FULL PAPER
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 000:000–000 (2012)
Excitation and Geometrically Matched Local
Encoding of Curved Slices
Hans Weber,1* Daniel Gallichan,1 Gerrit Schultz,1 Chris A. Cocosco,1 Sebastian Littin,1
Wilfried Reichardt,1 Anna Welz,1 Walter Witschey,2 Jürgen Hennig,1 and
Maxim Zaitsev1
have involved the acquisition of multiple planar slices
to cover the entire volume of interest followed by curved
planar reformations to create images in the coordinate
system of the curved 3D anatomical structure (1,2).
Although increased automation of these reformation
techniques has reduced the required manual interaction,
data acquisition is still time consuming and often inefficient, as a larger volume than actually required has to be
acquired. The need for 3D acquisitions and complex
reformation can be avoided by adaptation of the slice
shape to the specific region of interest. This can be of
particular interest for dynamic investigations in nonplanar anatomical regions like in fMRI of specific parts of
the cortical surface or dynamic measurements in curved
vessels.
One way to perform curved-slice imaging in combination with linear SEMs is the application of multidimensional radiofrequency (RF)-pulses, as demonstrated by
B€
ornert and Sch€affter (3). In principle, tailored RF-pulses
allow selection of arbitrarily shaped slices and require
no extra hardware. The undesirably long pulse duration
can be shortened partially by use of parallel transmit
approaches (4,5), but there remain open issues with
respect to the sensitivity to off-resonance effects and in
particular specific absorption rate constraints which continue to limit their applicability.
Besides the selection process, curved-slice imaging also
requires a dedicated in-plane encoding strategy. Conventional linear encoding represents a projection of the
selected magnetization onto a plane. Depending on the
degree of nonorthogonality between the slice-selection
and the in-plane encoding gradients, a variety of complications may need to be considered, including nonrectangular voxel shapes with geometric distortions, encoding
ambiguities and through-plane dephasing. For a curved
slice with curvature restricted to a single dimension, Jochimsen and Norris (6) proposed a projection of the magnetization onto a set of planes. Within a single-shot technique, the curved dimension is approximated by plane
segments, which define the planes to be acquired in a 3D
k-space. To avoid aliasing, every plane has to be fully
sampled even though a part of the information is
excluded in the final image. Compared to standard encoding, this leads to a loss in efficiency which is proportional
to the number of segments. Consequently, only a rough
approximation of the curved slice with a low number of
segments is feasible. As an alternative, B€
ornert presented
In this work, the concept of excitation and geometrically
matched local in-plane encoding of curved slices (ExLoc) is
introduced. ExLoc is based on a set of locally near-orthogonal
spatial encoding magnetic fields, thus maintaining a local rectangular shape of the individual voxels and avoiding potential
problems arising due to highly irregular voxel shapes. Unlike
existing methods for exciting curved slices based on multidimensional radiofrequency-pulses, excitation and geometrically matched local encoding of curved slices does not
require long duration or computationally expensive radiofrequency-pulses. As each encoding field consists of a superposition of potentially arbitrary (spatially linear or nonlinear)
magnetic field components, the resulting field shape can be
adapted with high flexibility to the specific region of interest.
For extended nonplanar structures, this results in improved
relevant volume coverage for fewer excited slices and thus
increased efficiency. In addition to the mathematical description for the generation of dedicated encoding fields and data
reconstruction, a verification of the ExLoc concept in phantom experiments and examples for in vivo curved single and
multislice imaging are presented. Magn Reson Med 000:000–
C 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
000, 2012. V
Key words: MRI; curved slice; functional MRI; nonlinear
encoding fields; spatial encoding; image reconstruction;
PatLoc; ExLoc
INTRODUCTION
MRI typically allows visualization of thin slices with
arbitrary orientation and a rectangular voxel shape. The
spatial linearity of the applied spatial encoding magnetic
fields (SEMs) is conventionally set as a hardware design
requirement. However, this restricts the technique to the
selection and in-plane encoding of planar slices. In particular for structures exhibiting a curved three-dimensional (3D) morphology, such as the spine or the cortex,
a description with planes is not optimal as it is not possible to show all important details simultaneously in one
image. Previous approaches to deal with this problem
1
Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Centre
Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
2
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, USA.
Grant sponsor: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Grant
number: #13N9298 (INUMAC).
*Correspondence to: Hans Weber, Department of Radiology, Medical
Physics, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 60a, 79106
Freiburg, Germany. E-mail: hans.weber@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Received 1 March 2012; revised 25 April 2012; accepted 13 May 2012.
DOI 10.1002/mrm.24364
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
C 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
V
1
2
Weber et al.
an encoding method for curved slices based on RF-pulse
encoding (7). The curved dimension is described by a chain
of voxels; each encoded using a set of specially designed 2D
RF-pulses. Although, this allows an unwarping of the curved
slices, the complexity of the multidimensional RF-pulses
results in low spatial resolution along the curved dimension
and a high sensitivity to off-resonances.
