High Performance Executive Teams
Sonia Taneja
Texas A&M University-Commerce
Scott Sewell
Texas A&M University-Commerce
Mildred Golden Pryor
Texas A&M University-Commerce
Strategically and tactically, organizational leaders often establish teams to accomplish the missions,
visions, goals and objectives of their respective organizations. Teams exist in all types of organizations
including financial institutions, factories, healthcare organizations, and educational institutions. Yet
executives often struggle to maintain high performance of their own leadership teams. This research
seeks to answer several questions, including: (1) What are the characteristics of a high performance
executive team? (2) What problems do executive teams face that negatively impact their potential for high
performance? And (3) What can executives do to increase their respective teams’ potential for high
performance?
INTRODUCTION
Holmes (2012) recognized that organizations are changing from traditional hierarchical work
structures to team-based approaches to work. He noted that high-performance teams must “develop goals
and plans, enhance communication among members, develop and maintain positive relationships among
members, solve problems and make decisions on a timely basis, successfully manage conflict, facilitate
productive meetings, clarify roles for team members, operate in a productive manner, exhibit effective
team leadership, provide development opportunities for team members” (Holmes, 2012, p.180). These ten
actions are critical in order to form a successful team. Authors of other publications in the area of
effective, high performance teams (Rico, Sanchez-Manzanares, Gil, and Gibson, 2008; Harrison and
Tarter, 2007; Adobor, 2004; Munro and Laiken, 2003; Ammeter and Dukerich, 2002; Pryor, 1993, 1998,
2007; and Pryor, Singleton, Taneja, and Toombs, 2009) also emphasized that it is important to establish
missions, visions, goals, and strategies because they act as catalyst for the success of teams and are
building blocks for the development and long term survival of an organization.
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
11
CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMS
Teams cannot be effectively measured as a success or failure unless it is united together for a
common purpose or a common goal (Robbins, 2005). In fact, a group without a common goal is really not
functioning as a team and would be more likely to fail because it has no unified direction.
Teams that have demonstrated that performance excellence is their “way of life” are high
performance teams. Along that line, Kur (1996) defines high performance teams as teams that
“consistently satisfy the needs of customers, employees, investors and others in their respective areas of
influence . . . and frequently outperform other teams that produce similar products and services under
similar conditions and constraints” (p. 34). High performance teams must be created (Richardson and
Denton, 2005), and there are specific strategies, tactics, and actions that can increase the probability that
teams will be high performance (Leholm and Vlasin, 2006; Harris, 2003). While all types of teams should
strive to become high performances teams, it is especially critical that natural work teams (including
executive leadership teams) make long-term commitments to excellence and high performance. Yet as
noted by Caska, et al (2001) and suggested earlier by Katzenbach and Smith (1993) “high performance
teams are a rarity.” Perhaps one explanation is that a high performance culture must exist in high
performance teams are to be the norm in an organization (Kaliprasad, 2006).
McKnight (2009) noted, “Top teams exist to support the organization, to grow its assets by enabling it
to produce value. In the most successful companies, the top team does this not only by creating the
organization’s business strategy but also by collaboratively executing that plan i.e., marshaling the
resources required to achieve those goals. This means building or maintaining the organizational
capabilities (needed for executing) the strategy” (p. 31). These teams are responsible for taking actions
that will help the organization to achieve its goals. These top level high performance teams which consist
of executives, CEO’s, vice presidents, and others achieve success by developing contact with people
(inside & outside the organization) to achieve the target, exert influence to get tasks accomplished, and
finally direct and empower employees to work toward a common goal.
The important role of the high performance executive team is to establish and maintain positive
relationships with other team members in the organization because “the effectiveness of
relationships…can have a direct impact on the overall success of an organization” (The CV Centre, 2011,
pg.1). These “positive relationships help to build trust within a team and can ensure that people feel
comfortable with airing their concerns or issues” (The CV Centre, 2011). Forming trust within a team
will encourage team members to assist each other in working toward team goals instead of focusing only
on their respective individual agenda. Positive relationships instill a sense of community within the team,
encourage open and honest dialogue, encourage a more overall positive experience, and usually enhance
the team’s capability for success.
