A brief history of pearls and pearl production in Scandinavia.
Part I: From Vikings to the Renaissance.
Author: Jan Asplund FGA DGA 2018
Introduction
The technology and knowledge to identify gemstones and pearls is in constant development
driven on by the continuous development of new treatments for gemstones and new and
improved methods for the manufacturing of synthetic materials. Another factor is customer
demand that shifts with different trends and increasing awareness and interest in the origin of
gemstones and pearls. There is an increasing demand for origin determination; something that
just a few decades ago was very difficult to determine if there were no clues that were seen by
magnification. With today’s large selection equipment for various kinds of chemical analysis
and, in the case of pearls, DNA testing opinions on geographic origin is often possible to
establish (Strack 2015). The consequence is that the techniques also can be used to determine
origin in older gemstones in antique jewellery. Something that may add value to a piece of
jewellery but also can help explain trade routs or weather a certain mine or material were
known at a specific time and place.
To meet with an increasing demand on origin determination and to confirm proveniences in
older jewellery there is a need for knowledge on materials, mines, products and producers that
no longer have any significance on the market. Concerning pearls one example is the Russian
historical production of fresh water pearls (Strack 2015). Another example of obsolete
freshwater producers is the Scandinavian countries that during parts of the last millennia
produced a majority of pearls in Europe but where production decreased significantly from
the mid 20th century until it was banned in all Nordic countries during the second half of the
20th century.
The European pearl mussel was first described by the Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus in
1758 in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae. Linnaeus named the mussel Mya Margaritifera
and eventually the Latin name became Margaritifera margaritifera after Christian Fredrich
Schumacher in 1817 had recognised the genus Margaritifera and replaced Linnaeus “Mya”
with “Margaritifera”. Margaritifera margaritifera have been known from several European
countries such as Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxemburg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Great Britain, Check republic,
Germany and Austria. Margaritifiera margaritifera have also been known from Poland and
Denmark but there have been no documented mussels in Poland since the 1930s and the latest
documented observation of the mussel in Denmark was in 1974 (Strack 2015; Margaritifera
margaritifera 2018).
Pearls in Scandinavia until the 17th century
From the mid 16th century onward there are several written sources on pearls in Sweden, a
result from the growing interest in pearls from the Crown. The increasing interest in pearls
from both a superficial and economical perspective resulted in stricter control of both pearl
fishing and the pear trade in Sweden. It was with King Gustav I, known as Gustav Vasa that
the crown started to show an interest in pearls and pearl fishing and it is from the mid 16th
century we start having official proclamations concerning pearls and pearl fishing in Sweden.
As Finland at the time was a Swedish province the proclamations also concerned Finland as
well as the parts of Carelia that today is part of Russia. Finland and specific places in Finland
are mentioned several times in the 16th century proclamations from the king. Pearl mussels are
also shown on the Carta Marina from 1539, one of the earliest documentation on the existence
of pearl production in the Nordic countries.
There are several finds of freshwater pearls dating to late Iron Age but most of the pearls are
supposed to have been imported by the Vikings. In the earliest finds of pearls they are often
used together with beads made from gemstones and glass. Often there is only one or two
pearls on a piece of jewellery containing dozens of beads made out of various other materials
(Wärmländer & Wåhlander 2012).
There are several freshwater pearls found during excavations of the Viking age town of Birka
at Björkö in lake Mälaren (Arwidsson 1989). The pearls in two of the objects (Object 107001;
Object 448608) are believed to be domestic (Johansson 1997; Johansson 2005). The pearls are
dated to the 9-11th centuries and were found in graves with bodies that had been cremated
together with their jewelry. The cremation process has damaged much of the jewelry making
it very difficult to find any clues on the origin of the pearls.