Alternative selection of curved slices without the use
of complex multidimensional RF-pulses requires spatial
adaptation of the geometry of the encoding field used
during RF-transmission. Already in the early 1990s, Lee
and Cho (8) showed the selection of a cylindrical volume
using a nonlinear SEM and a standard 1D RF-pulse. Further combination with linear SEMs has been shown to
allow a shift of the selection volume (9) and additional
variation of the RF-pulse offset-frequency a change of its
shape (10). But, due to the availability of only one nonlinear SEM, flexibility with respect to form and orientation of the selected volume was still strongly limited. As
these methods were intended for 3D volume selection,
linear encoding could be applied without restraints.
In this work, we present a concept (excitation and geometrically matched local encoding of curved slices
(ExLoc)) for curved-slice imaging, where curvature, orientation and position are each adjusted to the object under
investigation with high flexibility. Importantly, we complement curved-slice selection by geometrically matched local
in-plane encoding along the curved surface to maintain a
locally rectangular voxel-shape. The concept itself is based
on the application of a set of locally near-orthogonal SEMs,
which can have linear and nonlinear spatial variation, in
combination with standard RF-excitation. In terms of the
encoding fields, ExLoc represents an extension of PatLoc
imaging (11), which uses nonlinear SEMs for in-plane
encoding of planar slices. As for standard imaging using
conventional linear field gradients, each SEM can be
directly allocated to a slice selection, readout and phase
encoding field. The near orthogonality of the fields used for
in-plane encoding to each other and to the slice-selection
field guarantees a projection of the selected magnetization
approximately perpendicular to the plane of the curved
slice. Unlike linear in-plane encoding of the curved slice,
this approach is able to maintain a close-to-rectangular
shape for all voxels. Besides a mathematical description for
the generation of dedicated SEMs and data reconstruction,
we present a concept verification using phantom experiments and examples of in vivo (multi-)curved-slice imaging.
THEORY
For arbitrary SEMs, the signal s from an RF receive coil
with homogenous sensitivity is described by a generalized signal-equation, neglecting relaxation effects, as previously shown for PatLoc imaging (12):
Z
T
sðkÞ ¼
rðxÞeik wðxÞ dx
½1
V
The quantity r(x) describes the magnetization excited
in the volume V at position x. The components of the
multidimensional function w(x) correspond to the SEM
sensitivities. The variable k describes the PatLoc k-space;
its components can simply be defined as the effective
currents driving the individual SEMs integrated over
time: ki ¼ $Ii(t)dt. The dimension of k and w(x) represents the number of SEMs applied for spatial localization. Within this study, we assume that only two SEMs
are applied after RF excitation (read and phase encoding), thus w(x) and k have only two components, w(x) ¼
(wR(x), wp(x))T and kT ¼ (kR,kp). The slice-selection field,
BS(x), is then given by BS(x) ¼ ISwS(x).
Excitation with an Arbitrary SEM
For a standard slice-selective RF-pulse, the excitation
volume V and thus shape, orientation and position of
the selected slice, is defined by both the frequency properties of the RF-pulse and the geometry of the constant
SEM BS(x) applied during transmission: for an ideal
frequency-selective pulse all spins within a certain frequency range Dv are excited and all spins precessing at a
different frequency are not excited at all. The precession
frequency v of a spin at location x is given by v ¼
gBS(x), with g being the gyromagnetic ratio. Thus, the
excited volume can be described as
V ¼ fx 2 R2 jgBS ðxÞ 2 Dvg:
½2
The frequency range Dv ¼ [v0 BW/2,v0 þ BW/2]
results from the RF-pulse bandwidth BW and its frequency offset v0. For a small bandwidth, the excited volume will resemble a thin slice whose borders are formed
by the isosurfaces where the SEM has the field strength
BSB ¼ (v0 6 BW/2)/g. Where a simple linear gradient
would result in a conventional planar slice, application
of a nonlinear SEM yields a non-cubical volume V, representing a curved slice. To excite a slice with the
desired shape, the geometry of the slice-selection SEM
Bs(x) and the RF-pulse frequency property v0 have to be
optimized to match Eq. 2. In case of multiple possible
solutions further boundary parameters such as bandwidth and field strength can be taken into account.
Efficient In-Plane Encoding of Curved Slices
In principle, in-plane encoding of a curved slice can be
performed with conventional linear SEMs. However, this
is not an optimal choice as it can lead to a variety of complications and inefficiencies. For efficient encoding, the
frequency dispersion generated by the SEMs BR(x) and
BP(x) inside the curved slice has to be as large as possible.
No dispersion should occur along the direction perpendicular to the isosurfaces of the slice (¼ through the slice), as
this does not contribute to in-plane encoding but may
results in signal loss due to phase cancellations across the
direction normal to the curved slice. As a consequence,
the most efficient encoding is achieved with the local gradients of BR(x) and BP(x) being oriented as perpendicular
as possible to each other and to the local gradient of the
SEM BS(x) applied for slice selection. Including also the
aim for maximum gradient strength, the design criterion
for the dedicated SEMs can be expressed as
maxfðGR ðxÞ GP ðxÞÞ GS ðxÞg
½3
with Gi(x) ¼ !Bi(x) for all points x of the excited volume V.