In order for team members to make critical decisions, it is imperative for them to have enhanced
communication. In a recent study conducted in the medical field it was found that “communication
failures are the leading causes of inadvertent patient harm” resulting in the death of 75% of the patients
harmed from miscommunication (Leonard, Graham & Bonacum, 2004, pg. 1). Looking at groups of
people in the medical field as teams with a goal of keeping patients alive and healthy, it is obvious that
even if team members have clear goals, effective communication is needed from the formation of the
goals until they are achieved. Otherwise, there could be drastic consequences. Unclear communication
can be just as dangerous to the attainment of a goal as any other threat. It is important to recognize that
“many factors contribute to communication failures” (Leonard, Graham & Bonacum, 2004, pg. 1). In the
example from the medical field, it was noted that “doctors and nurses are trained to communicate quite
differently” (example of ineffective communication), “hierarchy, or power distance, frequently inhibits
people from speaking up”, a present “cultural barrier” made communication more challenging, and other
“human factors” contributed to ineffective communication that created inadvertent patient harm (Leonard,
Graham& Bonacum, 2004, pg. 2). The establishment of productive, consistent communication would help
avoid many of these problems.
12
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
Conflict is another important component for teams, especially the high performance executive teams,
to address because it has the potential to positively or negatively impact the team and team results. “If
(dysfunctional) conflict is left unresolved it creates a hostile work environment, leads to frustration,
hampers productivity, lowers morale, creates poor unity, causes inappropriate behaviors and can cause
more conflicts in the future” (Poetmel, 2010, p.1 ). In other words, resolving dysfunctional conflict is
essential because “unresolved conflict is a breeding ground for problems that prevent a team from
productivity” (Poetmel, 2010, p.1).
Effective communication is essential to accomplishing team objectives. However, if there is poor
unity, individuals may not share ideas and it may trigger low morale and negatively impact team member
motivation. Also, a hostile work environment leads to individuals looking out only for themselves and not
the team as a whole. Resolving conflict not only eliminates the current issues and teaches members how
to communicate better in the future, it also helps bring out leadership traits in team members who help
mediate conflict and reform team unity.
Meetings are one of the most common official forums for an executive team to communicate, but they
are frequently regarded as major time wasters. Of course, meetings can be productively facilitated. First
of all, the executive team should “schedule meetings only when necessary, not by habit” (Are your
meetings, 2011, p. 4). This prevents redundant conversations and lets team members know the meetings
require action, not just attendance. In addition, when meetings are called for a specific purpose, only
“people who need to attend” should be invited, and an agenda with subjects and allotted time should be
developed (Are your meetings, 2011). Meeting attendees should stay focused on agenda subjects, and
decisions and accountabilities should be agreed upon during the meeting and reviewed before the meeting
adjourns (Are your meetings, 2011). When team members recognize the significance of meetings and
show other members that they respect their time, this leads to greater team unity.
In meetings, executive team members decide what they wish to accomplish. However, unless actions
with a specific timeline for accomplishment are assigned to accountable people, the actions will not be
achieved. Dvorak (2007) discusses how IBM’s employees work around the world on various projects and
teams. The key “to smooth teamwork is dividing projects into small pieces” and further dividing them
into smaller chunks where each “chunk is further split into tasks designed to take one programmer a day
or two to complete. It handles mistakes or miscommunications and they are identified, and there is little
waiting for others to finish work” (Dvorak, 2007, p. 4). Clearly assigning specific work to team members
is extremely practical as they understand each other’s responsibility which increases the accountabilities
of the team. Further, clarification of members’ roles, duties and responsibilities leads to increased
efficiency and effectiveness.
Pearce (2008) suggested that “teams could be much more effective” than their typical current model if
there’s a shared leadership (p.1). It implies that in the executive teams, different individuals lead different
sub-objectives or tasks, and they are responsible for the progress and accomplishment of the final goals.