In non cremated graves in the Vivallen gravefield in Funäsdalen in the province of Jämtland,
further north in Sweden several freshwater pearls dating to the late 12th century have been
found. The graves have been attributed to south Sami culture and might indicate an early use
of pearls by Sami people (Zachrisson 1997; Object 107036; Object 1166737). It has not been
possible to confirm if the jewellery in the graves was made by Sami people or have come into
their possession through trade. I have not been able to find any other objects associated with
Sami culture containing pearls from the medieval or early modern eras. I have neither been
able to find any written documentation supporting any early Sami use of pearls.
It is somewhat logical that the Vikings might have found pearls in mussels as they sometime
used the shells for ornamental purposes (Arwidsson 1989; Fransson 2011; Object 107001). It
is also logical that some early findings of pearls are suggested to have Sami connection as it is
the northern half of Sweden that have had the largest mussel populations and where a majority
of the Swedish pearls have been produced (Zachrisson 1997; Awebro & Öberg 2001).
Very little is known about domestic pearl production in Sweden and the other Scandinavian
countries during the Middle Ages. Some medieval artefacts containing freshwater pearls have
been preserved in collections but the origin of the pearls is uncertain. If we as an example on a
medieval artefact with pearls use a mitre that is now in the collections of the Historical
Museum in Stockholm several questions arise. The mitre is embroided with hundreds of small
freshwater pearls and was made at a nunnery in Vadstena around the year 1100. It is made
from reused textile with enamelled plates from an earlier mitre of Italian origin. The mitre
was used until the mid 15th century and was repaired and adjusted several times during the
medieval age (http://www.linkopingshistoria.se/medeltid/1400-tal/). Another example is an
altar frontal donated by Märta Lydekadotter Stralendorp to the cathedral of Uppsala in 1452
that dates back to the medieval age and used to contain a large number of freshwater pearls
(Object DIG 011813).
These examples suggest that there was knowledge of pearlstitching in Sweden since at least
the early 12th century. It would not have been possible to keep up pearl stitching activity
without a steady supply of pearls.
The nunnery in Vadstena is known to have produced ecclesiastical objects such as clothes for
bishops and rosaries for several hundred years and many items are still in various museum
collections. A lot of beads were used for the rosaries and many of them were imported while
others were made out of domestic materials. During the Middle ages there were pearl
producing mussels in many rivers in Sweden, including Svartån not too far from Vadtena,
where extensive pearl fishing is documented from the 17th century onward (Nilsson 1940) but
it is not possible to determine weather the pearls used were local, from other parts of
Scandinavia or imported from other parts of Europe where the pearl river mussel
Margaritifiera margaritifiera occurred and pearl fishing was going on (Object 96338;
Zachrisson 1997; Regner 2017). Examples on European countries where pearl fishing have a
long history includes Russia, Scotland and the Iberian peninsula (Strack 2015).
What we do know from the many objects with pearls from the medieval age is that pearls
were used and they were popular especially within the ecclesiastical environment but also
royals and the nobility used pearls for decoration. As we will see there was an increased
demand from the crown when Gustav I seized power in Sweden in the 1520s.
When Gustav I seized the power in Sweden in the 1520s he soon started to make efforts to
match the royal houses on the continent when it came to clothes and jewellery. This resulted
in an increasing demand for pearls for decoration of everything from clothes to the Kings
crown (Candréus 2013). From the early 16th century we start to find quite many objects with
pearls in museums and ecclesiastical collections. It is also from the 16th century that we find
the first written documentation on pearls and pearl fishing in Sweden. In a letter from 1537
king Gustav I invites Demanth Riiss from Novgorod in Russia to bring pearl fishers from
Russia to Sweden to help with identifying potential pearl rivers and give instructions in pearl
fishing methods (Gustav I 1/1 1537). The eventual results from Riiss work are not known and
to my knowledge Riiss does not occur in any later documentation but the letter proves the
awareness of pearls in Sweden.
It was Gustav I who reformed Sweden and turned it into a protestant country. As a
consequence several monasteries were closed and the crown confiscated many of the artefacts
from monasteries and churches. At one occasion in the mid 16th century the previously
mentioned nunnery in Vadstena, who now had lost all their land and had severe financial
difficulties, sold 24 “alnar”, about 14 meters, of freshwater pearls from their stock of pearls
meant for decorating textiles (Lindgren-Sandgren 2018). The consequence was that the
nunnery could not use as much pearls in their production as before. This did not concern the
King as the crown since at least 1527 had pearl stitchers employed for the royal clothing
(Candréus 2013).