ExLoc
3
FIG. 1. Cross sections of possible ExLoc slices using first (x, y)
and second order (x2 y2, 2xy) (a), or first and fourth order (x4
6x2y2 þ y4, 4xy(x2 y2)) SEM components (b). Frequency offset
and shape of the encoding fields used for slice selection (dotted
line) define the slice to be selected (black area). Geometrically
matched local in-plane encoding (solid line) along the curved
dimension results in rectangular voxel shapes as shown by the
intersections of the isocontours. [Color figure can be viewed in
the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Realization of Dedicated SEMs
n
X
Image Reconstruction
Because of the curvature of the ExLoc slice, the signal
equation (Eq. 1) requires analysis in 3D. However, based
on a 3D variable transformation a ¼ u(x), the problem
can be reduced to 2D (for details see appendix):
Z
~ bÞeik R aþk P b dadb:
sðk R ; k P Þ ¼ ^rða; bÞdða;
½7
U
In practice, freedom of choice regarding the geometry of
the SEMs is not only constrained by Maxwell’s equations
but also by the practical feasibility. To increase flexibility, all ExLoc SEMs Bi(x) are created by a superposition
of n spatially linear and/or nonlinear varying field components (termed SEM components in this article). These
SEM components are characterized by the fact that they
are physically realizable. Then, the SEMs used for imaging are described according to
Bi ðIi ; xÞ ¼ Ii ci ðxÞ ¼ Ii
2xy) (a), or first and fourth order (x4 6x2y2 þ y4, 4xy
(x2 y2)) SEM components (b). In combination with the
offset frequency the isocontours of the slice-selection
SEM BS(x) define the selected slice; the additional superposition with one of the in-plane SEMs BP(x) yields the
voxel shapes. The difference in voxel shape for linear
and ExLoc encoding is demonstrated in Fig. 2 for a
curved slice with shape comparable to the one shown in
Fig. 1a. For geometrically matched local in-plane encoding as proposed by the ExLoc concept, the locally orthogonal encoding fields result in a more favorable close-torectangular voxel shape.
vi;l jl ðxÞ ¼ Ii xTi nðxÞ ¼ wTi nðxÞ;
l¼1
Thus, the ExLoc data correspond to the Fourier transform of a distorted and intensity modulated representa~ bÞ) of the image in the so-called (PatLoc)
tion (^rða; bÞdða;
encoding space. The magnetization within the curved
slice can therefore be retrieved by (a) performing an
inverse FFT to the signal data, followed by (b) division
by d̃(a,b) and by (c) transforming the distorted image
from encoding space coordinates a ¼ (a,b,c) back to Cartesian object space coordinates x ¼ (x,y,z) according to
x ¼ u21(a). Within encoding space, the excited volume
U represents a plane slice with equidistant voxel spacing. As for in-plane PatLoc encoding [c.f. (12)], the in-
½4
wTi
IixTi .
with
The spatial variation of the SEM sensi¼
tivity used for encoding, ci(x), is itself defined by the
current weightings vi,l of the SEM components and their
individual sensitivities jl. Thus, in practice, the final
field geometry can be adjusted by varying the currents
driving the individual SEM components.
As a consequence, the ideal SEM B*S(x) required for
the selection of the desired slice is approximated with
the technically feasible SEM BS(x). The total weighting
vector wS (composed of elements ISvS,l) can be determined by minimizing
minw |BS ðxÞ wTS nðxÞ|
½5
for all points x within the slice volume V.
The SEM design criterion (Eq. 3) yields the spatial
derivatives of the ideal SEMs for in-plane encoding
(G*R(x), G*P(x)). Analogous to Eq. 5, the individual sensitivity weightings vR,l and vP,l for the feasible SEMs BR(x)
and BP(x) are determined by minimizing
minw |Gi ðxÞ wTi rnðxÞ|
½6
within the volume V as Gi(x) ¼ !Bi(x) ¼ !(wTi n(x))
wTi !=n(x).
As an example, Fig. 1 shows cross-sections for feasible
slice shapes using first (x,y) and second order (x2 y2,
FIG. 2. Blow up of a slice cross section as shown in Fig. 1a. The
intersection with the isocontours represents the resulting voxel
shapes for linear (dotted line) and ExLoc (solid line) in-plane
encoding. Whereas for linear encoding the voxels are distorted, a
local rectangular shape is maintained for ExLoc encoding along
the curved dimension. [Color figure can be viewed in the online
issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
4
Weber et al.
plane voxel dimensions, and subsequently the position
(ai,bi) for each voxel i can be determined from kR,max,
kP,max according to the Nyquist criterion. The remaining
coordinate c along the slice selection dimension is
defined by the excitation frequency v0 and the encoding
field BS applied during RF-transmission according to
~ S ðaÞ ¼ gIS c
v0 ¼ gBS ðxÞ ¼ gIS cS ðxÞ ¼ gIS c
½8
where IS is the effective current driving the slice-selection SEM.
