Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Functional Colors: The Varied Applications of Complementary Hues

2017, Film History

Film scholars in recent years have identified a differentiated landscape of color systems in terms of looks and processes that represent natural color phenomena with increasing fidelity and automation. Here, I propose extending the concept of film colors to techniques that deploy colors in order to produce effects that do not show color but use it for other means. Stereoscopy and compositing are two applications from the 1920s that employed complementary colors and that were often developed by the same parties that helped create representational color systems. These correlations have, thus far, not been the subject of color studies because research is organized according to the intended applications of techniques and does not follow the work of the technicians and artists. I argue that techniques that use colors for other purposes have been ignored due to a focus on color primarily in relation to human perception and understanding. To extend the scope of research to nonrepresentational applications of color, as I propose, thus implies a methodological critique of the existing discourse on color as being anthropocentric, that is, as ignoring functional relationships of colors that do not relate to humans.

Open Access version: doi:10.5281/zenodo.2605321 BIRK WEIBERG Functional Colors: The Varied Applications of Complementary Hues ABSTRACT: Film scholars in recent years have identified a differentiated landscape of color systems in terms of looks and processes that represent natural color phenomena with increasing fidelity and automation. Here, I propose extending the concept of film colors to techniques that deploy colors in order to produce effects that do not show color but use it for other means. Stereoscopy and compositing are two applications from the 1920s that employed complementary colors and that were often developed by the same parties that helped create representational color systems. These correlations have, thus far, not been the subject of color studies because research is organized according to the intended applications of techniques and does not follow the work of the technicians and artists. I argue that techniques that use colors for other purposes have been ignored due to a focus on color primarily in relation to human perception and understanding. To extend the scope of research to nonrepresentational applications of color, as I propose, thus implies a methodological critique of the existing discourse on color as being anthropocentric, that is, as ignoring functional relationships of colors that do not relate to humans. KEYWORDS: technology, color, optical effects, stereoscopy YET ANOTHER COLOR CONCEPT The increased interest in the historical colors of motion pictures in recent years has substantially enriched the very notion of color in cinema. However, two basic categories have been described by scholars like Tom Gunning, Paul Read, Richard Misek, and others under varying names. There are, on the one hand, “natural” colors, which are inter alia conceived as “indexical” phenomena that are caused by specific qualities of objects in front of the camera.1 On the other hand, there is a class of “unnatural” colors.2 These colors result from processes such as tinting, toning, stenciling, and hand painting that add dyes to monochrome film footage to varying degrees. In his book Chromatic Cinema, Film History, 29.2, pp. 91–107. Copyright © 2017 Trustees of Indiana University. doi: 10.2979/filmhistory.29.2.04