This leadership style is extremely beneficial for the high performance team because (especially in large
organizations) of the size of the organization. Distributing responsibility helps develops a system of
checks and balances and helps prevent a large difference in power between team members. High
performance executive teams are focused on achieving organizational goals and also, on achieving
executive team goals.
CHALLENGE FACED BY HIGH PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVES TEAMS
High performance executive teams face many challenges that can negatively impact their respective
organizations’ potential for high performance, including stagnancy, de-motivation, competition, lack of a
skilled workforce, transition issues, globalization, and political dynamics.
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
13
Stagnancy or Complacency
Drucker (2006) emphasized that complacency is one of the top causes of organizational failure. A
stagnant organization does not grow, and one does that does not grow for some time has to die or has to
be replaced. When the stagnation is coupled by innovation and growth by the competition, it speeds up
the entire process. Numerous examples exist and include Research-in-Motion, Yahoo, Nokia, and Dell
where organizational leaders learned that strategies can be duplicated easily and in many cases is bettered
by intelligent competitors.
De-motivated Employees
According to Dunn (2009) employee motivation is a major function that contributes to company’s
success. Employees often feel neglected when the management team is unable (or unwilling) to provide
essential tools and resources. Most work can become repetitive and monotonous after it is done for a long
time, and it is the responsibility of the executive team to determine how to make work challenging and
rewarding.
Competition
One of the factors over which executive leadership teams have no direct control is competition. They
may try to influence factors that fall within their sphere of influence (Maxwell, 2001), but the impact is
very limited. Typically organizational leaders who are very entrepreneurial and ready to invest time and
resources in developing bigger and better products that offer more value are able to succeed and take over
the markets (Gilmartin, 1999). A very recent example is the situation of RIM Blackberry phones and
Apple iPhones. RIM had very innovative technology, but it did not take long for Apple to develop better
ones that had features that were of more value to customers (Kharif, 2012).
Lack of skilled workforce
This is another human resources issue that needs to be addressed by executive teams. Drucker (2006)
and Cohen (2004) highlight the importance of management information systems as applied to the
businesses around the world. Bigger and better information system, software, tools are required by
employees followed by appropriate training. If the employees are not skilled to perform the job,
organizations can lose their competitive advantage very fast.
Transition issues
Transition of executives or handling the responsibilities needed for the next generation is a key factor
of highly successful teams and companies. Opportunities need to exist for leadership development in
terms of mentoring and training as well as a variety of work experiences throughout the organization.
Major problems exist when a member of the executive team leaves whether it is to accept another position
or because of death or some unethical or illegal activity of the team member. Whatever be the reason for
it, (Drucker, 2006; Cohen, 2004; Cohen, 2008) identify transition as a very critical point in determining
the short and long term future of the organization. It can make or break the company very quickly.
Globalization
Executive leadership team members now have to worry about not just the local issues but the global
issues like competition, weather, political scenarios and dynamics, and terrorism. As a result of the
globalization, there is a diverse workforce. It becomes challenging to manage the team culturally and
geographically. The difference in dialect often makes it challenging to communicate because of language
barriers. Cultural differences and variations in dialect may create unforeseen challenges when trying to
exchange information (Taneja, Pryor, Humphreys, & Singleton, 2012).
14
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
Political Dynamics
Executives have to be aware of the political impact of the decisions they make and the actions they
take. They also have to be cognizant of impact that certain election results, political uprisings, strikes,
curfews, and other situations related to political dynamics. They may face challenges from economic or
financial issues to finding a market place to sell the product or equipment (Drucker, 2006; Elenkov,
Judge, & Wright, 2005).
These challenges create new opportunities for executive team members as they gain more experience
in communication. Table I depicts the challenges and possible solutions or responses to them by high
performance executive teams. In addition to identifying and addressing challenging facing their
organization, executive team members need to understand how to routinely function as a high
performance team. The challengers also help executive teams continuously strive to achieve solutions for
them and perform at their full potential by following high performance team practices.