Multi-Slice Imaging
As in conventional imaging, ExLoc also offers increased
volume coverage using multislice acquisitions by repetitive slice selection with varying RF-pulse frequency offsets v0. However, for standard multislice selection with
constant RF-pulse bandwidth and constant frequencyoffset increment, the nonlinearity of the slice-selection
SEM would not only result in varying thickness along
the curved slice dimensions (varying intraslice thickness) but also varying interslice thickness and spacing
between adjacent slices as shown in Fig. 3a. One possible solution for the selection of multiple slices with
identical thickness [at the field of view (FOV) center]
and equidistant spacing might be to spatially shift the
nonlinear SEM for every selection, resulting in shifted
copies of the original slice. But, as slice shapes are no
longer complementary, adjacent slices would no longer
allow an efficient coverage (Fig. 3b). As an alternative,
individual adaptation of the RF-pulse bandwidth (BWi)
and frequency offset (vi) for each individual slice allows
a defined slice position and thickness in combination
with complementary slice shapes (Fig. 3c).
METHODS
The ExLoc concept was implemented on 3 T MAGNETOM Trio Tim system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
equipped with a PatLoc gradient insert (13,14). Although
the system offers only two second order (x2 y2, 2xy)
SEM components in addition to the three first order ones
(x, y, z), creation of encoding fields for selection and geometrically matched local in-plane encoding of slices
with one curved dimension as the one shown in Fig. 1a
is possible. The curved dimension lies within the xyplane where the curvature, orientation and position can
be adapted. The conventional linear z-gradient is
retained for encoding along the z-axis. Prior to imaging
experiments, field maps of the nonlinear SEM components were fitted with their analytical expressions
including correction terms for amplitude, off-center and
orientation and served as basis for calculation of the
dedicated SEMs and image reconstruction. Fitting with a
third order polynomial was also applied to the slope of
the slice-selection SEM along the slice normal nV(x) at
the FOV center to allow automatic calculation of the
individual RF-Pulse bandwidths and frequency offset
increments for multislice imaging. An adapted spin echo
(SE) sequence with phase encoding along the curved and
read encoding along the noncurved dimension of the
slice was used for ExLoc data acquisition. For mapping
FIG. 3. Simulated cross-sections of a stack of five curved slices. a:
Conventional multislice selection with fixed bandwidth and constant
frequency-offset increment results in varying thickness and spacing
among the individual slices. b: Slice thickness at the FOV center
and spacing can be kept constant by shifting the slice-selection
field for every slice. However, as the shapes of the individual slices
are no longer complementary, efficient filling of the gap between
the slices is not possible. c: With individual adaptation of bandwidth
and frequency offset for every slice as proposed for ExLoc multislice imaging, constant thickness at the FOV center and spacing by
maintaining complementary slice shapes can be achieved. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
of the slice cross-section, the spatial encoding part was
replaced with conventional linear encoding with an
appropriately selected orientation.
In this first implementation of the ExLoc concept, slice
curvature, orientation and position were adjusted manually to the object under investigation. To guide positioning, slice cross-sections overlaid on a localizer image
were simulated in situ at the scanner console based on
the field-map data (see, e.g., Fig. 7a). As the available
SEM components represented two sets of fields with
local orthogonal gradients in the xy-plane [(x, y) and
(x2 y2, 2xy)], the ideal weightings vP,l for the effective
phase encoding field could be determined directly by
applying the corresponding rotations.
Image reconstruction from raw data was performed
with MATLAB (The MathWork, Natick, MA, USA) as
outlined in the theory section. The transformation x ¼
u1(a) of the image from encoding space (a,b,c) into the
undistorted object space (x,y,z) was achieved by solving
the system
cP ðx; y; zÞ ai ¼ 0
cR ðx; y; zÞ bi ¼ 0
½9
cS ðx; y; zÞ c ¼ 0
for every voxel i using the trust-region dogleg algorithm
(15). To access the slice thickness, the transformation
was repeated for the two isosurfaces forming the slice
borders. Voxel size, position in the slice-intrinsic coordinates (u,v,w) and FOV along the curved dimension were
calculated stepwise from the voxel positions determined
above. For slice-thickness specification minimum and
maximum thickness within the FOV are stated.
Verification of the ExLoc selection, local in-plane
encoding and reconstruction process was performed
using a dedicated geometry phantom. It consisted of a
4-mm thick acrylic-glass plate bent along one dimension
to create a curved surface up to an angle of 100 ,
placed in a container of doped water. The plate itself
was perforated with holes arranged in three lines with
ExLoc
5
FIG. 5. Cross section of a stack of curved slices acquired in conventional multislice mode (a) and ExLoc multislice mode (b). Conventional acquisition leads to varying global slice-thickness and
varying interslice distance. Using individual adaptation of RF-pulse
bandwidth and frequency, offset slices with comparable centerthickness and interslice distance can be selected.
different hole diameter for each line and constant spacing. To demonstrate the rectangular projection orientation during spatial encoding, the holes were oriented
perpendicular to the plane of the plate. For demonstration of the multislice mode, a standard bottle-phantom
was used.
In vivo singleslice and multislice measurements were
performed on a human volunteer after approval of the
local ethics-committee and informed consent was
obtained. During ExLoc imaging, linear and nonlinear
SEM components are driven simultaneously. For compliance with acoustic-noise limits human ear-corrected
sound-pressure level was checked with a calibrated
microphone for all sequences prior to in vivo experiments (16). To ensure prevention of peripheral nerve
stimulation both sequences were first applied with
downsized encoding-field amplitudes in order not to
exceed a switching rate of 20 T/s (Normal Mode). Within
successive repetitions the amplitudes were increased in
10% steps up to the desired maximum. An increment of
10% was chosen to stay below the minimum reported
difference between perception and pain level for peripheral nerve stimulation in the range of 15 and 32% (17).
