. lacustris but there are some significant differences e.g. it has a larger body (vs. 1.1–1.5 mm) and longer tail (vs. c' = 1.5–2.0). Andrássy (1992) synonymized M. polonicus with M. montanus described by Mulvey (1961). Our material is in agreement with the description given by Mulvey (1961) in both the measurements and morphological characters. Also a slight difference in value (27–29.2 vs. 33.1) was observed. In comparison with the specimens studied by Andrássy (2009), the Iranian population has no remarkable Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus… 425 Astara Tavalesh Rezvanshahr Masal Anzali Somesara Foman Rasht Shaft Astane Lahijan Siahkal Langrood Roodbar Amlash Roodsar Table 4. Distribution of nematodes identified in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran (with location of sampling). Root (5 g)/Soil (500 cm3) Aphelenchoides (A. besseyi & A. bicaudatus ) + + + 0 + + + + + 0 0 + + 0 + 0 Aporcelaimellus obtusicaudatus + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aquatides aquaticus + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 Chronogaster sp. + + 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 ++ 0 0 0 + + + Criconemella paragoodeyi + 0 0 0 + 0 + 0 0 + 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 Nematode species Dorylaimoides elegans Helicotylenchus spp. +++ +++ 0 0 0 ++ + ++ +++ +++ +++ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ++ + ++ ++ + + + + Heterodera elachista 0 0 0 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ischiodorylaimus cognatus + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Labronemella labiata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 Laimydorus pseudostegnalis + ++ + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + Leptonchus sp. 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lindseyus costatus + + 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 + Mesodorylaimus litoralis + + + 0 0 + + + + ++ + + 0 0 0 0 Mononchus aquaticus ++ ++ + + + ++ ++ ++ + + + + + + + + Mylonchulus spp. (M. polonicus & M. sigmaturus) 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oxydirus oxycephalus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paractinolaimus decramerae 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plectus spp. (P. aquatilis & P. parientinus) + + 0 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 0 + + + 0 Rhyssocolpus vinciguerrae + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thornenema baldum 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tobrilidae (Tobrilus, Eutobrilus) ++ + + + + ++ + 0 0 + + 0 + 0 + 0 + + + + + Tripyla sp. Tylenchorhynchus agri +++ +++ + + + ++ + ++ +++ +++ +++ + ++ + + + + + 0 ++ + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Tylenchidae (Basiria, Neopsilenchus, Irantylenchus, Filenchus) 0 + 0 0 0 + + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Xiphinema index 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = not recorded; + = present in survey; ++ = common; +++ = widespread. Relative density > 30% = widespread, relative density > 10–30% = common and relative density < 10% = present in survey differences in morphology and morphometric data. Compared with the data given by Khan and Araki (2002), our population has slightly smaller ranges for the index “a” (27–29.2 vs. 33–41) and tail length (93–96 vs. 95–117 μm). The species, only found in one soil sample (Table 4), was collected from a rice field next to the Caspian Sea in Tavalesh county (southwest of the Caspian Sea, 140 km northwest of Rasht. GPS coordinates: 37°21'54" North, 50°5'34" East). The current study presents new data on the diversity and distribution of nematode fauna in rice paddies in Guilan province, Iran. Most of the common species of plant parasitic nematodes observed in this study were similar to those reported in a previous survey in rice fields in Guilan by Pedramfar et al. (2001). However, the plant parasitic nematodes mentioned below which have previously been identified in rice include: A. besseyi, A. bicaudatus (Imamura, 1931) Filipjev & Schuurmans Stekhoven, 1941; Basiria graminophila Siddiq, 1959; Criconemella paragoodeyi, Filenchus facultative (Szczygiel, 1970) Brzeski, 1982; F. polyhypnus (Steiner & Albin, 1946) Meyl, 1961; Helichotylenchus crenacauda, H. digitiformis, Heterodera oryzae Luc & Berdon, 1961 