PRACTICES OF HIGH PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE TEAMS
Peter Drucker was one of the earliest people to identify the solutions to tackle most of the challenges
mentioned above. He identified eight practices for highly effective executives as follows (Drucker, 2006,
p. 2):
1. Ask “What needs to be done?”
2. Ask “What is right for the company?”
3. Develop an action plan.
4. Be responsible for the decisions.
5. Be responsible for communicating.
6. Focus on opportunities rather than problems.
7. Have productive meetings.
8. Focus on teamwork rather than individual effort.
According to Drucker (2006), following these eight practices lead to the most benefits for an
organization. Zenger, Folkman & Edenger (2009) also noted that the most important step for the
organization is for leaders to create clear vision & direction. Further, this is followed by developing (and
communicating to all employees) core values and guiding principles, goals, strategies and tactics and a
plan for risk mitigation. An organization that follows these steps boldly and sustains competitive
advantage succeeds in the long run. Executives are an important catalyst in increasing team and
organizational performance.
HOW EXECUTIVES INCREASE TEAMS’ POTENTIAL FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE
Formulating a high performance executive team that is adaptable to new situations and problems is
difficult to accomplish, and it takes continuous effort to maintain. Figure 1 depicts a model that assists in
developing and maintaining a high performance executive team.
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
15
FIGURE 1: DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE TEAM
Review the products &
services offered, available
market and competition
Monitor progress and do not
hesitate to make tough
decisions when required
Develop strategy that
can deliver results in
for long run
Establish clear definition of
expectations & duties
Develop vision, mission
& core values that are
consistent with strategy
Communicate the
same with all
employees
The following steps will be helpful in developing high performance executive teams and high
performance organizations:
1. Review the product/service offering, market position and scope, as well as the competition. A
complete knowledge of own organization, its position in market and competition is required
in order to develop sound strategy.
2. Develop vision, mission, core values and goals. Ensure that they are consistent with
strategies. In order to establish a high performance executive team to accomplish any task, it
needs to first establish the vision, mission, core values, goals, and strategies.
3. Develop strategies that can deliver in long run. It may take time to develop such strategies,
but this has to be done diligently to avoid or minimize any pitfalls.
4. Communicate strategic and tactical plans to all the employees. The vision, mission and core
values make the roadmap clearer for the employees, thereby making it easier for the company
to achieve its targets.
5. Establish clear definitions of expectations and duties. Responsibilities and accountabilities
should be very clear. All employees have to be accountable and responsible for the duties
assigned and expected of them.
6. Monitor the progress. Continuous monitoring is required to check compliance with the tasks
and to make sure the project is on track. It can be achieved by setting milestones and making
sure they are achieved within the time period they are planned. Any slippages will result
either in modifying the course of action or changing the project delivery date.
If adopted by executive teams, a methodical approach as discussed above will definitely help
executive teams continue to be high performing irrespective of the type of environment they operate in,
kind of market they service, kind of product & service offered. When faced with challenges, the high
performing teams do not see them as setbacks but as opportunities to improvise and suggest alternative
strategies, thereby leading to further benefits.
16
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
CONCLUSION
High Performance executive teams are useful assets for any organization. They are comprised of
skilled executive who understand strategic management, have mutual trust in one another, and work
together valuing team goals above individual assignments. In order to be successful, executive teams must
be carefully formed with the right executives chosen to participate. After shared experiences, executive
teams may be used to accomplish a variety of actions such as oversee a layoff, increase motivation, or
assist with accomplishing the organization’s objectives. Regardless of the specific situations they face and
the purposes for which they are formed, they can work together to help accomplish goals if they can
function as high performance teams. High performing teams are driven by effective and efficient leaders
who are intelligent enough to identify risks and opportunities and who can assign duties based on the
merit and performance of employees. In summary, high performance executive teams:
Develop goals and strategic plans;
Enhance communication among team members and throughout the organization;
Maintain positive relationships among members;
Solve problems and prevent them when possible;
Make decisions on a timely basis;
Successfully manage functional (and eliminate dysfunctional) conflict;
Facilitate productive meetings;
Clarify roles for team members;
Operate in a productive, efficient, and effective manner,
Exhibit effective and efficient (high performance) team leadership; and
Provide development opportunities for team members throughout the organization.