As mentioned the production of textiles and rosaries used both imported and domestic
materials so even though there are many objects containing pearls from throughout the
medieval ages in Sweden it is hard to draw any conclusions weather they really came from
Swedish mussels or not.
If there is written documentation from the same period as the objects it often helps a lot in
determining possible geographic origin. From the 16th century there are several kinds of
documentation on pearl fishing in Sweden. Most famous is Olaus Magnus Carta Marina from
1539 and his History of the Nordic peoples from 1555. Olaus Magnus works contains both
written descriptions of pearls and pearl fishing as well as pictures of pearl bearing mussels in
several rivers in Sweden and Finland. The information Olaus Magnus gives us confirms that
pearl fishing was going on and also supports the theories that pearl fishing had been going on
for quite some time by then. It was mainly people involved with framing that was fishing
pearls during the parts of the year there was less work with farming. Gustav I understands the
economical potential of the pearl fishing and in 1544 he orders stricter control of the pearl
trade.
On the 11 April 1544 the king sent a letter to the Vogt of the province of Ångermanland Jacob
Holst telling him that of the few pearls he have delivered to Stockholm only two or three is
good enough to be used and that he is now obliged to buy every pearl he can find (11 April
1544). Apparently the King did not think Holst would succeed as he in another letter two
weeks later commission Simon Andersson to search through the northern parts of the country,
including Ångermanland, for pearls. The local people are obliged to help him with all he
needs on his mission (25 April 1544). The Kings action on the pearl production may have to
do with reports from the eastern parts of Finland that Russian traders were buying large
amounts of pearls. Gustav I ordered the trade supervisors in the provinces Västerbotten and
Österbotten, Simonsson and Vilkeson, to sharpen the control over the trade with pearls and
copper and to put a stop to those who trade with the Russians (15 April 1544).
Carta Marina also shows pearl mussels in several rivers in Finland. During most of the last
millennia Finland was, until 1809, a part of Sweden. Pearl fishing in Finland have probably
been going on at least as long as in Sweden. The Russian Orthodox Church had used large
amounts of pearls embroided on textiles since the 10th century and held fishing rights in the
north Russian rivers bordering to Finland (Carta Marina; Strack 2015).
In 1561 King Eric XIV told the vogt of Österbotten in Finland that he banned Carelians from
fishing pearls in Finland. In the same letter Eric XIV asks the vogt to hire a Swedish pearl
fishing craftsman and a few young men for him to teach how to fish pearls. If no Swedish
craftsman would be found it would be ok to hire a carnelian instructor (Granlund 1981).
The oldest documentation on pearl fishing in Norway (at the time Norway was a part of
Denmark) is about one hundred years younger than that in Sweden and consists of a letter
from the Danish king Christian IV who on the 27th June 1637 to the Vogt Palle Rosenkrands
that the farmers who found pearls had to sell them to the crowns representative. The intention
was to make clear that all pearls in Norway belonged to the Danish crown (Taranger 1889).
Christian IVs successor Fredrik III employed pearl fishing inspectors and eventually King
Christian V made all pearls a privilege for the queen (Larsen 1997).
Apart from Norway there were pearl mussels in Denmark but only in one documented
locality; Vardeå in southwest Jylland, a locale that have had no observations of mussels since
1974 though there are no documentation on pearl fishing there until the early 20th century
(Hedegaard 2018).
The occurrence at Vardeå was before the last observation of mussels considered a relict form
and similar isolated occurrences of Margaritifera margaritifera is known from other places in
the Northern parts of central Europe such as Lüneburger Heide in Germany (Wallin 1942,
Margatifera margaritifera 2018).