and Tylenchorhynchus annulatus (Cassidy, 1930) Golden, 1971. The two species Heterodera elachista and T. agri were reported for the first time as associates with rice in Guilan province. The 28S rDNA D2/D3 sequence of the Iranian population of T. agri, found and sequenced in the present study (morphometric data and comparison with other populations are given in Table 5, with accession number KX622690) was identical to the sequence of the same genomic fragment of the species with accession number KJ461559 sequenced by Handoo et al. (2014), and only one nucleotide difference was observed in the overlapping part of two sequences, which is a common intra-species variation. T. agri has already been reported in Iran from the rhizospheres of pomegranate, date and sour lemon (Mojtahedi et al. 1983; Nowruzi and Barooti 2001). The species H. elachista has previously been reported from rice fields in Mazandaran province by Tanha Maafi Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM 426 Journal of Plant Protection Research 56 (4), 2016 Table 5. Morphometric characters of Tylenchorhynchus agri Ferris, 1963 population (measurements are in μm except ”L” in mm) Present study Population characters female Ferris, 1963 male female male female male n 12 10 – 10 10 L 737±100(637–810) 695±5(682–700) 700(660–770) 660(540–720) 700(660–770) 660(540–720) a 29.54±2.5(26–32.3) 31.5±1.5(29.4–33) 30(28–33) 33(29–36) 30(28–33) 33(29–36) 5.4±1.5(4.8–6.8) 5.1±1.5(4.0–6.5) 5.1(4.7–5.5) 5.1(4.3–5.6) 5.1(4.7–5.5) 5.1(4.3–5.6) 18(15–21) 16(15–18) 18(15–21) 16(15–18) b c 4 Nickle, 1991 14.3±2.2(13.6–16.1) 14.0±1.0(13.2–14.5) c’ 2.8±0.5(2.1–3.4) 3.0±0.6(2.7–3.7) 2.6 – – – V/T 55.2±3.5(52.8–58) 53±2.5(49–55.3) 56(55–58) 52(48–56) 56(55–56) 52(48–56) Stylet length 20.8±2.5(19–23) 19.0±1.2(18.6–20.0) 21(20–23) 20(19.5–21) 21(20–23) 20(19.5–21.0) DGO 24±3(21–26) – 23–24 – – – – – – – MB 48.3±4.5(44–52.3) 46.9±3.2(46–51.6) Excretory pore 96±4.5(92–101) 98.5±6.5(93.2–106) – – 92(88–98) 88–105 Oesophagus length 122±10(114–132) 119±10(110–129) – – 116(108–128) 111–128 48.5±5.5(42–54) 45.3±4.2(41.8–49.8) – – 35(32–39) – – 4 – – – – 22(18–26) – – – – 24(22–25) – 24(22–25) – 13.4(12.5–14.4) – 13.4(12.5–14.4) Tail Head annuli Tail annuli 4 23±2.5(21–25) Spicules – Gubernaculum – 23±3.5(21–26) 11.5±1.5(10.9–12.4) n – number of nematodes counted; L – nematode total length; a – body length/greatest body diameter; b – body length/ distance from anterior to esophagointestinal valve; c – body length/tail length; c’ – tail length/tail diameter at anus or cloaca; V/T – distance of vulva from anterior/length of male gonad relative to body length; DGO – dorsal espohageal gland orific; MB – distance from anterior to median bulb relative to length of oesophagus Table 6. Morphometric data for female Xiphinema index Thorne and Allen, 1950 (measurements are in μm except ”L” in mm) Population characters Present study Thorne and Allen, 1950 Heyns, 1971 Andrassy, 2009 Hunt, 1993 n 9 – 10 – – L 2.9±0.3(2.5–3.2) 3.4 3.25(2.9–3.6) 2.9–3.4 3.1(2.91–3.28) a 56±3.5(52.3–60.4) 58 57(54–61) 54–66 62(58–66) b 6.6±0.8(5.7–7.5) 7.6 6.6(6.2–8) 6.0–7.6 6.8(6.0–7.7) c 73.4±10.8(65–84) 76 88(72–98) 75–95 84(75–93) c’ 1.1±0.1(1–1.2) – 0.9(0.7–1.1) 0.8–1.3 1.12(1.0–1.3) V 38.4±2.5(37–41) 38 41(40–42) 38–42 39.4(38–40) Odontostyle 128±7.5(121–134) – 129(123–134) 120–130 126(119–129) Odontophore 73.5±5.5(69–78.2) – 78(74–81) 70–80 70(63–78) 195±11.5(185–209) – 206(197–215) – 196(190–206) Stylet total length Guiding ring from anterior end 107.8±7.1(102–115) – – – – Diam. at mid-body 50.4±4.0(46–54) – – – – Anterior genital tract length 318.5±63(252.5–380) – – – – Posterior genital tract length 400±45(355–460) – – – – Tail 37.3±2.5(36–39) – – – – Hyaline portion of tail 18.5±2.5(17–21) – – – – n – number of nematodes counted; L – nematode total length; a – body length/greatest body diameter; b – body length/ distance from anterior to esophagointestinal valve; c – body length/tail length; c’ – tail length/tail diameter at anus or cloaca; V – %distance of vulva from anterior Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus… et al. (2003). In this study the collected population of this species was sequenced for its 28S rDAN D2/D3 and ITS fragments (accession numbers KX622691 and KX622692, respectively). The ITS sequence of our population was identical to the corresponding