REFERENCES
Adobor, H. (2004). High performance management of shared-managed joint venture teams: contextual
and socio-dynamic factors. Team Performance Management. 10(3/4), 65-76.
Ben-Hur, S., Jonsen, K., & Kinley, N. (2010, November 10). Why the best executive teams can make the
worst decisions. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/10/group-team-bad-decisionsleadership-managing-groupthink.html
Cohen, W. (2008). Effective leadership. Leadership Excellence, 25(8), 7.
Cohen, W. (2004). The Art of the Strategist: 10 essential principles for guiding your company to victory.
New York, NY: AMACOM.
Cohen, W. (2008). Tough times. Leadership Excellence. 26 (6), 19.
Dvorak, P. (2007, Sep 17). Theory & Practice: How Teams can Work Well Together from Far Apart.
Wall Street Journal, page, B.4. ABI/INFORM Global. Retrieved on April 1, 2012.
Drucker, P. (2006). What executives should remember? Harvard Business Review. 84(2), 144-152.
Dunn, J. (2009). Study of perceptions regarding the changing roles, skills & effectiveness of Human
Resources functions. Benedictine University, Proquest Dissertation & Thesis.
Elenkov, D., Judge, W. & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic management & executive innovation influence.
Strategic Management Journal, 26, 665-682.
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
17
Gilmartin, R. (1999). Innovation, ethics & core values. Vital Speeches of the Day, 65(7), 209-213.
Harrison, B. and Tarter, D. (2007, Summer). Building and sustaining a high performance internal O.D.
practitioner team. Organization Development Journal. 25(2), 187-192.
Holmes, T. (n.d.). Ten characteristics of a high- performance work team. Retrieved from
http://www.doctorholmes.net/Ten Characteristics of a High Performance Work Team.pdf
Kharif, O. (2012, April 06). RIM Executives Depart as Blackberry Makes Weighs Strategy. Business
Week. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2012-04-06/rim-executives-depart-asblackberry-maker-weighs-strategy-shift.html
Leonard, M., Graham, S., & Bonacum, D. (2004, October). The human factor: the critical importance of
effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Retrieved from
http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/13/suppl_1/i85.full.
Munro, C. R. and Laiken, M.E. (2003). Developing and sustaining high performance teams: Managing
difference through an action research approach. OD Practitioner, 35(4), 62-67.
Pearce, C. (2008). Follow the leaders. Wall Street Journal, Retrieved from
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121441363110903891.html.
Poetmel. (2010). Work place conflict-conflict resolution-managing conflict. Retrieved from
http://poetmel.hubpages.com/hub/Conflicts-in-the-Work-Place.
Pryor, M.G. (1993). Teaming for Success, Center for Excellence, Texas A&M University-Commerce,
Commerce, Texas.
Pryor, M.G., Singleton, L.P., Taneja, S., and Toombs, L.A. (2009). Teaming as a Strategic and Tactical
Tool: An Analysis with Recommendations. International Journal of Management, 26(2), 320-333.
Pryor, M.G. (2007, 1998). Strategic Quality Management: A Strategic, Systems Approach to Continuous
Improvement. Thomson Learning.
Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., and Gibson, F. (2008, January). Team implicit coordination
processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review. 33(1), 163-184.
Robbins, J. (2005, December 19). What is a goal? Retrieved from
http://www.ncpad.org/exercise/fact_sheet.php?sheet=80&view=all
Taneja, S., Pryor, M.G., Humphreys, J.H., and Singleton, L.P. (2012, In Press). Strategic Management in
Conditions of Paradigmatic Chaos: Lessons for Managers. International Journal of Management, 29 (1-4).