RESULTS
FIG. 4. a: Cross section of the selected ExLoc slice, whose shape,
orientation and position is adapted to the geometry phantom. The
arrows mark position and orientation of the equidistant holes.
b: Local ExLoc in-plane encoding of the curved slice results in a geometrical correct representation of the phantom as indicated by the
equidistant bars. Closer inspection of the holes—see magnification
of the dashed box—reveals sharp edges, independent of their position on the phantom. The overlaid intensity profile was acquired
along the dashed line. c: Linear in-plane encoding corresponds to
a projection of the curved slice onto a flat plane. This results in a
geometrically incorrect representation of the object as shown by
the varying distance between the holes. Intensity increase within
the image toward the center is due to the varying slice thickness.
Increasing misalignment of hole orientation and projection direction
toward the side of the phantom causes distorted voxel shapes
resulting in increasing blurring of the hole edges.
The cross section of an excited curved slice using the
ExLoc technique is presented in Fig. 4a. Its shape, orientation and position are adapted to the geometry phantom
so that the selected slice contains the entire phantom.
Arrows mark the position of the equidistant holes, which
are oriented perpendicular to the plane of the phantom.
The corresponding ExLoc in-plane encoded, high resolution image of the curved slice is shown in Fig. 4b (SE;
pulse repetition time/echo time: 100/18 ms; matrix: 436
436; FOV: 20.7 16.0 cm; slice thickness: 5.0/12.9
mm). As visualization of a curved slice in 3D is difficult,
visualization in 2D is desirable. Therefore, all ExLoc
images within this study are presented in the slice-intrinsic, curvilinear coordinate system with coordinates
(u,v,w). This coordinate system is easily achieved by
transforming the encoding space system [with coordinates (a,b,c)] into object space according to u1. Thus, it
allows a distortion-free representation of the curved slice
6
Weber et al.
FIG. 6. Singleslice ExLoc image of a human brain, acquired with an adapted SE sequence. a: Curvature, orientation and position of the
slice are adapted to the lateral rim as shown on the localizer image. b: The reconstructed ExLoc image yields a panorama view of the
left hemisphere. The area of maximum slice thickness exhibits the largest voxel sizes. Thus, lowest resolution but also lowest noise is
achieved. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
on a plane. Within the ExLoc Image, the holes exhibit
similar distance as indicated by the bars, demonstrating
geometrical correct transformation of the image from the
encoding space into the slice intrinsic coordinate system.
As a result of accurate determination of the individual
voxel-volumes, the reconstructed image exhibits a relatively homogeneous intensity. The overlaid line in the top
part shows the intensity profile acquired along the dashed
line. The resulting intensity increase toward the edges is
due to uncompensated RF-coil-sensitivity inhomogeneities. The magnified area within the dashed box reveals
sharp edges of all holes, independent from their position
on the curved plate. They illustrate the successful projection of the excited spins globally perpendicular to the
plane of the selected curved slice. For comparison, Fig. 4c
shows the result for conventional spatial in-plane encoding using the linear x gradient instead of encoding along
the curved dimension (FOV: 19.2 16.0 cm). The representation of the object is distorted as stressed by the comparison with the red bars of equal length. Even though this
could be corrected for, the increasing misalignment of projection direction and slice normal toward the edges results
in distorted voxel shapes similar to the ones sketched in
Fig. 2. For the given phantom geometry this manifests as
blurred edges of the holes, representing an effective loss in
spatial resolution for structures of this orientation. In addition, image intensity increases not only toward the edges
but also toward the center. The latter is due to the varying
slice thickness, left uncompensated to demonstrate the
magnitude of this effect.
Figure 5 presents cross sections of stacks of curved slices within the homogenous phantom. The conventional
method to achieve multislice imaging with constant RFpulse bandwidth and constant frequency-offset increment results in slices with varying center thickness and
varying interslice distance due to the nonlinear nature of
the SEM applied during slice selection (Fig. 5a). With
ExLoc bandwidth and increment adaptation for every
RF-pulse the slices exhibit constant center-thickness and
interslice distance as illustrated in Fig. 5b.
Figure 6a shows an axial localizer image with the calculated cross section of a single ExLoc slice. Its shape,
orientation and position are adjusted to the lateral rim of
the brain. The resulting ExLoc image (Fig. 6b; SE; pulse
repetition time/echo time: 600/25 ms; matrix: 256 256;
FOV: 23.8 21.0 cm; slice thickness: 2.4/6.8 mm) represents a panorama of the left cerebral hemisphere. The
individual gyri are clearly distinguishable. Variation in
resolution is due to the nonlinear nature of the in-plane
(phase) SEM as already known from PatLoc imaging (12).
The smallest voxels are in the area of minimum slice
thickness. As visible in the background outside the
object, noise is increased in these areas.