sequences of the species deposited into the GenBank (accession numbers HM560778 and AF498391) (identity = 100%). A 98–99% identity was observed while comparing with several other populations of the species accessible in the database. The 28S rDNAD2/D3 sequence of the presently sequenced population of A. besseyi with accession number KX622689 was also identical to the same genomic fragment of several populations of the species available in the GenBank (99–100% identity was observed). Based on morphological and morphometric characters, Xiphinema index Thorne and Allen, 1950 was identified for the first time in association with rice in Iran. Morphometric data and a comparison with other populations of the species are presented in Table 6. Discussion Xiphinema spp. are large nematodes and economically important pests of several crops. These nematodes not only directly damage their hosts by direct feeding on root cells, but also can transmit plant pathogenic viruses. Several species of Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 have so far been recorded from the rhizosphere of rice namely X. cavenessi Luc, 1973 in Côte d’Ivoire; X. insigne Loos, 1949 in India; X. nigeriense Luc, 1961; and X. orbum Siddiqi, 1963 in India, and X. oryzae Bos and Loof, 1985 in Nigeria, X. seredouense Luc, 1975 in Guinea but none of these species are known to be harmful (Bridge et al. 2005). Furthermore, Xiphinema ifacolum Luc, 1961 can cause significant yield loss in rice when it interacts synergistically with other root pathogens. Even alone at low population densities, it can reduce rice yield (Lamberti et al. 1987). Because of the presence of X. index in a number of the surveyed rice fields in the present study, its tentative effects on rice crop loss should be further investigated. Helicotylenchus spp. were the most prevalent plantparasitic nematodes in the studied area. The economic importance of these nematodes on rice crop loss has not been well studied. Helicotylenchus spp. are often considered as mild pathogens (Norton 1974) and can increase susceptibility to other plant pathogenic fungi in order to gain access to the host root cells. Tylenchorhynchus spp. are common nematodes in rice fields throughout the world, and their damage is accentuated by an aggregation phenomenon known as ‘swarming’ (Joshi and Hollis 1976). Tylenchorhynchus annulatus has the widest distribution and is the main species found in irrigated rice fields. Other less commonly reported species of the genus in rice fields are T. annulatus; T. brassicae Siddiqi, 1961; T. clarus Allen, 1955; T. clavicaudatus Seinhorst, 1963; T. claytoni Cobb, 1913; T. crassicaudatus Siddiqi, Mukherjee & Dasgupta, 1982; T. elegans Siddiqi, 1961; T. karnalensis Saha, Singh, Lal & Kaushal, 2002 T. mashoodi Siddiqi & Basir, 1959 and T. nudus Allen, 1955 (Khan et al. 1990; Haidar et al. 1996; Khan and Shaukat 2000). However, none of these species have been shown 427 to cause remarkable damages to rice in the field (Bridge et al. 2005). The high population density of T. agri recovered in this study emphasizes the need for further studies on its potential pathogenicity and crop losses on rice. Heterodera elachista has an important role in yield loss in rice and despite low levels of infection with this species, management programs against it should be applied. A. besseyi causes white=tip disease in rice and it has worldwide distribution in rice fields. It causes up to 60% crop losses in various infested regions (Bridge et al. 2005). The nematode was first reported in Iran by Kheiri (1971) and is widely distributed in the rice growing areas in northern parts of the country including Guilan province (Talachian and Akhiani 1976; Elahinia and Mahdavian 1998; Jamali et al. 2006). Based on our results, about 40.4% of collected fresh seed samples of rice were infested with A. besseyi and about 27.1% of fresh seed samples had more than 500 nematodes per 1,000 seeds. Due to the economic importance of rice in Guilan province and the devastating effects of this nematode species on susceptible cultivars, management methods should be considered to reduce nematode population levels in these areas. Free-living nematodes have very important and beneficial roles in the decomposition of organic material and the recycling of nutrients in soil. They serve as important environmental