The CV Centre. (2011). Working relationships. Retrieved from http://www.careers-help.co.uk/workingrelationships.htm
Thiel, D. (2009, July 07). A process to build high-performance teams. Retrieved from
http://www.di.net/articles/archive/3102/
18
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
Touryalai, H. (2011). Fortress CEO takes leave following Fannie Mae charges. Wall Street Journal,
Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2011/12/21/fortress-ceo-takes-leavefollowing-fannie-mae-charges/
University of New Hampshire. (n.d.). Groupthink. Retrieved from
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~ckb/groupthink.html
Zenger, J., Folkman, J. & Edinger, S. (2009). How extraordinary leaders double profits. Retrieved from
http://www.extraordinaryperformancegroup.com/media/articles/ZFA-HELDP.pdf.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Dr. Sonia Taneja is Assistant Professor, Marketing & Management, Texas A&M University-Commerce.
She has a Ph.D. in Management, a Master’s Degree in Human Resources and Organizational
Development, and an MBA. Her research interests include Strategic Management, Crisis Management,
Empowerment, Diversity, and Management History. Eight of her 2010-2012 publications and
presentations won awards, including International Academy of Business and Public Administration
Disciplines Outstanding Research Awards and the 2010 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Publishers Distinguished
Paper Award. She also received 2011 and 2010 Texas A&M University System Teaching Excellence
Awards based on student evaluations. She serves as invited reviewer for a variety of journals and
professional organizations.
Dr. Mildred Golden Pryor is Professor of Management, faculty mentor, and recipient of 2012 and 2011
Outstanding Research Awards and 2011, 2010, and 2006 Teaching Excellence Awards at Texas A&M
University-Commerce. Her Ph.D. fields are Production/Operations Management, Organizational Theory
and Behavior, and Quantitative Methods. Research interests include Ethics, Strategic Management,
Organizational Transformation, Quality Management, Workplace Spirituality, and Empowerment. Her
publications appear in Harvard Business Review, Industrial Management, International Journal of
Management, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, International Journal of Business and Public
Administration, Journal of Management History, International Journal of Sustainable Strategic
Management, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Cases and
Applications, and other scholarly journals.
Dr. Scott M. Sewell is Associate Professor of Marketing & Management, Texas A&M UniversityCommerce. He has a Ph.D. in Education. His research interests include understanding student selfperceptions of their online experiences with the demands of online courses, and contemporary concepts in
management. He authored and co-authored many articles in various Business Disciplines. He serves as
invited reviewer for a variety of journals and professional organizations.
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012
19
TABLE 1
CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS
Challenge
Stagnancy or complacency
Solution as seen by “High Performance Executive Teams”
Executives are aware that organization cannot progress by being
stagnant. Therefore, they need to keep things moving in the right
direction. Also, they need to identify targets and milestones and
measure the extent to which they meet targets.
De-motivated employees
Employee motivation is very high on the list. Various ways to
motivate employees have to be identified. Some people want more
money while others prefer non-monetary factors like job rotation,
interesting job profiles, autonomy, being empowered to make
decisions and improve operations. Executives have to make sure
they motivate team members in right way.
Competition
High performance teams are aware of their environment in terms of
their competitors. It is their job to ensure that there are innovations
which add more value to their product/service offerings so that they
can outpace & outperform the competition.
Lack of skilled workforce
In an era of high unemployment, this issue is easier to handle by
matching the right candidate to the job i.e., matching job-ability fit.
However, some skills are not readily available, and organizations
have to provide training for new hires.
Transition issues
When a team member or executive is ready to leave, it is normally
identified in advance, and sufficient time is provided for the
transition to avoid any performance gap. However, preparation must
be made in case someone leaves abruptly (i.e., in case of death,
accepting another job, being involved in unethical or illegal
behavior, etc.). Such preparation involves mentoring, training, job
rotations, and other such knowledge and experience transfer options.
Globalization
High performance teams/executives are aware of the benefits and
risks of being global. They calculate these risks before making any
such transition or decision. There must be strategic and tactical
plans to use globalization to their organization’s advantage.
Political dynamics
Political dynamics are considered as part of risks that executives
face. Understanding the political dynamics and being able to address
them is crucial to an executive team and their organization’s longterm survival.
20
American Journal of Management vol. 12(2/3) 2012