A stack of 7 ExLoc slices (SE; pulse repetition time/
echo time: 600/25 ms; matrix: 256 256; FOV: 29.8
23.7 21.0 cm; slice thickness: 3.5/9.0 mm) is presented
in Fig. 7. The stack is orientated along the occipital lobe
(Fig. 7a), representing a stepwise progression through the
brain. Compared to conventional planar multislice imaging, a greater number of spatially separated brain regions
with comparable distance from the skull can now be
imaged in the same slice. In multislice mode, the individual slices are encoded with different parts of the nonlinear SEMs. This causes a variation in resolution
between the slices, combined with different FOV sizes
along the curved dimension.
DISCUSSION
The presented work demonstrates the feasibility of the
ExLoc concept for selection and geometrically matched
local in-plane encoding of curved slices without the
ExLoc
7
FIG. 7. Stack of curved SE slices, covering the occipital lobe with a few slices as shown on the localizer (a). The slices (b–h) represent
a stepwise progression through the brain form posterior to anterior in slice-intrinsic, curved coordinates. The difference in FOV is due to
the shape of the phase encoding field varying from slice to slice (applied along the horizontal image dimension). [Color figure can be
viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
need for time-consuming and specific absorption rate
intensive multidimensional RF-pulses. Because of the
superposition of linear and nonlinear SEM components,
slice curvature, orientation, and position can be adjusted
with high flexibility. As demonstrated in phantom
experiments, the proposed local in-plane encoding along
the plane of the curved-slice achieves a local rectangular
voxel-shape and allows unwarping of the curved slice
without ambiguities. Because of its generalized formalism, the ExLoc data-reconstruction itself is easy to implement and requires no noteworthy computational power
and time. From a safety perspective, the simultaneous
application of linear and nonlinear SEM components
showed no signs of inducing peripheral nerve stimulation for this implementation. This is in accordance with
previously presented safety aspects for in vivo imaging
with the PatLoc gradient insert (16).
Application of nonlinear SEMs for slice selection
results in slices with varying thickness along the curved
dimension. For the given hardware, a maximum variation
of 60% of the maximum slice thickness was observed.
From a diagnostic point of view, the observed variations
in slice thickness as well as the associated noise variation
should be acceptable for applications such as functional
MRI. In addition, the nature of the in-plane encoding
fields causes spatial varying resolution within the images.
However, compared to other nonlinear imaging techniques such as pure PatLoc imaging (18), the variation is
comparably low, resulting in a suitable base resolution in
the images. As all SEMs applied in this work exhibit strict
local orthogonality, both components, variation in slice
thickness and variation in-plane resolution, are mutually
dependent (19). To which extend this strict dependency
is relaxed for near-orthogonal nonlinear SEMs, is a topic
of ongoing research. Nevertheless, both components can
be compensated separately up to a certain degree: Comparable short multidimensional RF-pulses with low specific
absorption rate allow selection of slices with constant
thickness (20). In transmit encoding space, such a curved
slice with constant thickness corresponds to a planar slice
with varying thickness. The description of the thickness
variation along the corresponding dimension requires low
frequencies only. Therefore, less complex RF-pulses are
necessary compared to selection of the same slice using
conventional linear gradients only. Application of a dedicated subsampling strategy exploiting encoding properties of the nonlinear SEMs (21) allows adaptation of the
variation in in-plane voxel size toward a more homogenous resolution. Intensity variations due to varying voxel
volume can be compensated based on the information
provided by the reconstruction model. In the case of moderately curved slices, image quality is acceptable even
without intensity correction, as the corresponding variation is not significant compared to variations that result,
for example, from inhomogeneous RF-coil sensitivities.
Also, for multislice imaging, ExLoc keeps the advantage
of high quality profiles selected with short RF-pulses compared to other curved-slice imaging techniques (6,7). With
slice-specific adjustment of RF-pulse bandwidth and frequency offset, interslice thickness and spacing between
adjacent slices can be kept constant, thus, simplifying
image interpretation. Hence, ExLoc offers efficient coverage also for extended volumes, which cannot be described
with a single curved-slice. Because of the near-orthogonality of the applied SEMs, alternative slab-selection in combination with 3D encoding while maintaining the curved
geometry is also possible. Provided the gradients of the
applied SEMs exhibit sufficient strength and alignment
within the volume of interest as requested by the design
criterion, selection and in-plane encoding of slices with
more than one curved dimension is possible as well. However, for the final representation of the image on a screen,
a suitable map projection technique has to be added. Minimum requirements for the value of the design criterion to
achieve suitable imaging are a topic of ongoing research.
In case of low values it might be advisable to favor orthogonality and to compensate for low image resolution with
additional in-plane SEMs as proposed in Ref. 22.
8
Slice selection using nonlinear SEMs is typically
accompanied by spatial-selection ambiguities. One pragmatic method to prevent excitation of multiple slices is
to shift the undesired slices out of the object. As an alternative in case of multiple receivers, RF-sensitivities
could be used to distinguish between the signals originating from different slices. In particular applications
this might allow to increase acquisition efficiency, as
multiple slices could be imaged simultaneously. Instead
of adaptation to the structure under investigation, ExLoc
might also be used to adjust the slice shape and
orientation to the provided distribution of RF-receiver
sensitivities for improved encoding efficiency at higher
acceleration factors (23), in a similar way to the design
motivation of O-space imaging (24).