indicators, and the predator forms could potentially be bio-control agents against parasitic forms. In the present survey, based on morphological and morphometric characteristics, a number of free living nematodes were identified and their distribution and population density were studied. The identified species were as follows: Aporcelaimellus obtusicaudatus (Bastian, 1865) Altherr, 1968; Aquatides aquaticus (Thorne, 1930) Heyns, 1968; Chronogaster sp.; Dorylaimoides elegans Thorne & Swanger, 1936; Eutobrilus sp.; Ischiodorylaimus cognatus Andrássy, 1983; Labronemella labiate Andrássy, 1985; Laimydorus pseudostagnalis (Micoletzky, 1927) Siddiqi, 1969; Leptonchus sp.; Lindseyus costatus Ferris & Ferris, 1973; Mesodorylaimus litoralis Loof, 1969; Mononchus aquaticus Coetzee, 1968; Mylonchulus polonicus; Mylonchulus sigmaturus; Oxydirus oxycephalus (De Man, 1885) Thorne, 1939; Paractinolaimus decraemerae Pedram, Niknam, Vinciguerra, Ye & Robbins, 2010; Plectus aquatilis Andrassy, 1985; Plectus parientinus Bastian, 1865; Rhyssocolpus vinciguerrae Pedram, Porurjam, Robbins, Ye & Pena-Santigo, 2011; Thornenema baldum (Thorne, 1939) Andrássy, 1959; Tobrilus sp. and Tripyla sp. All of the abovementioned free living nematodes, except L. costacus, were first found in the rhizosphere of rice in Iran by Coomans and Kheiri in 1986. Earlier, they had been reported in the rhizosphere of other plants from the country (Ghaderi et al. 2012). Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Prof. Nathaniel A. Mitkowski (Professor in the Science Department at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI) for his helpful comments and valuable suggestions in revising the manuscript. Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM 428 Journal of Plant Protection Research 56 (4), 2016 References Ahmad W., Jairajpuri M.S. 2010. Mononchida: the Predaceous Nematodes. Series: Nematology monographs and perspectives 7. Brill, Leiden–Boston, Netherlands, 299 pp. Aliramaji F., Pourjam E., Álvarez-Ortega S., Pedram M., Atighi M.R. 2015. Rotylenchus dalikhaniensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae), a monosexual species recovered from the rhizosphere of Ruscus hyrcanus Woronow in Mazandaran province, northern Iran. Nematology 17 (1): 67–77. Andrássy I. 1992. A taxonomic survey of the family Mylonchulidae (Nematoda). Opuscula Zoologica Budapest 25: 11–35. Andrássy I. 2009. Free-living nematodes of Hungary (Nematoda errantia), III. Pedozoologica Hungarica 5: 608 pp. Ashouri M. 2012. The effect of water saving irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on rice production in paddy fields of Iran production in paddy fields of Iran. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics 2 (1): 56–59. Bridge J., Plowright R.A., Peng D. 2005. Nematode parasites of rice. p. 87–129. In: “Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture”. 2nd ed. (M. Luc, R.A. Sikora, J. Bridge, eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 896 pp. Coolen W.A., D’Herde C.J. 1972. A method for the Quantitative Extraction of Nematodes from Plant Tissue. State Nematology and Entomology Research Station, Merelbeke, Belgium, 77 pp. Coomans A., Kheiri A. 1986. Observations on Lindseyus costatus Ferris & Ferris, 1973 with a discussion on its relationships (Nematoda: Belondiridae). Revue De Nematologie 9 (4): 357–367. De Grisse A.T. 1969. Redescription ou modifications de quelques techniques utilisées dans l’étude des nematodes phytoparasitaires. Mededelingen Rijksfaculteit Landbouwwetenschappen te Gent 34: 351–369. Elahinia S.A., Mahdavian E. 1998. Geographical distribution of Aphelenchoides besseyi and its infection rate on different cultivars of rice in western parts of Mazandaran and Guilan provinces. p. 86. In: Proceedings of 13th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 23–27 August, Karaj, Iran, 180 pp. (in Persian, with English summary) Farahmand S., Eskandari A., Orselli L., Karegar A. 2009. Some known species of the genera Mononchus Bastian, 1865 and Mylonchulus (Cobb, 1916). Nematologia Mediterranea 37 (2): 145–154. Ferris V.R. 1963. Tylenchorhynchus silvaticus n. sp. and Tylenchorhynchus agri n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida). Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash, 30:165-168. Fukano H. 1962. Ecological studies on white tip disease of rice plant caused by Aphelenchoides besseyi, Christie and its control. Bulletin of the Fukuoka Agriculture Experiment Station 18: 1–10. Ghaderi R., Kashi L., Karegar A. 2012. The Nematodes of Iran (based on the published reports until 2011). Agricultural Education and Extension Publication, Tehran, Iran, 371 pp. Haidar M.G., Nath R.P., Thakur S.K. 1996. Growth response of rice plant to stunt nematode, Tylenchorhynchus nudus. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University 8 (2): 163–164. Handoo Z.A. 2000. A key and diagnostic compendium to the species of the genus Tylenchorhynchus Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Belonolaimidae). Nematology 32 (1): 20–34. Handoo Z.A., Palomares-Rius J.E., Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C., Liebanas G., Subbotin S.A., Castillo P. 2014. Integrative taxonomy of the stunt nematodes of the genera Bitylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus (Nematoda, Telotylenchidae) description of two new species and a molecular phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172 (2): 231–264. Heyns J. 1971. Three Xiphinema species from the south Western Cape Province (Nematoda: Longidoridae). Phytophylactica (plant protection sciences and microbiology) 3 (3): 107–114. Hopper B.E., Cairns E.J. 1959. Taxonomic Keys to Plant, Soil and Aquatic Nematodes. Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Auburn, AL, USA, 176 pp. Hunt D.J. 1993. Aphelenchida, Longidoridae and Tricodoridae: Their Systematics and Bionomics. International Wallingford, UK, 352 pp. Ingham R.E., Trofymow J.A., Ingham E.R., Coleman D.C. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecological Monographs 55 (1): 119–140. Jairajpuri M.S. 1969. Studies on Mononchida of India. I. The genera Hadronchus, Iotonchus and Miconchus and a revised classification of Mononchida, new order. Nematologica 15: 557–581. Jamali S., Pourjam E., Alizadeh A., Alinia F. 2006. Incidence and distribution of Aphelenchoides besseyi in rice areas in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2 (2): 337–344. Jairajpuri M.S., Ahmad W. 1992. Dorylaimida: Free-living, Predaceous and Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Brill Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands, 458 pp. Jenkins W.R. 1964. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for extracting nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter 48: 692. Joshi M.M., Hollis J.P. 1976. Pathogenicity of Tylenchorhynchus martini swarmers to rice. Nematologica 22 (1): 123–124. Khan Z., Araki M. 2002. A new and two first recorded species of mononchids (Nematoda: Mononchida) from Japan. Nematologia Mediterranea 30: 167–173. Khan A., Jaffry A.H., Khan M.A. 1990. Pathogenicity of Tylenchorhynchus brassicae to three cultivars of rice. International Nematology Network Newsletter 7 (2): 42–43. Khan A., Shaukat S.S. 2000. Effect of single and simultaneous inoculations of Hirschmanniella oryzae and Tylenchorhynchus annulatus to rice seedlings under laboratory conditions. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 16 (2): 197–200. Kheiri A. 1971. Plant-parasitic nematodes (Tylenchida) from Iran. Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea 40: 224–239. Koohkan M., Shokoohi E., Abolafia J. 2014. Study of some mononchids (Mononchida) from Iran with a compendium of the genus Anatonchus. Tropical Zoology 27 (3): 88–127. Lamberti F., Bleve-Zacheo T., Tuopay D.K., Ciancio A., Boibol J.B. 1987. Relationship between Xiphinema ifacolum and rice in Liberia. Nematologia Mediterranea 15: 303–314. Loof P.A.A., Luc M. 1990. A revised polytomous key for the identification of species of the genus Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) with exclusion of the X. americanum group. Systematic Parasitology 16: 35–66. Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM Occurrence and distribution of nematodes in rice fields in Guilan province, Iran and the first record of Mylonchulus polonicus… Minassian V., Barooti S. 1997. First report on occurrence of Hirschmanniella oryzae in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 33: 31–32. (in Persian, with English summary). Mohammadi A., Alimohammadi A., Habibi R., Shirzadi M.R. 2015. Spatial and statistical analysis of leptospirosis in Guilan province, Iran. The International Archives of the Photogramm. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-1/W5:497–502. Mojtahedi H., Balali G., Akhiani A., Barooti S., Naderi A. 1983. Tylenchorhynchid nematodes of Iran (Tylenchoidea: Nematoda). Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 19: 11–14. (in Persian, with English summary) Mousanejad S., Alizadeh A., Safaie N. 2009. Effect of weather factors on spore population dynamics of rice blast fungus in Guilan Province. Journal of Plant Protection Research 49 (3): 319–329. Mulvey R.H. 1961. The Mononchidae: a family of predaceous nematodes. I. Genus Mylonchulus (Enolpida: Mononchidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 39: 665–696. Nickle W.R., Hooper D.J. 1991. Manual of Agricultural Helminthology. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1035 pp. Norton D.C., Hoffmann J.K. 1974. Distribution of selected plant parasitic nematodes relative to vegetation and edaphic factors. Journal of Nematology 6 (2): 81–86. Norton D.C. 1978. Ecology of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 268 pp. Nowruzi R., Barooti S. 2001. Some predatory and plant parasitic nematodes from Bushehr Province, Iran. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 68 (2): 9–12. Nunn G.B. 1992. Nematode molecular evolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 192 pp. Panahandeh Y., Pourjam E., Aliramaji F., Pedram M. 2015. Data on some members of the family Tylenchidae (Nematoda: Tylenchina) from Iran. Biologia (Section Zoology) 70 (10): 1376–1387. Pedram M., Pourjam E. 2014. Description of Trichodorus iranicus sp. n. (Diphtherophorina, Trichodoridae) from Iran. Zootaxa 3795 (4): 431–440. Pedram M., Pourjam E., Panahandeh Y., Soleymanzadeh M., Atighi M.R., Roshan-Bakhsh A., Ehsani A. 2015. Additional data on Iranian trichodorids (Triplonchida: Trichodoridae) and proposal for a new synonymy. Nematology 17 (10): 1185–1191. Pedramfar H., Pourjam E., Kheiri A. 2001. Plant parasitic nematodes associated with rice in Guilan Province, Iran. Iranian 429 Journal of Plant Pathology 37 (3–4): 285–301. (in Persian, with English summary) Ravichandra N.G. 2013. Fundamentals of Plant Pathology. Phi Learning, Delhi, India, 652 pp. Roshan-Bakhsh A., Pourjam E., Pedram M. 2016. Description of Longidorus perangustus sp. n. (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae), an amphimictic species from Iran. European Journal of Plant Pathology 144 (3): 581–594. Sayari M., Babaeizad V., Ghanbari M.A.T., Rahimian H. 2014. Expression of the pathogenesis related proteins, NH-1, PAL, and lipoxygenase in the Iranian Tarom and Khazar rice cultivars, in reaction to Rhizoctonia solani the causal agent of rice sheath blight. Journal of Plant Protection Research 54 (1): 36–43. Siddiqi M.R. 2000. Tylenchida Parasites of Plants and Insects. 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 833 pp. Soleymanzadeh M., Pedram M., Pourjame E., Álvarez-Ortega S. 2016. Description of Lelenchus brevislitus n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchidae), an example of a cryptic species from Iran and its phylogenetic relationships with other species in the family. Nematology (in press). Spedding T.A., Hamel C., Mehuys G.R., Madramootoo C.A. 2004. Soil microbial dynamics in maize-growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36 (3): 499–512. Talachian P., Akhiani A. 1976. Occurrence of white tip nematode of rice in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 12: 27. (in Persian, with English summary) Tanha Maafi Z., Subbotin S.A., Moens M. 2003. Molecular identification of cyst nematodes (Heteroderidae) from Iran and a phylogeny based on ITS-rDNA sequences. Nematology 5 (1): 99–111. Thorne G., Alen M.W. 1950. Paratylenchus hamatus n. sp. and Xiphinema index n. sp. two new nematodes associated with fig roots, with a note on Paratylenchus anceps Cobb. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 17: 27–35. Vovlas N., Subbotin S.A., Troccoli A., Liébanas G., Castillo P. 2008. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Rotylenchus (Nematoda, Tylenchida) and description of a new species. Zoologica Scripta 37 (5): 521–537. Yeates G.W., Coleman D.C. 1982. Role of nematodes in decomposition. p. 55–80. In: “Nematodes in Soil Ecosystems” (D.W. Freckman, ed.). University of Texas Press, Austin, USA, 206 pp. Unauthenticated Download Date | 2/13/18 7:14 AM