Conclusions and suggested further research
It is not possible to determine that pearl fishing was going on in Scandinavian before the 16th
century. On the other hand, the existing written evidence from the 1500s describes an existing
activity. The many medieval artefacts containing pearls in various museum collections and
archaeological findings from the late Iron Age and throughout the medieval times in
Scandinavia confirms a well spread knowledge on pearls. It would be very welcomed with
further research on the geographical origin of pearls in Scandinavian medieval and iron age
artefacts by building databases with chemical analysis and DNA testing of both the preserved
pearls and mussels in rivers we know have been fished for pearls.
References
Arwidsson, Greta (1989) Birka II Systematische Analysen der Gräberfunde.
Awebro, K, Öberg, T (2001) ”Pärlproducent och miljöarkiv”, ”Människan i naturen,
Etnobiologi i Sverige 1”.
Candréus, Cecilia (2013) En svensk verkstad för utländska lyxvaror De kungliga
pärlstickarna vid Gustav I:s hov 1523–1560. Historisk Tidskrift.
Fransson, Ulf (2011) Från tand till kammargrav. Om att vara barn, att bli stor och att dö i en
hög. Spåren av de små. Arkeologiska perspektiv på barn och barndom.
http://www.mikroarkeologi.se/publications/children/3.Fransson.pdf
Granlund, John (1981) Pärlfiske. Kulturhistoriskt lexikon för nordisk medeltid, band 13.
Hedegaard, Claus, Hein, Jørgen: perler i Den Store Danske, Gyldendal. Hentet 8. oktober
2018 fra http://denstoredanske.dk/index.php?sideId=140804
Larsen, Björn Melding (1997) Elvemusling (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) Litteraturstudie
med oppsummering av nasjonal og internasjonal kunnskapsst
https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/fagrapport/028.pdf
Lindgren Sandgren, Eva (2018) Uthålliga Birgittasystrar i Vadstena under 1500-talet.
Signum nr 3 2018. http://signum.se/uthalliga-birgittasystrar-i-vadstena-under-1500-talet/
Magnus, Olaus (1539) Carta Marina http://www.alvin-portal.org/alvin/view.jsf?pid=alvinrecord%3A88495&dswid=-6537
Margaritifera margaritifera (2018) http://artfakta.artdatabanken.se/taxon/101268
Nilsson, Harald (1940) Något om svenskt pärlfiske. Kulturen Page 133-143.
Object 96338 http://historiska.se/upptack-historien/object/96338-mitra-av-textil/
Object 107001 http://historiska.se/upptack-historien/object/107001-hange-parlhange-avsilver-parla/
Object 107036 http://mis.historiska.se/mis/sok/fid.asp?fid=107036
Object 1166737 http://mis.historiska.se/mis/sok/fid.asp?fid=1166737
Object 448608 http://mis.historiska.se/mis/sok/fid.asp?fid=448608
Object DIG 011813 https://digitaltmuseum.se/011013967760/detalj-av-altarbrun-uppsaladomkyrka-uppsala-2009
Olofsson, Sven, Ingmar (1974) Övre Norrlands Historia. Umeå Del III 1678-1772. Sidan 335.
Regner, Elisabet (2017) Bön med band av stenar, Arkeologiska perspektiv på radbandsbruk
under senmedeltiden. Fornvännen 2017(112):4
http://samla.raa.se/xmlui/bitstream/handle/raa/12400/2017_227.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=
y
Strack, Elisabeth (2015) European Freshwater Pearls Part 1 – Russia. The Journal of
Gemmology Vol. 34 No. 7.
Wärmländer, Sebastian & Wåhlander, Linda (2012) Vikingatida pärlhängen, Silvertrådens
form och tillverkning. Birka nu pågående forskning om Birka och Hovgården.
http://www.forntida.se/artiklaruppsatser/Warmlander%20Wahlander%20(1).pdf
Wallin, Sten (1942) Flodpärlmusslan. Fiske och fiskar i Norden. Band 2.
Zachrisson, Inger (1997) Möte I gränsland: Samer och germaner i Mellanskandinavien.