Free from being constrained to planar slices, ExLoc
allows imaging in the coordinate system of a curved
structure. This flexibility might be beneficial for a more
efficient illustration of organic structures and allows a
greater flexibility for choosing brain regions which are
imaged in the same slice, as demonstrated by the presented in vivo brain images. With conventional imaging,
gathering additional information from such a representation would require time-consuming 3D acquisitions
followed by complex data reformatting while wasting a
lot of the acquired data (1). In this work, the geometry
restrictions of the available SEM components mean that
the chosen curved slices in the brain only follow the
anatomy for the particular z-positions shown in the
localizing image. At other z-positions, the curved slices
will be less physiologically relevant. In general, the flexibility of ExLoc regarding possible slice shapes, orientations and positions—and thus, its practicability—is
dependent on the number and or the geometry of available SEM components. For instance, a higher number of
individual SEM components is expected to allow generation of higher order SEM fields for selection of slices
with stronger curvature. A higher number of components
is also expected to enable a more local adaptation of the
SEM’s spatial variation for an improved follow up of
comparable smooth structures such as the external shape
of a brain. Therefore, multicoil systems have the potential to massively increase the range of possible slice
shapes, including those with curvature along both
dimensions. For the lower power and switching rate
requirements of dynamic shimming, such a system has
been presented recently (25). In addition, slices with a
smooth curvature variation might also serve as basis slice
shape with the more detailed curvature achieved by
comparably short multidimensional pulses. Hence,
Exloc’s maximum achievable flexibility in slice shape is
still a topic of ongoing research. Nevertheless, it is important to bear in mind that the major restrictions to the
shape of the possible SEM fields in the presented work
arise from the currently available hardware, and that we
have demonstrated a proof of principle of some of the
extended possibilities of imaging with nonlinear SEMs.
CONCLUSION
ExLoc allows selection of slices with flexible curvature,
orientation, and position. No time consuming multidimensional and specific absorption rate intensive RF-
Weber et al.
pulses are necessary. Spatial encoding along the curved
plane of the slice allows maintaining a local rectangular
voxel-shape for maximized efficient resolution and slice
unwarping. Because of the applied near-orthogonal
encoding-fields, 3D encoding by maintaining the curved
geometry for each partition is also possible. Combination
of the ExLoc concept with higher-order gradient systems
is necessary to further extend the variety of possible slice
shapes. Nevertheless, the presented ExLoc concept
presents a step toward an object customized MRI system.
For purely morphological imaging curved volumes can
be retrospectively reconstructed from a rectilinear 3Ddataset which covers the entire region of interest at the
expense of some additional (but usually tolerable) acquisition time. The application of ExLoc therefore is most
promising for dynamic examinations of curved structures
where time constraints restrict the size of the volume
which can be captured in rectilinear coordinates, that is,
for specific parts of the cortex in fMRI or dynamic flow
imaging of curved vessels.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors like to thank Dr. Gigi Galiana and Dr. Martin
Haas for fruitful discussions, Dr. Andrew Dewdney for
his magnet expertise and Dr. Nico Splitthoff and Denis
Kokorin for computational support.
APPENDIX
Reduction of the Signal Equation from 3D to 2D in ExLoc
Based on a variable transformation, the 3D signal equation (Eq. 1) can be reduced to 2D. Define the 3D-variable
transformation a :¼ u(x), where the first two components
can be chosen freely and where the third component is
given by u3(x) ¼ gBS(x); also define ^r ¼ r u1 ,
~ ¼ w u1 , U :¼ u(V), and d̃ as the inverse of the absow
lute value of the determinant of the Jacobian of u. Then,
the signal equation can formally be written as:
Z
Z
T
~
ikT wðaÞ
~
rðxÞeik wðxÞ dx ¼
~rðaÞdðaÞe
da
U
Z ZV Z
~
~ b; cÞeikT wða;b;cÞ
dc dadb
¼
~rða; b; cÞdða;
Z
ZZ
~
~ bÞeikT wða;bÞ
½A1
dadb
~rða; b; cÞdc
dða;
ZZ
~
~ bÞeikT wða;bÞ
dadb;
¼
^rða; bÞdða;
Z
with ^rða; bÞ :¼ ^rða; b; cÞdc
sðkÞ ¼
Equation A1 simply expresses the fact that the signal
can be represented as a 2D-problem by integrating along
the direction normal to the curved slice. Please note
that, in general, the presented 2D signal equation is only
an approximation because it ignores a possible variation
of both the volumetric correction d̃ and the in-plane
~ along the direction nV(x) perpendicencoding function w
ular to the curved slice V. However, at least for thin slices, the volumetric correction is nearly constant along
nV(x); moreover, it can be concluded that the above
ExLoc
9
approximation is very good if through-slice dephasing is
prevented by choosing the effective in-plane encoding
functions wR ¼ BR(x)/IR, and wp ¼ BP(x)/IP such that their
gradients are locally oriented orthogonal to the normal
nV(x) as proposed by the design criterion. The signal
equation is simplified even further by choosing (u1, u2)
~ ¼ Id and the equation reads:
¼ (WR, WP) because then w
sðkR ; kP Þ ¼
Z
~ bÞeikR aþkP b dadb:
rða; bÞdða;
½A2
U
14.
15.
16.
REFERENCES
1. Musse O, Armspach JP, Namer IJ, Heitz F, Hennel F, Grucker D. Datadriven curvilinear reconstructions of 3D MR images: application to cryptogenic extratemporal epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:1227–1235.
2. Vrtovec T, Ourselin S, Gomes L, Likar B, Pernus F. Automated generation of curved planar reformations from MR images of the spine.
Phys Med Biol 2007;52:2865–2878.
3. B€
ornert P, Sch€affter T. Curved slice imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;
36:932–939.
4. Katscher U, B€
ornert P, Leussler C, Brink JSVD. Transmit SENSE.
Magn Reson Med 2003;150:144–150.
5. Zhu Y. Parallel excitation with an array of transmit coils. Magn
Reson Med 2004;51:775–784.
6. Jochimsen TH, Norris DG. Single-shot curved slice imaging. Magn
Reson Mater Phys 2002;14:50–55.
7. B€
ornert P. 2D-RF-pulse-encoded curved-slice imaging. Magn Reson
Mater Phys 2003;16:86–92.
8. Lee SY, Cho ZH. Localized volume selection technique using an
additional radial gradient coil. Magn Reson Med 1989;12:56–63.
9. Oh CH, Hilal SK, Cho ZH, Mun IK. New spatial localization method
using pulsed high-order field gradients (SHOT: selection with HighOrder gradienT). Magn Reson Med 1991;18:63–70.
10. Wu EX, Johnson G, Hilal SK, Cho ZH. A new 3D localization technique
using quadratic field gradients. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:242–245.
11. Hennig J, Welz AM, Schultz G, Korvink JG, Liu Z, Speck O, Zaitsev
M. Parallel imaging in non-bijective, curvilinear magnetic field gradients: a concept study. Magn Reson Mater Phys 2008;21:5–14.
12. Schultz G, Ullmann P, Lehr H, Welz AM, Hennig J, Zaitsev M.
Reconstruction of MRI Data encoded with arbitrarily shaped, curvilinear, nonbijective magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:
1390–1403.
13. Welz AM, Zaitsev M, Jia F, Liu Z, Korvink JG, Schmidt H, Lehr H,
Post H, Dewdney AJ, Hennig J. Developement of a non-shielded Pat-
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Loc gradient insert for human head imaging. In: Proceedings 17th
Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, Honolulu; 2009. p. 3073.
Cocosco CA, Dewdney AJ, Dietz P, Semmler M, Welz AM, Gallichan
D, Weber H, Schultz G, Hennig J, Zaitsev M. Safety Considerations
for a PatLoc Gradient Insert Coil for Human Head Imaging. In: Proceedings 18th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm; 2010, p. 3946.
Powell MJD. A Fortran Subroutine for solving systems of nonlinear
algebraic equations. In: Rabinowitz P, editor. Numerical methods for
nonlinear algebraic equations. London: Gordon and Breach; 1970.
Cocosco CA, Gallichan D, Dewdney AJ, Schultz G, Welz AM, Witschey WRT, Weber H, Hennig J, Zaitsev M. First in-vivo results with
a PatLoc gradient insert coil for human head imaging. In: Proceedings 19th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal; 2011. p. 714.
Irnich W, Schmitt F. Magnetostimulation in MRI. Magn Reson Med
1995;33:619–623.
Schultz G, Weber H, Gallichan D, Witschey WRT, Welz AM, Cocosco
CA, Hennig J, Zaitsev M. Radial imaging with multipolar magnetic
encoding fields. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011;30:2134–2145.
Schultz G, Welz A, Hennig J, Zaitsev M. Generalized two-dimensional orthogonal spatial encoding fields. In: Proceedings 16th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, Toronto; 2008. p. 2992.
Weber H, Haas M, Kokorin D, Gallichan D, Hennig J, Zaitsev M.
Local thickness adaptation for curved slice selection. In: Proceedings
20th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Melbourne; 2012. p. 2206.
Weber H, Gallichan D, Schultz G, Hennig J, Zaitsev M. A Timeefficient sub-sampling strategy to homogenise resolution in PatLoc
imaging. In: Proceedings 18th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm; 2010. p. 548.
Gallichan D, Cocosco CA, Dewdney AJ, Schultz G, Welz A, Hennig J,
Zaitsev M. Simultaneously driven linear and nonlinear spatial
encoding fields in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:702–714.
Galiana G, Stockmann JP, Tam LK, Constable RT. Using RF to create
nonlinear virtual coil profiles. In: Proceedings 19th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal; 2011. p. 2886.
Stockmann JP, Ciris PA, Galiana G, Tam L, Constable RT. O-space
imaging: highly efficient parallel imaging using second-order nonlinear fields as encoding gradients with no phase encoding. Magn
Reson Med 2010;64:447–456.
Juchem C, Nixon TW, McIntyre S, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA. Magnetic field modeling with a set of individual localized coils. J Magn
Reson 2010;204:281–289.